February 2015 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] RPMLINT report - badness 10000 exceeds threshold 1000, aborting. on package - libaal
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Hello, What changes to spec file allows package to build [1] I get the following. --Thanks Glenn [ 65s] ... running 08-check-permissions [ 65s] ... testing for modified permissions [ 65s] ... running 09-check-packaged-twice [ 65s] ... running 10-check-lanana [ 65s] ... running 12-check-libtool-deps [ 66s] ... testing devel dependencies required by libtool .la files [ 66s] (can be skipped by "skip-check-libtool-deps" anywhere in spec) [ 66s] ... running 13-check-invalid-provides [ 66s] ... running 14-check-gconf-scriptlets [ 66s] ... testing GConf scriptlet presence [ 66s] ... running 72-translate-appdata [ 66s] ... running 99-check-remove-rpms [ 66s] ... removing all built rpms [ 66s] (order: reverse libaal-debuginfo libaal libaal-devel libaal-minimal0 libaal-debugsource libaal-minimal0-debuginfo) [ 66s] [ 66s] RPMLINT report: [ 66s] =============== [ 67s] (none): E: badness 10000 exceeds threshold 1000, aborting. [ 67s] libaal.x86_64: W: shlib-policy-nonversioned-dir /usr/share/doc/packages/libaal [ 67s] Your shared library package contains non-versioned directories. Those will not [ 67s] allow to install multiple versions of the package in parallel. [ 67s] [ 67s] libaal.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error (Badness: 10000) libaal-1_0-5 [ 67s] Your package contains a single shared library but is not named after its [ 67s] SONAME. [ 67s] [ 67s] libaal-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libaal*/libaal-libs/liblibaal* [ 67s] libaal.src:32: W: macro-in-comment %{version} [ 67s] libaal.src:53: W: macro-in-comment %{version} [ 67s] There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros [ 67s] are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and [ 67s] escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate. [ 67s] [ 67s] libaal-devel.x86_64: W: description-shorter-than-summary [ 67s] libaal-minimal0.x86_64: W: description-shorter-than-summary [ 67s] The package description should be longer than the summary. be a bit more [ 67s] verbose, please. [ 67s] [ 67s] 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. [1] spec and log https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:doiggl/libaal/libaal.spec… https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:doiggl/libaal/openSU… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] RPM %set_permissions problem
by Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Squid RPM used to have /etc/permissions.d/squid with: /var/cache/squid/ squid:root 750 /var/log/squid/ squid:root 750 This file is gone in Factory. Now, I am trying to change both groups to squid (same mode): https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918434 My RPM has: %verify(not user group mode) %attr(750,squid,squid) %dir /var/cache/squid/ %verify(not user group mode) %attr(750,squid,squid) %dir /var/log/squid/ But when I upgrade from an older version that still has the snippet, new ownership is lost, because when chkstat runs in %post, /etc/permissions.d/squid is present and mangles what is configured by RPM. RPM deletes /etc/permissions.d/squid after %preun, when is too late. Any help appreciated. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] How can libaal version 1.0.6 be used in build process of package ?
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Hello, How can libaal version 1.0.6 be used in build process of package ? Thanks Glenn spec https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:doiggl/reiser4progs/reise… log https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:doiggl/reiser4progs/… spec says: ---------- BuildRequires: libaal-devel BuildRequires: libaal-devel-static build log says: --------------- [ 54s] checking for aal/libaal.h... yes [ 54s] checking for libaal version = 1.0.6... [ 54s] An old version of libaal (1.0.5) was found. [ 54s] You need a libaal of the version 1.0.6 or newer. [ 54s] You can get it at http://www.namesys.com/snapshots [ 54s] no [ 54s] + make -j4 [ 54s] make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. [ 54s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.l8CC4E (%build) source code for libaal-1.0.6.tar.gz http://sourceforge.net/projects/reiser4/files/reiser4-utils/libaal/libaal-1… or http://en.sourceforge.jp/frs/g_redir.php?m=jaist&f=%2Freiser4%2Freiser4-uti… source older code: ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/devel%3A/… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] Thank you for your payment
by nycserv＠finance.nyc.gov 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

This is confirmation that your payment on Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:31:52 +0000 for USD 7900.00 has been accepted by the NYC Department of Finance. Your Credit Card statement will show an entry from Parking Fines NYCGOV. Please read the attachment and save it in case you have any questions about the items that you have paid. Name: sol chaimovits Payment Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:31:52 +0000 Receipt Number: WWW32550203 Payment Amount: USD 7900.00 Credit Card: Visa Account ending in: 6193 Your payment was for the following items: Agency Item Amount ------------------------------ -------------------- --------------- PVO 1160025162 USD 3000.00 PVO 7247746580 USD 4500.00 DOF Convenience Fee USD 400.00 Thank you for using New York City's website to process your payment. Please do not reply to this email. You may contact us by visiting http://nycserv.nyc.gov/NYCServWeb/ContactUs.html if you have questions or need further assistance.

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] malformed patch at line 2302
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Hello Some questions: How can two patches be joined together as one and be applied ? Thanks for your help. Thanks Glenn - I attempted to join two patches together to make one patch and apply it . Patch fails with [ 67s] patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line [ 67s] /usr/bin/patch: **** malformed patch at line 2302 Join 2 patches together patch 1 - http://www.spinics.net/lists/reiserfs-devel/msg04590.html patch 2 - http://www.spinics.net/lists/reiserfs-devel/msg04591.html To make one patch and apply patch to package. https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:doiggl/reiser4progs/reise… The build fails with error [ 67s] + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4progs-1.0.9.tar.gz [ 67s] + /bin/tar -xf - [ 67s] + STATUS=0 [ 67s] + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' [ 67s] + cd reiser4progs-1.0.9 [ 67s] + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . [ 67s] + echo 'Patch #0 (reiser4progs-1.0.9-add-node41-support.patch):' [ 67s] Patch #0 (reiser4progs-1.0.9-add-node41-support.patch): [ 67s] + /usr/bin/cat /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4progs-1.0.9-add-node41-support.patch . . . [ 67s] patching file plugin/format/format40/format40.c [ 67s] patching file plugin/format/format40/format40.h [ 67s] patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line [ 67s] /usr/bin/patch: **** malformed patch at line 2302: [ 67s] [ 67s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IJCDWK (%prep) [ 67s] [ 67s] [ 67s] RPM build errors: [ 67s] Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IJCDWK (%prep) Full log https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:doiggl/reiser4progs/… package https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:doiggl/reiser4progs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.J9PPYN (%prep)
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Hello, How can this error be fixed. What things do you look for ? --Glenn build log: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:doiggl/reiser4progs/… error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.J9PPYN (%prep) . . [ 54s] + umask 022 [ 54s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 54s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 54s] + rm -rf reiser4progs-1.0.9 [ 54s] + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4progs-1.0.9.tar.gz [ 54s] + /bin/tar -xf - [ 54s] + STATUS=0 [ 54s] + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' [ 54s] + cd reiser4progs-1.0.9 [ 54s] + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . [ 54s] + echo 'Patch #0 (reiser4-node41-layout-support-joined.patch):' [ 54s] Patch #0 (reiser4-node41-layout-support-joined.patch): [ 54s] + /usr/bin/cat /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4-node41-layout-support-joined.patch [ 54s] + /usr/bin/patch -p1 --fuzz=0 [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 3 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/Makefile [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/Makefile [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 13 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/Makefile [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/Makefile [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 22 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node.c [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node.c [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 69 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node.h [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node.h [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 84 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node40.c [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node40.c [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 11 out of 11 hunks ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 324 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node40.h [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node40.h [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored [ 54s] patching file fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node41.c [ 54s] patching file fs/reiser4/plugin/node/node41.h [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 532 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/plugin.h [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/plugin.h [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 543 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/reiser4.h [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/reiser4.h [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 553 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/disk_format40.c [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/disk_format40.c [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 576 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/jnode.c [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/jnode.c [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored [ 54s] can't find file to patch at input line 606 [ 54s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 54s] The text leading up to this was: [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] |--- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/disk_format40.h [ 54s] |+++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/disk_format40.h [ 54s] -------------------------- [ 54s] File to patch: [ 54s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 54s] Skipping patch. [ 54s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 54s] patching file configure.in [ 54s] patching file include/reiser4/plugin.h [ 54s] patching file plugin/Makefile.am [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/Makefile.am [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node41/Makefile.am [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node41/node41.c [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node41/node41.h [ 54s] patching file libreiser4/factory.c [ 54s] patching file libreiser4/profile.c [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node41/node41_repair.c [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node41/node41_repair.h [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node40/node40.h [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node40/node40.c [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node40/node40_repair.c [ 54s] patching file plugin/node/node40/node40_repair.h [ 54s] patching file include/reiser4/format.h [ 54s] patching file libreiser4/filesystem.c [ 54s] patching file libreiser4/format.c [ 54s] patching file libreiser4/tree.c [ 54s] patching file plugin/format/format40/format40.c [ 54s] patching file plugin/format/format40/format40.h [ 54s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.J9PPYN (%prep) [ 54s] [ 54s] [ 54s] RPM build errors: [ 54s] Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.J9PPYN (%prep) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] Find packages which requires a specific package
by Johannes Weberhofer 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Hi! Is there a osc command showing me which packages requires a specific package on obs? I'd like to find out, which packages requires php5-smarty. Best regards, Johannes -- Johannes Weberhofer Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] spec file problem patch/build failure
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Hello, I try and build reiser4progs-1.0.9 with node41-support.patch but it fails. How can it be fixed so it build ? Thanks Glenn details as follows: Project https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:doiggl/reiser4progs Spec file https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:doiggl/reiser4progs/reise… using files: disable_static.diff reiser4progs-1.0.9-add-node41-support.patch reiser4progs-1.0.9.tar.gz reiser4progs.changes other: http://www.spinics.net/lists/reiserfs-devel/msg04589.html [1] build errors and log https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:doiggl/reiser4progs/… [ 47s] + umask 022 [ 47s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 47s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 47s] + rm -rf reiser4progs-1.0.9 [ 47s] + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4progs-1.0.9.tar.gz [ 47s] + /bin/tar -xf - [ 48s] + STATUS=0 [ 48s] + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' [ 48s] + cd reiser4progs-1.0.9 [ 48s] + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . [ 48s] + echo 'Patch #1 (disable_static.diff):' [ 48s] Patch #1 (disable_static.diff): [ 48s] + /usr/bin/cat /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/disable_static.diff [ 48s] + /usr/bin/patch -p0 --fuzz=0 [ 48s] patching file configure.in [ 48s] + echo 'Patch #2 (reiser4progs-1.0.9-add-node41-support.patch):' [ 48s] Patch #2 (reiser4progs-1.0.9-add-node41-support.patch): [ 48s] + /usr/bin/cat /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4progs-1.0.9-add-node41-support.patch [ 48s] + /usr/bin/patch -p0 --fuzz=0 [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 31 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |Support of node41 layout (the same as node40, but [ 48s] |with 32-bit checksum). [ 48s] | [ 48s] |Signed-off-by: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin(a)gmail.com> [ 48s] |--- [ 48s] | configure.in | 1 [ 48s] | include/reiser4/format.h | 2 [ 48s] | include/reiser4/plugin.h | 9 [ 48s] | libreiser4/factory.c | 2 [ 48s] | libreiser4/filesystem.c | 11 - [ 48s] | libreiser4/format.c | 11 + [ 48s] | libreiser4/profile.c | 4 [ 48s] | libreiser4/tree.c | 28 ++ [ 48s] | plugin/Makefile.am | 2 [ 48s] | plugin/format/format40/format40.c | 9 [ 48s] | plugin/format/format40/format40.h | 18 + [ 48s] | plugin/node/Makefile.am | 2 [ 48s] | plugin/node/node40/node40.c | 118 ++++++----- [ 48s] | plugin/node/node40/node40.h | 51 ++++- [ 48s] | plugin/node/node40/node40_repair.c | 372 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ [ 48s] | plugin/node/node40/node40_repair.h | 39 +++ [ 48s] | plugin/node/node41/Makefile.am | 22 ++ [ 48s] | plugin/node/node41/node41.c | 150 ++++++++++++++ [ 48s] | plugin/node/node41/node41.h | 47 ++++ [ 48s] | plugin/node/node41/node41_repair.c | 153 +++++++++++++++ [ 48s] | plugin/node/node41/node41_repair.h | 39 +++ [ 48s] | 21 files changed, 902 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) [ 48s] | [ 48s] |--- a/configure.in [ 48s] |+++ b/configure.in [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 41 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/include/reiser4/plugin.h [ 48s] |+++ b/include/reiser4/plugin.h [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 3 out of 3 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 76 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/plugin/Makefile.am [ 48s] |+++ b/plugin/Makefile.am [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 94 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/plugin/node/Makefile.am [ 48s] |+++ b/plugin/node/Makefile.am [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 48s] patching file b/plugin/node/node41/Makefile.am [ 48s] patching file b/plugin/node/node41/node41.c [ 48s] patching file b/plugin/node/node41/node41.h [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 327 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/libreiser4/factory.c [ 48s] |+++ b/libreiser4/factory.c [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 338 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/libreiser4/profile.c [ 48s] |+++ b/libreiser4/profile.c [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 48s] patching file b/plugin/node/node41/node41_repair.c [ 48s] patching file b/plugin/node/node41/node41_repair.h [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 549 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/plugin/node/node40/node40.h [ 48s] |+++ b/plugin/node/node40/node40.h [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 618 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/plugin/node/node40/node40.c [ 48s] |+++ b/plugin/node/node40/node40.c [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 17 out of 17 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 886 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/plugin/node/node40/node40_repair.c [ 48s] |+++ b/plugin/node/node40/node40_repair.c [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 13 out of 13 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 1448 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/plugin/node/node40/node40_repair.h [ 48s] |+++ b/plugin/node/node40/node40_repair.h [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 1505 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/include/reiser4/format.h [ 48s] |+++ b/include/reiser4/format.h [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 1523 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/libreiser4/filesystem.c [ 48s] |+++ b/libreiser4/filesystem.c [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 1556 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/libreiser4/format.c [ 48s] |+++ b/libreiser4/format.c [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 3 out of 3 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 1590 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/libreiser4/tree.c [ 48s] |+++ b/libreiser4/tree.c [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 3 out of 3 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 1644 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/plugin/format/format40/format40.c [ 48s] |+++ b/plugin/format/format40/format40.c [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 3 out of 3 hunks ignored [ 48s] can't find file to patch at input line 1676 [ 48s] Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? [ 48s] The text leading up to this was: [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] |--- a/plugin/format/format40/format40.h [ 48s] |+++ b/plugin/format/format40/format40.h [ 48s] -------------------------- [ 48s] File to patch: [ 48s] Skip this patch? [y] [ 48s] Skipping patch. [ 48s] 3 out of 3 hunks ignored [ 48s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZlYMpM (%prep) [ 48s] [ 48s] [ 48s] RPM build errors: [ 48s] Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZlYMpM (%prep) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] What spec changes allows package to build [libtrash]
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 13 Feb '15

13 Feb '15

Hello, What spec changes allows package to build [libtrash] --Glenn --specfile https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:doiggl/libtrash/libtrash.… --project https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:doiggl/libtrash --source http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/3/srodzaj/2/search/libtrash-3.3-2.fc21… last buildlog: [ 78s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libtrash-3.3-44.1.src.rpm [ 78s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libtrash-3.3-44.1.x86_64.rpm [ 79s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libtrash-debugsource-3.3-44.1.x86_64.rpm [ 79s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libtrash-devel-3.3-44.1.x86_64.rpm [ 79s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libtrash-debuginfo-3.3-44.1.x86_64.rpm [ 79s] Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BxMD7h [ 79s] + umask 022 [ 79s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 79s] + cd libtrash-3.3 [ 79s] + rm -rf /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libtrash-3.3-44.1.x86_64 [ 79s] + exit 0 [ 79s] ... checking for files with abuild user/group [ 79s] ... running 00-check-install-rpms [ 79s] ... installing all built rpms [ 79s] Preparing packages... [ 79s] libtrash-3.3-44.1.x86_64 [ 79s] libtrash-devel-3.3-44.1.x86_64 [ 79s] libtrash-debuginfo-3.3-44.1.x86_64 [ 79s] libtrash-debugsource-3.3-44.1.x86_64 [ 79s] ... running 01-check-debuginfo [ 79s] ... testing for empty debuginfo packages [ 79s] ... running 02-check-gcc-output [ 79s] ... testing for serious compiler warnings [ 79s] (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output) [ 79s] (using //.build.log) [ 79s] [ 79s] I: Program returns random data in a function [ 79s] E: libtrash no-return-in-nonvoid-function open-funs.c:751 [ 79s] [ 79s] I: Program returns random data in a function [ 79s] E: libtrash no-return-in-nonvoid-function open-funs.c:751 [ 79s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER START ### [ 82s] [ 48.373480] SysRq : Power Off [ 82s] [ 48.377799] reboot: Power down [ 82s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER END ### About:http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/27034233/dir/fedora_21/co… Summary : Libraries to move files to a trash-folder on delete Description : Libtrash is the shared library which, when preloaded, implements a trash can under GNU/Linux. Through the interception of function calls which might lead to accidental data loss libtrash effectively ensures that your data remains protected from your own mistakes. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] is "buildall.sh" a magic file in OBS?
by Greg Freemyer 12 Feb '15

12 Feb '15

I'm looking at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/filesystems/ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs and I don't understand what "buildall.sh" is or if it is ever invoked. The contents of the file refer to older releases, so I suspect it is a remnant junk file at this point. I see it referenced as a source file in the spec file, but I don't see it actually used. I have removed the file and the spec file reference to it in my branch of the file and it still builds fine. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:gregfreemyer:branches:filesyst… Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2