June 2013 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] can apache HTTP Server be updated to version 2.4.4 [from v-2.4.3]
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

Hello, Can apache HTTP Server be updated to version 2.4.4 [from v-2.4.3] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=apache2&project=openSUSE%3A… http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi Stable Release - Latest Version: 2.4.4 (released 2013-02-25) http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache24 -- Thanks Glenn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-packaging] package looking for maintainer: the AT daemon
by Cristian Rodríguez 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

Hi: I will no longer maintain fix or otherwise care about the "at" daemon, starting now because I would rather devout my time testing and improving systemd.timer(5) So it is now up for grabs. that's all ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

19 47

[opensuse-packaging] Factory drop candidates
by Stephan Kulow 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

Hi, Due to long term failing I would like to drop these before end of June. Greetings, Stephan mono-tools Mono:Factory Fails for 182 days uiaatkbridge Mono:Factory Fails for 181 days uiautomationwinforms Mono:Factory Fails for 181 days branding-basedonopensuse system:install:head Fails for 127 days openstack-dashboard Cloud:OpenStack:Factory Fails for 121 days sblim-testsuite systemsmanagement:wbem Fails for 95 days openvas-manager security:OpenVAS:STABLE:v4 Fails for 95 days sblim-cmpi-firewall systemsmanagement:wbem Fails for 95 days sblim-cmpi-dns systemsmanagement:wbem Fails for 95 days libcompizconfig X11:Compiz Fails for 95 days compiz-plugins-main X11:Compiz Fails for 95 days compizconfig-settings-manager X11:Compiz Fails for 95 days -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 3

[opensuse-packaging] The Python3 devel project will be devel:languages:python3
by Sascha Peilicke 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

Hi guys, since the Python bunch had the discussion recently, I want to drop all python3 package _links in devel:languages:python and use their counterparts in devel:languages:python3 as devel packages for Factory from now on. This would include a number of chgdevel requests for Factory [1]. The idea behind to have only python2 packages in devel:languages:python. Currently, this project reached a size where it became tedious to use "zypper up". However, we will continue to track spec files for both python versions at the old package location (d:l:p). It should be easier to keep spec files in sync this way and you can submit changes for both in a single submit request. So for the packager, this won't change much. If you add a python3 spec file, a project maintainer will branch it to devel:languages:python3 once your sr is accepted. If we end up in far distant future where only python3 matters and the py2 maintenance burden isn't justified anymore, both projects can become independent of each other. For that we would simply remove _link files to d:l:p. So if nobody objects, I'll do it this afternoon. [1] http://paste.opensuse.org/83082794 -- Viele Grüße, Sascha Peilicke -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 5

[opensuse-packaging] libchoice for libjpeg devel for 12.3 ???
by Bruno Friedmann 16 Jun '13

16 Jun '13

On obs there's a increasing number of failed package ( essentially for x86_64 arch) For example https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=php5&project=server%3Aphp libjpeg62-devel libjpeg8-devel We have normally only libjpeg8-devel for 12.3 What happens ?? -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch openSUSE Member & Ambassador GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] Looking for new home for ejabberd
by Matwey V. Kornilov 16 Jun '13

16 Jun '13

Hi, Ejabberd XMPP server (package ejabberd) is currently hosting at devel:lanugages:erlang. And this is not appropriate place from which it may be submitted to Factory. Long time ago, we had erlang only in devel:languages:erlang, so ejabberd has been developing here. Now (since 12.2), we have erlang in Factory. So it is time to find more appropriate place for ejabberd, because it has nothing in common with development on erlang. In my personal opinion, I would like ejabberd to find asylum in server:messaging. I will miss it. Please, summon people, to whom it may concern. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] Changelog: Reference github issues or pull requests
by Johannes Weberhofer 13 Jun '13

13 Jun '13

At http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Patches_guidelines#Current_set_of… there is a quite impressive list of abbreviations to link to tickets of different system; As there is a growing number of tools which come from github, it would be great to have the possibility to reference the bugs; unfortunately they don't offer system-wide IDs but project specific IDs... Is there any plan how to handle this? Best regards, Johannes -- Johannes Weberhofer Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 7

[opensuse-packaging] How to proceed when upstream bundles prohibited sofware
by toganm＠opensuse.org 12 Jun '13

12 Jun '13

Hi, As the subject says how do we proceed when there is problematic bundled library code in the upstream. darktable package has bundled squish library in the sources, and after discussing with the legal team it is best we follow the same route as fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972604 In fedora guidelines the solution outlined can be found in the following link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohi… Since there is no suggestion in our guidelines, how do I proceed in this case, as implementing the removal of offending code is not the issue but AFAIK our buildservice has some checks for the source code from the Source URL Also does this removal of the code should be applied in the home project also, as I am providing nightly git builds as well in addition to the official package. Togan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 7

[opensuse-packaging] Anyone willing to maintain libraw?
by Vincent Untz 12 Jun '13

12 Jun '13

Hi, Is there anyone who would like to be the maintainer of libraw (in the graphics OBS project)? I last touched this package in November 2010, but I never really considered myself as maintainer of it... FWIW, there's a security bug to deal with: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822665 But otherwise, I don't think there's much work. Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] directories not owned by a package
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Hello, What would fix this problem [1]? What definition do I add to the %files section ? --Glenn [1] from the buildlog: [ 369s] mod_ssl-debuginfo-1:2.4.4-28.1.i586 [ 369s] ... running 01-check-debuginfo [ 369s] ... testing for empty debuginfo packages [ 369s] ... running 02-check-gcc-output [ 369s] ... testing for serious compiler warnings [ 369s] (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output) [ 369s] (using //.build.log) [ 370s] ... running 03-check-binary-kernel-log [ 370s] ... running 04-check-filelist [ 370s] ... checking filelist [ 370s] httpd-2.4.4-28.1.i586.rpm: directories not owned by a package: [ 370s] - /usr/lib/initscripts [ 370s] - /usr/lib/initscripts/legacy-actions Full spec file at https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?expand=1&file=httpd.spec&packa… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 6