June 2012 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] OBS and Infinality
by Nelson Marques 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Hi, Is it ok to build freetype with infinality patches on OBS for openSUSE ? NM -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] new texlive and frontends
by Cor Blom 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Hi, I am maintaining lyx and with the overhaul of texlive (now in factory) I wonder if I should change the "Requires" in the spec file. Now I have Requires: texlive-latex Recommends: texlive-xetex Maybe this is still working (can test this of course, when I have some time), but is it still the best way to do it. Would appreciate some advice. Thanks, Cor -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Two language packages from one source
by Kyrill Detinov 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Hello. I built an application that provides a program and a library. Both of them have translations. I use macros: %lang_package %lang_package -n libpdfview%{major} Hope, this is correct. Packages are built. Now I have: pdfviewer pdfviewer-lang libpdfview0 libpdfview0-lang The only problem I see is info for libpdfview0-lang: Summary : Languages for package pdfviewer Description : Provides translations to the package pdfviewer rpm -E %lang_package %package lang Summary: Languages for package %{name} Group: System/Localization Requires: %{name} = %{version} Provides: %{name}-lang-all = %{version} Supplements: packageand(bundle-lang-other:%{name}) BuildArch: noarch %description lang Provides translations to the package %{name} So rpm uses %{name} for all language packages. Is there a simple way to make correct Summary and Description for subpackage? Not in OBS yet. Here is a spec: http://susepaste.org/70371996 -- WBR Kyrill -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Something wrong with OGRE as built in games
by Ilya Chernykh 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

When trying to run stuntrally: An exception has occured: OGRE EXCEPTION(5:ItemIdentityException): Can not find codec for 'png' image format. I have no idea how to enable png codec in ogre. Previously the game worked. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 11

[opensuse-packaging] CruiseControl: contrib repo
by Graham Anderson 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

I have let maintenence of the CruiseControl package slip. I don't think I packaged it well in any case because I wanted the tests to pass but had to patch out some of the network units so that it would build on OBS. I found it hard to pacakge the http based interface and additionally the spec file is very messy, my apologies for that but I'm not really an au fait java hacker. Having said that, I always found CruiseControl to be a very efficient, flexible and non opinionated CI tool; but sadly I find myself and my current clients migrating away from that world. To cut a long story short, I will not be spending any more time on the package and it already intermitently fails on i586. Unless anyone else has a use for CruiseControl and can bring the package up to date, it will likely fall out of our distro as contrib is phased out. If you use this package, please update your CruiseControl from the project release in future: http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/ Cheers the noo, Graham

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] rabbitmq-server: extra plugins
by Matwey V. Kornilov 06 Jun '12

06 Jun '12

Hi, How should the extra plugins be packaged? For instance, I'd like to have rabbitmq-x-presence plugin in RPM. There is two options at my sight: 1) Build rabbitmq-x-presence inside rabbitmq-server package and spread it inside rabbitmq-server-plugins Not very flexible way. Easy to implement and build (due umbrella building system) 2) Put umbrella into separate 'rabbitmq-server-devel' (or even 'rabbitmq- sever-sources') and use it to build any desired 'rabbitmq-server-plugin-XXX' Hart to implement, but quite flexible. Most of extra plugins are in GIT and they don't have their own versions. How to designate the package versions? So, what is the right way to do? Thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Question about licenses and openSUSE OBS / packaging.
by Joop Boonen 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

I found this link: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Accepted_licences#Good_Licenses_3 With acceptable licenses. I have a few questions. 1) Is this official. 2) If does it apply all OBS non home projects of only Factory? Is a data package that may be only be redistributed non commercially OK for project games? That basically meets this license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 8

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Question about licenses and openSUSE OBS / packaging.
by Joop Boonen 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

On Tue, June 5, 2012 1:35 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote: > On 05.06.2012 13:10, Joop Boonen wrote: >> I found this link: >> http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Accepted_licences#Good_Licenses_3 With acceptable licenses. >> >> I have a few questions. >> 1) Is this official. > Check the first paragraph of this page - this is a purely private page cloning some Fedora page. It was a nice idea, but never took off. > >> 2) If does it apply all OBS non home projects of only Factory? > No, OBS has it's own policy: > http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_application_blacklist > >> >> Is a data package that may be only be redistributed non commercially OK for project games? >> That basically meets this license: >> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ >> > That does not match OSI and as such is not allowed in the OBS. The problem is that you put our mirrors in a rather bad position if they are distributing OBS repos as part of their commercial offering (ok, I'm not a lawyer, just wanting to point out a possible problem we don't even want to start discussing). > > There is enough great OSI compliant software around to keep OBS busy. Do you know if any OSI compatible non commercial use license exists, or is the non commercial part already cause an issue? (This is related to the data that is used by a GPLv2(+) game engines). Like world of padman, smokin guns etc. > > Greetings, Stephan > Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] No more libcdio_paranoia0
by Dave Plater 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

I haven't had much time atm but after updating libcdio to remove libcdio-mini which was causing pkgconfig conflicts in various packages, a licence problem was found see http://old.nabble.com/libcdio%27s-paranoia-is-getting-split-off-from-libcdi… To resolve bnc#756564 I updated to the git libcdio which no longer has libcdio-paranoia. I see that gvfs is the only package that requires it, it builds but without cdda support. I'm going to create the libcdio-paranoia package but it may not make it into 12.2. Regards Dave -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 8