June 2012 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] To %make_install or to %makeinstall (spec-cleaner)
by Joop Boonen 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Hi all, I have been using spec cleaner for while. What I notice it that it uses macro %make_install instead of %makeinstall. Both macros are OK for openSUSE but the first one breaks the build for SLE. <quote> + %make_install /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.59594: line 45: fg: no job control </quote> I wonder if this should be fixed, in either spec-cleaner (use%makeinstall in stead of %make_install) or in the buildserver (add macro %make_install for SLE)? Regards, Joop. See also: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712171 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 12

[opensuse-packaging] OCaml help please
by Robert Schweikert 20 Aug '12

20 Aug '12

Probably have mostly the same people on the obs list and the packaging list, but never the less I will try my luck here as well. I have a couple of requests/questions in "cleaning up" OCaml related packages and a problem. 1.) Since we have top level devel:languages:ocaml project can we please move everything that is ocaml related and maintained devel:languages:misc into the ocaml project? 2.) Do we have anyone that is really interested in OCaml or do we just have what we have because other projects/packages depend on the few packages we do have? in d:l:ocaml the ocaml package is a link to the package in Factory. The devel project for factory is d:l:misc. Because of local mods in d:l:ocaml the link is busted due to merge conflicts. This breaks other packages in d:l:ocaml. I have no idea how to fix this as every time I try to touch any of these packages to get something fixed I get a stupid: buildinfo is broken... it says: type of message. This is of course complete crap as it prevents a person trying to fix something from fixing it. In addition to the gripes above I have a problem that I am stuck on and could also use some help with. I am trying to build ocamlnet which depends on pcre. The build process failes with this error: ocamlfind ocamlc -g -I ../../src/netstring -package "unix" -custom -o ocamlrpcgen -package unix,netstring \ rpc_generator.cma main.cmo -linkpkg /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.6/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lpcre_stubs collect2: ld returned 1 exit status File "_none_", line 1, characters 0-1: Error: Error while building custom runtime system make[1]: *** [ocamlrpcgen] Error 2 Knowing nothing about OCaml build and link processes I can only infer things. Obviously the process calls ld to link a binary and passes -lpcre_stubs, this would require the presence of libpcre_stubs.so somewhere in the default search directories of ld. However, the package ocaml-pcre does not provide this, it provides a dllpcre_stubs.so file in a none-standard location (%{_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs). Should ocaml-pcre create and provide a link %{_libdir}/libpcre_stubs.so to {_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs/dllpcre_stubs.so, or maybe a link in %{_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs and then a -L argument on the link line? Or is there some trick that ocamlfind is supposed to play for me? Help is as always appreciated. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjschwei(a)suse.com rschweik(a)ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 6

[opensuse-packaging] build error on Apache version 2.4.1
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 04 Aug '12

04 Aug '12

Hello I get a build error on Apache. The failure is as follows: . . checking whether to enable mod_lbmethod_bybusyness... shared checking whether to enable mod_lbmethod_heartbeat... shared checking which MPM to use by default... itk configure: error: MPM itk is not supported on this platform. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.U21N0a (%build) The Spec file https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=apache2.spec&package=apac… Build Log https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=apache2&proje… Project https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=apache2&project=home%3Adoig… Sources http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache24 Question: What to I alter in the spec file so Apache can finish compiling ? Thanks Glenn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 6

[opensuse-packaging] Packaging/branching/build help
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Hello, This package builds ok in this location[1]. When I branch the package to [2] the package shows 'unresolvable' How can I get the branched package to build. Thanks Glenn [1]builds ok package smart of project system:packagemanager https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=smart&project=system%3Apack… https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=smart&project… [2]branched location - unresolvable https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=smart&project=home%3Adoiggl -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Interactive Package Review
by Andreas Jaeger 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

osc 0.135 comes with a nice feature: Interactive Package review. I've described it a bit at my blog: http://jaegerandi.blogspot.de/ Happy reviewing of packages! Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] gnome-maintainers group now maintainer of several packages
by Vincent Untz 29 Jun '12

29 Jun '12

Hi, The GNOME team is slowly moving towards workflows centered around the gnome-maintainers group in OBS. This group is made of people we trust to be able to properly deal with GNOME-related packages. One step I made today is to add gnome-maintainers with the maintainer role to the metadata of various packages, to enable any of the GNOME maintainers to accept changes for those packages. So don't be surprised about the change :-) In addition, I also added gnome-maintainers with the reviewer role for packages that, as far as I know, are 100% maintained by the GNOME team. This matches the workflow used by the team where we prefer to have a second pair of eyes review the changes before accepting sr. I specifically didn't do this changes for packages that are also updated by other people. Packages were gnome-maintainers was added as just maintainer: Base:System/polkit X11:common:Factory/poppler X11:common:Factory/poppler-data multimedia:libs/gnonlin multimedia:libs/gst-rtsp multimedia:libs/gstreamer multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10 multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-doc multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-bad multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-base multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-gl multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-good multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-ugly multimedia:libs/gstreamer-plugins-bad multimedia:libs/gstreamer-plugins-base multimedia:libs/gstreamer-plugins-good multimedia:libs/gstreamer-plugins-ugly multimedia:libs/orc Packages were gnome-maintainers was added as maintainer and reviewer: Base:System/udisks Base:System/udisks2 Base:System/upower M17N:fonts/cantarell-fonts X11:common:Factory/devilspie X11:common:Factory/libgxps X11:common:Factory/libspectre X11:common:Factory/media-player-info X11:common:Factory/shared-color-profiles X11:common:Factory/shared-color-targets YaST:Head/yast2-control-center-gnome devel:languages:python/python-cairo devel:languages:python/python-gnome devel:languages:python/python-gnome-extras devel:languages:python/python-gobject devel:languages:python/python-gobject2 devel:languages:python/python-goocanvas devel:languages:python/python-gstreamer-0_10 devel:languages:python/python-gtk devel:languages:python/python-gtkglext devel:languages:python/python-gtksourceview devel:languages:python/python-notify devel:languages:python/python-orbit devel:languages:python/python-webkitgtk devel:languages:python/python3-cairo hardware/libgusb (there might be a few more packages where we do a similar change, once we realized they were not on our initial list ;-)) Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Anyone interested in sawfish?
by Vincent Untz 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

Hi, Is there anyone interested in maintaining packages for the sawfish window manager? (http://sawfish.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page) We have packages in Contrib for it (sawfish + librep and rep-gtk, that are dependencies). Ideally, we'd move them to Factory, via X11:windowmanagers. But I'm not sure anyone in the GNOME team would be able to correctly maintain it (given that we wouldn't use it), and the fact that it'll be in X11:windowmanagers won't help for the GNOME team. So if someone wants to keep sawfish, please raise your hand. Otherwise, we'll just drop it, I guess. Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 4

[opensuse-packaging] [reminder] openSUSE 12.2 Goldmaster is next week
by openSUSE Roadmap Reminder 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

Hello all, openSUSE 12.2 Goldmaster will be released next week, on Friday 06 July 2012. Please submit your packages before Friday afternoon (UTC time) to make sure they will get included in this release. Leaf packages submitted during the week-end might also get accepted on Monday. For a quick overview of the openSUSE Roadmap, please see: http://en.opensuse.org/Roadmap Thanks, -- openSUSE Roadmap Reminder -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] Speed up packging with parallel gzip, xz, bzip2, lzma
by Petr Mladek 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

Hi, today someone pointed out that packing RPMS might take longer time than a real build, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-June/034161.html https://plus.google.com/101094190333184858950/posts/D9x87DkdceD We could get a significant speedup by parallel versions of compression tools: http://www.zlib.net/pigz/ http://compression.ca/pbzip2/ http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/pxz/ I probably wont have time to play with it anytime soon. Anyway, I wanted to share it here. Maybe, someone else might be interested. Hackweek is getting close, ... Best Regards, Petr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Fallen into a Java rat hole and need some help
by Robert Schweikert 27 Jun '12

27 Jun '12

Hi, Working on dependencies to build CloudStack. One of the packages needs ws-commons-util which already exists in network:/cluster:/xtreemos. ws-commons-util requires java-javadoc and some package fulfills this requirement as it builds just fine on openSUSE. However, on SLE nothing provides java-javadoc and the build fails. How can I figure out what package provides java-javadoc On my openSUSE 12.1 system -> rpm -qf /usr/bin/javadoc file /usr/bin/javadoc is not owned by any package OBS search for java-javadoc turns up nothing either. I took a look at the spec file for openjdk to no avail. I am out of ideas of places to look and could use some help. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjschwei(a)suse.com rschweik(a)ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-packaging] GCC47 transition - need help
by Ilya Chernykh 25 Jun '12

25 Jun '12

Please help with GCC4.7 transition. The package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=i586&package=kde3-di… The error: In file included from exception.h:14:0, from thread.h:19, from thread.cpp:11: argstring.h:39:13: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration argstring.h:39:22: error: 'ArgString& ArgString::arg' conflicts with a previous declaration argstring.h:38:13: note: previous declaration 'ArgString::arg' argstring.h:39:22: warning: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'off_t' with no type [-fpermissive] The code: class ArgString { public: ArgString(const std::string& s = ""); ArgString(const ArgString& as); ArgString& operator=(const ArgString& as); virtual ~ArgString() {} ArgString& arg(const std::string&); ArgString& arg(const char*); ArgString& arg(bool); ArgString& arg(char); ArgString& arg(unsigned char); ArgString& arg(int, int = 10); ArgString& arg(unsigned int, int = 10); ArgString& arg(uint64_t, bool = true); ArgString& arg(off_t); ArgString& arg(double, int = 3); std::string str() const; virtual void flush() {} private: class ArgStringImpl : public ReferenceCounted { public: ArgStringImpl(const std::string&); void arg(const std::string&); std::string str() const; private: int where; typedef std::pair<std::string, int> node_t; typedef std::list<node_t> str_list_t; typedef str_list_t::iterator str_list_i_t; typedef str_list_t::const_iterator str_list_ci_t; str_list_t list; }; Pointer<ArgStringImpl> impl; }; -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] Please help with lilypond
by Dave Plater 25 Jun '12

25 Jun '12

Reading another thread on the factory list has prompted this request. I'm currently computerless and am unable to finish lilypond which currently has two problems : 1) It currently requires gnutls-extra for it's build, this is easy to fix and if this stupid phone could download spec (text) files I could have fixed it myself. 2) The documentation part of the build takes far too long. This I started to fix on by putting the doc build in a linked package and not building the "lilypond snippets". This is still WIP. The documentation used to be available as a large separate tarball but I couldn't find it in my last moments at the pc so my plan is to leave it out as the docs are duplicated online at lilypond.org. Dave -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] Groups icinga and icingacmd are not registered
by Tim Hardeck 19 Jun '12

19 Jun '12

Hi, the groups icinga and icingacmd are not registered according to rpmlint. They are part of the Icinga packages shipped with openSUSE 12.1. Regards Tim -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany T: +49 (0) 911 74053-0 F: +49 (0) 911 74053-483 http://www.suse.de/

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Java repositories
by todd rme 19 Jun '12

19 Jun '12

There are a number of repositories for software written in specific development language, including packages not meant for factory. These include, for example, devel:languages:python and devel:languages:perl. I was wondering if there is a similar directory for packages written in Java that are not intended for factory but do seem to be of general use across OBS projects. -Todd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-packaging] [opensuse-buildservice] "W: non-executable-script" for files which are executable in the sources
by Florian Höch 19 Jun '12

19 Jun '12

I get the above warning for some files in the following package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=dispcalGUI&project=home%3Af… rpmlint log for Factory i586: dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/wxDisplayAdjustmentFrame.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/ccmx.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/main.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/report.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/wxwindows.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/wxLUTViewer.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/colormath.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/encodedstdio.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/jspacker.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/util_str.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/wxMeasureFrame.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/safe_print.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/xrandr.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/argyll_RGB2XYZ.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/wxTestchartEditor.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/wxProfileInfo.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/colord.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/util_win.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/setup.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/postinstall.py 0644L /usr/bin/env dispcalGUI.i586: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dispcalGUI/dispcalGUI.py 0644L /usr/bin/env When I look into the source archive, the respective files have the executable bit set, so I'm not really understanding where the warning comes from. I've even hacked the spec file to make sure the files have the executable bit set (ie. I call chmod +x on the files in %prep), but it seems almost as if something removes it later? -- Florian Höch -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] A package fails in devel project but not in Factory
by Ilya Chernykh 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

Hi! Currently kdelibs3 fails in devel project against Factory with the following error: /opt/kde3/bin/mcopidl: error while loading shared libraries: libmcop.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory If to insert an ls command before build, it shows that this file exists in /opt/kde3/lib. https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=i586&package=kdelibs… In Factory and in 12.1 the package builds well. The error happens in both 32-bit and 64-bit builds. I have no clue why it cannot find the file. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 6

[opensuse-packaging] need help to fix unresolvable errors in .spec file.
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 13 Jun '12

13 Jun '12

Hello, How can the unresolvable errors be fixed ?, so package can build.[1] Here is the package I am trying to build and its .spec file Thanks for your help. Glenn [1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=smart&project=home%3Adoiggl https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=smart.spec&package=smart&… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] led display Suppliers shared photos with you
by led display Suppliers 10 Jun '12

10 Jun '12

Dear Mr/Miss, Still be puzzling about looking for best led display supplier? Now it will be miles easier working with KEROSA! Here you can find competitive price and excellent quality with a best mix. We"ve been in led display career for many years. We know your market and your country well. Our business is flexible which something is more likely to be a friend chat. We never waste your time. Our conversation will be very efficient base on our good communication. Please reply as soon as possible .if you are working on some led display project. We are ready to make you a satisfied offer! Samuel Shezhen Krosa Techology Co.,Ltd. Address: Building 3,Park,Guanguang road,Bao"an District,Shenzhen,China. post 518000

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Questons with RPATH
by Sascha Manns 09 Jun '12

09 Jun '12

Hello Mates, acttually i'm working on qt-mobility package. Actually it builds, but not to the end. <<< SNIP + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-rpath ERROR: RPATH "/home/user/qt/lib" on /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qt- mobility-1.2.0-7.1.x86_64/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qml_device is not allowed ERROR: RPATH "/home/user/qt/lib/usr/lib64" on /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qt- mobility-1.2.0-7.1.x86_64/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qml_device is not allowed ERROR: RPATH "/home/user/qt/lib" on /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qt- mobility-1.2.0-7.1.x86_64/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qml_device is not allowed ERROR: RPATH "/home/user/qt/lib/usr/lib64" on /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qt- mobility-1.2.0-7.1.x86_64/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qml_device is not allowed >>> SNAP. Does anyone knows how to fix this? Greetings Sascha -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 4

[opensuse-packaging] [reminder] openSUSE 12.2 RC 1 is next week
by openSUSE Roadmap Reminder 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

Hello all, openSUSE 12.2 RC 1 will be released next week, on Thursday 14 June 2012. Please submit your packages before Friday afternoon (UTC time) to make sure they will get included in this release. Leaf packages submitted during the week-end might also get accepted on Monday. For a quick overview of the openSUSE Roadmap, please see: http://en.opensuse.org/Roadmap Thanks, -- openSUSE Roadmap Reminder -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 22

[opensuse-packaging] OBS and Infinality
by Nelson Marques 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Hi, Is it ok to build freetype with infinality patches on OBS for openSUSE ? NM -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] new texlive and frontends
by Cor Blom 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Hi, I am maintaining lyx and with the overhaul of texlive (now in factory) I wonder if I should change the "Requires" in the spec file. Now I have Requires: texlive-latex Recommends: texlive-xetex Maybe this is still working (can test this of course, when I have some time), but is it still the best way to do it. Would appreciate some advice. Thanks, Cor -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Two language packages from one source
by Kyrill Detinov 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Hello. I built an application that provides a program and a library. Both of them have translations. I use macros: %lang_package %lang_package -n libpdfview%{major} Hope, this is correct. Packages are built. Now I have: pdfviewer pdfviewer-lang libpdfview0 libpdfview0-lang The only problem I see is info for libpdfview0-lang: Summary : Languages for package pdfviewer Description : Provides translations to the package pdfviewer rpm -E %lang_package %package lang Summary: Languages for package %{name} Group: System/Localization Requires: %{name} = %{version} Provides: %{name}-lang-all = %{version} Supplements: packageand(bundle-lang-other:%{name}) BuildArch: noarch %description lang Provides translations to the package %{name} So rpm uses %{name} for all language packages. Is there a simple way to make correct Summary and Description for subpackage? Not in OBS yet. Here is a spec: http://susepaste.org/70371996 -- WBR Kyrill -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Something wrong with OGRE as built in games
by Ilya Chernykh 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

When trying to run stuntrally: An exception has occured: OGRE EXCEPTION(5:ItemIdentityException): Can not find codec for 'png' image format. I have no idea how to enable png codec in ogre. Previously the game worked. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 11

[opensuse-packaging] CruiseControl: contrib repo
by Graham Anderson 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

I have let maintenence of the CruiseControl package slip. I don't think I packaged it well in any case because I wanted the tests to pass but had to patch out some of the network units so that it would build on OBS. I found it hard to pacakge the http based interface and additionally the spec file is very messy, my apologies for that but I'm not really an au fait java hacker. Having said that, I always found CruiseControl to be a very efficient, flexible and non opinionated CI tool; but sadly I find myself and my current clients migrating away from that world. To cut a long story short, I will not be spending any more time on the package and it already intermitently fails on i586. Unless anyone else has a use for CruiseControl and can bring the package up to date, it will likely fall out of our distro as contrib is phased out. If you use this package, please update your CruiseControl from the project release in future: http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/ Cheers the noo, Graham

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] rabbitmq-server: extra plugins
by Matwey V. Kornilov 06 Jun '12

06 Jun '12

Hi, How should the extra plugins be packaged? For instance, I'd like to have rabbitmq-x-presence plugin in RPM. There is two options at my sight: 1) Build rabbitmq-x-presence inside rabbitmq-server package and spread it inside rabbitmq-server-plugins Not very flexible way. Easy to implement and build (due umbrella building system) 2) Put umbrella into separate 'rabbitmq-server-devel' (or even 'rabbitmq- sever-sources') and use it to build any desired 'rabbitmq-server-plugin-XXX' Hart to implement, but quite flexible. Most of extra plugins are in GIT and they don't have their own versions. How to designate the package versions? So, what is the right way to do? Thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Question about licenses and openSUSE OBS / packaging.
by Joop Boonen 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

I found this link: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Accepted_licences#Good_Licenses_3 With acceptable licenses. I have a few questions. 1) Is this official. 2) If does it apply all OBS non home projects of only Factory? Is a data package that may be only be redistributed non commercially OK for project games? That basically meets this license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 8

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Question about licenses and openSUSE OBS / packaging.
by Joop Boonen 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

On Tue, June 5, 2012 1:35 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote: > On 05.06.2012 13:10, Joop Boonen wrote: >> I found this link: >> http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Accepted_licences#Good_Licenses_3 With acceptable licenses. >> >> I have a few questions. >> 1) Is this official. > Check the first paragraph of this page - this is a purely private page cloning some Fedora page. It was a nice idea, but never took off. > >> 2) If does it apply all OBS non home projects of only Factory? > No, OBS has it's own policy: > http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_application_blacklist > >> >> Is a data package that may be only be redistributed non commercially OK for project games? >> That basically meets this license: >> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ >> > That does not match OSI and as such is not allowed in the OBS. The problem is that you put our mirrors in a rather bad position if they are distributing OBS repos as part of their commercial offering (ok, I'm not a lawyer, just wanting to point out a possible problem we don't even want to start discussing). > > There is enough great OSI compliant software around to keep OBS busy. Do you know if any OSI compatible non commercial use license exists, or is the non commercial part already cause an issue? (This is related to the data that is used by a GPLv2(+) game engines). Like world of padman, smokin guns etc. > > Greetings, Stephan > Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] No more libcdio_paranoia0
by Dave Plater 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

I haven't had much time atm but after updating libcdio to remove libcdio-mini which was causing pkgconfig conflicts in various packages, a licence problem was found see http://old.nabble.com/libcdio%27s-paranoia-is-getting-split-off-from-libcdi… To resolve bnc#756564 I updated to the git libcdio which no longer has libcdio-paranoia. I see that gvfs is the only package that requires it, it builds but without cdda support. I'm going to create the libcdio-paranoia package but it may not make it into 12.2. Regards Dave -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 8