Hi,
Please excuse the cross post.
I want to do another clean up round in OBS as done end of last year:
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2010-11/msg00218.html
Again repositories of projects which did not saw a change since quite some
time will get removed. Unlike last year, only source changes are taken into
account.
This will affect 2.329 home projects and 74 other projects out of 20.846
projects.
Please review the following list of projects and speak up when you don't want
to get the repositories removed:
non-home projects:
http://www.suse.de/~adrian/OBS-remove-list-candidates
home projects:
http://www.suse.de/~adrian/OBS-remove-list-candidates-home
The FAQ from last time:
Why remove repos and not just disable the build ?
This will free disk space on our servers and also on all mirrors. As result
we can be mirrored more easily.
Will any source get lost ?
No.
How to enable it again ?
Just add the wanted repos again.
There is a project which has not been touched, but the repos are still anyway
important !
Just drop me a mail ....
Why not drop the entire project now that we have an undelete function ?
I thought about that, but currently the webui just says that the project does
not exist.
It is not able to show the former content and does not offer to undelete it,
so that might be too agressive for now.
Why not drop people a mail and ask them to remove it ?
Way too many accounts have no valid email adress and past experience showed
that people do often not react when they lost interesst in their project.
My plan is to do the removal next week, except more discussion about
this is needed.
Just tell me your opinion, also when you support this ;)
thanks
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH
email: adrian(a)suse.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi,
LyX fails to build for SLE_11/i586. The reason is that two versions of
texlive are mixed and thus there is a conflict. Texlive-bin-devel is
from the project Publishing itself, but texlive-devel is taken from
SLE_11 (although it is available in Publising). Result:
file X from install of texlive-devel-2007-219.34.6.noarch conflicts with
file from package texlive-bin-devel-2010-74.1.i586
Can someone look into this please? Or is there something I can do about
it? I would be nice to have everything green.
As far as I can see "gle-graphics" is the only other package in
Publishing that is having this problem.
Regards,
Cor Blom
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi all,
as part of systemd integration in openSUSE, Michal suggested we might
want to create our own openSUSE policy for packaging systemd .unit file,
similar to Fedora policy
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd , moreover the
scriptlets part :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
However, I'm not sure we should directly add those direct call to
systemctl in %post but instead, use some macros, similar to the one we
have for sysvinit and / or update those macros to be systemd compliant :
%stop_on_removal / %insserv_force_if_yast / %{fillup_only} / %
restart_on_update / etc..
Opinions ?
--
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat(a)suse.com>
SUSE
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Am Donnerstag, 25. August 2011, 11:59:10 schrieb Malcolm:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:34:07 +0200
...
> Hi Adrian
> I have two on the list, home:malcolmlewis (around 800 downloads) and
> home:malcolmlewis:Fonts (around 5100 downloads) based on coolo's list.
so, you want to keep the repositories ?
>
> Since home:malcolmlewis is my main project, won't that delete all
> underlying sub-projects?
We don't delete projects at all. Just the repos of them.
And no, just the listed projects will be affected.
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH
email: adrian(a)suse.de
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello all,
openSUSE 12.1 Milestone 5 will be released next week, on
Thursday 01 September 2011.
Please submit your packages before Friday afternoon (UTC time) to make
sure they will get included in this release. Leaf packages submitted
during the week-end might also get accepted on Monday.
For a quick overview of the openSUSE Roadmap, please see:
http://en.opensuse.org/Roadmap
Thanks,
--
openSUSE Roadmap Reminder
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello,
It looks like a large amount of these messages "nothing provides
python-gobject2 >= 2.21.3 needed by <packagename>"
listed at [1]
[1]
https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?blocked=0&building=0&dispatching…
In the message python-gobject2 is common to alot of the unresolvable
items, can it be fixed ?.
I was unsure if it belonged to factory or packaging so I sent it to both.
Thanks Glenn
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi All
As coolo suggested, I have submitted SaX3 to X11:Utilities and I am
waiting an acceptance to it. I will act as the maintainer and bugowner
for the same.
Can the project owners review it and add it to the project?
Thanks a lot
--
Regards
Manu Gupta
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi:
A while ago, we had a discussion
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.suse.opensuse.packaging/7514
about enabling --no-copy-dt-needed-entries by default in Factory that
apparently fell through the cracks..was any decision made about this ?
I strongly suggest we follow suit with other distros and enable it ;)
Cheers.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi!
It seems that the polkit policy in Factory is no longer compatible with HAL which is essential
for normal use of KDE3. Is it possible to enable a custom policy set in KDE3 repository without
forking the polkit-default-priv package?
That is with current Factory policy a KDE3 user can enable say, automatic mounting of
removable media with the following command:
sudo polkit-auth --user $USER --grant org.freedesktop.hal.storage.mount-removable
But this command is not suitable for autostart (because requires a root password) and
also not suitable for install-time because it requires a username and cannot be used to enable
the privilege for all users.
It there another way of doing the same which is suitable for packaging and makes the process
automatic?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org