March 2009 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] Import of Fedora Packaging Guidelines
by Michal Vyskocil 28 Aug '09

28 Aug '09

Hi all, as you know I wrote a post about Fedora Packaging Guidelines [1]. I was working on it during last three weeks (but a little, so it takes a long time :)) and nowadays I'm ready to import a Fedora's content to en.opensuse.org wiki. Now it is on pack.suse.cz [2]. I also checked that none of that page conflicts with an existing content on openSUSE wiki, so it can be imported easily. Tom Callaway [3] from RedHat confirms me that a Guidelines are under Open Publication License [4] and we can use it for SUSE without restrictions. He was also interested on future collaboration and offers some meeting on LinuxTag - it would be nice if anyone from SUSE will be ready to start a discussion. Before import I'd like to ask: Which pages should be excluded for openSUSE? Some pages seems that they are not interesting for SUSE (like Packaging:OldJPackagePolicy [5], Packaging:SugarActivities [6]). Import it, or don't? Second one is how to edit the text and adapt it for SUSE? Change the existing text or leave it and add a SUSE specifics to the beginning or end of page (as suggests Vladimir)? The second way should help us with synchronizing of changes. After that I'll add a warning [7] on the beginning of every page to prevent that some users will use those guidelines and ask for help with editing ;-) [1] http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2009-02/msg00043.html [2] http://pack.suse.cz/mvyskocil/fedora-packaging-guidelines/ [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway [4] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/OPL [5] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OldJPackagePolicy [6] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SugarActivityGuidelines [7] http://en.opensuse.org/Template:Warning1 Best regards Michal Vyskocil -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 26

[opensuse-packaging] /etc/modprobe.* changes
by Michal Marek 24 Jul '09

24 Jul '09

Hi, the new module-init-tools, which will appear in Factory soon, deprecated /etc/modprobe.conf(.local) and only uses /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf configuration files (files without the .conf suffix are still read, but cause a warning). I tried to find and fix packages that install modprobe config files, but in case I missed some, the fix is simple: change /etc/modprobe.d/$name to /etc/modprobe.d/50-$name.conf. Also, mkinitrd should be updated to not copy /etc/modprobe.conf* if it's not there. Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

5 14

[opensuse-packaging] Dropping python-numeric
by Jan Matejek 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear fellow packagers, for 11.2 i plan to drop the package python-numeric. Reasons? Well, it's long abandoned original version of a project that is now called NumPy. NumPy is not source compatible with Numeric, so it lives in its own package called python-numpy. New(er) projects that used to depend on Numeric now depend on NumPy. If your package depends on python-numeric, please review it. It's likely that you will be able to either remove the dependency, or painlessly switch to python-numpy. If not, say so now or be silent forever ;e) PDB says that there's an explicit dependency on python-numeric in these packages: package-lists-openSUSE-KDE-cd package-lists-openSUSE package-lists-openSUSE-GNOME-cd package-lists-openSUSE-images (i assume that it's because of some of the following) dia fonttools python-wxGTK-examples python-gtk pythoncad python-gnome-extras python-gnome inkscape python-gtk and python-gnome are mine, i'll handle them; i'm Ccing maintainers of the others. regards m. - -- (if you have any comments, please CC me in the reply, otherwise my replies will break threads. that is a bug in my way of using the mailinglist, which is not yet fixed) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknSFkIACgkQjBrWA+AvBr93aACgh5a2Q2cI4UC8MKaBxEyDtDXU W6AAoK1rL/RugrjRHmsfXzZ1KkkNWKR1 =TIbW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] skrooge 0.2.6
by Sascha 'saigkill' Manns 31 Mar '09

31 Mar '09

Hello Mates, actualy i'm try to build skrooge. But in the CMakeLists.txt is the following: ########### install files ############### INSTALL(TARGETS skrooge DESTINATION ${BIN_INSTALL_DIR} ) INSTALL(FILES ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}/skrooge.desktop DESTINATION ${XDG_APPS_INSTALL_DIR} ) #INSTALL(FILES ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}/skrooge.desktop DESTINATION ${XDG_APPS_INSTALL_DIR}/../kde/ ) #CORRECTION BUG 2256687 on ubuntu 8.04 INSTALL(FILES ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}/x-skg.desktop DESTINATION ${MIME_INSTALL_DIR}/application/ ) INSTALL(DIRECTORY theme DESTINATION ${DATA_INSTALL_DIR}/skrooge FILES_MATCHING PATTERN "*.css" PATTERN ".svn" EXCLUDE PATTERN "CMakeFiles" EXCLUDE) kde4_install_icons( ${ICON_INSTALL_DIR} ) That means, that i have 2 *.desktop Files (skrooge.desktop and x- skg.desktop). So i have placed in the Spec: %suse_update_desktop_file skrooge Finance But now comes the Error: + /usr/lib/rpm/suse_update_desktop_file.sh -- project 'home:saigkill / openSUSE_Factory' --project home:saigkill -- basedir /usr/src/packages/SRPMS skrooge Finance + /usr/lib/rpm/suse_update_desktop_file.sh --project 'home:saigkill / openSUSE_Factory' --project home:saigkill --basedir /usr/src/packages/SRPMS -i skrooge Office Finance `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/skrooge-0.2.6/skrooge/skrooge.desktop' -> `/var/tmp/kde4-skrooge-0.2.6- build/usr/share/applications/skrooge.desktop' ERROR: suse_update_desktop_file: skrooge has multiple desktop files I the last Version i have comment out the desktop Files in CMakeLists.txt and create my own skrooge.desktop. But i think it is not good that x-skg.desktop is missing. Is it possible to fix this? -- Sincereley yours Sascha Manns openSUSE Marketing Team openSUSE Build Service openSUSE Features Screening Team Web: http://saschamanns.gulli.to Project-Blog: http://lizards.opensuse.org/author/saigkill Private-Blog: http://saschasbacktrace.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] games group and setgid
by Cristian Morales Vega 27 Mar '09

27 Mar '09

How is the games group supposed to be used? Tower Toppler want to set itself in the games group with setgid set so it can write on a global hiscore file also set at games group. It seems ok to me, but rpmlint complains about the setgid. Should I ignore rpmlint or it is correct and users able to play games are supposed to be in the games group to start with? If my memory doesn't fails in openSUSE, by default, users aren't in the games group... since an user that plays games hasn't to know about users and groups that would be a bug. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] What replaces yup?
by Andreas Vetter 25 Mar '09

25 Mar '09

Hi, what is the proposed way to mirror SLE11 Updates? yup is not included in SLE11, 11.1 and factory. And the SLE10 yup does not do it. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Andreas Vetter Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik Fakultaet fuer Physik und Astronomie Universitaet Wuerzburg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-packaging] License for a repository?
by Lubos Lunak 23 Mar '09

23 Mar '09

Hello, I would like to add a license to some repositories, similarly like the main oss repository has (in order to provide some information about the repository users should know). Looking at the oss repo I found out this is handled by the license.tar.gz file in the root repo directory, but I have't managed to find out any details about it. While I can guess the format for it, I have no idea how to actually add such a file to a repository in the OBS. Can somebody provide me some information about this? Thanks -- Lubos Lunak KDE developer -------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: l.lunak(a)suse.cz , l.lunak(a)kde.org Lihovarska 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 972 190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 3

[opensuse-packaging] dbus++: Error in Namespace
by Sascha 'saigkill' Manns 23 Mar '09

23 Mar '09

Project: home:saigkill Package: libdbus++ Hello Mates, after upgrading to Version 0.6.1 i become the following Errors: libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -fmessage- length=0 -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -Wctor-dtor-privacy -Wnon-virtual- dtor -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-deprecated -Wunused-parameter -Wunused- variable -Wunused-value -Wunused-function -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 - I/usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -DDBUSPP_WITH_THREAD -I../../include - fmessage-length=0 -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector - funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT dbus.lo -MD -MP -MF ..deps/dbus.Tpo -c ../dbus.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/dbus.o In file included from ../../include/dbus++/service.hpp:27, from ../../include/dbus++/server.hpp:26, from ../../include/dbus++/dbus.hpp:26, from ../dbus.cpp:22: .../../include/dbus++/detail/connection.hpp:64: error: 'condition' in namespace 'boost' does not name a type In file included from ../../include/dbus++/dbus.hpp:30, from ../dbus.cpp:22: .../../include/dbus++/detail/timer.hpp:63: error: 'condition' in namespace 'boost' does not name a type make[3]: *** [dbus.lo] Error 1 Does anyone know what th error is? -- Sincereley yours Sascha Manns openSUSE Marketing Team openSUSE Build Service openSUSE Features Screening Team Web: http://saschamanns.gulli.to Project-Blog: http://lizards.opensuse.org/author/saigkill Private-Blog: http://saschasbacktrace.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] libdbus++ error in MAkefile
by Sascha 'saigkill' Manns 23 Mar '09

23 Mar '09

Project: home:saigkill Package: libdbus++ Hello Mates, i have an Question about my libdbus++ Build. After autoreconf i get: + cd libdbus++-0.6.0 + autoreconf -fi src/debug/Makefile.am:9: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined src/debug/Makefile.am:9: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' src/debug/Makefile.am:9: to `configure.in' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. src/debug/Makefile.am:9: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.in', make sure src/debug/Makefile.am:9: its definition is in aclocal's search path. src/release/Makefile.am:7: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined src/release/Makefile.am:7: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' src/release/Makefile.am:7: to `configure.in' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. src/release/Makefile.am:7: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.in', make sure src/release/Makefile.am:7: its definition is in aclocal's search path. src/thread/Makefile.am:9: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined src/thread/Makefile.am:9: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' src/thread/Makefile.am:9: to `configure.in' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. src/thread/Makefile.am:9: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.in', make sure src/thread/Makefile.am:9: its definition is in aclocal's search path. src/threadd/Makefile.am:10: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined src/threadd/Makefile.am:10: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' src/threadd/Makefile.am:10: to `configure.in' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. src/threadd/Makefile.am:10: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.in', make sure src/threadd/Makefile.am:10: its definition is in aclocal's search path. Have anyone an idea, how to fix this? -- Sincereley yours Sascha Manns openSUSE Marketing Team openSUSE Build Service openSUSE Features Screening Team Web: http://saschamanns.gulli.to Project-Blog: http://lizards.opensuse.org/author/saigkill Private-Blog: http://saschasbacktrace.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] build-check: no-return-in-nonvoid-function
by Matthias Fehring 22 Mar '09

22 Mar '09

Hello list, another package, another no-return-in-nonvoid-function... ;-) I have tried anything that came to my mind, but my C++ is really poor. I hope, someone can help me. Package: kopete-otr in KDE:Community https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kopete- otr&project=KDE:Community Buildlog: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=i586&package=kopete- otr&project=KDE:Community&repository=openSUSE_11.1 Lines in the source code: static const char *protocol_name(void *opdata, const char *protocol){ //Never seen... kdDebug() << "protocol_name called" << endl; } Best greetings Buschmann ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE Member - de.opensuse.org Sys-Op http://en.opensuse.org/User:Buschmann23 http://en.opensuse.org/How_to_Participate http://en.opensuse.org/Geeko_wants_you!

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] Conditional build?
by Cristian Morales Vega 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

The osc build command has the options: --without=X disable feature X for build --with=X enable feature X for build ...can it be specified in package metadata or something? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] fillup --maintain ?
by Susanne Oberhauser 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

Hi, in openSUSE:Tools in package obs-server, I do a %fillup_and_insserv. With this, a later package update will override user settings in the sysconfig file. Now I see two options: [ ] drop the sysconfig template and instead package a plain %config(noreplace) [ ] somehow (how so) pass --maintain to fillup [ ] something completely different... any pointers appreciated S. -- Susanne Oberhauser +49-911-74053-574 SUSE -- a Novell Business OPS Engineering Maxfeldstraße 5 Processes and Infrastructure Nürnberg SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-packaging] libffmpeg-api
by Cristian Morales Vega 19 Mar '09

19 Mar '09

Project home:jnweiger has a libffmpeg-api that is supposed to allow linking against ffmpeg without having a real copy of it, so avoiding patent problems. But it doesn't works and doesn't seems mantained anymore. The package right now transform the Packman package to obtain a new package with all the headers and bogus libraries (from gcc -o empty.so --shared empty.c). So packages depending of it compile but fail at link. So, what else it needs? I don't know too much about the linker and ELF internals, I could use some help. An "objcopy -R .text <lib>" to libavcodec, libavdevice, etc. should remove all the codec code from them and from that point should not be problems in including it in the OBS, I'm wrong? Perhaps only libavcodec/format need it? I don't know if libavdevice has any codec/patented code. At this point it still doesn't works. First, a "nm -D" shows that doing this some symbols change from 'D' (initialized data section) to 'B' (BSS). Ok, makes sense... but that would mean a problem? I can't think of any. Something more confusing is a symbol (mm_flags from libavcodec) changing from 'B' to 'N' (debugging symbol)... I don't really understand why, but neither I know the effects. And then there is the problem of undefined symbols. libav* also depends of other libraries with codec code (libavcodec -> libx264). Best solution? a) 'objcopy -R .text' all the deps of ffmpeg. Simple, but "lot" of work. b) If I'm not wrong at link time the linker doesn't really needs them, or at least I don't know why it needs them. The final binary will be the same, true? So, there is some way to stop the linker from asking for it? Something like "--allow-shlib-undefined" that could be put in the .pc files? c) Something completly different. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

5 13

[opensuse-packaging] apache2-mod_perl
by Oliver Block 18 Mar '09

18 Mar '09

Hello everybody, today I reported a bug for mod_perl2, because it hangs when you try to do a rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/packages/SPECS/apache2-mod_perl.spec I was also facing this problem with Version 10.3 some time ago. So I think this problem does exists for quite some time. Did anybody of you solve this issue yet? Best Regards, Oliver Block -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] strange gcc relocation error
by Wolfgang Rosenauer 18 Mar '09

18 Mar '09

Hi, I'm running into the following issue: /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.2.1/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: ../../staticlib/components/libgklayout.a(nsLayoutModule.o): relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `NS_NewCanvasRenderingContext2D(nsIDOMCanvasRenderingContext2D**)' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.2.1/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value As you can see that is gcc 4.2 actually from openSUSE 10.3. I'm working on packaging Firefox 3.1/3.5 in the buildservice (mozilla:beta) and actually it's _only_ failing on 10.3-x86_64 with that error and I've verified that nsLayoutModule.cpp is compiled using -fPIC. Is there really something wrong with the code/compile or is it a gcc bug? Thanks, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] home:RedDwarf:fakePackman
by Cristian Morales Vega 16 Mar '09

16 Mar '09

After everything from http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2009-03/msg00107.html I have created a project home:RedDwarf:fakePackman with a false libffmpeg (and its false dependencies) that should allow you to build in the OBS packages that link against ffmpeg libraries and then run them with real Packman packages. The packman2obs.sh script (based on devel2api.pl but wrote in a language I know: bash) used to create them is included in every package. In home:RedDwarf:multimedia there is an aegisub package that I verified is bit identical to a package built with the real Packman packages in everything but the .note.gnu.build-id and .gnu_debuglink sections... and two/three bytes from .rodata. These two/three byte seem to be different with each build, so... I will appreciate any tech or legal comment. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] Updating docbook-xsl-stylesheets
by Karl Eichwalder 11 Mar '09

11 Mar '09

I'm about to update the docbook-xsl-stylesheets package (version 1.74.3). If building docs fails for you with a sudden, please drop me a line. -- Karl Eichwalder R&D / Documentation SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] rpmlint: Program causes undefined operation
by Matthias Fehring 11 Mar '09

11 Mar '09

Hello list, rpmlint complains about the following error: I: Program causes undefined operation (likely same variable used twiceand post/pre incremented in the same expression). e.g. x = x++; Split it in two operations. E: pdfedit sequence-point ../engine/qsnumber_object.cpp:85 Log: http://tinyurl.com/pdfeditlog Package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=pdfedit&project=KDE:Communi… The complained code line: double n = args.isEmpty() ? n = 0.0 : args[0].toNumber(); Full code block: QSObject QSNumberClass::construct( const QSList &args ) const { double n = args.isEmpty() ? n = 0.0 : args[0].toNumber(); return createNumber( n ); } The file qsnumber_object.cpp is part of the Qt Script for Applications framework (QSA) version 1.1. I have looked in newer versions of the QSA source code, but this code line is not changed. I have searched the internet for that and after that, this code line seems to be correct for me, but I am not a programmer... ;-) So, how can I fix this rpmlint error? Best greetings Buschmann ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE Member - de.opensuse.org Sys-Op http://en.opensuse.org/User:Buschmann23

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] Is there a way to find out the status of a to-be-released update package
by Andreas Vetter 11 Mar '09

11 Mar '09

Apologies, if this is not the right list. Which one is it? Assume you have a bug in bugzilla. The bug is in status resolved fixed, the update "has been added to maintenance queue now" and SWAMP says: Update released for: <package>, <package>-debug, <package>-devel Products: openSUSE 11.1 (debug, i586, ppc, x86_64) Is there a documentation for the workflow an update has to go through? And is there a way to find out where the update currently is in the workflow? Or: How long will it take approx. from the SWAMP message above till the update appears in the update-repo? -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Andreas Vetter Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik Fakultaet fuer Physik und Astronomie Universitaet Wuerzburg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 5

[opensuse-packaging] freeremoted: shlib-policy-missing-suffix
by Sascha 'saigkill' Manns 11 Mar '09

11 Mar '09

Project: home:saigkill Package: freeremoted Hello Mates, i become this RPMLint Warning: freeremoted.x86_64: W: shlib-policy-missing-suffix Your package containing shared libraries does not end in a digit and should probably be split. First i tried to fix LDFLAGS with -soname %version. But i doesn't found an good Place to leave it i the CMakeLists.txt. Or can i fix the RPMLint Warning with creating two Subpackages? -- Sincereley yours Sascha Manns openSUSE Marketing Team openSUSE Build Service Web: http://saschamanns.gulli.to Project-Blog: http://lizards.opensuse.org/author/saigkill Private-Blog: http://saschasbacktrace.blogspot.com DISCLAIMER: Please note that in accordance with the German law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange with me is retained for a period of six months. http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de http://www.ccc.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Package: dumb Project: home:saigkill
by Sascha 'saigkill' Manns 10 Mar '09

10 Mar '09

Hello Mates, at this moment, i'm building dumb (a Music Library). A part of the RPMLint Warnings i've fixed. But a few Warnings are present. dumb.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/dumbplay That i never heard. libdumb0_9_3.x86_64: W: shlib-policy-missing-lib This is strange. I've created an Subpackage with the *.so and RPMLint doesn't see it. libdumb0_9_3.x86_64: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libdumb-0.9.3.so libdumb0_9_3.x86_64: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libaldmb-0.9.3.so I think, this i can ignore. Versionformat x.x.x.so is compatible with the Guides. libdumb0_9_3.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libaldmb-0.9.3.so libdumb0_9_3.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libdumb-0.9.3.so I think i can place this in the rpmlintrc. -- Sincereley yours Sascha Manns openSUSE Marketing Team openSUSE Build Service Web: http://saschamanns.gulli.to Project-Blog: http://lizards.opensuse.org/author/saigkill Private-Blog: http://saschasbacktrace.blogspot.com DISCLAIMER: Please note that in accordance with the German law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange with me is retained for a period of six months. http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de http://www.ccc.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

5 13

[opensuse-packaging] Re: [obs submit-request 7749] openSUSE:Factory:Contrib/qcad-free: created by pgajdos
by Michal Vyskocil 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

On Monday 09 of March 2009 15:48:29 Petr Gajdos wrote: > home:pgajdos:Contrib/qcad-free -> openSUSE:Factory:Contrib/qcad-free > > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=qcad-free&project=home:pgaj >dos:Contrib > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=qcad-free&project=openSUSE: >Factory:Contrib What's the difference between existing qcad you maintain in Contrib and this new qcad-free? If you would like to rename an existing package, please follow an existing rules for it [1]. What's the origin of archive called qcad-free-090301.tar.*? I found only qcad- community-2.0.5.0-1-comunity.src.tar.gz [2] on ribbonsoft.com dowload page [3]. Google didn't helped me. [1] http://en.opensuse.org/Upgrade_Dependencies#Renaming_a_package [2] ftp://anonymous@ribbonsoft.com/archives/qcad/qcad-2.0.5.0-1- community.src.tar.gz [3] http://www.ribbonsoft.com/qcad_downloads.html Regards Michal Vyskocil -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-packaging] Fedora packaging Guidelines imported
by Michal Vyskocil 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

Hi all, I'd like to announce I have imported Fedora Packaging Guidelines [1] to openSUSE wiki [2]. I excluded following pages: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FullExceptionList http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SugarActivityGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:GCJGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Committee http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OldJPackagePolicy http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsSpecTemplate Which seemed that they are not important for openSUSE (or are empty in Fedora wiki like FullExceptionList), but I could add them later, if you missed them. I also renamed the page titles, unfortunately only them, so links are wrong. But every page must be reviewed before it should be used, so this is not a big problem. I'll start a work on merging the documentation to the Guidelines (volunteers are welcome :-)). You can just change the content and remove the part which differs from Fedora, but try to keep changes as smallest as possible to allow easy merging of changes between Fedora and SUSE. I'm planning to use a git repository to help track a changes between Fedora and SUSE, but it will be a lot of manual work (I expect). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines [2] http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Guidelines [3] http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25insta… Best regards Michal Vyskocil -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

6 13

[opensuse-packaging] Gcc 4.4 again
by Stephan Kulow 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

Hi, I disabled the staging repo and linked all packages that currently fail into a new project. So it should be easier for you now to verify if your package creates a problem. Just visit http://tinyurl.com/brslzp Right now there are ~130 packages. Note that some of them also fail with gcc 4.3, but we need to fix these too :) We still don't have a rush to use that compiler as default, but most failures are easily catched - so if someone is interested, just build against Factory:Gcc44 and do submitrequests against the devel project. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-packaging] rpmlint: shlib-policy-name-error only on i586
by Matthias Fehring 09 Mar '09

09 Mar '09

Hello list, on the following packages in the Build Service project KDE:Community, rpmlint complains about shlib-policy-name-error only on i586, on x86_64 this does not happen. I am a little bit confused about that... Both packages contain kicker applets. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=KPrayertime&project=KDE:Com… https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=klipoquery&project=KDE:Comm… Best greetings Buschmann ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE Member - de.opensuse.org Sys-Op http://en.opensuse.org/User:Buschmann23

3 4