December 2009 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] Probable problem with %__make %{?jobs:-j%{jobs}}
by Dave Plater 27 Dec '09

27 Dec '09

Hi, with the above line added to a spec file rpmbuild causes a kernel panic on my 1 gig ram celeron E1200 x86_64 system. Seeing that the same spec file is packaged in the source rpm isn't this a potential problem and I've already had a submit to my graphics blender project with this added and sent it to factory. I've added a "%if 0%{?opensuse_bs}" conditional to the spec file but I haven't tried a local osc build in case of another kernel panic. Does the conditional prevent a parallel build on my local machine with obs build? Regards Dave P -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 3

[opensuse-packaging] Contrib policy regarding setgid binaries
by Guido Berhoerster 25 Dec '09

25 Dec '09

Hello, what is the policy regarding setgid binaries in Contrib? Does http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/Security_Policies#Setuid_Binaries apply and do I need to get a review before I can submit a package containing a setgid binary to Contrib? Thanks, -- Guido Berhoerster -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] RPM_OPT_FLAGS, stripping, and debug_package in OpenSuSE 11.2
by Adam Rosenstein 23 Dec '09

23 Dec '09

Just a quick question about the official 11.2 distribution packaging process: What is RPM_OPT_FLAGS set to when the official RPMs are built? I noticed that if I download gzip-1.3.12-100.4.src.rpm and do rpmbuild -ba I don't get stripped binaries, yet the officially released x86_64 rpms have stripped binaries. I also notice there is no %debug_package macro, yet there is a gzip-debuginfo rpm available. How are these built for the official opensuse release? Just curious. Adam Rosenstein -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Buildservice down
by Marcus Rueckert 23 Dec '09

23 Dec '09

hi, it seems we get an outage of the opensuse buildservice as christmas present. we will try to fix it as soon as possible. Stay tuned for more and sorry for the inconvenience. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] debuginfo extraction
by Wolfgang Rosenauer 20 Dec '09

20 Dec '09

Hi, I'm currently investigating an interesting warning I get in one of my packages. I get the following rpm build output for i586 builds: during debuginfo extraction: WARNING: /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2b5/libxpcom.so is already stripped! from rpmlint check: mozilla-xulrunner192.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2b5/libxpcom.so in RPM_BUILD_DIR: Hygiea:/var/tmp/build-root/usr/src/packages/BUILD/mozilla/dist/xulrunner # file libxpcom.so libxpcom.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped So everything suggests that the file is created correctly but the debuginfo extraction fails for some reason. Any hints? Thanks, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 5

[opensuse-packaging] Not registered Category in desktop file
by Michal Čihař 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Hi what is needed to register a category in desktop file, which is already in Registered Categories in freedesktop.org specification[1]? I currently get following error in buildservice (in Factory, 11.1 shows even more confusing message about unknown category \"$i\"): WARNING: Category "TelephonyTools" is unknown \! WARNING: it is ignored, until you registered a Category at opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org . ... ERROR: No sufficient Category definition: /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/wammu-0.31.1-1.1.i386//usr/share/applications/wammu.desktop Errors in installed desktop file detected. Please mail stbinner(a)suse.de, if you think this is wrong. PS: It's great that error messages show two contacts - one is reachable only after subscribing and second one does not exist at all. [1]:http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com

7 10

[opensuse-packaging] What does rpm macro %insserv_cleanup do
by Richard Bos 14 Dec '09

14 Dec '09

Summary: the rpm macro %insserv_cleanup expands to 'sbin/insserv etc/init.d' what looks not good. Is this correct or not? More details: When packaging kolab without the macro %insserv_cleanup, I get the following warning: RPMLINT report: =============== kolab.noarch: W: postun-without-%insserv_cleanup /etc/init.d/kolab kolab.noarch: W: postun-without-%insserv_cleanup /etc/init.d/kolabd The package doesn't have a %insserv_cleanup call in %postun Following the suse convention I add the macro, according: http://en.opensuse.org/SUSE_Package_Conventions/Init_Scripts in spec file %postun .... %insserv_cleanup In rpm postun section: rpm -qp --scripts /var/tmp/build-root-openSUSE_11.1- i586/usr/src/packages/RPMS/noarch/kolab-2.2.2.90_cvs20091214-0.noarch.rpm ........ postuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): ...... sbin/insserv etc/init.d <<<<<< strange line What is that line doing. When executing it, it results in: -bash: sbin/insserv: No such file or directory The macro is defined as: In /usr/lib/rpm/suse.macros: # macro: insserv_cleanup %insserv_cleanup() \ sbin/insserv etc/init.d When adding it as, e.g.: %insserv_cleanup kolabd or %{insserv_cleanup kolabd} -- Richard -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 4

[opensuse-packaging] How to add updates to openSUSE 11.2
by Schlomo Schapiro 14 Dec '09

14 Dec '09

Hi, I submitted a sr for an updated rear package to openSUSE:11.2:Update in the hope to get it into the Update repo. 1) Is this the correct process for updates? 2) Whom to bug if I get no response? How long should I wait for a response? Regards, Schlomo PS: Yes, I know I did it over the weekend and probably nobody looked into it yet. I just wanted to ask about the process... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-packaging] %debug_package woes
by Hans-Peter Jansen 11 Dec '09

11 Dec '09

Hi, I stumbled across the %debug_package issue a few times now. Latest one: + exec rpmbuild -ba --define '_srcdefattr (-,root,root)' --define 'jobs 4' --define 'disturl obs://build.opensuse.org/KDE:KDE3/openSUSE_11.1/f42dda8a858fcd5ab8692348db1…' --eval %suse_insert_debug_package /usr/src/packages/SOURCES/kmymoney.spec error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo and while I do not understand the background, I guess, it's due to some projects adding %debug_package automagically, and build falls flat on its face, if the spec contains another %debug_package statement. Since adding it to local builds is highly desirable, it's a pain in the <beep> to being forced to remove that darn thing before checking in... Maintaining KDE:KDE3 since a few days, I accepted a sr containing this bugger. Later I tried to check the diff again, but failed. Is it possible to see the --diff again _after_ a request was accepted? Thanks, Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] Packman: deleting 10.3 packages
by Pascal Bleser 11 Dec '09

11 Dec '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 JFYI: we will be deleting our openSUSE 10.3 packages by end of this year. http://dev-loki.blogspot.com/2009/12/packman-deleting-103-packages.html cheers - -- -o) Pascal Bleser <loki(a)fosdem.org> http://www.fosdem.org /\\ FOSDEM 2010 :: 6 + 7 February 2010 in Brussels _\_v Free and Opensource Software Developers European Meeting -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLIsivr3NMWliFcXcRAufFAJ0ZGJdI998FVpw6AQti5HBvqtaUGwCeLGjH h4noZjo3lUnge7PYMs8Uz2o= =3ESk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0