October 2008 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] Tips & Tricks: desktop files
by Stephan Kulow 19 Nov '08

19 Nov '08

Hi, If you have a Factory package that you also package in a backports repo, then there is the problem that the suse_update_desktop_file will erase translations not known to the old distribution. First let me explain the way Factory translates: 1. spec files have %suse_update_desktop_file, which will a) mark the desktop file for the translation process b) update the desktop files against desktop-translations 2. collect-desktop-files is built against all packages with desktop files, this will collect all _upstream_ translations from the desktop files 3. Karl is updating the lcn SVN to merge the openSUSE translations with the upstream translations (upstream translations win) 4. Karl submits new desktop-translations to start the process over So this works for Factory pretty well and allows openSUSE to a) update the translations - unknown translations can be filled up b) update translations by an online update - translations unknown will be erased from the desktop files to allow GNOME and KDE to look into dekstop_translations.mo file But this creates a problem with backports as way more translations will be unknown and hurting more than it helps. Now my tip: osc linkpac home:coolo update-desktop-files <myproject> and make sure it's disabled for Factory. This version is patched not to care about translations, so you get 100% the upstream translations and not less. Greetings, Stephan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-packaging] Conventions for summary/description/group of devel packages?
by Vincent Untz 12 Nov '08

12 Nov '08

Hi, Looking at the packaging conventions, I didn't see any information for creating devel packages, which is something rather... common :-) (or maybe I missed the page about this) It looks to me like all packages use different conventions for this, while a standard pattern for summary and description would make sense. Eg, a standard summary could be "Development files and libraries for $package" and a standard description could be "Headers and libraries for developing applications that use $something." Also, right now, it's not clear to me if the group of the devel package should be the same as the non-devel package or something like Development/Libraries. Any opinion? Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

7 6

[opensuse-packaging] How to set javac target ?
by Stefan Dirsch 31 Oct '08

31 Oct '08

Hi I'm wondering how to set the javac target in a specfile. [...] ERROR: the files above contain java bytecode for something later than java 1.5, ERROR: please set the javac target to 1.5 or lower. BTW, the error message contradicts itself ("later" means "lower" version number?). --> /usr/lib/rpm/brp-check-bytecode-version How to reproduce: osc co home:sndirsch geotag cd home:sndirsch/geotag env -u BUILD_DIST osc build Best regards, Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

5 18

[opensuse-packaging] translation is neither enabled nor disabled
by Andrew Jorgensen 29 Oct '08

29 Oct '08

What do I do about these? ERROR: translation is neither enabled nor disabled for this file: ... for a package that is /not/ going to be translated by SUSE? We are not supposed to use %suse_update_desktop_file for such packages, but when building against Factory this is a fatal error. TIA, Andrew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Automatically install a specific package for build
by Magnus Boman 25 Oct '08

25 Oct '08

Hello, Trying to build the latest GNOME for openSUSE 11.0. A fair amount of those packages (~150) seem to require pcre-devel to be able to build (which is not the case on Factory). Is there an easy way to tell OBS to automatically install this package during build for a specific project? Thanks, Magnus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

4 10

[opensuse-packaging] php5 compile questions
by Andre Hübner 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Hi List, i try to compile php5 on my own to package and make my own setup. I have some difficulties at some extenstions. Is this list also intended to use for questions to php5-configure-line,needed packages and missing libs or only rpm-based questions? I asked in opensuse-list but answer was "why do you compile, you can download it"... and the php-lists are barely useful. Thanks, Andre -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

4 7

[opensuse-packaging] intltool update
by Vladimir Nadvornik 15 Oct '08

15 Oct '08

Hi, The update of intltool to 0.40.5 apparently made several packages fail with this: /work/built/info/failed/head-x86_64/jpilot:config.status: error: po/Makefile.in.in was not created by intltoolize. Is it something that should be fixed in intltool or in the failing packages? Vladimir -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] rpmlintrc and check_if_valid_source_dir
by Bernhard Walle 15 Oct '08

15 Oct '08

Hi, | $ submitpac -m . | ... | microcode_ctl-1.17-rpmlintrc is not mentioned in spec files as source | or patch. Is this correct? [N/y/d] (y to ignore) ^C So, should the rpmlintrc really be added to the spec file? The name is microcode_ctl-1.17-rpmlintrc which I think is correct. As Source? Regards, Bernhard -- Bernhard Walle, SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Architecture Development -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 4

[opensuse-packaging] RPM version ordering
by Jan Matejek 14 Oct '08

14 Oct '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi all, i have a problem with one of my packages, python-openssl: the previous version was called 0.7a and the current one is 0.7. However, in rpm's (and zypp's) view 0.7a > 0.7 and the package will break distribution upgrade because it won't let itself be "downgraded". How can i work around this? Is it possible to e.g. specify that the newer one Obsoletes: %{name} = 0.7a and be done with it? thanks for help m. - -- (if you have any comments, please CC me in the reply, otherwise my replies will break threads. that is a bug in my way of using the mailinglist, which is not yet fixed) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjuL9kACgkQjBrWA+AvBr8WXwCgie6RWXcffcUid45l3vaiDnrk G7EAoKWKsK5eF3xjkAaGGcryImOrz/Fo =0Pqb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

7 8

[opensuse-packaging] AutoReqProv gives me interpreters - not want
by Jan Engelhardt 12 Oct '08

12 Oct '08

Hi, it seems that as part of some AutoReqProv mechanism scripts in /usr/lib/rpm, rpmbuild, as part of the build systems, will add /usr/bin/perl and /usr/bin/python as a requirement to my rpm packages whenever they merely find a file that has them in the #!-line. Can I disable this behavior? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0