January 2005 - openSUSE AMD64 - openSUSE Mailing Lists

postfix crashes in smtp & qmgr
by Dan Wilson 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

I noticed a posting to this list with the same subject from a month or so back, but I can't find any resolution. Here is the original posting: http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2004-Nov/0089.html And another similar one: http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2005-Jan/0122.html I'm seeing this same issue and was wondering if there has been any resolution. I'm running: Linux pedro 2.6.5-7.135-default #1 Wed Dec 15 21:30:01 UTC 2004 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux With the following: postfix 2.1.1-1.4 mysql-Max 4.0.18-32.1 Anybody have any ideas? Would upgrading help? If so, anyone have an rpm with mysql support built in for the latest postfix? -Dan

1 0

usb mouse doesn't work
by Joe Landman 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

Hi folks: Just bought an HP zv5460us (Athlon64 2GHz) to replace a laptop that died last week. Everything works, including the USB ports (this was by far the easiest install of SuSE9.2 I have ever done). What doesn't work is the usb mouse. I used several USB mice that I know work (on this and other systems in some-other-os), and they all fail to be detected. What I also noticed is that there is no usbmouse.ko kernel module to insert. I tested the USB by using my USB memory stick, and I can read/write to it, mount and unmount it. It is detected on insertion, and it automounts properly. usbview sees the memory stick, but not the mouse, regardless of which USB ports they are plugged into. Rebooting the unit into windows, and the mouse (all of the USB mice) do work. This is SuSE 9.2 pro, AMD64 balto:~ # uname -a Linux balto 2.6.8-24.11-default #1 Fri Jan 14 13:01:26 UTC 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I can provide lspci and other output as well. It seems though that since there is no usbmouse.ko, that the usbmouse will not be recognized. Is this correct? Or is the mouse in another kernel module? If I need usbmouse.ko, are there instructions for rebuilding the SuSE kernel to enable me to compile a new module (just basically that one)? Thanks in advance! Joe

2 1

Re: [suse-amd64] AMD 64, X.org and multihead
by patheve2 23 Jan '05

23 Jan '05

Hello Markus Well, if I well remember, there is no 64 bits graphic card driver for Linux made by ATI. Only nVidia supplies such a driver. So I suppose that you can only use the driver included in X.org, a 64 bits driver but without 3D GLX features : only 2D. Regards Pascal > > De: "Markus Feilner" <lists(a)feilner-it.net <http://130.244.199.229/agent/MobNewMsg?to=lists@feilner-it.net>> > Date: 2005/01/22 sam. PM 03:28:01 GMT+01:00 > À: suse-amd64(a)suse.com <http://130.244.199.229/agent/MobNewMsg?to=suse-amd64@suse.com> > Objet: [suse-amd64] AMD 64, X.org and multihead > > Hello List, > has anybody managed to get a ATI grafixcard with multihead support working on > suse 9.2 (X.org) on AMD 64? > I'm close to surrender with my radeon 9000 and newest drivers. > My setup includes a DVI TFT display as primary and an analog TFT as secondary. > I followed the readme and the howto from ATI, (several times), but when > "startx" the primary display (dvi) stops immediately, syaing "entering sleep > mode". > IU managed to make the secondary display work, but only without dri and glx. > (videos are only blue, no 3D support) > In my logfile it says something like: > XFree86.0.log:(EE) Failed to initialize GLX extension (NVIDIA X driver not > found) > which is funny, because it's a radeon - or is this a misunderstanding ? > but X stops wiith various configurations because of missing screens or > displays - in fact I never managed to get a working config with the > fglrxconfig tool, I always had to fix XF86Config by hand. > > (apart from the typo bug Keyboard->keyboard in the driver line) :-( > > any ideas/hints? > I would also appreciate hints about working multihead configurations with > other grafixcards on AMD64 platform, because i really like this hardware, but > I feel very sad about the bad quality of ATI drivers ... or my incapability > to make them work properly. > Thanks! > > -- > --------------------------- > Bitte beachten Sie unsere neuen Adressdaten! Vielen Dank. > --------------------------- > Feilner IT Linux & GIS > Linux Solutions, Training, Seminare und Workshops - auch Inhouse > Beraiterweg 4 93047 Regensburg > fon +49 941 9465243 fax +49 941 9465244 mobil + +49 170 3027092 > mail mfeilner(a)feilner-it.net <http://130.244.199.229/agent/MobNewMsg?to=mfeilner@feilner-it.net> web http://www.feilner-it.net > > -- > Check the List-Unsubscribe header to unsubscribe > For additional commands, email: suse-amd64-help(a)suse.com <http://130.244.199.229/agent/MobNewMsg?to=suse-amd64-help@suse.com> > >

2 1

Fwd: Your email requires verification verify#rOmaGgM9TfU5iXNeITsJtqR4cV653G4v
by Janis Klava 23 Jan '05

23 Jan '05

Is this legitimate ?? Janis ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Your email requires verification verify#rOmaGgM9TfU5iXNeITsJtqR4cV653G4v Date: Sunday 23 January 2005 21:42 From: pde(a)e-lessel.com To: jklava(a)lettux.lv The message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live human being and not a spam source. To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave the subject line intact. The headers of the message sent from your address are show below: >From suse-amd64-return-5141-pde=e-lessel.com(a)suse.com Sun Jan 23 19:42:07 > 2005 Received: from eless by hosting.webhs.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Csncc-0000Nt-Bw for pde(a)e-lessel.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:42:07 +0000 Received: from [195.135.221.131] (helo=lists.suse.com) by hosting.webhs.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Csnca-0000Ni-TZ for pde(a)e-lessel.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:42:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 10399 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2005 19:42:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact suse-amd64-help(a)suse.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:suse-amd64@suse.com> List-Help: <mailto:suse-amd64-help@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:suse-amd64-unsubscribe-pde=e-lessel.com@suse.com> List-Subscribe: <mailto:suse-amd64-subscribe@suse.com> X-Mailinglist: suse-amd64 X-MIME-Notice: attachments may have been removed from this message Delivered-To: mailing list suse-amd64(a)suse.com Received: (qmail 10387 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2005 19:42:18 -0000 From: Janis Klava <jklava(a)lettux.lv> To: suse-amd64(a)suse.com Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:47:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200501232114.42264.jklava(a)lettux.lv> <200501231120.05322.helphand(a)pacbell.net> <200501231132.55137.helphand(a)pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200501231132.55137.helphand(a)pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501232147.57978.jklava(a)lettux.lv> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at scanhost.suse.de Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Acroread 5.010-4.1 Broken X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on hosting.webhs.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 -------------------------------------------------------

2 1

Acroread 5.010-4.1 Broken
by Janis Klava 23 Jan '05

23 Jan '05

After doing a YOU update, tried Acroread but it still does not work. I had this same problem earlier, posting 10 Jan., "Adobe pdf viewer". Opening a pdf file defaults to +260 magnification and about 1/4 of the page is lost on the right hand margin. There is no vertical or horizontal scroll bar. My previous fix for this was to revert to Acroread 5.09-6 which worked fine. I have again installed Acroread 5.09-6 and it works. Janis

3 4

SuSE 9.2: Can't see Plextor 712 SATA DVD
by Andy Stewart 23 Jan '05

23 Jan '05

Hi everybody, With SuSE 9.1 and the SuSE supplied kernel, I was able to use my Plextor 712 SATA DVD burner - no problems. However, that software would frequently lockup on me for no apparent reason. I've upgraded quite recently to SuSE 9.2, kernel version 2.6.8-24.11-smp, and the lockup problem has ceased, however, I can no longer access my DVD burner. When the kernel boots and identifies the devices, the DVD burner is not identified as it was with SuSE 9.1. All other system devices work flawlessly. I am at a loss as to how I should proceed to debug this problem. Any advice would be most appreciated. I'm supplying some information that I think should be useful for debugging this problem. My system components: 2 x AMD Opteron 244 MSI K8T Master2 FAR Motherboard 1 GB memory (Kingston) 1 SATA Disk - Maxtor 6B200S0 (200 GB) 1 SATA DVD Burner - Plextor PX-712SA 1 SCSI tape drive 1 SCSI Hard drive - Maxtor ATLAS10K5_73WLS (73 GB) 1 SCSI DVD Reader - TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-M1401 Onboard sound, network, usb, parallel, serial The output of 'lspci' is shown below. 0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8385 [K8T800 AGP] Host Bridge (rev 01) 0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI bridge [K8T800 South] 0000:00:06.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys NC100 Network Everywhere Fast Ethernet 10/100 (rev 11) 0000:00:07.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7892A U160/m (rev 02) 0000:00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5705 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 03) 0000:00:0f.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VIA VT6420 SATA RAID Controller (rev 80) 0000:00:0f.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) 0000:00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81) 0000:00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81) 0000:00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81) 0000:00:10.4 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 86) 0000:00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [K8T800 South] 0000:00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 60) 0000:00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 0000:00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map 0000:00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller 0000:00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control 0000:00:19.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 0000:00:19.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map 0000:00:19.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller 0000:00:19.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control 0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] Also, here are the salient portions of the 'dmesg' output: libata version 1.02 loaded. sata_via version 0.20 sata_via(0000:00:0f.0): routed to hard irq line 9 ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB800 ctl 0xBC02 bmdma 0xC800 irq 169 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC000 ctl 0xC402 bmdma 0xC808 irq 169 ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:0f00 82:0000 83:0000 84:0000 85:0000 86:0000 87:0000 88:0007 ata1: dev 0 ATAPI, max UDMA/33 ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/33 scsi1 : sata_via ata2: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:7c6b 83:7f09 84:4043 85:7c69 86:3e01 87:4043 88:407f ata2: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 398297088 sectors: lba48 ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/133 scsi2 : sata_via Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6B200S0 Rev: BANC Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdb: 398297088 512-byte hdwr sectors (203928 MB) SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sdb4 Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Thanks in advance for any help/assistance that you may provide. Andy -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group Worcester, MA USA http://www.wlug.org

1 0

AMD 64, X.org and multihead
by Markus Feilner 22 Jan '05

22 Jan '05

Hello List, has anybody managed to get a ATI grafixcard with multihead support working on suse 9.2 (X.org) on AMD 64? I'm close to surrender with my radeon 9000 and newest drivers. My setup includes a DVI TFT display as primary and an analog TFT as secondary. I followed the readme and the howto from ATI, (several times), but when "startx" the primary display (dvi) stops immediately, syaing "entering sleep mode". IU managed to make the secondary display work, but only without dri and glx. (videos are only blue, no 3D support) In my logfile it says something like: XFree86.0.log:(EE) Failed to initialize GLX extension (NVIDIA X driver not found) which is funny, because it's a radeon - or is this a misunderstanding ? but X stops wiith various configurations because of missing screens or displays - in fact I never managed to get a working config with the fglrxconfig tool, I always had to fix XF86Config by hand. (apart from the typo bug Keyboard->keyboard in the driver line) :-( any ideas/hints? I would also appreciate hints about working multihead configurations with other grafixcards on AMD64 platform, because i really like this hardware, but I feel very sad about the bad quality of ATI drivers ... or my incapability to make them work properly. Thanks! -- --------------------------- Bitte beachten Sie unsere neuen Adressdaten! Vielen Dank. --------------------------- Feilner IT Linux & GIS Linux Solutions, Training, Seminare und Workshops - auch Inhouse Beraiterweg 4 93047 Regensburg fon +49 941 9465243 fax +49 941 9465244 mobil + +49 170 3027092 mail mfeilner(a)feilner-it.net web http://www.feilner-it.net

1 0

9.2 - > Nvidia Graphics issues.
by Joel Wiramu Pauling 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

Hi there, I have a strange problem with 9.2 (latest kernel) and the Nvidia proprietry drivers. My card is a MSI 256VTDR GForceFX5600. Everytime I switch to a fullscreen app that uses 1024x768 by default (i.e supertux/many sdl apps/ut2004) I get horrible screen corruptions, the games still plays but the screen is wavy and distorted and the app is unusable. This only occurs at 1024x768 in full screen apps. Does someone have experience with the same problem. I did not have this issue when using a stock kernel from kernel.org and I'm guessing it's somthing to do with the agpgart/agp-amd64 modules that are compiled into the suse kernels by default. (BTW I have tried default -smp and bigsmp(which does not have the agp modules in it) and bigsmp refuses to boot this machine as I don't think it's initrd has raid0/1 (md) included.... this should probably be fixed. Kind regards Joel W (System is opteron 248 /msi master2-far/2gb)

2 1

High performance system
by Pierre Patino 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

Hello We've been given the green light to explore a replacement to our current architecture. One of the ideas kicked around was a quad or dual processor Linux system. I know nothing about Linux systems with more than one processor. Anybody on this list with a happy story? A happy motherboard/CPU? I can't reveal too much other than to say that one of the user processes can currently switch to near realtime priority and there's about 20 other processes running with varying degrees of load. Dual independent X-servers would be great each with its own VGA but that's another hurdle. I guess the main question is: who's running the most simultaneous CPUs out there with stock kernels and stock motherboards? TIA & Cheers

6 5

SSL, Apache2 and Suse 9.2
by James D. Parra 21 Jan '05

21 Jan '05

Hello, I know this isn't an amd64 question, but I was hoping that someone here could point me in the right direction. I am getting an error "You configured HTTP(80) on the standard HTTPS(443) port!", when I have a virtual host on port 443. This is appears to be a common problem when setting up Apache2 on SuSE and, yet, I haven't found an answer after googling. I have openssl installed, Apache 2, and PHP4. Any ideas on how to resolve this, or, can someone point me to a help document specific to SuSE and Apache2 and mod_ssl? Many thanks in advance. James

1 0