> I'm using a MSI K8D Master board with two Opteron 240 Processors, 6 GB
What BIOS revision and motherboard revision do you have? I am unable to install SLES-8 on a system based on this motherboard.
-- David
The installer belew up -- ending with a machine reset. I was able to do a "safe" install, but the installed system would not boot. That is why I personally sent you one of my MSI-9131 motherboards. Have you gotten it yet?
-- David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:09 PM
> To: OBrien, David
> Cc: stoesser(a)chemie.uka.de; suse-amd64(a)suse.com
> Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] kernel trouble
>
>
> david.obrien(a)amd.com writes:
>
> >> I'm using a MSI K8D Master board with two Opteron 240
> Processors, 6 GB
> >
> > What BIOS revision and motherboard revision do you have? I
> am unable to install SLES-8 on a system based on this motherboard.
>
> What problems do you hit? I'm not aware of any...
>
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas Jaeger, aj(a)suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
> SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C
> C272 A126
>
Hi List,
I'm having some trouble with my Opteron Box, I runs fine for some days
and then dies :-(
I get the following message:
aoc2pc75 kernel: Northbridge Machine Check Exception f61b200100000813 0
Kernel is 2.4.19 as shipped with SuSE 8.2 x86_64.
I'm using a MSI K8D Master board with two Opteron 240 Processors, 6 GB
RAM, 1 IDE and 3 SCSI Disks, SCSI controller is a Symbios Logic 53c895.
Any hints?
Gregor
--
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
Gregor Stößer email: gregor.stoesser(a)chemie.uni-karlsruhe.de
Institut für Anorganische Chemie
Universität Karlsruhe Tel: 0721/608 2988
Fax: 0721/608 4854
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
The UnitedLinux SP2 patch set includes the kernel k_smp-2.4.19-249,
which doesn't boot on my system. At least, it didn't boot after
following the normaly YaST2 based install. I haven't tried to
debug it thoroughly (I spent the last few hours figuring out how
to revert the kernel.) so I'm not sure if the kernel is broken, or
the kernel *install* is broken.
BTW, the "boot installed system" option on the install disk is
a nice touch. I found it by accident, it is really worthy of a
place in the printed documentation.
--
Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep."
The i86_64.rpm packages of gimp in the 8.2-beta9 need a version
of glibc that is not installed on my system yet. I'm for keeping
the install relatively canonical, so messing with glibc will
wait.
So I think my answer is to build the gimp nosrc.rpm package
on my SLES8 system. But there seem to be prerequisite src.rpms.
For example where is the gimp-print-4.2.5.tar.bz2 located?
I presume there is a src.rpm that contains it somewhere?
P.S. If anybody cares, I'll gladly make the compiled rpms available.
P.P.S. I'm making the switch to SuSe/AMD64 from RedHat/alpha,
so bear with my stumbling over conventions in this world.
--
Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep."
Dear listers,
I am running RIoworks' HDAMA with two Broadcom gigabit interfaces.
When I tried to configure them, I had a funny experience.
First I set up eth0, and then went on to eth1. eth0 is connected
to the internet backbone, while eth1 is a port for local lab
network, for ipforwarding. Funny thing was that the default
gateway, thedomainname of eth1 were just copies of eth0!!!
# The network address itself was correct.
If I set up in the opposite order, the same mystery occured;
eth0 copied some data from eth1.
I do not know ehy this happened, but any way I did everything manually,
and created a script to run iptables at the bootup time.
# As I wrote in the above, eth0 and eth1 are same chips.
Has anyone got a similar experience?
Thank you for your attention.
yoriaki fujimori
Check the downloadable SuSE Linux 8.2 beta 9 for AMD64. There's an RPM in there.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Williams [mailto:1mc9i5i02@sneakemail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 11:11 AM
To: suse-amd64(a)suse.com
Subject: [suse-amd64] GIMP RPM Packages for AMD64
Are there any RPM packages of gimp (including gimp-devel) for
Suse/AMD64? The gimp.spec file included with the GIMP source
seems to be specific to RedHat (i.e. gtk+ vs gtk) and rpm 4
vs the rpm 3 that seems to be included.
GIMP seems to compile just fine, but ti sure would be nice
to have proper packages.
--
Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep."
--
Check the List-Unsubscribe header to unsubscribe
For additional commands, email: suse-amd64-help(a)suse.com
--
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
Gregor Stößer email: gregor.stoesser(a)chemie.uni-karlsruhe.de
Institut für Anorganische Chemie
Universität Karlsruhe Tel: 0721/608 2988
Fax: 0721/608 4854
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
Hi,
has anyone experiences with Portland Compiler (Fortran) on AMD64? I'm
interested in comparing the perormance of PGF77 (64bit) with Intel
Compiler (ifc 32bit). Has anybody on the list the list experiences with
this. I've seen that all the data in the spec website are compiled with
ifc, but I'm interested in comparing it whit with PGF77 because we're
running a lot of programms written in fortran on our linux cluster. And
all of these programms were compiles with 32bit Intel-Compiler. Whatv
about the performance of the Portland compiler?
Gretings
Gregor
******************************************************************
Thank you for NOT using Microsoft Products !
******************************************************************
, ,
/( )`
\ \___ / |
/- _ `-/ '
(/\/ \ \ /\
/ / | ` \
\ O O ) / |
\ `-^--'`< '
\ (_.) _ ) /
`.___/` /
`-----' /
<----. __ / __ \
<----|====O)))==) \) /====
<----' `--' `.__,' \
| |
\ /
______( (_ / \_____
,' ,-----' | \
`--{__________) \/
Are there any RPM packages of gimp (including gimp-devel) for
Suse/AMD64? The gimp.spec file included with the GIMP source
seems to be specific to RedHat (i.e. gtk+ vs gtk) and rpm 4
vs the rpm 3 that seems to be included.
GIMP seems to compile just fine, but ti sure would be nice
to have proper packages.
--
Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep."
