May 2015 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] release-notes-openSUSE requires google-opensans-fonts
by Felix Miata 23 Apr '17

23 Apr '17

TW $SUBJECT can't be right, but trying to zypper rm opensans wants to remove releasenotes. :-( -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 8

[opensuse-packaging] Python 2 and 3 in single specfile
by Jan Matějek 22 Jul '15

22 Jul '15

Fellow packagers, after some discussions in our team, we figured that it would be neat if we could build python modules for Python 2 and 3 from a single spec file. Now that a great deal of python modules work with both pythons, this makes a lot of sense. A good deal of work can be done by RPM macros. Then we could even seamlessly start building modules for PyPy, Jython and other pythons. A sample specfile, and the corresponding set of RPM macros, is attached. As you can see, the appropriate subpackage is generated automatically by %python_subpackages, build and install steps are handled through %python_build and %python_install respectively. There is some more magic involved, as well as possibilities for customization. There is a minor problem with BuildRequires. As long as you only need python-devel, it's not too bad to just list $flavor-devel requirements by hand. It's worse when you require more subpackages, because then you need all of them in both python2 and python3 versions. It would be nice to be able to specify %{python_require Mako} and expand that to all the necessary BuildRequires, but OBS blocks us here, because the limited environment will not expand such macros. mls, ro, or anyone from the OBS team, would it be possible to solve this? Still, it basically doesn't matter if you list all the BuildRequires twice in one spec or in two specs, so there. Another thing I'm still unclear on are the filelists. It's certainly possible to make a generic filelist, something along the lines of: %package -n %flavor-%modname # python3-Mako %defattr(-, root, root) %{%flavor_sitelib}/* %{%flavor_sitearch}/* but this doesn't solve docs and possible other files. Again, obviously, we can write the filelists by hand. But if you have good suggestions for some smart macros here, I'd love to see them. What do you folks think? Comments, questions? m.

3 5

[opensuse-packaging] a common project for packages built for SLE12
by Ludwig Nussel 08 Jun '15

08 Jun '15

Hi, Those of you running SUSE Linux Enterprise somewhere may know the problem. openSUSE contains some package that you want on SLE but since there is no SUSE support for that particular package you won't find it in any of the official repos either. openSUSE on the other hand contains that package and maybe the package maintainer(you!?) even builds it in the Factory devel project for SLE. Devel projects however may contain lots of other experimental stuff that you may not want on your SLE installation. So it would be really nice to have a central project to collect known good community packages built for SUSE Linux Enterprise server. That project is here now: openSUSE:Backports:SLE-12! Getting a package in there is quite easy. Just file a submit request to openSUSE:Backports:SLE-12. There are basically two rules for packages in that project: - packages must not conflict with packages already contained in SLE - package sources must be accepted also in Factory More details are explained in the wiki: https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Backports The whole thing is still a bit experimental to find out what works and what not. Nevertheless testers, contributors and feedback in general welcome! cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.de/ SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] Editing rpm changelogs
by Stanislav Baiduzhyi 01 Jun '15

01 Jun '15

I see that lots of packages include changelog entries up to seconds. I wounder, are people writing time with seconds (while rpm allows it to be date only) or is there some special tool to do that properly that I'm not aware of? -- Regards, Stas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] Any WindowMaker user out there willing to help building WM cross-distro on OBS?
by Howard Guo 28 May '15

28 May '15

Hey fellow WindowMaker users. The current maintainer of WindowMaker, Carlos Mafra, has expressed an interest in building and distributing WM across multiple distributions, using build.opensuse.org. This is his message: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.devel/9221 " It would be awesome if someone who understands about packaging could set up the wmaker package to be built on https://build.opensuse.org/" Let us help him out for the awesome window manager :) Kind regards, Howard -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] /usr/bin/chkstat modified files that are not properly handled!
by Axel Braun 27 May '15

27 May '15

Morning all, during rebuild of a package I suddenly get a new error messages, resulting in a failed build: [ 42s] package: trytond [ 42s] /usr/bin/chkstat modified files that are not properly handled! [ 42s] this will break rpm -V, ask ro for details. [ 42s] diff for both runs of rpm -V: [ 42s] +.M...UG.. /var/log The only point I address /var/log in the spec file is .... mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_localstatedir}/{lib,log}/%{basename} [...] %files #%files -f filelist %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README tryton-server.README.SUSE trytond.conf.example doc/* %{python_sitelib}/* %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{basename} %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_unitdir}/%{name}.service %attr(640,root,tryton) %config(noreplace)%{_sysconfdir}/%{basename}/%{name}.conf %attr(640,root,tryton) %config(noreplace)%{_sysconfdir}/%{basename}/%{name}_log.conf %attr(744,tryton,tryton) %dir %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{basename} %attr(744,tryton,tryton) %dir %{_localstatedir}/log/%{basename} and that was not changed compared to before. Any idea how I can get rid of the message, or what the reason suddenly is? Thanks Axel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] Packaging scheme major change — how to?
by Dmitriy Perlow 27 May '15

27 May '15

Hi to all. I maintain monster-rpg-2 package at games repo. The game provided some files at /usr/share/%name but now it should provide the single zip file there. So I just updated the spec, rebuild packages and installed them. For some reason /usr/share/%name' files weren't purged! So game tries to load both files and zip file and fails. Any tips please? -- Best regards, Dmitriy DA(P).DarkneSS Perlow @ Linux x64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 12

[opensuse-packaging] 'timezone-2015d' update
by Waleed Lutfi 22 May '15

22 May '15

Hi, I was wondering when the timezone will be updated to the 4th release of 2015? http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2015-April/000031.html In Egypt, we won't be observing DST this year, however 'timezone-java-2015c-1.1.noarch', the current version in Tumbleweed, applied it since 30th of April. Regards, Waleed Lutfi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] git package and ca-certificates-mozilla dependency
by Stefan Schweter 22 May '15

22 May '15

Dear packaging maintainers and users, when playing around the openSUSE docker image and installing git I figured out some "missing" dependency: ca-certificates-mozilla. There's no direct or indirect depedency for installing ca-certificates-mozilla. That results to these kind of error messages: git clone https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlab-ci-runner.git fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlab-ci-runner.git/': SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate What do the packagers think about adding a ca-certificates-mozilla package dependency? For example on Arch Linux, git has a curl dependency. And curl has a "ca-certificates" dependency (this is not equivalent to the openSUSE ca-certificates package, as it includs all Common CA certificates). So it can be called an indirect dependency. Thanks in advance for your feedback! Regards, Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] rpmlint and vendor (under /opt)
by Stanislav Baiduzhyi 20 May '15

20 May '15

Hi All, Quick question, I am getting the rpmlint warning "/opt may not be used by a SUSE. It is reserved for 3rd party packagers". I am obviously not SUSE, but how can I specify the vendor? I've tried "Vendor:" tag in spec file, it did not helped. And disable of rpmlink check seems like a cheating, I'm sure there should be proper solution which I'm not aware of. -- Regards, Stas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 11

[opensuse-packaging] Need help to understand why %cmake macro is failing
by Bruno Friedmann 18 May '15

18 May '15

With this package https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:bruno_friedmann:branches:Appli… I've a kind of interesting case where only one target is failing osc remotebuildlog home:bruno_friedmann:branches:Application:Geo libght openSUSE_13.2 x86_64 [ 92s] + cd libght-0.1.0 [ 92s] + find . -name CMakeLists.txt -exec sed -i -re '/^[[:blank:]]*[sS][eE][tT][[:blank:]]*$[[:blank:]]*(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE|CMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE|CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX|CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE).*$/{s/^/#IGNORE /}' '{}' + [ 92s] + mkdir -p build [ 92s] + cd build [ 92s] + /usr/bin/cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=/usr/lib64 -DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/include -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/lib64 -DSYSCONF_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/etc -DSHARE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr/share -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None '-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,-z,now' '-DCMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,-z,now' '-DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,-z,now' -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE:BOOL=ON -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON -DBUILD_STATIC_LIBS:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_INSTALL_DO_STRIP:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_MODULES_INSTALL_DIR=/usr/share/cmake/Modules -DCMAKE_USER_MAKE_RULES_OVERRIDE=/usr/share/cmake/Modules/opensuse_rules.cmake '-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -fno-strict-aliasing -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -fno-strict-aliasing -g -DNDEBUG' -DCMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_RPATH=ON -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPAH=ON -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/bin/c++ .. [ 95s] -- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.8.3 [ 95s] -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.8.3 [ 95s] -- Check for working C compiler: cc [ 95s] -- Check for working C compiler: cc -- works [ 95s] -- Detecting C compiler ABI info [ 95s] -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done [ 95s] -- Detecting C compile features [ 96s] -- Detecting C compile features - done [ 96s] CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:7 (project): [ 96s] The CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER: [ 96s] [ 96s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/libght-0.1.0/build/c++ When under openSUSE_Factory it works perfect [ 69s] + cd libght-0.1.0 [ 69s] + find . -name CMakeLists.txt -exec sed -i -re '/^[[:blank:]]*[sS][eE][tT][[:blank:]]*$[[:blank:]]*(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE|CMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE|CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX|CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE).*$/{s/^/#IGNORE /}' '{}' + [ 69s] + mkdir -p build [ 69s] + cd build [ 69s] + /usr/bin/cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=/usr/lib64 -DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/include -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/lib64 -DSYSCONF_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/etc -DSHARE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr/share -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None '-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,-z,now' '-DCMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,-z,now' '-DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,-z,now' -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE:BOOL=ON -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON -DBUILD_STATIC_LIBS:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_INSTALL_DO_STRIP:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_MODULES_INSTALL_DIR=/usr/share/cmake/Modules -DCMAKE_USER_MAKE_RULES_OVERRIDE=/usr/share/cmake/Modules/opensuse_rules.cmake '-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -fno-strict-aliasing -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE=-fmessage-length=0 -grecord-gcc-switches -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -fno-strict-aliasing -g -DNDEBUG' -DCMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_RPATH=ON -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPAH=ON -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/bin/c++ .. [ 69s] -- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.8.3 [ 69s] -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.8.3 [ 69s] -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc [ 69s] -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc -- works [ 69s] -- Detecting C compiler ABI info [ 69s] -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done [ 69s] -- Detecting C compile features [ 69s] -- Detecting C compile features - done [ 69s] -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ [ 69s] -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- works [ 69s] -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info [ 70s] -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done [ 70s] -- Detecting CXX compile features [ 70s] -- Detecting CXX compile features - done [ 70s] -- Looking for include file stdint.h [ 70s] -- Looking for include file stdint.h - found [ 70s] -- Looking for include file getopt.h [ 70s] -- Looking for include file getopt.h - found [ 70s] -- Found LibXml2: /usr/lib64/libxml2.so (found version "2.9.2") [ 70s] -- Searching for LibLAS + library [ 70s] -- Found libLAS version: 1.06.000 [ 70s] -- Found libLAS: /usr/lib64/liblas.so [ 70s] -- Found PROJ4: /usr/lib64/libproj.so [ 70s] -- Found CUnit: /usr/lib64/libcunit.so [ 70s] -- las2ght build enabled [ 70s] -- Configuring done [ 70s] -- Generating done [ 70s] CMake Warning: [ 70s] Manually-specified variables were not used by the project: [ 70s] [ 70s] BUILD_STATIC_LIBS [ 70s] CMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS [ 70s] CMAKE_INSTALL_DO_STRIP [ 70s] CMAKE_MODULES_INSTALL_DIR [ 70s] CMAKE_SKIP_RPAH [ 70s] INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR [ 70s] LIB_SUFFIX [ 70s] SHARE_INSTALL_PREFIX [ 70s] SYSCONF_INSTALL_DIR [ 70s] [ 70s] [ 70s] -- Build files have been written to: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/libght-0.1.0/build Same for 13.1 and the most funny 13.2 i586 If some spyhawk eyes could have a look and tell me what's going wrong ? -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch openSUSE Member & Board, fsfe fellowship GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot

3 3

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Re: suse_macros bug on SLE_11?
by Kyrill Detinov 16 May '15

16 May '15

On Sat, 16 May 2015 17:03:50 +0100 Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > The problem is that during postun, the .info.gz file has already been > removed and can't be unregistered anymore... Move that call to %preun > and be done with it. Thanks! This helps. BTW, I've found the same issue in the Base:System/gpg2 package. -- WBR Kyrill

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] suse_macros bug on SLE_11?
by Darin Perusich 16 May '15

16 May '15

Hello, The %install_info on SLE_11_SP3 is calling sbin/install-info which is not fully qualified, is this on purpose or is it a bug? I''ve linkpac'd Publishing/texinfo -> devel:languages:R:released and the %post is failing which calls %install_info yet install-info is available in the build-root. [ 116s] Preparing packages for installation... [ 116s] info-5.2-89.1 [ 117s] install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/info-stnd.info.gz [ 117s] error: %post(info-5.2-89.1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 [ 117s] makeinfo-5.2-89.1 [ 117s] texinfo-5.2-89.1 [ 117s] install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/texinfo.info.gz [ 117s] install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/texinfo.info-1.gz [ 117s] install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/texinfo.info-2.gz [ 117s] install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/texinfo.info-3.gz [ 117s] error: %post(texinfo-5.2-89.1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 [ 117s] failed to install rpms, aborting build Thanks! -- Later, Darin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

Re: [opensuse-packaging] python setup.py tweak needed - does openSUSE support $LastChangedRevision$
by greg.freemyer＠gmail.com 15 May '15

15 May '15

On May 15, 2015 2:13:00 AM EDT, Robert Munteanu <robert.munteanu(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On May 15, 2015 12:17 AM, "Greg Freemyer" <greg.freemyer(a)gmail.com> >wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I think I'm getting an error with setup.py because >> $LastChangeRevision$ isn't defined? >> >> == details == >> I'm trying to update python-pefile. >> >> With the lastest released tarball it fails when I run "python >setup.py >build". >> >> I assume it is a local openSUSE error? >> >> The setup.py file has: >> download_url = 'http://pefile.googlecode.com/files/pefile-%s.tar.gz' >% >> pefile.__version__, >> >> in pefile.py: >> __revision__ = "$LastChangedRevision$" >> __version__ = '1.2.10-%d' % int( __revision__[21:-2] ) >> >> >> But I have no idea what $LastChangeRevision$ is or where it is >defined. > >This value is automatically expanded on checkout by CVS (and I think >SVN >can be configured to do so as well) to the revision this file was last >changed in. > >For SVN this will generate a revision number like 1234. For CVS I am >not >sure, have not used it in ages. > >Robert Thanks, I'll have to do a patch to hard code it. At least I know what value it should be. I wish Google upstream projects were better behaved. In my experience they pay no attention to issues they cause packagers. Greg -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] python setup.py tweak needed - does openSUSE support $LastChangedRevision$
by Greg Freemyer 14 May '15

14 May '15

All, I think I'm getting an error with setup.py because $LastChangeRevision$ isn't defined? == details == I'm trying to update python-pefile. With the lastest released tarball it fails when I run "python setup.py build". I assume it is a local openSUSE error? The setup.py file has: download_url = 'http://pefile.googlecode.com/files/pefile-%s.tar.gz' % pefile.__version__, in pefile.py: __revision__ = "$LastChangedRevision$" __version__ = '1.2.10-%d' % int( __revision__[21:-2] ) But I have no idea what $LastChangeRevision$ is or where it is defined. Here's the error (which I get both as a manual build and via "osc build"): === python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 8, in <module> import pefile File "/home/gaf/obs/home:gregfreemyer:Tools-for-forensic-boot-cd/python-pefile/pefile-pefile-1.2.10-139/pefile.py", line 25, in <module> __version__ = '1.2.10-%d' % int( __revision__[21:-2] ) ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '' === Thanks Greg #!/usr/bin/env python try: from setuptools import setup except ImportError, excp: from distutils.core import setup import pefile import os os.environ['COPY_EXTENDED_ATTRIBUTES_DISABLE'] = 'true' os.environ['COPYFILE_DISABLE'] = 'true' setup(name = 'pefile', version = pefile.__version__, description = 'Python PE parsing module', author = pefile.__author__, author_email = pefile.__contact__, url = 'http://code.google.com/p/pefile/', download_url = 'http://pefile.googlecode.com/files/pefile-%s.tar.gz' % pefile.__version__, platforms = ['any'], classifiers = ['Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable', 'Intended Audience :: Developers', 'Intended Audience :: Science/Research', 'Natural Language :: English', 'Operating System :: OS Independent', 'Programming Language :: Python', 'Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules'], long_description = "\n".join(pefile.__doc__.split('\n')), py_modules = ['pefile', 'peutils'], packages = ['ordlookup'] ) -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] New Rpm-ecosystem Mailing List
by Florian Festi 11 May '15

11 May '15

Hi! tl;td: Join at http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem if your interested in any part of the rpm ecosystem. While there are quite some mailing lists already that deal with the different tools around and including rpm we realized that there is no good place to discuss issues that involve multiple parts of (our own) package handling stack even less so to stay in contact with other rpm based solutions. To solve this we create a new mailing list: rpm-ecosystem(a)lists.rpm.org Normal user questions and development talk is supposed to stay on the per project mailing lists. The new list is for questions like: * How do other implementations handle specific problems? * Is this new feature interesting for downstream distributions? * How do the different packaging guidelines treat a special topic? * Anyone there to support our demand for this new rpm feature? And it is for topics like: * Packaging guide lines * RPM features * Build systems and compose tools * Dependency solvers, installers and updaters * RPM based image creation / non rpm based updates for rpm based distributions In short: It is meant to bind the rpm universe together. Join at http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem Please forward this mail to anyone that might be interested - especially to rpm related sub projects and groups. Thanks! Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/ Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Charles Peters -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Packaging python noarch project with SLES_11
by Johannes Weberhofer 08 May '15

08 May '15

I have a problem packaging the new fail2ban version vor SLES 11: All python modules are installed to /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages instead of /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages. How can I force python to install to the correct location? You can check the build at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:weberho:branches:security/fail… Best regards, Johannes -- Johannes Weberhofer Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Ruby changes/problems?
by Christian Boltz 07 May '15

07 May '15

Hello, I received a notice that the AppArmor packages don't build anymore in Factory because ruby can't be found. The failure is caused by configure no longer finding ruby, however there is an IMHO more interesting error at the start of the build: [ 297s] ----- building apparmor.spec (user abuild) [ 297s] ----------------------------------------------------------------- [ 297s] ----------------------------------------------------------------- [ 297s] + exec rpmbuild -ba --define '_srcdefattr (-,root,root)' --nosignature --define '_build_create_debug 1' --define 'disturl obs://build.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Factory/standard/fa789611d9fa83a15aa4ca7f…' /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/apparmor.spec [ 298s] sh: /usr/bin/ruby: No such file or directory [ 298s] sh: /usr/bin/ruby: No such file or directory [ 298s] sh: /usr/bin/ruby: No such file or directory [ 298s] Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lmuznN Note that the build ignores those error messages (not sure if they are harmless or critical) and continues. Full build log: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory/apparmor… Is this something I need to fix in the AppArmor package, or will it fix itsself? Regards, Christian Boltz -- [diverse Fähigkeiten von Google] Beagle2 wird google allerdings wohl auch nicht finden... [Achim Hillenbrand in suse-linux] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] Use of generics in "requires" statements?
by Greg Freemyer 06 May '15

06 May '15

All, My SR to add a couple of generic "Requires:" to the wordpress spec file has been rejected because they are generic: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/304469 My re-opened SR was also rejected. Can someone explain to my why the use of Requires: httpd Requires: mod_php_any is wrong. I know the below will also work, but I don't see why we should be restrictive Requires: apache2 Requires: apache2-mod_php5 That is unless wordpress is strictly a apache2 based tool, but I can't imagine that is true. fyi: In the SR Eric did say: "httpd only for other than opensuse." I don't understand that since apache2, lighttpd and nginx all provide httpd in their opebnsuse packages. He also said "zypper se php_mod_any" show "package not found" That is true, but "zypper se" doesn't search for generic provides so that logic would invalidate all use of generic requires. Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

6 11

[opensuse-packaging] systemd service file question
by Greg Freemyer 05 May '15

05 May '15

I'm testing (using) autossh. It has a service file that is designed to be installed immediately via zypper and then manually edited. That works until you re-install the package, at which point it replaces my edits with the virgin service file. What's the right way to fix this. FYI, this is the current service file in the RPM ===========[Unit] Description=AutoSSH service for port 2222 After=network.target [Service] Environment="AUTOSSH_GATETIME=0" ExecStart=/usr/bin/autossh -M 0 -NL 2222:localhost:2222 -o TCPKeepAlive=yes foo(a)bar.com [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target =========== As you can see there are several things on the ExecStart line that need to be edited for this to work. fyi2: In the sysvinit days there was a separate config file, but whoever converted it to a systemd service file dropped that functionality. Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 8