openSUSE Packaging March 2013

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

34 participants
25 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] If I as maintainer see a bug ...

by Greg Freemyer

All, I maintain ewftools and I just found a significant bug that impacts 12.2 and 12.3. Do I have to file a bugzilla, or can I just branch, fix, submit. Thanks Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] webcam modules kmp

by Matwey V. Kornilov

Hi, Which project is responsible for kmp for webcam and v4l kernel stuff? I would like to submit home:matwey v4l2loopback to the right place. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] package update

by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au

Hello, Can the smart package manager[1] be updated to a later version. I have compiled a later version see [2] I was unable to raise a service request for a version update,because I see no link for a package update. Some other package details at [3]. I cc'd SPeilicke(a)suse.com [Sascha Peilicke] who processed previous request 86999 Thanks Glenn [1] [version 1.3.1] openSUSE Build Service > Projects > system:packagemanager > smart https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=smart&project=system%3Apack… [2] [version 1.4.1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=smart&project=home%3Adoiggl [3] update details: distro.py 430 Bytes smart-245344-takes_long_computing_upgrades.patch 4.15 KB smart-gtk-progress-nothread.diff 798 Bytes smart-gtk.desktop 277 Bytes smart-ksmarttray.desktop 314 Bytes smart-ksmarttray.patch 599 Bytes smart-newer.py 4.85 KB smart-no-strict-aliasing.patch 1.17 KB smart-qt.desktop 276 Bytes smart-rpm-check-signatures.patch 6.24 KB smart-rpmlintrc 171 Bytes smart-show-changelog.patch 5.5 KB smart.changes 26.8 KB smart.spec 8.06 KB channels.tar.bz2 684 Bytes smart-1.4.1.tar.bz2 803 KB rpms produced with newer version: Architecture: i586 rpmlint.log smart-1.4.1-19.1.i586.rpm smart-1.4.1-19.1.src.rpm smart-debuginfo-1.4.1-19.1.i586.rpm smart-debugsource-1.4.1-19.1.i586.rpm smart-gui-gtk-1.4.1-19.1.i586.rpm smart-gui-gtk-appdata.xml smart-gui-qt3-1.4.1-19.1.i586.rpm smart-gui-qt3-appdata.xml smart-ksmarttray-1.4.1-19.1.i586.rpm smart-ksmarttray-appdata.xml smart-ksmarttray-debuginfo-1.4.1-19.1.i586.rpm Architecture: x86_64 rpmlint.log smart-1.4.1-19.1.src.rpm smart-1.4.1-19.1.x86_64.rpm smart-debuginfo-1.4.1-19.1.x86_64.rpm smart-debugsource-1.4.1-19.1.x86_64.rpm smart-gui-gtk-1.4.1-19.1.x86_64.rpm smart-gui-gtk-appdata.xml smart-gui-qt3-1.4.1-19.1.x86_64.rpm smart-gui-qt3-appdata.xml smart-ksmarttray-1.4.1-19.1.x86_64.rpm smart-ksmarttray-appdata.xml smart-ksmarttray-debuginfo-1.4.1-19.1.x86_64.rpm -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] Proper use of obsolietes?

by Greg Freemyer

I just want to make sure this is right before I send it to factory: --- # fiwalk has been incorporated into sleuthkit. Last standalone version was 0.6.16 Obsoletes: fiwalk < 0.7 Provides: fiwalk --- As found in my specfile at: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=sleuthkit&project=home%3Agr… Thanks Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] guidelines for moving programs between packages

by Bernhard Voelker

Hi, are there any guidelines on how to move programs from one package to another - while guaranteeing that the program is installed any time (either by the old or by the new package)? The case: su and kill are moved from coreutils to util-linux upstreams. It'd be "quite not so optimal" if an installation would be left behind without them ... Therefore we're trying to add a hack in coreutils.rpm to install the su binary as su-core, and to create a symlink "su" pointing to it in the %post script when "su" does not already exist (i.e. is not yet installed by a newer util-linux.rpm): %post test -e %{_bindir}/su || ln -sv su.core %{_bindir}/su The problem is the order in RPM i.e. when %post is run: According to my tests, it is obviously run _before_ the old version of the coreutils package is uninstalled. Thus, su of the old version is still there, and the symlink is not created. ;-( D: %post(coreutils-8.21-0.x86_64): scriptlet start [...] D: %post(coreutils-8.21-0.x86_64): waitpid(4078) rc 4078 status 0 D: ========== +++ coreutils-8.17-6.2.1 x86_64-linux 0x0 D: erase: coreutils-8.17-6.2.1 has 287 files Cleaning up / removing... [...] D: fini 124755 1 ( 0, 0) 44288 /usr/bin/su The strangest thing is that RPM seems to behave different during `osc build` ... Any ideas? Thank you & have a nice day, Berny -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 years, 10 months

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging March 2013