January 2012 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] Is there a quick way to test all Requires are in factory?
by Greg Freemyer 10 Jan '12

10 Jan '12

All, More than once I have submitted something to factory that didn't have all the requires and buildrequires pieces already there. Is there a simple test I can run on the package to verify that before I submit a new package? In this specific case, I want to submit security -- log2timeline. I've been slowly submitting all the pre-reqs and I think I finally have everything in factory. Thanks Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

12 21

[opensuse-packaging] generic provides for MPI environments
by todd rme 07 Jan '12

07 Jan '12

There are currently at least 3 MPI (message passing interface) environments provided by openSUSE: lam, mpich, and openmpi. Packages related to MPI, like mpi-selector, and python-pypar, require an MPI environment be installed, but do not care which it is as long as it is compliant with the MPI standard. There is no easy way to specify this in the requires, however. What does everyone think about having a generic provides for MPI environments, such as pkconfig(MPI), that each of these can provide and that other packages could require in order to be MPI environment-agnostic? If so, what would be the best name for it? -Todd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] libexiv2.so.9 needed by rawstudio-2.0-1.2.i586
by Mariusz Fik 06 Jan '12

06 Jan '12

Hi, I just added graphics repository on openSUSE 12.1 and I tried to install rawstudio but got following error: |Problem: nothing provides libexiv2.so.9 needed by rawstudio-2.0-1.2.i586 | Solution 1: do not install rawstudio-2.0-1.2.i586 | Solution 2: break rawstudio by ignoring some of its dependencies -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Mariusz Fik openSUSE Community Member GPG: 5FCE 7241 B3B9 32FD 455B C30E 42D6 6C88 9E83 7C3D

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Submitting multiple changes against phpunit packages
by Robert Munteanu 05 Jan '12

05 Jan '12

Hi, I've branched server:php:applications to https://build.opensuse.org/project/packages?project=home%3Arobert_munteanu%… and updated a couple of packages, fixing https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734936 . These packages are in a dependency tree, and I'm not sure how to submit requests for them. Should I start with the leaves and once they are accepted submit the parents, or should I submit them all at once and mention that they should be reviewed/merged together? Thanks, Robert -- Sent from my (old) computer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] enable some build repos for clisp
by Ruediger Meier 04 Jan '12

04 Jan '12

Hi, Could anybody with power please enable building clisp in devel:languages:misc for SLE* and Tumbleweed repos? cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] GCC 4.7 transition
by Richard Guenther 03 Jan '12

03 Jan '12

FYI, Jakub Jelinek from RedHat has done some preliminary testing of GCC 4.7 on the Fedora code-base which shows the following common issues when porting packages to build with GCC 4.7. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-December/160723.html I will create and populate a devel:gcc:gcc47 project you can build against (similar to devel:gcc:gcc46). Richard. -- Richard Guenther <rguenther(a)suse.de> SUSE / SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer

2 2

Re: [opensuse-packaging] %if 0%{?suse_version} >= 1210 not working?
by Lutz Thuns 02 Jan '12

02 Jan '12

Am 07.12.2011 05:50, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez: > Use > 1140 instead ;-) Guess what? ;) Doesn't work either. I've changed to the following: %if 0%{?suse_version} <= 1140 %patch0 -p1 %endif %patch1 -p1 %patch2 -p1 %patch4 -p1 %patch5 -p1 %if 0%{?suse_version} > 1140 %patch6 -p1 %endif So patch0 should affect all releases from including 11.4 and downwards. patch6 should affect all releases above 11.4. Again, patch6 is only applied in Factory, not 12.1. Maybe the build target has a wrong suse_version? https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=lxdm&project=home%3AlOtz100… --- Lutz Thuns openSUSE member (lOtz1009) LXDE team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 5