openSUSE Packaging September 2011

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

57 participants
44 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] Lilypond won't work with guile 2.0, What can I do to prevent it being dropped? Do we really want guile 2.0 yet?

by Dave Plater

OpenSUSE has jumped way ahead of all the other major distributions by pushing guile-2.0 to factory, this may cause problems for packages such as gnucash if it uses guile to the extent that lilypond does. Lilypond uses guile extensively and are working on porting lily to guile 2.0 but this is their timeline quoted from one of my emails from Graham Percival to the devel list please note that lilypond 2.16.0 may not be released before openSUSE 12.1 and I'm working on 2.14.2 atm the current release : There is absolutely zero chance of lilypond 2.16 using guile 2.0. There is maybe a 10% chance that any version of lilypond will support guile 2.0 in 2011. Total guesswork for future predictions: 50% chance of supporting guile 2.0 before July 2012, 80% chance of support guile 2.0 before the end of 2012. What that means for opensuse is up to you. If you particularly want guile 2.0, then by all means jump in; the more people working on it, the higher the chances are that it'll get done sooner. But based on the amount of work that currently goes into guile 2.0, those are my estimates. Cheers, - Graham and I think this is also relevant, another lily developers reply from the same message: Given that the upcoming ubuntu oneiric apparently does not include guile 2.0, I also don't see a switch to guile 2.0 in the near future. I suppose that we should ask the ubuntu people when they'll finally package guile 2.0. Cheers, Reinhold I've looked at parallel installation of guile 1.8.8 (we jumped from 1.8.7 to 2.0.1) and it doesn't look easy otherwise I would have submitted guile1 but I'm still working on it although I'm not that familiar with the autoconf/automake build system at this level. What this means for openSUSE, lilypond is a very popular musical notation type setting program, the developers pride themselves in the accuracy of the notation positions, it is also used, for musical notation by rosegarden, a popular music and midi composition program. Both of these applications have no substitutes in the open source world and only have costly equivalents in the ms windows world, neither being available for ms windows although there are requests to port for both this won't happen in the immediate future. Rosegarden can work without lilypond as it is only bound to lilyponds notation fonts but the sheet music it exports will be useless so it will lose major functionality. Lilypond won't even be able to be installed via tarball on openSUSE 12.1 without the user removing guile 2.0 completely and installing guile 1.8 via tarball, as a result these users of lilypond and rosegarden will drop openSUSE. I started as a community maintainer by saving both lilypond and rosegarden from being dropped, I'm now very active in maintaining multimedia apps and libs and losing these programs will mean losing a large section of professionals in music related professions that have migrated from the windows world including the people that I've converted from ms windows just by showing them rosegarden although ms's change from xp to vista also helped. For the other packages that directly depend on guile : guile aisleriot gnucash autogen and slib, the change back to guile-1.8.8 won't AFAICS have any negative effects, all of these packages simply have patches for guile 2.0 and after looking at the patches, will most probably build with the patches still in place. I don't know what the situation is with guile users but it is an app for use by apps and not a direct users app. Guile-1.8.7 builds for factory, guile-1.8.7 doesn't build for 11.4. What are we going to do? Drop lilypond, I will keep it alive in home:plater:lilypond with guile-1.8.8 to replace guile-2.0.2 or revert to guile-1.8.8 in line with the other linux distributions? Thanks Dave Plater -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] Request for perl help

by Greg Freemyer

All, Can someone who knows perl take a look at perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2 and get it to compile for openSUSE and then enable the opensuse repos for it? That seems like it would be useful module for lots of perl programs, so I assume there are other packages that would benefit from it being available. == why I need it I'm trying to update a perl app/module (perl::Image::ExifTool) that has a new requires (per the readme) and now it needs IO::Compress::Bzip2 We have that in D:L:P, but it is disabled for opensuse builds: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2&proj… I branched it to my home to see what happens with openSUSE builds. They all fail: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2&proj… I tried a local build, and it is apparently the self tests that fail === Test Summary Report ------------------- t/100generic-bzip2.t (Wstat: 1792 Tests: 670 Failed: 7) Failed tests: 3-4, 12-13, 15, 125, 131 Non-zero exit status: 7 t/105oneshot-bzip2.t (Wstat: 3584 Tests: 970 Failed: 14) Failed tests: 476-477, 480-481, 484-485, 502, 507, 558-559 562-563, 566-567 Non-zero exit status: 14 t/107multi-bzip2.t (Wstat: 65024 Tests: 694 Failed: 300) Failed tests: 12, 19, 28-32, 34, 36, 40, 48-52, 54, 56 60, 73-74, 80-81, 89-93, 95-101, 103, 105 109, 117-121, 123-129, 131, 133, 137, 152-153 159-160, 168-172, 174-180, 182-188, 190 192, 196, 204-208, 210-216, 218-224, 226 228, 232, 243, 250, 259-263, 265, 267, 271 279-283, 285, 287, 291, 304-305, 311-312 320-324, 326-332, 334, 336, 340, 348-352 354-360, 362, 364, 368, 383-384, 390-391 399-403, 405-411, 413-419, 421, 423, 427 435-439, 441-447, 449-455, 457, 459, 463 474, 481, 490-494, 496, 498, 502, 510-514 516, 518, 522, 535-536, 542-543, 551-555 557-563, 565, 567, 571, 579-583, 585-591 593, 595, 599, 614-615, 621-622, 630-634 636-642, 644-650, 652, 654, 658, 666-670 672-678, 680-686, 688, 690, 694 Non-zero exit status: 254 Files=14, Tests=8339, 15 wallclock secs ( 2.57 usr 0.19 sys + 9.76 cusr 2.07 csys = 14.59 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 3/14 test programs. 321/8339 subtests failed. === Since, I'm not an experienced perl programmer this is over my depth. Thanks Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] unresolvable: nothing provides device-mapper-devel-32bit

by Per Jessen

This is really a continuation of a thread from July: http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse-packaging/2011-06/msg00146.html I'm updating lilo to 23.2 - when I try to build for openSUSE 11.3 and SLE_11_SP1, I see this error. What am I supposed to do about it, if anything? > osc results openSUSE_11.3 x86_64 unresolvable openSUSE_11.3 i586 succeeded openSUSE_11.4 i586 succeeded openSUSE_11.4 x86_64 finished openSUSE_Factory x86_64 finished openSUSE_Factory i586 succeeded SLE_11_SP1 i586 succeeded SLE_11_SP1 x86_64 unresolvable thanks Per -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.9°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] ANNOUNCE: systemd service packaging

by Frederic Crozat

Hi everyone, I just finished merging the migration macros into the "main" systemd macros, so here is the final result for macros (see file attached). Usage would be like this (it will be hard to put macros in the wrong section ;) : Add : %systemd_requires and if you are compiling your package for old distributions : %if 0%{suse_version} <= 1140 %define systemd_requires %{nil} %endif for scripts : %post %service_add_pre demo.service demo1.service %post %service_add_post demo.service demo1.service %preun %service_del_preun demo.service demo1.service %postun %service_del_postun demo.service demo1.servoce Please note those macros are "systemd preset" aware (this was discussed on this mailing list in july) : you don't need to enable a service in % post : if it is specified in the default preset policy as "enabled by default", it will be handled automatically. These defaults will be in systemd-default-presets package (not yet created, probably tomorrow). -- Frederic Crozat <fcrozat(a)suse.com> SUSE # RPM macros for packages installing systemd unit files # ### # # When a package install systemd unit files, it should use the following macros: # # add %systemd_requires in the specfile # # %post # %service_add_pre demo.service demo1.service # # %post # %service_add_post demo.service demo1.service # # %preun # %service_del_preun demo.service # # %postun # %service_del_postun demo.service # ### # This is for /bin/systemctl %systemd_requires \ Requires(pre): systemd \ Requires(post): systemd \ Requires(preun): systemd \ Requires(postun): systemd \ %_unitdir /lib/systemd/system %service_add_pre() \ test -n "$FIRST_ARG" || FIRST_ARG=$1 \ # disable migration if initial install under systemd \ if [ $FIRST_ARG -eq 1 ]; then \ for service in %{?*} ; do \ sysv_service=`echo $service | sed -e 's/\\.[a-z]*//g'` \ touch "/var/lib/systemd/migrated/$sysv_service" \ done \ else \ for service in %{?*} ; do \ sysv_service=`echo $service | sed -e 's/\\.[a-z]*//g'` \ if [ ! -e "/var/lib/systemd/migrated/$sysv_service" ]; then \ services_to_migrate="$services_to_migrate $sysv_service" \ fi \ done \ if [ -n "$services_to_migrate" ]; then \ /usr/sbin/systemd-sysv-convert --save $services_to_migrate >/dev/null 2>&1 || : \ fi \ fi \ %{nil} # On install, tell systemd to reload its unit files %service_add_post() \ test -n "$FIRST_ARG" || FIRST_ARG=$1 \ for service in %{?*} ; do \ sysv_service=`echo $service | sed -e 's/\\.[a-z]*//g'` \ if [ ! -e "/var/lib/systemd/migrated/$sysv_service" ]; then \ services_to_migrate="$services_to_migrate $sysv_service" \ touch "/var/lib/systemd/migrated/$sysv_service" \ fi \ done \ if [ -n "$services_to_migrate" ]; then \ /usr/sbin/systemd-sysv-convert --apply $services_to_migrate >/dev/null 2>&1 || : \ fi \ /bin/systemctl daemon-reload >/dev/null 2>&1 || : \ /bin/systemctl preset %{?*} >/dev/null 2>&1 || : \ %{nil} # On uninstall, disable and stop services %service_del_preun() \ test -n "$FIRST_ARG" || FIRST_ARG=$1 \ if [ $FIRST_ARG -eq 0 ]; then \ # Package removal, not upgrade \ /bin/systemctl --no-reload disable %{?*} > /dev/null 2>&1 || : \ /bin/systemctl stop %{?*} > /dev/null 2>&1 || : \ fi \ %{nil} # On uninstall, tell systemd to reload its unit files %service_del_postun() \ test -n "$FIRST_ARG" || FIRST_ARG=$1 \ if [ $FIRST_ARG -ge 1 ]; then \ # Package upgrade, not uninstall \ /bin/systemctl try-restart %{?*} >/dev/null 2>&1 || : \ else # package uninstall \ for service in %{?*} ; do \ sysv_service=`echo $service | sed -e 's/\\.[a-z]*//g'` \ rm -f "/var/lib/systemd/migrated/$sysv_service" 2> /dev/null \ done \ /bin/systemctl daemon-reload >/dev/null 2>&1 || : \ fi \ %{nil}

10 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] download_file services not working

by Stefan Seyfried

see CrossToolchain:avr/avrdude Is this supposed to work? It works locally with "osc build". -- Stefan Seyfried "Dispatch war rocket Ajax to bring back his body!" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 9 months

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Request for perl help

by Greg Freemyer

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Joop Boonen <joop.boonen(a)boonen.org> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > As you can see this perl module (2.0.15) is quite old because of this > probably doesn't support per 5.12 any more. > http://search.cpan.org/~pmqs/IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015/ > I think it's better to use a more resent version. > http://search.cpan.org/~pmqs/IO-Compress-2.037/ > Contains IO:Compress:Bzip2 > http://search.cpan.org/~pmqs/IO-Compress-2.037/lib/IO/Compress/Bzip2.pm > > I see that this package already exists: perl-IO-Compress in > devel:languages:perl > > Regards, > > Joop. > Joop, Thanks but this looking a little more complex. perl-IO-Compress won't install because it requires perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib won't install because it is obsoleted by perl-5.12.3-11.16.1.x86_64 Assuming that means what it says I'm testing this specfile change to perl-IO-Compress ============ # Compress::Raw::Zlib is now a core perl function %if 0%{suse_version} < 1140 BuildRequires: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) >= %{version} Requires: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) >= %{version} %endif ============ Can you (or anyone else) confirm that the above is accurate. Thanks Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 9 months

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Request for perl help

by Joop Boonen

Hi Greg, As you can see this perl module (2.0.15) is quite old because of this probably doesn't support per 5.12 any more. http://search.cpan.org/~pmqs/IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015/ I think it's better to use a more resent version. http://search.cpan.org/~pmqs/IO-Compress-2.037/ Contains IO:Compress:Bzip2 http://search.cpan.org/~pmqs/IO-Compress-2.037/lib/IO/Compress/Bzip2.pm I see that this package already exists: perl-IO-Compress in devel:languages:perl Regards, Joop. On Mon, September 26, 2011 9:43 pm, Greg Freemyer wrote: > All, > > Can someone who knows perl take a look at perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2 and get it to compile for openSUSE and then enable the opensuse repos for it? > > That seems like it would be useful module for lots of perl programs, so I assume there are other packages that would benefit from it being available. > > == why I need it > > I'm trying to update a perl app/module (perl::Image::ExifTool) that has a new requires (per the readme) and now it needs > IO::Compress::Bzip2 > > We have that in D:L:P, but it is disabled for opensuse builds: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2&proj… > > I branched it to my home to see what happens with openSUSE builds. They all fail: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2&proj… > > I tried a local build, and it is apparently the self tests that fail > > === > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > t/100generic-bzip2.t (Wstat: 1792 Tests: 670 Failed: 7) > Failed tests: 3-4, 12-13, 15, 125, 131 > Non-zero exit status: 7 > t/105oneshot-bzip2.t (Wstat: 3584 Tests: 970 Failed: 14) > Failed tests: 476-477, 480-481, 484-485, 502, 507, 558-559 > 562-563, 566-567 > Non-zero exit status: 14 > t/107multi-bzip2.t (Wstat: 65024 Tests: 694 Failed: 300) > Failed tests: 12, 19, 28-32, 34, 36, 40, 48-52, 54, 56 > 60, 73-74, 80-81, 89-93, 95-101, 103, 105 > 109, 117-121, 123-129, 131, 133, 137, 152-153 > 159-160, 168-172, 174-180, 182-188, 190 > 192, 196, 204-208, 210-216, 218-224, 226 > 228, 232, 243, 250, 259-263, 265, 267, 271 > 279-283, 285, 287, 291, 304-305, 311-312 > 320-324, 326-332, 334, 336, 340, 348-352 > 354-360, 362, 364, 368, 383-384, 390-391 > 399-403, 405-411, 413-419, 421, 423, 427 > 435-439, 441-447, 449-455, 457, 459, 463 > 474, 481, 490-494, 496, 498, 502, 510-514 > 516, 518, 522, 535-536, 542-543, 551-555 > 557-563, 565, 567, 571, 579-583, 585-591 > 593, 595, 599, 614-615, 621-622, 630-634 > 636-642, 644-650, 652, 654, 658, 666-670 > 672-678, 680-686, 688, 690, 694 > Non-zero exit status: 254 > Files=14, Tests=8339, 15 wallclock secs ( 2.57 usr 0.19 sys + 9.76 cusr 2.07 csys = 14.59 CPU) > Result: FAIL > Failed 3/14 test programs. 321/8339 subtests failed. > === > > Since, I'm not an experienced perl programmer this is over my depth. > > Thanks > Greg > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] auto submit to factory?

by Stephan Kulow

Hi, During the conference there was some discussion that some developers would like to have something submit their packages as soon as they succeed for factory - if they are devel package of course. Some projects (like KDE and GNOME that follow release cycles) obviously do not want that, but it still sounds like we should discuss it. We can for sure implement something that does this, but we have several options: - We can have an option in osc that you need to enable, so osc ci will automatically submit too if it's a _link - We can have an attribute in the devel projects that either enables or disables that a script automatically submits factory devel packages with a diff in .changes file - We can do the above, but automatically open a review for the devel project to accept before the package is commited to factory. This has the drawback atm, that no mail notifcation will go out and people tend to ignore these reviews (only the webui will show them if you login). But this is something that needs fixing in hermes anyway. - We can rely purely on mail reminders in case of unsubmitted changes This mail reminder I want to implement most definitely - and with some chance I'll use next week for it, but I would still like to hear if people are interested in auto submit. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] Packaging .desktop files for GNOME

by Manu Gupta

Hi All I am trying to package sax3 and want to add a shortcut entry to gnome, how do I do it? I have a desktop file which I am attaching along with it and my package can be found at https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=sax3&project=X11%3Asax -- Regards Manu Gupta

10 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] Take care all

by Nelson Marques

Hi all, I'm leaving, I would just like to thank everyone for the last year in which I've learned a lot from people. All the best, NM -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 9 months

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging September 2011