openSUSE Packaging July 2011

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

40 participants
29 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] Optional stuff in spec files

by Sascha Peilicke

Hi all, just to notify you all, since quite some time you neither need to specify a clean section nor a BuildRoot in your spec files. Official rpm.org rpm (present in openSUSE) has reasonable defaults. It happened recently that I already let a (games) package into Factory which had no %clean setion. Whilst this was an accident, the question is on how we want to handle this in the future. You should be aware that this is not support on any SLE*. Generally, we wouldn't care for Factory but if you want to build for SLE, you may want to keep it. I was told that the games guys already started to convert their spec files. So we need a decision. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Sascha Peilicke

10 years, 11 months

[opensuse-packaging] Call to a function is ambiguous

by Ilya Chernykh

Hi, people! I have a following error when building a package: application_ob.cpp:103:41: error: call of overloaded 'FormatFromExt(QString&)' is ambiguous application_ob.cpp:103:41: note: candidates are: /usr/include/openbabel-2.0/openbabel/obconversion.h:81:24: note: static OpenBabel::OBFormat* OpenBabel::OBConversion::FormatFromExt(const char*) /usr/include/openbabel-2.0/openbabel/obconversion.h:84:24: note: static OpenBabel::OBFormat* OpenBabel::OBConversion::FormatFromExt(std::string) Does anybody know how to fix it? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 11 months

[opensuse-packaging] Java packages and target bytecode

by Duncan Mac-Vicar P.

Hi, Lot of Java packages from JPackage/Fedora and other distros would build "as is" on openSUSE/SLE except for a small "mess". - SLE requires target bytecode set to 1.5. (because there is only 1.5 Java for all archs) - This bytecode requirement is usually fixed by changing the ant call to ant -Dant.build.javac.source=1.5 -Dant.build.javac.target=1.5. However sometimes you need to pass similar options to javac or mvn-jpp if they are invoked from the spec file. - Even while SLE requires 1.5 bytecode, %{ant} evaluates to "JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib64/jvm/java ant", the same as in openSUSE - Some specs call %{ant}, but others just call ant. I am tired of editing spec files only to add this SLE specific requirement in order to keep packages building for all repositories. So I am looking for a better solution for our Java:base repository. One solution I was thinking was to create a helper package installing an alias in /etc/profile.d so that ant becomes ant -Dant.build.javac.source=1.5 -Dant.build.javac.target=1.5. Add this package to the project config surrounded by if sle_version. A similar alias would be added for mvn-jpp. However I could not get this to work with rpm. This would allow to build the packages that use "ant" or "mvn-jpp" directly without touching the spec file. Fixing the spec files to use %{ant} would still be possible in parallel, but is not worth while this fixes do not go upstream and a similar macro would be needed for mvn-jpp. I am open to hear more solutions. Another may be using source services to "fix" the spec file, but that would require to add a _service per package. Only have in mind that the goal is to not touch the spec file, but either workaround it in the project setup, or to adapt SUSE conventions so that other's packages become buildable. And the ideal solution of course would be to fix all packages to use a target macro, but this is only worth if these changes go upstream to Fedora and JPackage. -- Duncan Mac-Vicar P. - Novell® Making IT Work As One™ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 11 months

[opensuse-packaging] Opera package

by Derek Kulinski

Hi everyone, I'm wondering when OpenSuSE 11.4 will update Opera package to 11.50? Or at least how to do it properly myself? There were at least two security vulnerabilities fixed, they're not critical but still... -- Best regards, Derek mailto:takeda@takeda.tk How are we supposed to hack your system if it's always down! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 11 months

[opensuse-packaging] [reminder] openSUSE 12.1 Milestone 3 is next week

by openSUSE Roadmap Reminder

Hello all, openSUSE 12.1 Milestone 3 will be released next week, on Thursday 14 July 2011. Please submit your packages before Friday afternoon (UTC time) to make sure they will get included in this release. Leaf packages submitted during the week-end might also get accepted on Monday. For a quick overview of the openSUSE Roadmap, please see: http://en.opensuse.org/Roadmap Thanks, -- openSUSE Roadmap Reminder -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 11 months

[opensuse-packaging] "directories not owned by a package"

by Stephan Kulow

Hi, There are 49 packages that fail now because a check was temporarly disabled and is now reenabled. This check fails for example like this: fwzs-0.4-2.3.noarch.rpm: directories not owned by a package: - /usr/share/polkit-1 - /usr/share/polkit-1/actions Please fix these packages: devel:libraries:c_c++ Botan devel:openSUSE:Factory fwzs GNOME:Apps f-spot GNOME:Apps gedit-latex-plugin GNOME:Apps nautilus-terminal GNOME:Factory gnome-applets GNOME:Factory gnome-power-manager GNOME:Factory system-config-printer graphics blender KDE:Distro:Factory kde4-l10n KDE:Distro:Factory kdeedu4 KDE:Distro:Factory kde-susetranslations KDE:Distro:Factory koffice2-l10n KDE:KDE3 kbiff M17N wm-icons Mono:Factory monodevelop-java mozilla:Factory MozillaFirefox-branding-SLED network:ha-clustering:Factory hawk network sim Printing cups security tinyca2 Virtualization virt-viewer YaST:Web webyast-activedirectory-ui YaST:Web webyast-firewall-ui YaST:Web webyast-kerberos-ui YaST:Web webyast-ldap-ui YaST:Web webyast-licenses-ui YaST:Web webyast-mail-ui YaST:Web webyast-mail-ws YaST:Web webyast-network-ui YaST:Web webyast-permissions-ui YaST:Web webyast-reboot-ui YaST:Web webyast-roles-ui YaST:Web webyast-root-user-ui YaST:Web webyast-services-ui YaST:Web webyast-software-ui YaST:Web webyast-status-ui YaST:Web webyast-status-ws YaST:Web webyast-time-ui YaST:Web webyast-users-ui Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 11 months

[opensuse-packaging] python > 2.7.1 for 11.4?

by Mathias Homann

hi there, I'm still trying to package calibre >= 0.8 for opensuse. Problems are: 1. calibre by now requires python 2.7.1 or higher but NOT python 3 2. the original author is about as cooperative and helpful as the german tax authorities on a bad day. His general approach to any kind of support question is "If you're not running the binaries from my website, go eff yourself." ...problem with that is, calibre is pretty much the only decent ebook reader management software that is platform independent. any ideas? bye, MH -- Die unaufgeforderte Zusendung einer Werbemail an Privatleute verstößt gegen §1 UWG und §823 I BGB (Beschluß des LG Berlin vom 2.8.1998 Az: 16 O 201/98). Jede kommerzielle Nutzung der übermittelten persönlichen Daten sowie deren Weitergabe an Dritte ist ausdrücklich untersagt! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 12 months

Re: [opensuse-packaging] python > 2.7.1 for 11.4?

by Ismail Doenmez

On 06/30/2011 10:25 AM, Mathias Homann wrote: > nope, my package works fine, I just don't know if the requirement "python>= 2.7.1" on > calibre's website is just a quirk or actually justified... I think the author actually meant "Don't use Python3". So please submit updated calibre to Factory and we can move on :) -- Ismail Dönmez - openSUSE Booster SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 12 months

[opensuse-packaging] Problem packaging perl-5.10 für CentOS

by Grenzlaeufer

Hallo list, I am trying to build perl-5.10 für CentOS-5 64-Bit which fails. The SLES-Version builds correctly. I got the package originally form "opensuse_11.1-updates". I get several error-messages like these, when I try to compile: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ../../lib/ExtUtils/MakeMaker/Config.pm line 6. Compilation failed in require at ../../lib/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm line 7. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ../../lib/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm line 7. Every line which is effected lookes like this: use ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Config; use Config (); It seems that a Perl-Config-Module is missing in CentOS. I am no Perl-expert, but I am wondering that a perl-module can be missing, when I try to compile Perl from source. You can have a look at my package here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=perl&project=home%3Agrenzla… Can anyone help to solve the problem? Greetings Grenzläufer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 12 months

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging July 2011