May 2011 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] Icon not working on KDE for a package...
by Nelson Marques 14 May '11

14 May '11

Dear all, I've packaged a game called Unknown Horizons which installs the desktop file in /usr/share/applications/%{name}.desktop. This file has an icon file entry in the following format: Icon=unknown-horizons Which seems cool to me. The icon is installed on /usr/share/pixmaps/unknown-horizons.svg. Everything works just fine in GNOME, but in KDE the icon for the applications isn't rendered on the menus. Anyone familiar with KDE knows what is happening? Nelson -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-packaging] Re: debian *.install files ignored?
by Sergey Vlasov 12 May '11

12 May '11

Hello, I have created two packages that share the same source tarball but built with different techniques as described in http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Debian_builds In the first package the "alternative" method is used, tarball + diff + dsc http://bit.ly/mcmODK And in the second package all the files from debian/ directory were renamed accordingly and uploaded separately as source files http://bit.ly/mxCrFh The goal is to create several .deb packages from the same source file. While it works well with the "alternative" method in the second package it creates empty .debs. Does OBS support *.install files? -- Sergey -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] How do I go about submitting openCOLLADA--svn839 to 11.4 update?
by Dave Plater 12 May '11

12 May '11

I've finally finished polishing the openCOLLADA collada import/export libraries with a bit of help from Fedora and cmake and it's now in Factory. I can either push it to Packman where an ffmpeg blender-2.57b is destined or tumbleweed to take care of <= 11.3 but it was suggested that I push it as an update to 11.4 due to "undefined-non-weak-symbol"s present in older scons builds. What and how do I do? Suggestions and guidance are welcome. Dave P P.s. I'm also wondering when python3-3.2 is going to factory, this is needed by blender, I have to patch to build with py3.1. I'm busy pleading with the Packman folks to allow me to push it there. Blender and a couple of minor gnome apps are all that use python3, 3.2 is totally backward compatible with 3.1 the blender devs managed to replace pages of 3.1 code with a few lines of 3.2 code so one can understand why they have no wish to use py3.1. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 6

[opensuse-packaging] OBS takes wrong dependency (not mine) for my project
by Grenzlaeufer 10 May '11

10 May '11

Hallo list! I have a strange problem with a dependency when building a package: Package: perl-MIME-Tools Dependency: perl-File-Temp (min. 0.18, installed 0.16, my-version 0.22) Target: CentOS 5 AMD64 The problem occurs when building perl-MIME-Tools: ------- snip ------- t/ticket-11901....................File::Temp version 0.18 required--this is only version 0.16 at /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/MIME-tools-5.502/blib/lib/MIME/Tools.pm line 14. ------- snap ------- I have my own package for "File::Temp"/perl-File-Temp in Version 0.22 which is built in the same project as perl-MIME-Tools. I had expected that my version would have been taken, because prior building it, it was a missing dependency for perl-MIME-Tools. I can also query the package from my CentOS-Test-System ------- snip ------- [root@centtest ~]# yum info perl-file-temp Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile ... 68 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Available Packages Name : perl-File-Temp Arch : noarch Version : 0.22 Release : 1.el5.rf Size : 46 k Repo : rpmforge Summary : Return name and handle of a temporary file safely URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Temp/ License : Artistic/GPL Description: Return name and handle of a temporary file safely. [root@centtest ~]# ------- snap ------- It seems that the build environment pulls the dependency from a wrong source, because it is older than what I have built. Could anyone tell me why my version is not used in the build-environment and how to solve the problem? Greetings Grenzlaeufer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 3

[opensuse-packaging] libraries could not be found from package
by Denny Beyer 10 May '11

10 May '11

Dear all, I'm having an issue with some libraries in a program I'm helping to package using obs. The program is called gnuaccounting and you'll find the obs project under Build Service > Projects > home:lumnis > gnuaccounting ( https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=gnuaccounting&project=home%… ) It is mainly a java progam, but using some native libraries for viewing documents etc. All the java stuff and pics/icons/doc goes into /usr/share/gnuaccounting. All platform depended libraries (here: libnativeview.so ) go into /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 Because the dev team put the latter ones in the project directory also (now the /usr/share/gnuaccounting directory), this is the tested setup. For packaging and QA checks during rpm build, this is not acceptable and package build breaks with badness error in rpm lint check. Could anybody help pointing me/the developers in the right direction to find a solution to that. Isn't it so, that libraries, when located in /usr/lib should be picked up by programs automatically. What is required, to make that happen (e.g. system variables for path). regards, Denny -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

5 14

[opensuse-packaging] debian.conffiles not working?
by Schlomo Schapiro 09 May '11

09 May '11

Hi, I am trying to mark some files as configuration files in Debian packages and created a debian.conffiles file. However, the resulting packages ignore this. For an example see home:sschapiro/rear-snapshot Is there another way how to get DEBs to also mark conf files properly? Kind Regards, Schlomo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] what the eqivalent names of these packages in obs
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 09 May '11

09 May '11

Hello. What the eqivalent names of these packages in obs to these ? Thanks Glenn nothing provides elfutils-libelf, nothing provides elfutils-devel, nothing provides bzip2-devel >= 1.0, nothing provides perl >= 2:5.8.0 spec file link https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=rpm.spec&package=rpm&proj… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] subscribe
by Michal Vyskocil 09 May '11

09 May '11

s -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] "library /lib/udev/hid2hci is linked against libraries in /usr or /opt"?
by Stefan Seyfried 07 May '11

07 May '11

Hi, bluez-4.93 got hid2hci back, it was on holiday in the udev sources for some time. Unfortunately, the test build fails: + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-rpath + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-pie + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-rootfs library /lib/udev/hid2hci is linked against libraries in /usr or /opt libusb-0.1.so.4 => /usr/lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x00007f77e36e7000) libusb-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0 (0x00007f77e2f5d000) Please adjust the paths in your package But the hid2hci from udev is: seife@susi:~> rpm -qf /lib/udev/hid2hci udev-166-7.1.x86_64 seife@susi:~> ldd /lib/udev/hid2hci|grep usr libusb-0.1.so.4 => /usr/lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x00007f764b901000) libusb-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0 (0x00007f764b17d000) The rpmlintrc from udev in FACTORY looks innocent. Why did it build at all? And how do I get rid of that error? I don't care about "separate /usr" crap. -- Stefan Seyfried "Dispatch war rocket Ajax to bring back his body!" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

8 19

[opensuse-packaging] fixing error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 04 May '11

04 May '11

Hello How this error be fixed [1] I suspect I'm missing lines in %files section what should the lines look like ? Thanks Glenn Spec file at [2] Full Log at [3] [1] Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/CodeAnalyst-2_13_2_0156-15.1.x86_64 error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/libCA.a /usr/lib64/libCAbba.a /usr/lib64/lib_tbp_output.a /usr/lib64/libopdata.a RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/libCA.a /usr/lib64/libCAbba.a /usr/lib64/lib_tbp_output.a /usr/lib64/libopdata.a [ 826.145642] SysRq : Power Off [ 827.780449] Power down. [2] spec file https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=CA-test.spec&package=CA-t… [3] log https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=CA-test&proje… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 3