September 2009 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] Updating DeviceKit-disks?
by Vincent Untz 30 Sep '09

30 Sep '09

Hey, Another hard question. While looking at the remaining packages that were missing for GNOME 2.28, I saw that gnome-disk-utility requires a newer DeviceKit-disks. Missing the latest gnome-disk-utility version wouldn't be a huge issue for me (except that we'll lack many translation updates). However, the latest version of DeviceKit-disks contain some changes that can be important. Stuff like "NULL dereference" or a fix for "Require password to eject a CD or DVD mounted by the same user". However, the dbus API has been updated. As far as I can tell, the only user of DeviceKit-disks is gnome-disk-utility (and therefore gvfs). And this release of DeviceKit-disks was more or less done for GNOME 2.28. A couple of options: + update DK-disks (and gnome-disk-utility) + cherry-pick the patches that seem relevant from git (when git.fd.o will be back online). Not sure yet it's possible, but I guess it should be. + keep our current version Opinions? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Something went wrong with an accepted submit to factory.
by Dave Plater 29 Sep '09

29 Sep '09

Hi, when my submit from graphics to factory #20473 for blender-2.49a was accepted something went wrong and the main tarball hasn't transferred to factory. Regards Dave P -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 3

[opensuse-packaging] compilation of testdiskdisk package
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 29 Sep '09

29 Sep '09

Hello, Here is the compilation log on testdisk package, the compilation stopped. I spotted a line near the end in the log that says 'cannot find -lz' Last build log -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=x86_64&package=testd… Am I missing BuildRequires: ???-devel packages somewhere ? Thankyou Glenn Project -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=testdisk&project=home%3Adoi… spec file -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=testdisk.spec&package=tes… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] boinc_client: m_bAccessibilyEnabled was not declared in this scope
by Sascha 'saigkill' Manns 29 Sep '09

29 Sep '09

Hello Mates, i'm try to update boinc to 6.6.40. Now i'm getting the following: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../lib -I../api -I../db -I../client -I../tools -I../sched -I../lib/mac -pthread -I/usr/lib64/wx/include/gtk2-unicode- release-2.8 -I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES - D__WXGTK__ -I/usr/lib64/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.8 - I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D__WXGTK__ - pthread -g -fmessage-length=0 -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -msse2 - march=opteron -mtune=generic -MT boincmgr-BOINCGUIApp.o -MD -MP -MF ..deps/boincmgr-BOINCGUIApp.Tpo -c -o boincmgr-BOINCGUIApp.o `test -f 'BOINCGUIApp.cpp' || echo './'`BOINCGUIApp.cpp BOINCGUIApp.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool CBOINCGUIApp::OnInit()': BOINCGUIApp.cpp:155: error: 'm_bAccessibilityEnabled' was not declared in this scope make[2]: *** [boincmgr-BOINCGUIApp.o] Error 1 Is it enough to add "#define m_bAccesibilityEnabled" in the Head? -- Sincerely yours Sascha Manns openSUSE Member openSUSE Ambassador openSUSE Marketing Team openSUSE Build Service Web: http://saschamanns.gulli.to Blog: http://saigkill.wordpress.com ClaimID: http://claimid.com/saigkill

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] No rpmlint in local builds
by Vincent Untz 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

Hey, Since some time, whenever I do "osc build", there's no rpmlint running at the end of the build. It could be related to the fact that we now build stuff against oS:F/snapshots in G:F, but I'm unsure. Any hint? Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] query - opensuse equavilant of ncurses-static, libjpeg-static, zlib-static.
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

Hello I am trying to compile a package called 'testdisk' I extracted the files out of the source rpm file in this case it was testdisk-6.11.3-1.src.rpm The error I get is as follows: expansion error nothing provides ncurses-static, libjpeg-static, zlib-static Question: What are equivalent opensuse items that I can use instead of these items ? BuildRequires: ncurses-static BuildRequires: libjpeg-static BuildRequires: zlib-static Thank you Glenn Project -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=testdisk&project=home%3Adoi… spec file -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=testdisk.spec&package=tes… No log available available as yet. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] Build against the latest kernel
by Werner Flamme 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

Hi all, I don't know if I'm right here or if I have to consult the buildservice mailing list instead, but I'll try here first ;-) I try to build the latest version of drbd, and it works for the most cases. SLE_10, SLE_11, openSUSE 10.3, 11.0, and 11.1 build successfully, in Factory it's still scheduled. But the kernel modules are build against the original kernel only, not against the latest kernel from the official update channel (for example, in 11.1 they are build as drbd-kmp-${KERNEL_FLAVOR}-8.3.2_2.6.27.7_9.1-5.1.${ARCH].rpm, not - as I would prefer - against kernel 2.6.27.29-0.1. When I modify the BuildRequires line to kernel-syms >= 2.6.27.29, I get an error "nothing provides kernel-syms >= 2.6.27.29" right away. Is it possible to have the modules built against the latest kernel? If so, how? :-) I think that I have to include the update repository, but I didn't find a hint in the Build Service docu how to do so. The solution should work on the openSUSE build service too, not only locally ;-) Regards, Werner -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-packaging] drbd: Compiling problem on Factory
by Werner Flamme 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

Hi, I try to build the latest drbd package. It succeeds on SLE_10/11 and openSUSE 10.3/11.0/11.1, but it fails on openSUSE Factory. The build log ends with: ---snip--- CC [M] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/drbd-8.3.2/obj/debug/drbd_req.o /usr/src/packages/BUILD/drbd-8.3.2/obj/debug/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_start_io_acct': /usr/src/packages/BUILD/drbd-8.3.2/obj/debug/drbd_req.c:64: error: lvalue required as increment operand /usr/src/packages/BUILD/drbd-8.3.2/obj/debug/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_end_io_acct': /usr/src/packages/BUILD/drbd-8.3.2/obj/debug/drbd_req.c:86: error: lvalue required as decrement operand make[3]: *** [/usr/src/packages/BUILD/drbd-8.3.2/obj/debug/drbd_req.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/src/packages/BUILD/drbd-8.3.2/obj/debug] Error 2 make[1]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.31-8-obj/i386/debug' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AFE5vj (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.AFE5vj (%build) ---pins--- I appreciate the way any new gcc version creates various new error messages, but since I'm not a programmer of drbd, I do not know how to work around this. Line 64 in drbd_req.c reads mdev->vdisk->part0.inflight++ while line 86 is mdev->vdisk->part0.inflight-- Do I have to rewrite those lines as mdev->vdisk->part0.inflight += 1 rsp. -= 1 ? Or do I need another compiler option? Regards, Werner -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Icons
by Cristian Morales Vega 27 Sep '09

27 Sep '09

I would like to clear the icons thing... We have /usr/share/pixmaps in the filesystem package, some packages install there its icons. But then we have the FreeDesktop standard for icon themes, with icons installed in /usr/share/icons/<icon_theme>. /usr/share/icons/ is owned by filesystem, but the subdirs are owned by each thme package. The default theme is hicolor, and the hicolor-icon-theme package provides all the subdirs (but no real icons, so is a small package). Should icons be installed at /usr/share/pixmaps? It Is wrong enough to create a RPMLINT test? What about gtk-update-icon-cache? It is needed for GTK apps to show correctly the icons (also the ones from /usr/share/pixmaps or only the /usr/share/icons), but since it takes a lot of time we don't put it in scriptlets. Until now YaST sw_single executed SuSEconfig after installation and gtk-update-icon-cache was executed a single time... but that now doesn't happens if you use zypper. There is any final fix planned now that we are updating RPM? Lets suppose all icons should be installed in /usr/share/pixmaps, under the hicolor icon theme if there isn't anything better. I put my icon at /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/<app>.png. - Should my package own /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64 and /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps? These dirs are already owned by the hicolor-icon-theme package. If so, no problem. - Shouldn't my package own the subdirs? -- Well, then I'm going to require a "BuildRequires: hicolor-icon-theme" so RPMLINT/post-scripts/whatever don't complain about files/dirs not owned by any package. -- But the problem of dirs not owned by any package will happen at "runtime". So I *also* need a "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme". Note that adding the Requires doesn't stop RPMLINT/post-scripts/whatever from complaining. And also note that adding the "BuildRequires" stops the error message... but the problem is still there. (all this at least when building for 11.1). What Fedora does is adding a Requires: hicolor-icon-theme to every package with an icon. For compatibility sake we could do the same... but I don't really like it. Whouldn't be better to add all the dirs owned by hicolor-icon-theme to the filesystem package? It's a 34 KiB package!! I don't think people that runs openSUSE without a GUI will complain about having some dirs from a 34 KiB package they don't need... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] line starting with %ghost [bugzilla-3.4.2]
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 25 Sep '09

25 Sep '09

Hello, What does the following line do, I found in in the %files part of bugzilla.spec , Ive not heard of %ghost before, the line reads as: %ghost %{bzinstallprefix}/bugzilla/bugzilla-req How can this error be resolved ? build20 started "build bugzilla.spec" at Mon Sep 21 14:47:01 UTC 2009. Processing files: bugzilla-3.4.2-3.1.noarch error: File not found: /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/bugzilla-3.4.2-3.1.x86_64/usr/share/bugzilla/bugzilla-req Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.EyV1Q6 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/packages/BUILD + cd bugzilla-3.4.2 + DOCDIR=/usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/bugzilla-3.4.2-3.1.x86_64/usr/share/doc/packages/bugzilla + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/bugzilla-3.4.2-3.1.x86_64/usr/share/doc/packages/bugzilla + /bin/mkdir -p /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/bugzilla-3.4.2-3.1.x86_64/usr/share/doc/packages/bugzilla + cp -pr README /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/bugzilla-3.4.2-3.1.x86_64/usr/share/doc/packages/bugzilla + cp -pr README.fedora /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/bugzilla-3.4.2-3.1.x86_64/usr/share/doc/packages/bugzilla + exit 0 RPM build errors: File not found: /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/bugzilla-3.4.2-3.1.x86_64/usr/share/bugzilla/bugzilla-req System halted. other ===== bugzilla.spec https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=bugzilla.spec&package=bug… Last log https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=x86_64&package=bugzi… Project https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=bugzilla-3.4.2&project=home… Originally sourced from # rpm2cpio bugzilla-3.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm | cpio -ivd bugzilla.spec bugzilla.spec 4850 blocks Help appreciated thanks Glenn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2