October 2006 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

Re: [opensuse-packaging] Updates of packages (right numbering scheme?)
by Dominique Leuenberger 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

>>> Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.de> 18-10-2006 14:24 >>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:26:30PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > Hi, > > I have created packages for SuperTuxKart 0.2rc2 and then for > SuperTuxKart 0.2 (obsoleteing 0.2rc2) (only home: repo up to now) > > RUG and other tools don't recognize 0.2 being newer as 0.2rc2 > > What suggestion can you give me for future Numbering schemes of > RC-Releases? > >The upstream project should do so... > >0.1.99rc2 I would have used for the RC ;) Thanks Marcus, I'll get in touch with the upstream maintainers for this. Hopefully for the next release, it will be adopted. Would 0.2.0 be treated newer as 0.2rc2? Dominique

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Updates of packages (right numbering scheme?)
by Dominique Leuenberger 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Hi, I have created packages for SuperTuxKart 0.2rc2 and then for SuperTuxKart 0.2 (obsoleteing 0.2rc2) (only home: repo up to now) RUG and other tools don't recognize 0.2 being newer as 0.2rc2 What suggestion can you give me for future Numbering schemes of RC-Releases? Thanks for an advise, Dominique

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] brasero ?
by Pascal Bleser 14 Oct '06

14 Oct '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anyone already packaging "brasero" (used to be named "bonfire") ? http://gnomefiles.org/app.php/Brasero - -- -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/ /\\ <pascal.bleser(a)skynet.be> <guru(a)unixtech.be> _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFMRwpr3NMWliFcXcRApPZAJ95NbTLEsZCOXwSDtDPXIxHFoDMlACfTUwv cLgiob0PcntpIpnjKyXVRXE= =aItd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] question on packaging and gconf failures
by Rauch Christian 09 Oct '06

09 Oct '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello List, today I packaged the newly released Gnucash 2.0.2, but it failed this time, whereas 2.0.1 worked just fine. The following error caused the build (or better make install) to stop: > mkdir -p /var/tmp/gnucash-compiler/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults > GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults > /opt/gnome/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule > apps_gnucash_history.schemas > Failed to load source "xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults": Failed: > Could not make directory `/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults': No such file > or directory After asking back on gnucash-devel, this issue could be resolved by adding the following line just before "%__make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" > export GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1 According to http://www.gnome.org/projects/gconf/ (Section Application developer information), this is known and they tell a workaround there. Is this the established way to workaround this or is there a "suse way" to do this? Thanks, Christian Rauch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFKj20ayhvFxrDZlkRApjmAJ9VwD/S5i58FFLSez2TUN8z1fe3VgCdEi8S UeYuGMMXSlmk3zRkoA0dF34= =bMbt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] Packaging kernel module with conflicting file
by Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) 05 Oct '06

05 Oct '06

Is there a way I can build a package which would install a new kernel module that already exists on the kernel-default package? AFAIK, the packages would conflict with an error telling that the file already exists. Anyone know a solution for that? LKM maybe? I wish to build a package with the prebuilt module so that the user doesn't need to build it by himself. TIA -- % Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) % mteixeira{a}webset{d}net <> Maceio/AL/BR % http://mteixeira.webset.net <> http://pmping.sf.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Gnome/KDE Path
by Andreas Schneider 03 Oct '06

03 Oct '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, what will be the Gnome and KDE path in openSUSE 10.2? Bye, -- andreas - -- http://www.cynapses.org/ - cybernetic synapses -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE8wMlf94+j/M+P8YRAnH4AKCUITnaSxeCyFQLLzmnLcSHuxMgEwCcDqk0 MtgbCS2WdDguDrYPd6sTGw0= =KUH4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

6 9

[opensuse-packaging] Differencies between tools?
by Anders Norrbring 02 Oct '06

02 Oct '06

I've been thinking a little.. What's the differencies between building packages with y2pmbuild and build? I'd like the best of the worlds.. I'd like to build several architectures in one run (build), but I'd also like to have the packages signed and dumped to the repositary I'm building. One problem is that it appears as the rpm's doesn't get signed.. I have to dig into that a bit more, I'm setting some traps in the y2pmbuild script to see if I can find something out.. I guess a script running 'y2pmbuild-10.1' and then 'linux32 y2pmbuild' would do the trick, but I'd like to know which exit codes y2pmbuild generates for failure and success. -- Anders Norrbring Norrbring Consulting

4 13