On 28. 01. 20, 8:55, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> So, here's the question: what should we do?
> Do we "promote" kvmsmall?
If you need severe changes, I wouldn't touch kvmsmall.
> Do we create a new kernel (i.e., a new branch in our kernels, IIUC)?
Not new kernel or branch. Just new flavor as kvmsmall is.
> Do we, I don't know, find a way to build and ship Kata's upstream
I don't see a reason for this. Are there some out-of-tree patches? If
so, you need to build your own kernel. But you can still do that by
linking kvmsmall and tune it with config.addon and/or patches.addon.