February 2005 - openSUSE AMD64 - openSUSE Mailing Lists

Re: [suse-amd64] SUSE 9.2 FTP distribution and ISOs
by Andreas Jaeger 02 Feb '05

02 Feb '05

"Mikhail Kuzminsky" <kus(a)free.net> writes: > In message from Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.de> (Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:01:14 > +0100): >> >>I'm not sure whether you have read the following, so I want to >>announce it now: >>http://www.novell.com/products/linuxprofessional/downloads/suse_linux/index… >> >>We have released our FTP installation for both x86-64 (AMD64, EM64T) >>and x86 - and also an 3.5 GB installable ISO image that supports both >>x86-64 and x86. > Sorry, does this iso image correspond to special evaluation version > or personal version of SuSE Linux? More exactly, the question is about > differences w/SuSE 9.2 Professional. Is the difference (between this > iso image and Professional version) only in a set of applications > binary rpms (sendmail, HPC applications etc) ? The 3.5 GB ISO contains less than half the packages that the 9.2 Professional DVD contains (which is 8.5 GB). It supports both 32-bit x86 and 64-bit x86-64 platforms. A major difference to the 9.2 DVD is that development packages are completely missing. The ftp installation contains all the packages that are also on the 9.2 Professional DVD, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj(a)suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

1 0

Kernel BUG at direct_io:544
by Ahmon Dancy 02 Feb '05

02 Feb '05

Has anyone seem this problem before? Kernel BUG at direct_io:544 invalid operand: 0000 [1] SMP CPU 1 Modules linked in: usbserial parport_pc lp parport edd freq_table thermal processor fan button battery ac autofs4 raw ipv6 evdev joydev sg st sr_mod ext3 jbd e100 mii tg3 ohci_hcd hw_random usbcore dm_snapshot dm_mod reiserfs 3w_9xxx sd_mod scsi_mod Pid: 6359, comm: oracle Tainted: MG (2.6.8-24.10-smp SL92_BRANCH-200412221154270000) RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8019fd55>] <ffffffff8019fd55>{dio_new_bio+197} RSP: 0018:00000100f1daf9a8 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000020 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000001007f6bab30 RDX: 0000000000000048 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000100f8833380 RBP: 00000100f9f96400 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000000f9 R10: 00000000094789d5 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000045889 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000045889 R15: 0000000000000009 FS: 0000002a97336e40(0000) GS:ffffffff804e2e80(0000) knlGS:000000005568e460 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 00000000007ebe50 CR3: 00000000f9f82000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Process oracle (pid: 6359, threadinfo 00000100f1dae000, task 00000100eac2c030) Stack: 00000100f9f96400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff8019ff82 0000000000000007 0000000000000000 00000100f9f96400 ffffffff801a0cb5 Call Trace:<ffffffff8019ff82>{dio_send_cur_page+114} <ffffffff801a0cb5>{__blockdev_direct_IO+2165} <ffffffffa003aa8c>{:reiserfs:reiserfs_direct_IO+76} <ffffffffa003ec40>{:reiserfs:reiserfs_get_blocks_direct_io+0} <ffffffff8015ac34>{generic_file_direct_IO+100} <ffffffff8015acfb>{generic_file_direct_write+123} <ffffffff8015b959>{generic_file_aio_write_nolock+713} <ffffffff8015ba9e>{generic_file_write_nolock+158} <ffffffffa005955f>{:reiserfs:do_journal_end+3199} <ffffffff80137a80>{autoremove_wake_function+0} <ffffffff8015bcf5>{generic_file_write+101} <ffffffffa0042548>{:reiserfs:reiserfs_file_write+488} <ffffffff8015a0d5>{filemap_nopage+405} <ffffffff801681fc>{do_no_page+1532} <ffffffff80169990>{handle_mm_fault+368} <ffffffff80362141>{__down_read+49} <ffffffff8021206d>{__up_read+29} <ffffffff801222e8>{do_page_fault+504} <ffffffff8017c455>{file_move+37} <ffffffff80179abe>{filp_open+62} <ffffffff8017bb93>{vfs_write+243} <ffffffff8017bcd3>{sys_write+83} <ffffffff8011074e>{system_call+126} Code: 0f 0b 13 d2 38 80 ff ff ff ff 20 02 bf d0 00 00 00 48 8b 9d RIP <ffffffff8019fd55>{dio_new_bio+197} RSP <00000100f1daf9a8>

1 0

relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32
by orecchio＠unime.it 02 Feb '05

02 Feb '05

I have a AMD OPTERON 64bit with SUSE LINUX SERVER 9.1. I tried to compile a software (tomoDD) in fortran with some subroutine also in C and I obtained this error message tomoDD.o(.text+0x65e): In function `MAIN__': : relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 contrl_ tomoDD.o(.text+0x5083): In function `MAIN__': : additional relocation overflows omitted from the output collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [tomoDD] Error 1 Any help will be greatfully received. thanks, Barbara

1 0

Max Number of Sata Drives
by Joel Wiramu Pauling 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

Hi not strictly a suse amd64 question, but i'm hoping someone on this list will be able to answer. Is the number of sata devices (and cards) stackable. I.e I have an onboard controller which supports 2 channel, can I then go and add another 4 channel sata controller card and use them all at the same time (i.e the as a striped 0 array onboard, + raid array on the 4 port card). Is there a limit to this setup, can I have say 2 4 port cards with a total of 10 drives (raided or not). Kind regards Joel W

1 0