October 2005 - openSUSE AMD64 - openSUSE Mailing Lists

RE: [suse-amd64] Can't load SuSE 9.3 on new motherboard
by Black, Alain 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

When I had this problem, it turned out to be the firmware of the DVD drive that was causing the problem. I swapped it out for another drive, and the install went smoothly from there. I later upgraded the firmware on the drive and was able to then use it to perform the installation. -Alain -----Original Message----- From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@suse.de] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 9:20 AM To: suse-amd64(a)suse.com Cc: Pierre Patino Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] Can't load SuSE 9.3 on new motherboard On Thursday 27 October 2005 17:35, Pierre Patino wrote: > Greetings > > I obtained a newly released Opteron/Athlon64 socket 939 motherboard from > SuperMicro. I built the box and put the DVD in and booted. After I get What chipset is it? > through the installation choices, the installer stops and says it can > no longer "see" the DVD/CD reader (panel becomes painted in red). This I > tried with every installation choice (acpi on/off, safe mode etc.). > > I tried loading SLE9 and I got a different problem -- it could not see > the SATA hard disk. Does 10.0 work? And is it an SATA DVD? You can check the BIOS setup. If it has something called "legacy IDE mode" or similar enabling that might help. > I suspect that the loaded 9.3 kernel module has trouble talking to the > DVD drive because of some chipset issue. I'm surprised that the initial > whatchamacallit that boots and starts the installation process has no > trouble with the DVD drive. Has anybody conquered this demon? The initial boot loader uses the BIOS to access the DVD, the later installation requires a Linux driver. -Andi -- Check the List-Unsubscribe header to unsubscribe For additional commands, email: suse-amd64-help(a)suse.com

1 0

many lost ticks
by Jonathan Brooks 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

Hi, I have an AMD Athlon64 X2 machine running SuSE 10 (x86_64) on an Nvidia Nforce4 Ultra motherboard, and have noticed that the system clock has become unstable (it runs too fast). Not sure when it occurred, but I have been getting a lot of error messages like this in dmesg: warning: many lost ticks. Your time source seems to be instable or some driver is hogging interupts rip acpi_processor_idle+0x12f/0x37f [processor] Is there some parameter I should be passing to the kernel to stop it correcting for lost ticks? Also, is there some way to track whether the clock is really gaining seconds - other than by just leaving it, and watching the clock? :) Best wishes, Jon. -- Jonathan Brooks (Ph.D.) Research Assistant. PaIN Group, Department of Human Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QX tel: +44(0)1865-282654 fax: +44(0)1865-282656 web: http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~jon

3 3

iptables probably broken
by Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas 27 Oct '05

27 Oct '05

Hi, all. In my recent postings to this board I mentioned that 'iptables' gave me errors like iptables v1.3.3: can't initialize iptables table `nat': Bad file descriptor Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. iptables v1.3.3: can't initialize iptables table `filter': Bad file descriptor Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. iptables v1.3.3: can't initialize iptables table `mangle': Bad file descriptor Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. ...[Repeated many times, probalby depending on how many times a script invokes 'iptables -t ...'.] I was got these errors regardless of whether I used my own firewall/NAT script or SuSE's firewall. Just to be sure, I compiled the SuSE stock kernel myself (I also wanted to "lighten it up" since it comes configured for all kinds of hardware I don't have); I still got the same errors. Then, I downgraded to the version and dependencies on the SuSE 9.3 DVD. After that, 'iptables' worked flawlessly on my SuSE 10.0. Therefore, I must conclude that the newer versions of 'iptables' are broken. It makes no difference if I install the one on the SuSE 10.0 DVD or the repositories. I suspect this problem is NOT particular to SuSE 10; therefore earlier versions of SuSE may also be affected by the "upgraded" versions of 'iptables' in the apt-get repositories. CF

1 0

A8V, Suse 9.3 and BIOS memory remapping
by Siegbert Baude 26 Oct '05

26 Oct '05

Hi, I just upgraded the BIOS of my A8V deluxe to the newest version (1014) und tried to boot with the Suse 9.3 Live-CD, distributed by the German magazine c't. If I activate "software memory hole" in the BIOS, I see only 3GB (with the "free" comand and also inside the BIOS system information) despite 4GB of physical RAM installed. dmesg says this: Linux version 2.6.11.4-20a-default (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 3.3.5 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 Wed Mar 23 21:52:37 UTC 2005 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000e4000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000bffb0000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 00000000bffb0000 - 00000000bffc0000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 00000000bffc0000 - 00000000bfff0000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 00000000bfff0000 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ff780000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000140000000 (usable) Warning only 4GB will be used. Use a PAE enabled kernel. 3200MB HIGHMEM available. 896MB LOWMEM available. Just as clarification of terms: - What is HIGHMEM and LOWMEM and shouldn't they be called the other way round as the big part is counted from 0x00000000 on? - Isn't PAE for 32bit OS only (I booted the 64bit version)? So after all, would a full 64bit installation of 9.3 install a "PAE enabled kernel", so that I would see all 4GB of installed RAM? Is this a special choice then or simply the standard kernel? Thanks in advance for your help! Ciao Siegbert

2 4

GA-K8NF-9
by Volker Kuhlmann 26 Oct '05

26 Oct '05

The Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9 was mentioned on this list before, having few problems. However, people tend to report "works", which isn't terribly useful. Specifically: Does it work with the SUSE 10.0 kernel out of the box (basic functionality)? Does the IEEE1394 interface work with SUSE 10.0? (There is no specific chip specified, and linux1394.org is dead.) Are SATA disks recognised during installation and give no trouble for booting and otherwise? Does the gigabit LAN work reliably/at all at 100M and at 1G? Thanks for any confirmation, + or -, Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.

2 1

MANY-MANY PROBLEMS AFTER UPGRADING TO 10.0
by Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas 26 Oct '05

26 Oct '05

Hello everybody. Today (errrrrr, yesterday, since it is now well past midnight and I am still pulling my hair off!), UPS brought me 10.0. With eager anticipation I started upgrading 9.3 to 10.0 on my Presario 3240 laptop (2.2 GHz AMD64 based, nVidia chipset, nVidia GeForce4 440, Go with 64MB dedicated video memory). Now I regret it ever doing this upgrade. Below I describe some of the many problems I am facing after the upgrade and then provide what I think are pertinent syslogs. --What happened to alsaplayer? It seems it has disappeared, even from the repositories! --Often the cursor does not "grab" when it is supposed to (left-clicking on sliders or window frames for resizing or when attempting to "block" text to be pasted by left-clicking and dragging --I use KDE). --The internet connection unexpectedly freezes after about 10 minutes of uptime (it did not do it just before the upgrade and after the upgrade I tested it with a 32-bit system; the ethernet cable and the cable modem seem to work fine with the 32-bit system --running 32-bit SuSE 9.3). This happens even if there is virtually no internet activity. See the pertinent syslogs below. Could this be a kernel problem? 'uname -r' responds '2.6.13-15-default', the stock SuSE kernel. --Shutdown takes forever (maybe over a minute) to commence. --Lost ticks are reported in the syslogs, even booting with the 'no_timer_check' kernel directive. (And no, I need ACPI because this is a laptop!) See the pertinent syslogs below. --DMA and IRQ errors also get registered in the syslogs, as you can see below. --The upgrade trashed all my "politically incorrect" media players! (I remember that before SuSE was aquired by Novel, it offered, on the installation CD/DVD, rpms for hard-to-install media players. Those were the days!) with some effort, I can tolerate "politically correct" libraries, such as 'xine-lib', if I know what I have to delete and install from other sources. But in my case it insisted on replacing perfectly good libraries, claiming inconsistencies. When the upgrade was done, kaffeine, xine, and MPlayer, which worked reasonably well under 9.3 (with the exception of some --not all-- .wmv files) had been virtually eviscerated. None could play DVDs, or mpegs, or whatever else! None! I uninstalled 'xine-lib', reinstalled 'libxine1', uninstalled and then re-installed kaffeine, and made sure that 'w32codec' was installed, but the end result was the same. (It could be that some packages are 32-bit and some others 64.) At least, if the user has "politically incorrect" libraries and executables installed, the upgrade procedure should make an attempt to leave them alone!!!! Some libraries, such as 'libdvdcss' are not even available in the apt-get repositories and one has to go on a treasure hunt to find them --if he is able to at all. Hear me out, SuSE/Novell! I cannot spend all my waking hours and cut into my sleep hunting for dependencies to get my computer to do the things I want. I am seriously thinking about switching to Mandriva or some other distribution which has all the software I want ready to go. If this had been a friend's computer, most probably I WOULD have gone with Mandriva. (Where is the ease of use, advertised on the box my10.0 came in? Novell has been quoted in the newsmedia about its desire to pernetrate the desktop. How are they going to attract people away from Windows with problems like these? Sure, I am no guru, but I am no novice either.) --Why does 'lspci' report my video card as '01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 420 Go 32M] (rev a3)', while I know it is a *64MB* GeForce *440* Go? Now some snippets of the syslogs (obtained via 'tail -n 100 -f /var/sys/log/messages'): Internet connection hangs: Oct 25 00:04:53 presario gconfd (nonsense-7105): GConf server is not in use, shutting down. Oct 25 00:04:53 presario gconfd (nonsense-7105): Exiting Oct 25 00:06:25 presario kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Oct 25 00:06:25 presario kernel: eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0c 0055 c07f media 10. Oct 25 00:06:25 presario kernel: eth0: Tx queue start entry 5131 dirty entry 5127. Oct 25 00:06:25 presario kernel: eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 0008a047. Oct 25 00:06:25 presario kernel: eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 0008a063. Oct 25 00:06:25 presario kernel: eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 0008a047. Oct 25 00:06:25 presario kernel: eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 0008a047. (queue head) Oct 25 00:06:25 presario kernel: eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1 Oct 25 00:06:37 presario kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Oct 25 00:06:37 presario kernel: eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0c 0055 c07f media 10. Oct 25 00:06:37 presario kernel: eth0: Tx queue start entry 4 dirty entry 0. Oct 25 00:06:37 presario kernel: eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 0008a047. (queue head) Oct 25 00:06:37 presario kernel: eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 0008a047. Oct 25 00:06:37 presario kernel: eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 0008a047. Oct 25 00:06:37 presario kernel: eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 0008a047. Oct 25 00:06:37 presario kernel: eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1 [This pattern repeats itself.] Sound, DMA, interrupt, and timing problems (disregard the errors about skype segfaulting; it was happening under 9.3, too): Oct 25 00:14:17 presario kernel: hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x24 Oct 25 00:14:27 presario kernel: hda: DMA interrupt recovery Oct 25 00:14:27 presario kernel: hda: lost interrupt Oct 25 00:14:50 presario hp: unable to open /var/run/hpiod.port: No such file or directory: prnt/hpijs/hplip_api.c 75 Oct 25 00:15:23 presario kernel: hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x24 Oct 25 00:15:33 presario kernel: hda: DMA interrupt recovery Oct 25 00:15:33 presario kernel: hda: lost interrupt Oct 25 00:17:04 presario kernel: Losing some ticks... checking if CPU frequency changed. Oct 25 00:20:40 presario kernel: ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c:2126: playback write error (DMA or IRQ trouble?) Oct 25 00:20:50 presario kernel: ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c:2429: capture read error (DMA or IRQ trouble?) Oct 25 00:20:59 presario kernel: skype[6459]: segfault at 0000000057318920 rip 0000000057318920 rsp 00000000567e742c error 14 Oct 25 00:21:09 presario kernel: ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1451: playback drain error (DMA or IRQ trouble?) Oct 25 00:21:15 presario su: (to root) nonsense on /dev/pts/1 Oct 25 00:21:42 presario kernel: ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c:2126: playback write error (DMA or IRQ trouble?) Oct 25 00:21:52 presario kernel: ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c:2126: playback write error (DMA or IRQ trouble?) Oct 25 00:21:58 presario kernel: skype[6508]: segfault at 00000000572f1920 rip 00000000572f1920 rsp 00000000567e742c error 14 Oct 25 00:22:08 presario kernel: ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1451: playback drain error (DMA or IRQ trouble?) presario:~ # Here is output of 'vmstat 5'; I am used to seeing *five* times as many interrupts under the same conditions (idling system): procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 0 32140 150092 360188 0 0 109 31 300 377 7 1 88 4 0 0 0 32156 150100 360188 0 0 0 16 255 284 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 32156 150100 360188 0 0 0 6 253 276 0 0 100 0 CF

2 2

Eclipse problems under x86_64 / 10.0
by Mike 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

Hi. I just updated to 10.0, and everything seems to work except Eclipse. I get an unsatisfied link error. The error message doesn't make much sense since the file it is complaining is present. Anyone know what's going on? I suspect 32 vs 64 bit issues, but SuSE's approach to java configuration is so bizarre I haven't been able to figure it out. Thanks! !SESSION 2005-10-24 14:29:27.405 ----------------------------------------------- eclipse.buildId=I20050627-1435 java.version=1.5.0_03 java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. BootLoader constants: OS=linux, ARCH=x86, WS=gtk, NL=en_US Command-line arguments: -os linux -ws gtk -arch x86 -data /home/mike/.eclipse !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 2005-10-24 14:29:31.189 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /home/mike/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.1/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/69/1/.cp/libswt-pi-gtk-3138.so: /home/mike/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.1.1/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/69/1/.cp/libswt-pi-gtk-3138.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1751) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1660) at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:822) at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:992) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:123) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.gtk.OS.<clinit>(OS.java:19) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(Converter.java:63) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(Converter.java:54) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.<clinit>(Display.java:122) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createDisplay(Workbench.java:381) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createDisplay(PlatformUI.java:155) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.createDisplay(IDEApplication.java:128) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication.run(IDEApplication.java:79) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.PlatformActivator$1.run(PlatformActivator.java:226) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:376) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:163) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:334) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:278) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:973) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:948) !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 2005-10-24 14:29:31.193 !MESSAGE Bundle update(a)plugins/org.eclipse.platform.source.linux.gtk.x86_3.1.0/ [45] was not resolved. !SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.osgi 2005-10-24 14:29:31.194 !MESSAGE Missing host org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.0. !SESSION 2005-10-24 14:38:32.144 ----------------------------------------------- eclipse.buildId=I20050627-1435

5 5

OSDL Linux client survey
by Miller, Marc 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

OSDL is surveying users who have Linux-based clients in their companies. Currently, 62% of the respondees are using Ubuntu, 26% are using Open SUSE, and 24% are using NLD or SLES. We the OSDL members believe that Novell/SUSE is underrepresented. To correct this, please fill out the survey at the below link (if you have not already responded). http://developer.osdl.org/dev/dtl/survey/start.shtml The information from this survey will assist the OSDL Desktop working group to focus on areas of development that are important to you. The results of this survey may also be valuable to your business. Once you complete the survey, you will be able to view the current aggregated public results of the survey. The target recipients of this survey are IT professionals that have deployed enterprise Linux clients/desktops or are planning to deploy Linux clients/desktops. Please pass this survey announcement on to the appropriate members of your organization. Your prompt attention to this survey will provide the DTL team with pertinent data and allow the team to focus on areas of development that are important to you. Regards, OSDL DTL Marketing Working Group -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

1 0

network installation iso image for 10.0
by Eric Whiting 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

Is there an 10.0 iso image for network installation? There was one in the 9.3 tree. I realize I can use CD1 with manual=1 to start a network install, but I need to do a network install of x86_64.. Is there another flag for that? eric

2 1

RE: [suse-amd64] MANY-MANY PROBLEMS AFTER UPGRADING TO 10.0
by Black, Alain 25 Oct '05

25 Oct '05

(Sorry for the top posting, I have yet to figure out how to get Outlook to properly inline post) I'm running 10.0 x64 and have had no network issues. My system is a desktop and not a laptop. The x64 system was a fresh install, but I have a 32bit system that I upgraded from 9.3 (with politically incorrect media players as well). Those players were marked in YAST as do not upgrade. They were preserved through the upgrade and continue to work quite nicely under 10.0. My 32bit system that I upgraded is running MythTV. If you want to re-install the "good" versions of the media players again, I would suggest heading over to http://packman.links2linux.org he even has a YAST repository setup that will plug right in. -Alain -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:aj@suse.de] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:32 AM To: Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas Cc: suse-amd64(a)suse.com Subject: Re: [suse-amd64] MANY-MANY PROBLEMS AFTER UPGRADING TO 10.0 Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas <fantanas(a)innocent.com> writes: > Hello everybody. > > Today (errrrrr, yesterday, since it is now well past midnight and I am > still pulling my hair off!), UPS brought me 10.0. With eager > anticipation I started upgrading 9.3 to 10.0 on my Presario 3240 laptop > (2.2 GHz AMD64 based, nVidia chipset, nVidia GeForce4 440, Go with > 64MB dedicated video memory). Now I regret it ever doing this upgrade. Interesting, I haven't heard about such problems and I'm running 10.0 on all my AMD64 machines without problems. > Below I describe some of the many problems I am facing after the upgrade > and then provide what I think are pertinent syslogs. > > --What happened to alsaplayer? It seems it has disappeared, even from > the repositories! > > --Often the cursor does not "grab" when it is supposed to (left-clicking > on sliders or window frames for resizing or when attempting to "block" > text to be pasted by left-clicking and dragging --I use KDE). If you have any problems that are reproduceable, please file them in our bugzilla, for details check: http://www.opensuse.org/Submit_a_bug > --The internet connection unexpectedly freezes after about 10 minutes of > uptime (it did not do it just before the upgrade and after the upgrade I > tested it with a 32-bit system; the ethernet cable and the cable modem > seem to work fine with the 32-bit system --running 32-bit SuSE 9.3). > This happens even if there is virtually no internet activity. See the > pertinent syslogs below. Could this be a kernel problem? 'uname -r' > responds '2.6.13-15-default', the stock SuSE kernel. This looks like a kernel problem of the ethernet driver. > --Shutdown takes forever (maybe over a minute) to commence. This should be only at the first time. > --Lost ticks are reported in the syslogs, even booting with the > 'no_timer_check' kernel directive. (And no, I need ACPI because this is > a laptop!) See the pertinent syslogs below. > > --DMA and IRQ errors also get registered in the syslogs, as you can see > below. > > --The upgrade trashed all my "politically incorrect" media players! (I > remember that before SuSE was aquired by Novel, it offered, on the An update removes SUSE Linux packages that are not on the media anymore - this is the default for all cases. The details of the package selection shows this. Leaving some of the libraries might give you a working program either. > installation CD/DVD, rpms for hard-to-install media players. Those were > the days!) with some effort, I can tolerate "politically correct" > libraries, such as 'xine-lib', if I know what I have to delete and > install from other sources. But in my case it insisted on replacing > perfectly good libraries, claiming inconsistencies. When the upgrade > was done, kaffeine, xine, and MPlayer, which worked reasonably well > under 9.3 (with the exception of some --not all-- .wmv files) had been > virtually eviscerated. None could play DVDs, or mpegs, or whatever > else! None! I uninstalled 'xine-lib', reinstalled 'libxine1', > uninstalled and then re-installed kaffeine, and made sure that > 'w32codec' was installed, but the end result was the same. (It could be > that some packages are 32-bit and some others 64.) At least, if the > user has "politically incorrect" libraries and executables installed, > the upgrade procedure should make an attempt to leave them alone!!!! > Some libraries, such as 'libdvdcss' are not even available in the > apt-get repositories and one has to go on a treasure hunt to find them > --if he is able to at all. Hear me out, SuSE/Novell! I cannot spend > all my waking hours and cut into my sleep hunting for dependencies to > get my computer to do the things I want. I am seriously thinking about > switching to Mandriva or some other distribution which has all the > software I want ready to go. If this had been a friend's computer, most > probably I WOULD have gone with Mandriva. (Where is the ease of use, > advertised on the box my10.0 came in? Novell has been quoted in the > newsmedia about its desire to pernetrate the desktop. How are they going > to attract people away from Windows with problems like these? Sure, I am > no guru, but I am no novice either.) > > --Why does 'lspci' report my video card as '01:00.0 VGA compatible > controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 420 Go 32M] (rev a3)', > while I know it is a *64MB* GeForce *440* Go? No idea, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj(a)suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

1 0