July 2004 - openSUSE AMD64 - openSUSE Mailing Lists

problem with c64-emulator vice
by Martin Markgraf 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

Hello, I tried to start the C64-emulator "vice" on my AMD Athlon 64 maschine with Asus K8V Deluxe board and 1GB RAM under KDE running SuSE 9.1, but all I got was -------------------------snip------------------------------- >~ x64 *** VICE Version 1.14 *** Welcome to x64, the free portable C64 Emulator. Current VICE team members: A. Boose, D. Lem, T. Biczo, A. Dehmel, T. Bretz, A. Matthies, M. Pottendorfer, M. Brenner, S. Trikaliotis. This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. See the "About VICE" command for more info. X11: 24bit Farbtiefe erkannt. DGA2: Found mode: 800x600-85,1Hz, 53 DGA2: Found mode: 640x480-120,1Hz, 58 DGA2: Found mode: 720x400-85,0Hz, 59 DGA2: Found mode: 640x400-85,1Hz, 60 DGA2: Found mode: 640x350-85,1Hz, 61 DGA2: Found mode: 512x384-87,1Hz, 62 DGA2: Found mode: 416x312-74,7Hz, 63 DGA2: Found mode: 400x300-85,3Hz, 64 Received signal 11. Beenden... ------------------------snap------------------------- Any hints ? thanks, martin -- Martin Markgraf

2 1

nvidia GeForce FX 5200 problem
by Miroslav Ruda 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

Hello, I have problem with nvidia GeForce FX 5200 graphics card on Suse 9.1 64bit. When some specific output should be displayed (mostly scrolling in xterm/Mozilla etc.), display is switched to black for 1 second. It's like blank screen saver, but I'm pretty sure that it's not misconfigured screen saver :-) I have tried both 1.0-5332 and 1.0.6106 drivers, I have tried Option "AGPMode" "4" or Option "NvAgp" "1", but nothing has changed. The problem is with kernels 2.6.5-7.75 and 2.6.5-7.95. Has anyone else the same problem? Mirek Ruda

1 0

[PATCH] Gigabit Ethernet support for forcedeth, Howto
by Col Jim Creech 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

I Found this patch for Gigabit ethernet support for Nforce: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg276976.html. How do I go about applying this patch and get my 8kda3+ Nforce3-250 onboard nic working in amd64? Thanks in advance. Jim -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

2 1

Re: [suse-amd64] Opteron single cpu - which mainboard
by chu＠tes-mail.jpl.nasa.gov 20 Jul '04

20 Jul '04

Joe Landman wrote: >Hmm. I am pretty sure that the 3ware cards are hardware based parity. > >http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata.asp > >If you are seeing high CPU utilization, it could easily be something else. >We have built/used a number of server systems for customers based on them, >and do not see CPU-"sucking" for large raid-5 systems under heavy load. You are right; the newer Escalade cards now have much better hardware based parity generators. Despite what their web site claims, I am uncertain about their earlier controllers, such as the 7506 series that we run. Our RAID5 LUNs ran at about 1/3 the speed that they did in RAID0 or RAID1+0. I'm not sure if my version of Linux kernel shows kernel business under top, but I know that my FFTW benchmarks also slow down a lot when running the LUNs under RAID5. However, if I configure them to RAID0 or RAID1+0 (with the same number of data disks in parallel as the RAID5 configuration), they run a lot faster, and the FFTW benchmarks also run a lot faster. From these observations I conclude that the parity generation for RAID5 have been done in their kernel drivers, or their hardware parity generators are really slow. >If you are constantly remapping bad sectors, or rebuilding the array, >you might see some load, but not significant amounts. Our disks are still new, so I have not yet see any of these activities. >Some of the Linux journaling file systems have performance issues >under intense load, specifically in their journaling code pathways. >This shows up as system time being a significant fraction of a runtime >for an intense IO job. Boy, you can say that again! But then, the difference between writing to an EXT2 file system made on these LUNs with and without journaling was much smaller than the difference between configuring these LUNs as RAID5 and RAID0/RAID1+0. I wonder if there are more efficient file systems that run like EXT2 without the journaling but provide the playback feature so that you don't have to fsck a disk after a system comes back up from an abrupt shut down? Now that we're talking about file systems in terabyte sizes, a full fsck can take a really long time. eyc

1 0

Re: [suse-amd64] Opteron single cpu - which mainboard
by chu＠tes-mail.jpl.nasa.gov 20 Jul '04

20 Jul '04

Peter Bast wrote: >I want to use SuSE Linux 9.1 with a AMD Opteron single cpu and if >possible with a 3ware raid controler (Escalade 7506-4LP). Has anybody >experience with such a configuration. My most important question is: >Which mainboard works safe and stable with SuSE Linux 9.1 and a AMD >Opteron single cpu. I am using an Escalade 7506-8 on a MSI K8D Master (dual Opteron) board running SLES 8. I had a lot of problems getting it all to work at first. But it is now working. The first thing you should do is check with the 3ware site to see which board they support, and what firmware (BIOS) upgrade you might need. They had some issues with their newer boards not working in PCI-X buses, or something like that, but that did not affect me. My problem with the motherboard had to do with out of date BIOSs, so once those were updated, the motherboard worked fine with the controllers. My more furstrating problems were with SLES 8, as the version on the origianl install CD needed a lot of patching. The strange thing was that the initial installation seemed to proceed correctly, and it even recognized the disks configured on the Escalade. But the machine would hang up when trying to boot. The procedure I eventually worked out was to do the initial install, remove the Escalade, boot the system and immediately apply all the patches. Then I can re-install the Escalade card and boot the system back up, and MOST things will appear to work: On the SLES 8/32 version, we introduced some kind of errors with the updates that prevented us from installing Oracle components. The initial install of Oracle was done BEFORE the patches, and those went fine. We ended up going to SLES 8/64, following the above procedure, and after Oracle released their support for Linux/64. Also, somewhere along the patches, the support for disks greater than 1TB started to work, but it was too late for us. We had already configured multiple LUNs of less than 1TB each because of initial problems with LUNs that were bigger. As a side note, the RAIDing functions of the Escalade cards are all done by their kernel drivers. Therefore, if you use a parity based RAID, like level 3 or level 5, you will be sucking down your CPU as you use those disks. I have mine configured in RAID 1+0, to get greater capacity, speed, and 100% redundancy. good luck, eyc

2 1

Opteron single cpu - which mainboard
by Dr. Peter Bast 20 Jul '04

20 Jul '04

Hi I want to use SuSE Linux 9.1 with a AMD Opteron single cpu and if possible with a 3ware raid controler (Escalade 7506-4LP). Has anybody experience with such a configuration. My most important question is: Which mainboard works safe and stable with SuSE Linux 9.1 and a AMD Opteron single cpu. thanks Peter ______________________________________ Inflex - installed on mailserver for domain @infai.de Queries to: postmaster(a)infai.de

1 0

SataRAID
by Nicolás Moreno 19 Jul '04

19 Jul '04

Hi, I want to install SuSE Linux 9.1 but it doesn't recognize the SataRAID configured on the BIOS RAID configuration utility. This is the message that appears: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Error WARNING: This system has at least one hard disk with a RAID configuration sold by de BIOS as RAID that is in fact a Software Raid. We detected de folowing disks to be part of such RAID. /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd The linux kernel 2.4 support some of this systems (Fasttrack and HighPoint RocketRaid), the linux kernel 2.6 does not support them at all. If you do an installation into these disks your RAID configuration and any data on the raid will be lost. Have a look at http://portal.suse.com to learn how to migrate to a Linux Software Raid. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My hardware is: Motherboard: Tyan S2882G3NR (Dual AMD Opteron) HD Controller: Silicon Image SATARaid Controller. Thanks. Nicolás Moreno. Buenos Aires. Argentina.

5 4

Getting Xine to Play DVD's
by Scott Leighton 18 Jul '04

18 Jul '04

Hi All, I just got a new box, AMD Athlon 64 2800+, and installed SuSE 9.1 on it. I'm coming from an old PII 450mhz machine where I was also running 9.1 for the past month (I'm a very recent Linux user). On the 32 bit machine, it was relatively easy to get Xine to work with DVDs, just visit packman's site and download the correct RPMs and install them. With this new 64 bit machine, no such luck. I've looked thru this lists archive back to May and noted several references to compiling from source, and other references to using the 32 bit version. The existing posts I found all assume a level of knowledge that I haven't come anywhere close to achieving yet. So, my questions. 1) Is it possible to get DVD's to play on the AMD64? 32 bit or 64 bit player, either one. 2) If so, is there a source somewhere with step by step instructions on how to accomplish that? Instructions geared to a complete newbie... Scott -- POPFile, the OpenSource EMail Classifier http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ Linux 2.6.5-7.95-default x86_64

3 7

Re: [suse-amd64] Getting Xine to Play DVD's
by Scott Leighton 18 Jul '04

18 Jul '04

On Monday 05 July 2004 11:59 am, you wrote: > Yes! > > You can 1) Either download vlc .7.2 source and all the various > dependancy, and try building yourself or. > > 2) The easy way. Is grab the prebuilt 32bit dvd enabled xine > packages(Google the link, they are out there). Remove xine64bit from > your install completely through yast (doing it through yast will > hopefully get rid of any dependancys). > No go, I run into dependency hell. I am really frustrated here and could use some help. I removed all of the Suse provided xine stuff along with Kaffiene. I was able to install libxine1 but xine-ui won't install.... helphand:/home/helphand/Documents # rpm -ivh --force xine-ui-0.99.2-0.pm.0.i686.rpm warning: xine-ui-0.99.2-0.pm.0.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 5277a2fa error: Failed dependencies: libcurl.so.2 is needed by xine-ui-0.99.2-0.pm.0 It complains about libcurl, but I get into a catch 22, libcurl is there in lib64 and that version has numerous dependencies, including Yast itself, so when I try to install it fails... helphand:/home/helphand/Documents # rpm -ivh curl-7.10.7-0.pm.1.i586.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] package curl-7.11.0-31 (which is newer than curl-7.10.7-0.pm.1) is already installed file /usr/bin/curl from install of curl-7.10.7-0.pm.1 conflicts with file from package curl-7.11.0-31 file /usr/share/man/man1/curl.1.gz from install of curl-7.10.7-0.pm.1 conflicts with file from package curl-7.11.0-31 file /usr/share/man/man1/curl-config.1.gz from install of curl-7.10.7-0.pm.1 conflicts with file from package curl-devel-7.11.0-31 Is there some secret to getting 32 bit and 64 bit versions of the same package to co-exist happily? Scott -- POPFile, the OpenSource EMail Classifier http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ Linux 2.6.5-7.95-default x86_64

1 0

Any luck with Matrox Parhelia frame buffer?
by Lewis Wolfgang 17 Jul '04

17 Jul '04

Hi Folks, Being a gutton for punishment, I decided to try a Matrox Parhelia frame buffer on a new Tyan S2875 with two 246 Opterons. Yast picks the card up as "VESA", nothing more. Matrox has a beta driver for Redhat 9.0, but it doesn't install cleanly on SuSE 9.1. What do you think? Should I get a Matrox G550 and put the Parhelia on the shelf for a year or so until the drivers catch up? If not a G550, what would you recommend? Thanks in advance, Lew Wolfgang

1 0