Hello,
list admins, please corect me if I'm wrong.
Since this list is intended for 'Linux security discussions'[1], I
really do not know why MS worms and viruses are discussed here.
The same holds for spam you get as a result of posting to this list.
Please reduce the traffic to discussions that are related to Linux _and_
security, not _only_ security, crap related to MS products or spam (for
that issue I would contact the list admins - they can ban spammers from
the list, I cannot).
TIA
GTi
[1] http://www.suse.com/us/private/support/online_help/mailinglists/
P.S.: Please don't cc me, I'm on the list.
I was looking for a solution concurrently in the web - but didn't find anything that answers my question .
imho, this should work :
iptables -A OUTPUT -t nat -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
but I get following error :
iptables: Invalid argument
-bruno
Martin Peikert <list(a)nolog.org> schrieb am 27.01.2004 10:59:13:
> Hello,
>
> BLeonhardt(a)analytek.de wrote:
> > how do I masquerade / source-nat locally generated packets with iptables - any hints ?
>
> rtfm and the HowTos you'll find at netfilter.org. Next time try google
> first before asking '31337' questions.
>
> GTi
Hi,
I allow ssh access to a number of accounts on one of
my servers from a list of IP addresses, but I don't
really want people to be using this service outside
normal working hours..
I'm restricting access to these accounts thus:
In /etc/pam.d/sshd, add:
account required pam_time.so
In /etc/security/time.conf, add:
sshd;*;user;Wd0900-1700
All well and good, BUT... I can't log in!
(And yes, it _is_ a weekday between 9am and 5pm....)
Given that the only system change is the addition of
that line, and that in /var/log/messages I see:
Jan 27 12:07:13 carbon pam_time[4642]: garbled syntax; expected name (rule
#1)
Jan 27 12:07:13 carbon sshd[4642]: PAM rejected by account
configuration[6]: Permission denied
I'm using SLES 8, and my pam package is version 0.76-109
Does the positioning of the line in pam.d/sshd matter
that much? It's currently the last "account" line, but
it was the first "account" line.
(And no, Mr PromotionFactory, I don't want to be on
your list)
Tom.
---------------
Tom Knight
System Administration Officer
Arts & Humanities Data Service
Web: http://www.ahds.ac.uk
Email: tom.knight(a)ahds.ac.uk
Tel: (0)20 7928 7371
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 07:11, maillist(a)promotionfactory.net wrote:
> Please reply to this e-mail to receive our current specials. If others
> should get this, include their e-mail also.
This is the whois info. Maybe this could be posted on a few newsgroups,
I'm sure they would like to get the additional phone calls.
Registrant:
Lockhart Design (LMTIZXWXGD)
7505 Big Buck Trail
Waxhaw, NC 28173
US
Domain Name: PROMOTIONFACTORY.NET
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Dunn, Lance (LD3695) dunnnc(a)AOL.COM
Dunn Mfg Corp dba Adcap Line
1400 Goldmine Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
US
704-283-2147 fax: 704-289-6857
Record expires on 19-Aug-2004.
Record created on 19-Aug-2003.
Database last updated on 27-Jan-2004 07:16:01 EST.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.PROMOTIONFACTORY.NET 66.193.15.252
NS2.PROMOTIONFACTORY.NET 66.193.15.253
This comes back from ARIN
kens:~ # whois 66.193.15.252
Time Warner Telecom TWTC-NETBLK-4 (NET-66-192-0-0-1)
66.192.0.0 - 66.195.63.255
Charlotte Colocation TWTC-CHRL-C-CHCO-00 (NET-66-193-8-0-1)
66.193.8.0 - 66.193.15.255
Perhaps a complaint to Time Warner would be in order.
--
Ken Schneider
unix user since 1989
linux user since 1994
SuSE user since 1998 (5.2)
Hi Giovanni,
i got the same message too from lists.suse.com.
Regards
Ben
---------------------
the source is:
Received: from lists.suse.com (lists.suse.com [195.135.221.131])
but did you (all) receive the same e-mail ?
Giovanni
I am trying to get Freeswan to work with my SuSE 8.1 Pro installation. My kernel does not have KLIPS support, so I am trying to
recompile it. I got the files from the http://www.suse.de/~garloff/linux/FreeSWAN/ website and I am still coming up blank.
I downloaded and installed the following files via YaST2
freeswan-1.99_0.934-0.i586.rpm
freeswan-1.99_0.934-0.src.rpm
km_freeswan-1.99_0.934-0.i586.rpm
I then issued the following commands
# cd /usr/src/linux
# make xconfig
(left all the default settings in xconfig)
# make dep
# make bzImage
# cd /usr/src/kernel-module/zz_freeswan
# make xgo
As I understand it, at this point, I should be able to go to the NETWORK OPTIONS in the xconfig and selection the options for
FreeSwan and IPSEC. However, I do not have any options for FreeSwan anywhere in the configuration window! I do not understand why
this is the case. I am new to kernel configs, so any information would be helpful!
Thanks