openSUSE Security June 2003

security@lists.opensuse.org

156 participants
147 discussions

how to keep nimda and code red from filling apache logs
by Mathias Homann 25 Sep '03

25 Sep '03

Hi all, here's a bit of a step-by-step description on how to keep nimda and codered from filling your apache logs. Parts used: - SuSE 7.2 Professional - SuSEfirewall2 - iptables 1.2.3 - linux kernel 2.4.13-pre5 steps: 1. install kernel sources for a kernel >> 2.4.9, running 2.4.13- pre5 here, works fine so far 2. get the sources for iptables 1.2.3 from http://netfilter.samba.org 3. unpack sources somewhere 4. export KERNEL_DIR=$(where you put the kernel tree) 5. cd into unpacked iptables sources, there's a subdirectory named patch-o-matic there 6. apply wanted patches by running ./runme $(name.of.patch)patch for this here You'll want the string patch You can also apply other patches, like the irc-conntrack patch 7. now there's a little bug in this patch... here's a diff: --- linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_string.c~ Sun Oct 21 00:16:29 2001 +++ linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_string.c Sun Oct 21 16:54:45 2001 @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ sk = skip[haystack[right_end - i]]; sh = shift[i]; - right_end = max(int, right_end - i + sk, right_end + sh); + right_end = max(right_end - i + sk, right_end + sh); } return NULL; 8. now, make config/menuconfig/xconfig... as usual. You can import your running kernel's config first. 9. enable the experimental stuff 10. go to networking options->netfilter, there's an option there to enable string matching; set that to M 11. compile and install kernel as usual; remember to uncomment the export INSTALL_PATH=/boot in the main makefile. 12. now build a rpm file for the new iptables stuff by installing the source rpm which comes with suse, then edit the spec file, put the iptables source in /usr/src/packages/SOURCE and rebuild. 13. now there are some small changes to the firewall config files. a) uncomment the last line in /etc/rc.config.d/firewall2.rc.config: FW_CUSTOMRULES="/etc/rc.config.d/firewall2-custom.rc.config" b) edit that file, I got the following stuff in mine: for forbidden_string in root.exe cmd.exe .ida; do iptables -I input_ext -p tcp --dport http -m string \ --string $forbidden_string -m state \ --state ESTABLISHED -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset done put that in the last supfunction defined in the custom rc file. c) change the FW_LOG setting in firewall2.rc.config from reading -log-level warning to -log-level kernel.warning 14. last: some small changes to /sbin/SuSEfirewall2 search in the script for the parts where the modules are loaded and unloaded; be sure to add ipt_string (and the other new modules you created by patching the kernel and enabling them in make config) to the modules loading/unloading code there. 15. reboot 16. if you try now to access (from outside, of course) one of the nimda or codered URLS, all you get is a 'connection reset by peer', and the request doesn't show in apache log files. btw, no guarantees, and the usual YMMV :) bye [L]

7 7

[suse-security] unsubscribe
by njean 09 Aug '03

09 Aug '03

Please remove me from your distribution list. Thanks, Neal Jean

10 10

Linux Security Modules
by Thomas Jones 02 Jul '03

02 Jul '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, Has anyone implemented LSM into a SuSE box as of yet? I tried a quick text search through the last 6 months or so of the list archive, but found no instance of this topic. I am particularly interested in utilizing the SELinux module. Possibly LIDS as well. Thanks. - -- Thomas Jones Linux-Howtos Network Administrator OpenGPG Key: 0x6A3DF6E9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+/wkhQT2komo99ukRAhPUAKDGaNz1YDeRPsFGjxjDaqSkWMhL5QCeIsu2 P0uUg9SAwFVf/tNwngn2e3k= =hUnf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

NIS - problems with passwd
by Niels Kueck 01 Jul '03

01 Jul '03

Hi, I've got some machines running as NIS clients very fine. Files like hosts, networks, auto.master, ... are used by all these machines. The passwd-file is also allocated by NIS and I can change the passwd by yppasswd an some minutes later I have the new password on all other machines. Everything is fine, but there is one thing I cannot change and maybe it's just a small entry in one configuration-file. The NIS server should be a NIS client at the same time so that I can logon to my NIS server by using the same password as I use for the NIS clients. I configured all files in the same way as I configured the other client machines but when I log on the server I have to give the password I gave the server when I installed the linux system. Using passwd (or yppasswd) on the server will change the NIS password so that I have to login on every nis client with the new apssword except the server/client. I don't see any possibility to change this password (or to login to server using the same password I am using for the clients). One more thing attract my attention: In the nsswitch.conf file the order to lookup for the passwd is 'nis files'. I can login my server by using the 'local' passwd (not the nis passwd). If I delete the 'files' entry, so that all passwds should be talken from nis it makes no differences. But, I am not able to change to root any longer (whcih seems to be normal). Maybe someone can help me ? Or do you have a good link to get a solution for this ? Thanks, ... ...niels. Here are some of my configurations: Using SuSE 8.2 on alle machines. The 'domainname' is the same on all machines. /etc/nsswitch.conf (on all machines): passwd: nis files shadow: nis files group: nis files hosts: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files networks: nis [NOTFOUND=return] files ... yp.conf contains the IP of the server or 127.0.0.1 (on all machines) /var/yp/securenets allows access for 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 192.168.200.0 /etc/passwd contains no 'normal users'. The last line is +:::::: (same for file /etc/group) /etc/nis/passwd contains all 'normal users' and /var/yp/Makefile includes /etc/nis for passwd, shadow and groups. -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!

1 1

Restrict usage of ssh-keypair
by Michael 'bukhem' Scherer 01 Jul '03

01 Jul '03

Hi List. I have a issue concerning the usage of an ssh keypair. With that keypair it should only be possible to: 1.) scp, if possible restrict it to a specifiy directory 2.) ssh -R ... Any ideas how to do that? thanks / greets Michael -- GiS - Gesellschaft fuer integrierte Systemplanung mbH +==================================================================+ Michael Scherer mscherer(a)gis-systemhaus.de Tel: 06201-503-74 Junkersstr.2 69469 Weinheim Fax: 06201-503-66 +==================================================================+ It's a book about a Spanish guy called Manual, you should read it. -- Dilbert

4 4

Re: AW: [suse-security] IPSEC plus SuSEFfrewall2
by John Lederer 30 Jun '03

30 Jun '03

I should have been clearer. I want subnet-to-subnet. It doesn't work on a ping between machines in the subnets, so I am missing something!. Thanks. John Uli Wurst wrote: >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: John Lederer [mailto:john@jhml.org] >Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Juni 2003 19:52 >An: suse-security(a)suse.com >Betreff: [suse-security] IPSEC plus SuSEFfrewall2 > >Hello John, > > > >>I am struggling to get a vpn working between two Suse 8.2 boxes. >>[SNIP] >>conn jhlnet-to-drsnet >> left=24.196.143.44 >> leftsubnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 >> leftid=(a)golum.ipsec.con >> leftrsasigkey=[keyid AQOyimW2p] >> leftnexthop=%defaultroute >> rightupdown="/usr/lib/ipsec/_updown_custom" >> right=208.171.49.111 >> rightsubnet=10.1.0.0/255.255.0.0 # >> rightid=(a)stpeter.ipsec.con # >> rightrsasigkey=[sums to 7873...] >> rightnexthop=%defaultroute >> auto=start >> >> > >IIRC this will only create a tunnel between the networks, NOT between your >two IPSEC-Gateways. Try to ping between two machines within the right- and >leftsubnet and it should work. If you want tunneled communication beween the >two gateway-machines you will have to add a section > >conn jhlnet-to-drsnet-from-this-gatway > left=24.196.143.44 > leftid=(a)golum.ipsec.con > leftrsasigkey=[keyid AQOyimW2p] > leftnexthop=%defaultroute > rightupdown="/usr/lib/ipsec/_updown_custom" > right=208.171.49.111 > rightsubnet=10.1.0.0/255.255.0.0 # > rightid=(a)stpeter.ipsec.con # > rightrsasigkey=[sums to 7873...] > rightnexthop=%defaultroute > auto=start > >on both ends of the tunnel (the "leftsubnet" on the left gateway's side has >been left out, so this would be from golum's ipsec.conf). On stpeter's side >you have to delete the rightsubnet line. > >HTH, > >Uli > > >

1 0

AW: [suse-security] Need hints for FreeSwan
by Neumann, Jens 30 Jun '03

30 Jun '03

Hi it's possible to do this. 1. Use DynDNS for the nameresolution with dynamic addresses. 2. You need a script (perl could be a good choice) to crate a dynamic ipsec.conf. You should ping the name of the other side of the tunnel and cut the received ip address. You can then rewrite the ipsec.conf file and reload the freeswan daemon. I tried it once and it works. I used a cronjob to check if the tunnel is up and running and to rewrite the config-file. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Jens Neumann Jens Neumann ZEDA GmbH & Co. KG , Dept. ZDT Mühlenweg 17-37 D - 42270 Wuppertal Tel.: +49 202 564-1175 Fax : +49 202 564-1384 Email: jens.neumann(a)zeda.de <mailto:jens.neumann@zeda.de> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Backhausen, Sven [SMTP:sbackhausen@ntcg.de] Gesendet am: Montag, 30. Juni 2003 09:16 An: SuSE-Security ML Betreff: Re: [suse-security] Need hints for FreeSwan we are running a lan-to-lan vpn with freeswan and dynamic ip adresses on both sides. it works, but you have to restart the tunnels on both ends if one end goes down. We are using a small script run by cron on both gateways which is pinging into the remote lan to see if the tunnel is still existing and taking action if not. sven Am Fre, 2003-06-27 um 23.30 schrieb Andreas Fießer: > Hi list, > > I'd like to connect a remote Win2K box to a internal LAN which has only > a dynamic IP via DSL. > I allready have dyndns.org domain, that gets updated on DSL login. > > Now I glimpsed at free-swan's documentation and - as far as I understand > - the setup-guide says I needed fixed IPs und update the DNS with key > info and so on. > So it is not possible for me to use it ? > > I currently have: > - SuSE 8.2 and the provided freeswan 1.99 on the gateway > - Win2K SP4 on the outside boxes > > Later there should be 2 Linux gateways connecting 2 LANs but still > dynamic IPs. > > Is there someone who could point me to a HowTo or at least verify that > what I'd like to do is possible with free-swan ? > > > > > -- > Check the headers for your unsubscription address > For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help(a)suse.com > Security-related bug reports go to security(a)suse.de, not here -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help(a)suse.com Security-related bug reports go to security(a)suse.de, not here

2 1

Need hints for FreeSwan
by Andreas Fießer 30 Jun '03

30 Jun '03

Hi list, I'd like to connect a remote Win2K box to a internal LAN which has only a dynamic IP via DSL. I allready have dyndns.org domain, that gets updated on DSL login. Now I glimpsed at free-swan's documentation and - as far as I understand - the setup-guide says I needed fixed IPs und update the DNS with key info and so on. So it is not possible for me to use it ? I currently have: - SuSE 8.2 and the provided freeswan 1.99 on the gateway - Win2K SP4 on the outside boxes Later there should be 2 Linux gateways connecting 2 LANs but still dynamic IPs. Is there someone who could point me to a HowTo or at least verify that what I'd like to do is possible with free-swan ?

2 1

IPSEC plus SuSEFfrewall2
by John Lederer 29 Jun '03

29 Jun '03

I am struggling to get a vpn working between two Suse 8.2 boxes. This is a ipsec-vpn between two subnets. Both gateway servers (stpeter and golum)are Suse 8.2, ipsec version is 1.99. here is a simple sketch of the setup: 10.1.x.x<=>10.1.1.214 |stpeter|208.171.49.111<=ipsec=>24.196.143.44|golum|192.168.204.1<=>192.168.x.x I do not want to use certificates for now. I seem to be getting a tunnel established with little trouble. My on;ly problem is that no packets use it <g>. With all the ipsec shut down, I can ping from 10.1.1.236 to 192.168.204.30 and vice versa. With ipsec up, a ping from either end shows nothing. The Susefirewall2 doesn't seem to show any dropped packets at either end. Ifconfig shows no packets received by ipsec0, but with the firewall tagged to show accepted packets , I show packets being delivered to ipsec0. So my suspicion has been routing. It looks like something happens between ethx sending the packets to the ipsec enabled interface and that interface receiving them. Tcpdump is not very illuminating -- it shows packets going out of the internal interface to ispec0, but nothing being received at the the external ethernet interface or the ipsec interface. I am mystified and confused. I have sort of run out of places to look. I ran "ipsec barf" on both gateways. To save bandwidth I uploaded stpeter's barf to: http://www.jhml.org/misc/stpeterbarf.txt and golum's to http://www.jhml.org/misc/golum.txt I would appreciate any help at all. I likely am missing something obvious. Thanks. John Lederer

1 0

POP3 via SSL with stunnel or sslwrapper
by info 29 Jun '03

29 Jun '03

Hi list, i encounter the followinf problem since i updated from suse 8.0 to suse 8.2 on my mailserver. I used pop3 with ssl with the qpopper on a SuSE 8.0 with the following entry in /etc/inetd.conf: pop3s stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sslwrap -cert /usr/ssl/certs/mymailserver.pem -port 110 I created a key/certificate with the following command: openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -nodes -out /usr/ssl/certs/mymailserver.pem -keyout /usr/ssl/certs/mymailserver.pem Then i started Eudora (my mailclient) and set it to use an alternate port for SLL. It the told me the certificate is not trusted. I imported the certificate to the trusted certificates and checked mail again. Now anything worked fine. This worked fine for nearly half a year. So no problems with this! Now i updated the mailserver to SuSE 8.2 and i encounter the following: 1. I can still connect to the machine. 2. My certificate is still valid and trusted. 3. I can not download any mail - even if my /var/spool/mail/user mailbox has some mails in it. 4. I can connect to port 110 (without SSL) and can download the mail. (So popper is still working fine) 5. The message log displays entries with SSL connections and POP3 connections (from localhost) just as allways. and now for the problem: 6. the /var/log/mail.warn displays the following: popper[14887]: Possible probe of account info from host 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) [pop_quit.c:29] This seems to be a result from a connection that just send the username and the issues a QUIT command. Why does my connection via port 110 work fine but via the SSL wrapper not? (And why did it work before the update?) Thanks in advance - rossi -

1 0

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

openSUSE Security June 2003