* Daniel Bauer <linux(a)daniel-bauer.com> [04-28-20 08:03]: You need to add the repo which contains the needed libmypaint as Carlos wrote or you will continue to get the missing package error. Zypper cannot find packages when it does know know the repo's containing the package, ie: add the necessary repo re-read Carlos' post. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 28/04/2020 14.32, Daniel Bauer wrote: Bugzilla. Or install 1.5 breaking that particular dep and see what happens. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)

On 28/04/2020 15.13, Daniel Bauer wrote: You might try with libmypaint from 15.2. It is version 1.4 Warning: do not add the 15.2 repo, just download the packages to a local directory and add that instead. Download gimp and the deps. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)

Hello, In the Message; Subject : Re: [opensuse] installing Gimp 2.10 on OS 15.1 failed (or: how to get webp for gimp?) Message-ID : <fe23e972-1903-7e5e-bafa-4184a41d5f08(a)daniel-bauer.com> Date & Time: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:36:20 +0200 [DB] == Daniel Bauer <linux(a)daniel-bauer.com> has written: [...] DB> > Warning: do not add the 15.2 repo, just download the packages to a local DB> > directory and add that instead. Download gimp and the deps. DB> I can't find a non-source rpm. DB> I searched DB> https://software.opensuse.org/download/package?package=libmypaint&proje… DB> Only a source rpm is available. The last "three million times" I tried to DB> compile something I failed. So this is no alternative for me... Yes, the compilation of libmypaint 1.4.0 is difficult. I didn't investigate the reason, that is, I searched the easier solution. Please compile gimp 2.10.12-lp151.1.5.src.rpm with libmypaint 1.5.1. It's easier than compiling the libmypaint 1.4.1. Regards, --- ┏━━┓彡 Masaru Nomiya mail-to: nomiya @ galaxy.dti.ne.jp ┃＼／彡 ┗━━┛ "Three young men died for Rationalization. Yet, Margaret Bloody Thatcher LIVES!" 'Brassed Off' -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Am 28.04.20 um 15:37 schrieb Harrie Baken: Thank you. I did the same and it works :-) I have seen that rpm before but I was afraid to install it as it is not "official". After you pointed on it I simply risked it, I hope I did not due something bad... However I can now work with the new version. -- Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Málaga https://www.patreon.com/danielbauer https://www.daniel-bauer.com -- Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Málaga https://www.patreon.com/danielbauer https://www.daniel-bauer.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Am 11.05.20 um 13:45 schrieb Anton Aylward: Anyway, gimp-2.10 isn't worth install. It is /extremely/ slow, in fact not usable. It has some new features that I'd love to have, but is so slow that I had to deinstall it and reinstall gimp-2.8. A simple adjust of a curve, for example, takes like a minute, you can see how it generates the effect line by line. You can search for "gimp 2.10 slow" and find countless reports. -- Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Málaga https://www.patreon.com/danielbauer https://www.daniel-bauer.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Hi Anton, others On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 07:45 -0400, Anton Aylward wrote: May be if I explain how this problem originates, I'll hopefully convince you that this isn't some "idiocy" on part of obs://graphics maintainers or anyone else, but rather an example of why installing packages from the devel repositories is not a recommended way of getting an "updated" application while continuing to use Leap:X as the base OS. The complaint about libmypaint is but a red herring. Rather, since obs://graphics serves as a devel project for openSUSE:Factory -- __not__ as a backport for Leap:15.X, libraries therein continue to be upgraded to their latest versions and pushed to openSUSE:Factory. One of these -- babl -- as part of its upgrade to version 0.1.70, switched to using meson >= 0.50 as its only build system (by upstream). As soon as this was checked into graphics, it stopped building for Leap:15.1 and became unresolvable. Why? Because Leap:15.1 only has meson 0.46 in its official repo and obs://graphics doesn't have meson >= 0.50.0 for Leap either (rightly so, it's not a graphics library/application but a core build system tool). Gimp also has a dependency on babl (in addition to libmypaint), so when babl became unresolvable in the graphics project for Leap:15.1, so did gimp, and it has been thus since. The last successful build of gimp for Leap:15.1 happened with babl version 0.1.66 (last pre-0.1.70 version), when the graphics project still had libmypaint version 1.4 which gimp linked against. In the meanwhile, libmypaint, which still builds just fine even on Leap 15.1 has continued being updated (now at v1.5.1, soon to-be v1.6.0) in the project (and sent to Factory), so version 1.4 is no longer available for any oS version from obs://graphics. Fwiw, gimp 2.10.x is in Leap:15.2 and, of course, has been in Tumbleweed for a while. I hope this helps you understand why. Cheers, -- Atri Bhattacharya (maintainer of libmypaint) Mon 11 May 18:21:32 CEST 2020 Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed on my laptop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 11/05/2020 19.00, Atri Bhattacharya wrote: There is a problem here. Repositories lack a description or comment that explains what is the use case of each repository. We only know that they are either "home" or "experimental". We do not know if it is a "devel" repo or that we should not use it - because the view as user is that if its published, we can use it. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.1 (Legolas))

On 11/05/2020 20.31, Atri Bhattacharya wrote: Not valid for users. It has to say it inside YaST, zypper, and here, search page: <https://software.opensuse.org/package/gimp> and inside the files in "/etc/zypp/repos.d/" so that YaST displays the info. Hidden in the OBS is only seen by developers, not users. Sorry. So, where do we get them from? From Debian, Ubuntu perhaps? If users should not use packages from repositories, just do not publish them. Problem solved. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)

On 11/05/2020 17:48, Patrick Shanahan wrote: I think he was being sarcastic. -- A: Yes. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 11/05/2020 23.52, Anton Aylward wrote: I was. ;-) -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)

On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 23:04 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: YaST, zypper, or any other package interface do not come with additional repositories pre-configured. You __choose__ to add them, either manually using `zypper addrepo` or via the package search website, which, to be fair, makes it as difficult as possible for you to do so. If that or the "experimental" sign on these packages in the search result does not deter a user, nothing will. One assumes they know what they are doing and on their own if this possibly breaks their system. I think gimp.org offers flatpack packages [1]. If you absolutely need version 2.10.x, that may be one way to get it. I'm going to ignore this unnecessarily provocative line... They are published with a view that advanced users may be able to make use of them, as long as they know what they are doing. That is, they understand how these devel projects work, are not shy to look at the build status of a package in a devel project and understand why if something isn't working, and perhaps to try and fix them. Often it works out with nary a worry. I am trying to explain why sometimes it does not and why in certain cases it can be rather difficult to fix. That said, it would probably be nice to have a mechanism to wipe binaries from a repo if they are no longer installable for whatever reason. But I suppose this would be rather difficult to implement considering the vast number of repositories and packages in those repositories that the OBS currently hosts. [1] https://www.gimp.org/downloads/ -- Atri Bhattacharya Mon 11 May 23:32:57 CEST 2020 Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed on my laptop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 11:48 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: Go figure! With due respect, you are not an authority on how openSUSE users use the distro either. Anyway, last comment from my side on this: * "Plain user" wants to install gimp on Leap: do nothing if it's pre- installed, if not open YaST or gnome-software or KDE Discover, search for gimp, and install it. * Advanced user: go to https://software.opensuse.org/package/gimp and try "Show gimp for other distributions ==> Show experimental packages" and proceed from there, with the knowledge that you may end up with a broken package that may or may not work or, worse, a broken system. But you are an advanced user, and you can fix it or rollback your system. You are not going to end up with GIMP from the graphics repository unless you go fishing for it. -- Atri Bhattacharya Tue 12 May 13:24:50 CEST 2020 Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed on my laptop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Anton Aylward wrote: Anton - You are not going to end up with GIMP from the graphics repository unless you go fishing for it ["it" being the graphics repository] . -- Per Jessen, Zürich (10.4°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - dedicated server rental in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 12/05/2020 08:24, Atri Bhattacharya wrote: Not so. Use Tumbleweed and you get experimental versions of everything that makes up openSUSE rather than the latest and determined stable versions of specifics. If I wanted latest/unstable version of Darktable there is a repository for that; I can pull HEAD from git or similar. I can compile that myself, manually apply patches, only I don't/cant (since I don't have the compiler suite or use build) git://github.com/darktable-org/darktable.git. But as I say, I'm not a developer, not interested in being a developer, not interested in the 'experimental'. Darktable 3..0.2 (from last year) is quite stable, thank you and is from the graphics repository. -- A: Yes. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Op dinsdag 12 mei 2020 15:25:34 CEST schreef Anton Aylward: Completely wrong. You get latest reviewed and openQA tested versions, where the entire distro is tested and released over and over again. No KDE beta or GNOME Unstable will land in TW f.e. -- Gertjan Lettink a.k.a. Knurpht openSUSE Forums Team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 12/05/2020 05:48, Carlos E. R. wrote: +1 -- A: Yes. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

* Anton Aylward &lt;opensuse(a)antonaylward.com&gt; [05-11-20 17:39]: ever hear about openSUSE build service -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Op dinsdag 12 mei 2020 07:13:16 CEST schreef Mathias Homann: Come on, we all know about OBS. The messages on searching are clear. If you don't care, that's OK, but don't criticize then. -- Gertjan Lettink a.k.a. Knurpht openSUSE Forums Team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Op dinsdag 12 mei 2020 11:48:20 CEST schreef Carlos E. R.: To stick to that comparison: you ignore the book that came with the car. And you ignore the factory calling out in the news to all owners of your car's model to immediately have the breaks replaced. OBS is on the frontpage of our website, software.o.o clearly shows links to build.opensuse.org ( OBS ) for every package in every project that has the 'publish' flag on. Packages from devel: repos will only land in TW / Leap after reviewing, passing openQA etc. If they haven't ( either in TW distribution repos or as Leap updates ), they haven't passed those. This info has been all over the place for years. Atri's posts on this list are definitely not the first elaborating on this. But you and others seem to simply refuse to accept those facts given. -- Gertjan Lettink a.k.a. Knurpht openSUSE Forums Team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 07:13 +0200, Mathias Homann wrote: Wrong analogy. More like you are trying to customise your car with highly selective, experimental parts not meant to be used by regular Joe/Jane (and clearly marked as such). In that case you better know as much details about those parts as possible, including where those parts come from. Indeed if these repositories were meant to be widely used, they would have come preconfigured with openSUSE releases or at least been made easy to add, for example, without making users click on "experimental packages" or "expert download" on the package search interface. Cheers. -- Atri Bhattacharya Tue 12 May 12:35:34 CEST 2020 Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed on my laptop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 08:41 -0400, Anton Aylward wrote: It is, and, if you didn't already, you know now. Please pass on this 'statutory warning' when you share these repositories with others. I am not classifying anything, the distro is. If you have to click on 'experimental packages' in the package search to get to a package, it is, quite clearly classified thus. As a rule, it bears keeping in mind that you are on your own when using these repositories, no matter how great and/or latest the packages coming from there may be. If you just 'heard' it from someone, they have done you a disservice if they didn't warn you about it first. I am not talking about this Konqueror package particularly; the packager in this case may well have gone the extra mile to ensure Leap 15.1 users are well supported (for example, the packman repos do this too). But don't simply go and 'zypper addrepo' because someone told you so. Cheers, -- Atri Bhattacharya Tue 12 May 14:57:34 CEST 2020 Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed on my laptop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Op dinsdag 12 mei 2020 15:35:40 CEST schreef Anton Aylward: That's what I call creating your own untested and unreviewed TW version. Your perception of how things work is plain wrong. -- Gertjan Lettink a.k.a. Knurpht openSUSE Forums Team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 11/05/2020 23.51, Knurpht-openSUSE wrote: But we do not search on the OBS. We search on the search page of opensuse web page. <https://search.opensuse.org/> to: <https://search.opensuse.org/packages/> which has a quick install button, named "direct install", with which you can install things not in the official distribution, without knowing the name of the repository it comes from. Then I can click "... for other distributions", select "show experimental packages" and then "1 click install" on the one with the higher version. No warnings at all. As easy as can be. To see the OBS page, one has to hit "expert download" and ... No, it is not there. It was, but the page was reformed and now it is not there. The OBS is hidden, as it should be. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)

* Per Jessen &lt;per(a)computer.org&gt; [05-12-20 06:13]: [...] but YaST and zypper will only show packages for configured repos and opi or search.o.o will include non-configured repos. wouldn't one want to know a package was available? and needing to configure a new repo would at lease provide a modicum of caution due to the detail needed to make the configuration. maybe just Irish luck but I run many experimental packages from added repos utilizing caution for possible system problems related to the (Carlos's words) non-Official repos, and experience few problems. Isn't that one method of "giving back" to the community? -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Hi Anton, On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 17:37 -0400, Anton Aylward wrote: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/graphics/openSUSE_Leap_15.1/ Calling this URL <A> > to > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/graphics and this <B>, my question to you would be: how do you get to <A> in the first place? To be sure, there are several ways to get there. For example, 1. You may search for a package foo on <https://software.opensuse.org/> , click on "Show foo for other distributions", scroll down to openSUSE 15.1, click on "Show experimental packages", then click on "Expert download", click on the openSUSE logo, then click "Grab binary packages directly" or "Add repository and install manually". This will have therefore warned you already that a) the packages are experimental and b) that you are doing something requiring "expertise". 2. You picked up URL <A> from a forum post or some other place which did not clarify that it is recommended to avoid this repository and packages therefore may break at any time. This word-of-mouth spreading, so to say, is, in my opinion, the hardest to guard a possibly not-so-advanced user from ending up using these experimental repos. 3. You are a long term user of openSUSE and just "know" where to look. If this is the case, I would guess it is more likely than not that you will have heard about build.o.o and its connection to download.o.o/repositories, and that, indeed, <A> is the published end-product of the work going on in <B>. There may possibly be other ways. It would be nice to know the route users take to end up at <A>, so that it may be possible to set up proper warning lights along the way. Cheers, -- Atri Bhattacharya Tue 12 May 00:49:17 CEST 2020 Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed on my laptop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 10:45 +0100, Dave Howorth wrote: Yeah, it's weird, but you have to click on the "Extra files for GIMP"... ... and then you can click on "Show gimp for other distributions". Nothing to do to protect against this, so I'll just tell you for the umpteenth time: Use non-standard, experimental repos **only** if you are an advanced user and know how to fix your system if you break it. Otherwise stick to the repositories openSUSE provides by default. Pass on this message to anyone with whom you share/discuss a non-std repository the next time. And where does YaST come with the graphics repository already configured and added in? -- Atri Bhattacharya Tue 12 May 12:17:17 CEST 2020 Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed on my laptop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Carlos E. R. wrote: Essentially, users are not expected to use anything but the official repos - download.o.o/distribution download.o.o/tumbleweed download.o.o/update download.o.o/repositories should be considered experimental. That is hardly major news to anyone? -- Per Jessen, Zürich (9.2°C) http://www.cloudsuisse.com/ - your owncloud, hosted in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Carlos E. R. wrote: I thought he explained in a very polite and understanding way that we all have the option, but that things may break. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (10.0°C) http://www.cloudsuisse.com/ - your owncloud, hosted in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 12/05/2020 06:48, Per Jessen wrote: Why presume that "extra" = "experimental" ??? Does that hold for Packman? Does that hold for the people who want to continue to run KDE3? There seem to be two ways of dealing with kernel updates: a) apply the patches to the old kernel and don't change it's numbering b) apply patches and generate a new kernel and change the numbering to reflect that. That I choose the latter and have 'old' kernels stacked so I can roll-back (until they get purged) seems to me better than having just the one kernel. If a patch is unstable then I have an option that the single-kernel people don't, which is why they need to use BtrFS and keep a whole pile of other stuff, stuff I don't want' in a rollback. I guess I'm a 'single issue' guy :-) I don't think that "extra" = "experimental" for all cases. -- A: Yes. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Anton Aylward wrote: I don't, but in the case of what we provide in repositories/, we say it is experimental because it has not gone through the same process as the distribution repos. In principle, yes in both cases. Which repos do you consider to be "extra"? -- Per Jessen, Zürich (13.4°C) http://www.cloudsuisse.com/ - your owncloud, hosted in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 12/05/2020 05:47, Carlos E. R. wrote: +1 -- A: Yes. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 12/05/2020 07.32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: Absolutely! Thanks :-) You hit the very nail on the head. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)

Hello, In the Message; Subject : Re: [opensuse] installing Gimp 2.10 on OS 15.1 failed (or: how to get webp for gimp?) Message-ID : &lt;871ro7bxal.wl-nomiya(a)galaxy.dti.ne.jp&gt; Date & Time: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:38:10 +0900 [MN] == Masaru Nomiya &lt;nomiya(a)galaxy.dti.ne.jp&gt; has written: [...] PS> You need to add the repo which contains the needed libmypaint as Carlos PS> wrote or you will continue to get the missing package error. Zypper PS> cannot find packages when it does know know the repo's containing the PS> package, ie: add the necessary repo MN> There doesn't exist such a repo. MN> The compilation of gimp 2.10.12-lp151.1.5.src.rpm is the solution for MN> him, I think. I built gimp 2.10.12-lp151.1.5.src.rpm with libmypaint 1.5.1 (installed from the graphics repo), and installed. Not so difficult. It's a nice-looking for me. Regards, --- ┏━━┓彡 Masaru Nomiya mail-to: nomiya @ galaxy.dti.ne.jp ┃＼／彡 ┗━━┛ "No Windows, no gains!" ..... "Why, I am wrong?" -- Bill -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

Am 28.04.20 um 16:26 schrieb Anton Aylward: hope I give the right details :-) [graphics] name=Graphics Project (openSUSE_Leap_15.1) enabled=1 autorefresh=0 baseurl=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/graphics/openSUSE_Leap_15… type=rpm-md gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/graphics/openSUSE_Leap_15.… In Yast, checking the versions of libmypaint I only see 1.5 -- -- Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Málaga https://www.patreon.com/danielbauer https://www.daniel-bauer.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

On 28/04/2020 16.53, Anton Aylward wrote: S | Name | Summary | Type --+----------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+----------- | libmypaint | A brushstroke creation library | srcpackage | libmypaint-1_5-1 | A brushstroke creation library | package | libmypaint-1_5-1-debuginfo | Debug information for package libmypaint-1_5-1 | package | libmypaint-debuginfo | Debug information for package libmypaint | package | libmypaint-debugsource | Debug sources for package libmypaint | package | libmypaint-devel | Header files for libmypaint, a brushstroke creation library | package | libmypaint-gegl-devel | Header files for libmypaint, a brushstroke creation library | package | libmypaint-gegl0 | GEGL bindings for libmypaint, a brushstroke creation library | package | libmypaint-gegl0-debuginfo | Debug information for package libmypaint-gegl0 | package | libmypaint-lang | Translations for package libmypaint | package cer@Telcontar:~> zypper search --details libmypaint S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository --+----------------------------+------------+------------------+--------+-------------- | libmypaint | srcpackage | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | noarch | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-1_5-1 | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | x86_64 | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-1_5-1-debuginfo | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | x86_64 | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-debuginfo | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | x86_64 | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-debugsource | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | x86_64 | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-devel | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | x86_64 | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-gegl-devel | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | x86_64 | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-gegl0 | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | x86_64 | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-gegl0-debuginfo | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | x86_64 | OBS: graphics | libmypaint-lang | package | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | noarch | OBS: graphics cer@Telcontar:~> As you can see, there is no version 1.4 there. I happen to have the graphics repo enabled. package 'libmypaint' not found. Information for srcpackage libmypaint: -------------------------------------- Repository : OBS: graphics Name : libmypaint Version : 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 Arch : noarch Vendor : obs://build.opensuse.org/graphics Summary : A brushstroke creation library Description : libmypaint, a.k.a. "brushlib", is a library for making brushstrokes which is used by MyPaint and other projects. Builds binary package : S | Name | Version --+-----------------------------+----------------- | libmypaint-1_5-1 | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | libmypaint-1_5-1-debuginfo | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | libmypaint-debuginfo | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | libmypaint-debugsource | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | libmypaint-devel | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | libmypaint-gegl-devel | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | libmypaint-gegl0 | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | libmypaint-gegl0-debuginfo | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | libmypaint-lang | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | typelib-1_0-MyPaint-1_5 | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 | typelib-1_0-MyPaintGegl-1_5 | 1.5.1-lp151.19.1 -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)

On 28/04/2020 20.39, Anton Aylward wrote: cer@Telcontar:/etc/zypp/repos.d> ls | grep graph OBS_graphics.repo cer@Telcontar:/etc/zypp/repos.d> cat OBS_graphics.repo [OBS_graphics] name=OBS: graphics enabled=1 autorefresh=1 baseurl=http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/graphics/openSUSE_Leap_15… path=/ type=rpm-md priority=100 keeppackages=1 cer@Telcontar:/etc/zypp/repos.d> -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)