February 2022 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1195591] Intel® Wi-Fi 6 AX201 160MHz IwlWifi not include this driver.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1195591 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1195591#c2 --- Comment #2 from Walddys Emmanuel Dorrejo C�spedes <dev.dorrejo(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #1) > The TW kernel contains the latest upstream code as well as the latest > upstream firmware, so if any performance issue is seen with it, better to > ask upstream devs. Please try to ping the upstream devs, e.g. on > bugzilla.kernel.org but at best on linux-wireless ML. Ok, thanks for the answer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1195887] kernel 5.16.8 with amdgpu (Processor graphics 4650G) wont work
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195887 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195887#c57 --- Comment #57 from Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch(a)suse.com> --- So for now it's recommended to go back to previous kernel. simpledrm will be disabled for the next kernel update. With that things will be working again as expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1188896] "BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000e555b579 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-256" during build of cross-epiphany-gcc11-bootstrap
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188896 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188896#c63 --- Comment #63 from LTC BugProxy <bugproxy(a)us.ibm.com> --- ------- Comment From geraldsc(a)de.ibm.com 2022-02-17 12:45 EDT------- Thanks, that looks (almost) good. I can open the dump with the vmlinux in crash, and see the kernel messages. As expected, the log buffer is completely filled with rcu_sched messages, starting at timestamp [33838.823685], and previous messages are lost. This should not be a problem when we have a dump with panic_on_taint setting, as that would immediately stop the system at the interesting part, and not have all the follow-on messages. However, "bt -a" does not work in crash with this dump, it shows all registers 0, and error "bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 20003c0600000d8 type: "readmem_ul"". This looks a bit like a (normal) stand-alone dump w/o "CPU store status", but current dump solutions should not require that any more. Of course, the "dump-guest-memory" approach does not sound like the normal dump solutions, at least I am not at all familiar with it, and find also no mention of that in our dump tools documentation. A normal "CPU store status" like in LPAR or z/VM is probably not possible in your case. Do you know if kdump would work in your system, i.e. when you would get a normal panic with panic_on_taint setting, then (on a normal system) kdump would trigger a dump? If not, we might wait and see if the dump with "dump-guest-memory" would maybe produce better results in that case, i.e. when the system gets dumped after it ended in a panic, instead of dumping it from a running state. At least we now have a working process to submit dumps plus matching vmlinux, which is good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1196060] systemtap fails to build simple example from docs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196060 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196060#c2 --- Comment #2 from Tony Jones <tonyj(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Tony Jones from comment #1) > Please try the version in devel:tools. It is in staging right now for > Tumbleweed. It is now in openSUSE:Factory. systemtap version 4.6 Also please always report what version of systemtap you are using stap -V or rpm -q systemtap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1196060] systemtap fails to build simple example from docs
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196060 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196060#c1 Tony Jones <tonyj(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfehlig(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(jfehlig(a)suse.com) --- Comment #1 from Tony Jones <tonyj(a)suse.com> --- Please try the version in devel:tools. It is in staging right now for Tumbleweed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1193889] [Build 20211215] openQA test fails in reconnect_mgmt_console because yast.ssh can not restart the operating system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1193889 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1193889#c42 --- Comment #42 from Sarah Kriesch <ada.lovelace(a)gmx.de> --- Our SUSE kernel developers are on CC and they know more about which patches are included. @SUSE Kernel Developers: Is this patch included in our Kernel? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=fi… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1188896] New: "BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000e555b579 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-256" during build of cross-epiphany-gcc11-bootstrap
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188896 Bug ID: 1188896 Summary: "BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000e555b579 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-256" during build of cross-epiphany-gcc11-bootstrap Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: S/390-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: ada.lovelace(a)gmx.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- This bug report is a mixture of gcc11 and Linux kernel. The build process of cross-epiphany-gcc11-bootstrap is hanging since 1 day with following information: [ 865s] g++ -fno-PIE -c -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Ic -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/c -I../../gcc/../include -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/../libcody -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace -o c/c-aux-info.o -MT c/c-aux-info.o -MMD -MP -MF c/.deps/c-aux-info.TPo ../../gcc/c/c-aux-info.c [ 866s] In file included from ./tm.h:23, [ 866s] from ../../gcc/c/c-aux-info.c:26: [ 866s] ../../gcc/config/elfos.h:201: warning: "READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP" redefined [ 866s] 201 | #define READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP "\t.section\t.rodata" [ 866s] | [ 866s] In file included from ./tm.h:21, [ 866s] from ../../gcc/c/c-aux-info.c:26: [ 866s] ../../gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h:671: note: this is the location of the previous definition [ 866s] 671 | #define READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP "\t.section .rodata" [ 866s] | [ 871s] g++ -fno-PIE -c -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Ic -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/c -I../../gcc/../include -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/../libcody -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace -o c/c-objc-common.o -MT c/c-objc-common.o -MMD -MP -MF c/.deps/c-objc-common.TPo ../../gcc/c/c-objc-common.c [ 876s] [ 846.778933] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000e555b579 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-256 ... [ 2241s] g++ -fno-PIE -c -O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/. -I../../gcc/../include -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/../libcody -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace -o reload1.o -MT reload1.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/reload1.TPo ../../gcc/reload1.c [ 2241s] [ 2211.961786] BUG: Bad page state in process cc1plus pfn:11d401 [ 2241s] [ 2211.967831] BUG: Bad page state in process cc1plus pfn:11d402 [ 2241s] [ 2211.968097] BUG: Bad page state in process cc1plus pfn:11d403 [ 2241s] [ 2211.968458] BUG: Bad page state in process cc1plus pfn:11d404 [ 2241s] [ 2211.968668] BUG: Bad page state in process cc1plus pfn:11d405 [ 2241s] [ 2211.968878] BUG: Bad page state in process cc1plus pfn:11d406 [ 2241s] [ 2211.969081] BUG: Bad page state in process cc1plus pfn:11d407 [ 2241s] [ 2211.969287] BUG: Bad page state in process cc1plus pfn:11d408 . [ 865s] g++ -fno-PIE -c -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Ic -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/c -I../../gcc/../include -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/../libcody -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace -o c/c-aux-info.o -MT c/c-aux-info.o -MMD -MP -MF c/.deps/c-aux-info.TPo ../../gcc/c/c-aux-info.c [ 866s] In file included from ./tm.h:23, [ 866s] from ../../gcc/c/c-aux-info.c:26: [ 866s] ../../gcc/config/elfos.h:201: warning: "READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP" redefined [ 866s] 201 | #define READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP "\t.section\t.rodata" [ 866s] | [ 866s] In file included from ./tm.h:21, [ 866s] from ../../gcc/c/c-aux-info.c:26: [ 866s] ../../gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h:671: note: this is the location of the previous definition [ 866s] 671 | #define READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP "\t.section .rodata" [ 866s] | [ 871s] g++ -fno-PIE -c -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Ic -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/c -I../../gcc/../include -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/../libcody -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace -o c/c-objc-common.o -MT c/c-objc-common.o -MMD -MP -MF c/.deps/c-objc-common.TPo ../../gcc/c/c-objc-common.c [ 876s] [ 846.778933] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000e555b579 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-256 [ 2241s] In file included from ./tm.h:23, [ 2241s] from ../../gcc/backend.h:28, [ 2241s] from ../../gcc/reload1.c:23: [ 2241s] ../../gcc/config/elfos.h:201: warning: "READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP" redefined [ 2241s] 201 | #define READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP "\t.section\t.rodata" [ 2241s] | [ 2241s] In file included from ./tm.h:21, [ 2241s] from ../../gcc/backend.h:28, [ 2241s] from ../../gcc/reload1.c:23: [ 2241s] ../../gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h:671: note: this is the location of the previous definition [ 2241s] 671 | #define READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP "\t.section .rodata" ... [ 2243s] g++ -fno-PIE -c -O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/. -I../../gcc/../include -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/../libcody -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace -o resource.o -MT resource.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/resource.TPo ../../gcc/resource.c [ 2243s] In file included from ./tm.h:23, [ 2243s] from ../../gcc/backend.h:28, [ 2243s] from ../../gcc/resource.c:23: [ 2243s] ../../gcc/config/elfos.h:201: warning: "READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP" redefined [ 2243s] 201 | #define READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP "\t.section\t.rodata" [ 2243s] | [ 2243s] In file included from ./tm.h:21, [ 2243s] from ../../gcc/backend.h:28, [ 2243s] from ../../gcc/resource.c:23: [ 2243s] ../../gcc/config/epiphany/epiphany.h:671: note: this is the location of the previous definition [ 2243s] 671 | #define READONLY_DATA_SECTION_ASM_OP "\t.section .rodata" [ 2243s] | [ 2301s] [ 2272.129159] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU [ 2301s] [ 2272.129930] rcu: 1-...!: (2004 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 2301s] [ 2272.130195] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 5803 jiffies! g57669 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 2301s] [ 2272.130474] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 2301s] [ 2272.130715] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 2301s] [ 2272.130909] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 2481s] [ 2452.178521] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 2481s] [ 2452.179275] rcu: 1-...!: (8411 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 2481s] [ 2452.179617] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 23808 jiffies! g57669 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 2481s] [ 2452.179949] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 2481s] [ 2452.180241] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 2481s] [ 2452.180457] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 2661s] [ 2632.370659] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 2661s] [ 2632.422457] rcu: 1-...!: (15430 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 2661s] [ 2632.422835] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 41827 jiffies! g57669 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 2661s] [ 2632.423099] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 2661s] [ 2632.423322] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 2661s] [ 2632.423498] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 2841s] [ 2812.408987] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU [ 2841s] [ 2812.409246] rcu: 1-...!: (21988 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 2841s] [ 2812.409342] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 59831 jiffies! g57669 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 2841s] [ 2812.464705] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 2841s] [ 2812.464890] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 2841s] [ 2812.465021] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 3022s] [ 2992.448529] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 3022s] [ 2992.568724] rcu: 1-...!: (29161 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 3022s] [ 2992.568847] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 77835 jiffies! g57669 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 3022s] [ 2992.568940] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 3022s] [ 2992.569021] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 3022s] [ 2992.569104] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 3202s] [ 3172.579399] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 3202s] [ 3172.638172] rcu: 1-...!: (36644 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 3202s] [ 3172.638356] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 95848 jiffies! g57669 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 3202s] [ 3172.638486] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 3202s] [ 3172.638608] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 3202s] [ 3172.638733] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 3382s] [ 3352.635605] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 3382s] [ 3352.785267] rcu: 1-...!: (44755 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 3382s] [ 3352.796719] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 113853 jiffies! g57669 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 3382s] [ 3352.807909] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 3382s] [ 3352.808153] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 3382s] [ 3352.809425] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 3562s] [ 3532.659925] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU [ 3562s] [ 3532.671463] rcu: 1-...!: (53554 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 3562s] [ 3532.697304] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 131859 jiffies! g57669 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 3562s] [ 3532.697588] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 3562s] [ 3532.697733] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 3562s] [ 3532.697877] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 3742s] [ 3712.708722] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 3742s] [ 3712.709943] rcu: 1-...!: (61764 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 3742s] [ 3712.710087] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 149861 jiffies! g57669 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 3742s] [ 3712.710195] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 3742s] [ 3712.710286] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: [ 3742s] [ 3712.710380] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 3922s] [ 3892.766529] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: [ 3922s] [ 3892.770375] rcu: 1-...!: (70277 ticks this GP) idle=cda/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=72272/72272 fqs=21 [ 3922s] [ 3892.805972] rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 167870 jiffies! g57669 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1 [ 3922s] [ 3892.806225] rcu: Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. [ 3922s] [ 3892.806499] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: Kernel version: 5.13.4-1.1: https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel/releases/tag/v5.13.4 Logs: https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory:zSystems/standard/s390x/c… Latest updates for s390x July 21: https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory:zSystems/cros… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 25

[Bug 1193889] [Build 20211215] openQA test fails in reconnect_mgmt_console because yast.ssh can not restart the operating system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193889 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193889#c41 --- Comment #41 from LTC BugProxy <bugproxy(a)us.ibm.com> --- ------- Comment From Ulrich.Weigand(a)de.ibm.com 2022-02-17 10:17 EDT------- Thanks Andreas! I guess that could indeed explain the hang in the kexec. Mark/Sarah, can you check whether that initial kernel (the one directly loaded by grub2, which then does the kexec to load another kernel) has the patch applied that Andreas mentioned? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1195887] kernel 5.16.8 with amdgpu (Processor graphics 4650G) wont work
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195887 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195887#c49 --- Comment #49 from Ilgaz �cal <ilgaz.nsa(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Thomas Zimmermann from comment #48) > > > no arguments: It gets stuck displaying > > > > "Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:MokListRT (MOKvar table)" > > > > I believe whatever supposed to happen after this is the problem. > > Thanks for attaching the log. On line 556 there is: > > [ 0.502730] simple-framebuffer simple-framebuffer.0: [drm] *ERROR* > fbdev: Failed to setup generic emulation (ret=-22) > > That's most likely because the video= resolution is not the one that grub > uses. So simpledrm could not enable it. Yeah, as I said in comment 44: > simpledrm shoudl probably ignore the parameter or provide a fallback. Hope I didn't create confusion, that dmesg log is from successful boot with display argument. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1193889] [Build 20211215] openQA test fails in reconnect_mgmt_console because yast.ssh can not restart the operating system
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 17 Feb '22

17 Feb '22

1 0