July 2022 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1188352] New: Can't enter LUKS password since kernel 5.13 on Pinebook Pro
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188352 Bug ID: 1188352 Summary: Can't enter LUKS password since kernel 5.13 on Pinebook Pro Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: jonasdcdm(a)mailbox.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 851029 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=851029&action=edit dmesg Since the upgrade to kernel 5.13 it's no longer possible to enter the LUKS password on boot. The physical keyboard works fine in GRUB, but the LUKS prompt won't see it, it doesn't register any key press. Entering the password via serial console works, and the Pinebook Pro boots to the desktop, where the physical keyboard works again. Kernel 5.12.13-1 is still working fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1201121] New: kernel: spi-nor spi0.0: BFPT parsing failed. Please consider using SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP when declaring the flash
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201121 Bug ID: 1201121 Summary: kernel: spi-nor spi0.0: BFPT parsing failed. Please consider using SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP when declaring the flash Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: opensuse(a)mike.franken.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Starting with the Tumbleweed snapshot installed on June 7th I get kernel: spi-nor spi0.0: BFPT parsing failed. Please consider using SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP when declaring the flash in my journal on every boot. Running fwupdmgr I get fwupd[6102]: 12:26:06:0015 FuPluginDfu truncated DFU interface data, no bcdDFUVersion The daemon nevertheless is starting. Because there is no newer firmware for any of my devices I am not able to test, if an update would work despite these error messages. This is a XPS 13 9310 2-in-1/0NVVG0, BIOS 2.8.1 02/25/2022. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1189283] New: kernel-obs-build needs af_alg
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189283 Bug ID: 1189283 Summary: kernel-obs-build needs af_alg Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: fvogt(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- libkcapi got updated to 1.3.1 (https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/910806) and apparently gnutls picks that up now and enables support for it. It seems like that depends on AF_ALG sockets though, which are currently not enabled in kernel-obs-build (missing af_alg module), so various builds (libzip, libvirt) fail with libkcapi - Error: AF_ALG: socket syscall failed (errno: -97) I'm not sure whether just af_alg is enough, it might need some other modules as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1198722] New: initialize useful compiled in LSMs by default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198722 Bug ID: 1198722 Summary: initialize useful compiled in LSMs by default Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: dmueller(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Currently CONFIG_LSM is very minimal, not even listing the LSMs that we compile into the kernel, which requires manual fixing on kernel boot cmdline using the "lsm=" parameter. we can enable these * landlock: optional ability for user land applications to sandbox themselves * yama: optional restrict of use of ptrace for nonprivileged users * bpf: create eBPF based LSMs dynamically bpf was enabled earlier already, but reverted due to bsc#1197746 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1196048] New: audit file watches do not really work?
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196048 Bug ID: 1196048 Summary: audit file watches do not really work? Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: meissner(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- auditctl -e 1 auditctl -w /etc/issue if i do echo hallo >> /etc/issue -> not audited if i do vim /etc/issue ... remove hallo line and save ... -> audited cat /etc/issue -> not audited Not sure if I am doing it right. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1194268] New: disable btrfs asserts in default kernels
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194268 Bug ID: 1194268 Summary: disable btrfs asserts in default kernels Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: dmueller(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- while chasing for I/O performance issues in virtualized environments (usecase Open Build Service package builds for example), I noticed that btrfs in our default kernel has asserts enabled. according to the Kconfig help setting, this setting is purely for development purposes. I suggested to move the setting CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT only into the debug flavors, however there was concerns that this affects finding memory corruptions and other hardware related issues. On the other side, in my brief testing it appeared disabling reduced code size noticeably (in dual-digit percentage range) and also improved IOPS on a FIO randrw test (on a cow file) by over 20%. I will replicate the tests to be sure. This bug is to track how to address the issue and making asserts purely developer only and disable them in production builds of the openSUSE distribution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1195297] New: fbtft spi screens no longer functions properly.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195297 Bug ID: 1195297 Summary: fbtft spi screens no longer functions properly. Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: simonf.lees(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Connected to the raspberry pi on my Robot I have a small 3.2" display [1] (or a clone / older version) it connects via SPI on the raspberry pi's GPIO header. In the past i've had it working with the overlay at [2] and the fbtft driver. This kinda setup is pretty common in the embedded / hobbyist world, I don't use a desktop or anything just simple status apps using the framebuffer directly on the other hand it wouldn't be the end of the world if I moved to Qt. Today I finally got a chance to update and as of now I no longer have an /dev/fb1 (/dev/fb0 is hdmi) is that expected with my current setup? I had other issues with the update and had to grab a fresh image and re add my overlay and raspbery pi config so there is also a chance I missed something setting it up again. I've put some dmesg output from the older system the new system shows nothing and below that is an fbi command I use for testing. Log from previously working system: [ 59.468595] fbtft: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have been warned. [ 59.714749] fb_ili9340: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have been warned. [ 59.716023] fb_ili9340 spi0.0: fbtft_property_value: buswidth = 8 [ 59.716049] fb_ili9340 spi0.0: fbtft_property_value: debug = 0 [ 59.716063] fb_ili9340 spi0.0: fbtft_property_value: rotate = 270 [ 59.716079] fb_ili9340 spi0.0: fbtft_property_value: fps = 25 [ 59.716093] fb_ili9340 spi0.0: fbtft_property_value: txbuflen = 32768 [ 61.352903] graphics fb1: fb_ili9340 frame buffer, 320x240, 150 KiB video memory, 32 KiB buffer memory, fps=25, spi0.0 at 16 MHz Test command: sudo fbi -T 13 -d /dev/fb1 --noverbose 1-110313112A3.jpg 1. https://www.waveshare.com/wiki/3.2inch_RPi_LCD_(B) 2. https://github.com/swkim01/waveshare-dtoverlays -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1179894] New: warnings in OBS builds from kernel+initrd about "Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179894 Bug ID: 1179894 Summary: warnings in OBS builds from kernel+initrd about "Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps" Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: okurz(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: fvogt(a)suse.com, jslaby(a)suse.com, msuchanek(a)suse.com, okurz(a)suse.com, thomas.blume(a)suse.com, tiwai(a)suse.com Depends on: 1178401 Found By: --- Blocker: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1178401 +++ ## Observation https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory/images/local/000product:o… shows repeated warnings about: ``` [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps ``` ## Steps to reproduce Seemingly reproducible in any build of packages, e.g. https://build.opensuse.org/public/build/openSUSE:Factory/standard/x86_64/00… shows the same ## Expected result Only errors and warnings in the log that I as package/project maintainer can fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[kernel-bugs] [Bug 1178463] New: Flood of "usb usb{2,6}-port1: Cannot enable." messages
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178463 Bug ID: 1178463 Summary: Flood of "usb usb{2,6}-port1: Cannot enable." messages Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: lmb(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 843325 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=843325&action=edit lsusb -vv With the 5.10.0rc2 kernel from Kernel:HEAD, I'm experiencing a flood of: ... [ 372.567942] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 374.686509] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 377.026495] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 378.986503] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 381.446415] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 383.290504] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 385.918496] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 387.586478] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 390.386475] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 391.894454] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? ... The XPS 13 is connected to a Belkin Thunberbird dock. As far as I can tell, except for these messages, all USB connected peripherals (keyboard, mouse, webcam) are working. Attaching lsusb -vv and dmesg output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1188487] New: BUG: workqueue lockup
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Jan '23

26 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188487 Bug ID: 1188487 Summary: BUG: workqueue lockup Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: tdevries(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I started seeing this bug on my tumbleweed system: ... 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803560+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804959] CPU: 3 PID: 31988 Comm: gdb Tainted: G D 5.12.10-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed Message from syslogd@lena at Jul 19 16:18:29 ... kernel:[722585.589404] BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for inted: G D 5.12.10-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803561+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804964] Hardware name: LENOVO 20F5S0KF00/20F5S0KF00, BIOS R02ET73W (1.46 ) 01/08/2020 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803563+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804966] Call Trace: 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803564+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804971] dump_stack+0x76/0x94 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803566+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804978] bad_page.cold+0x9b/0xa0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803567+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804983] get_page_from_freelist+0x739/0x13a0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803568+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804990] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x161/0x310 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803569+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804993] pagecache_get_page+0x14c/0x4f0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803570+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805000] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0 7-07T16:24:41.803572+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805009] iomap_write_actor+0x9f/0x1a0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803573+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805013] iomap_apply+0x111/0x2e0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803575+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805015] ? iomap_write_end+0x260/0x260 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803576+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805020] iomap_file_buffered_write+0x5c/0x80 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803577+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805023] ? iomap_write_end+0x260/0x260 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803578+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805026] xfs_file_buffered_write+0xbd/0x2b0 [xfs] 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803579+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805122] ? _flat_send_IPI_mask+0x21/0x40 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803580+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805128] ? generic_exec_single+0x50/0xc0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803582+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805133] ? smp_call_function_single_async+0x17/0x20 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803583+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805138] new_sync_write+0x11c/0x1b0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803583+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805143] vfs_write+0x1b8/0x270 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803585+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805146] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803586+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805150] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803587+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805155] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803588+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805159] RIP: 0033:0x7fc4b3b4539f 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803589+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805162] Code: 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 10 89 7c 24 08 e8 b9 49 f9 ff 48 8b 54 24 18 48 8b 74 24 10 41 89 c0 8b 7c 24 08 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 31 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 0c 4a f9 ff 48 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803590+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805167] RSP: 002b:00007fff61dfb5f0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803592+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805171] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 00007fc4b3b4539f 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803592+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805174] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 0000000001f9fe90 RDI: 000000000000000e 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803593+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805177] RBP: 0000000001f9fe90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff61dfbb30 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803594+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805180] R10: 0000000001a44440 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000001000 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803596+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805182] R13: 00000000018442a0 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 00007fc4b3c18700 ... This is with kernel: ... $ uname -a Linux lena 5.12.13-1-default #1 SMP Mon Jun 28 06:37:23 UTC 2021 (74bd8c0) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ... It happens during a build and test run of gdb. I've updated and rebooted to kernel version 5.13.0-1-default, but ran into the same bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

2023

2022

2021

2020

openSUSE Kernel Bugs July 2022