August 2021 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1188954] New: black screen on initial X open on Kaveri Radeon R7, /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory with radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Apr '23

14 Apr '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188954 Bug ID: 1188954 Summary: black screen on initial X open on Kaveri Radeon R7, /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory with radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: mrmazda(a)earthlink.net QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: sndirsch(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 851460 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=851460&action=edit Xorg.0.log and dmesg Initial summary: black screen on initial X open on Kaveri Radeon R7, /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory with radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1 To reproduce: 1-boot with included on kernel cmdline radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1 2-wait for X to fail to start 3-login on a tty 4-systemctl restart xdm Actual behavior: 1-X fails to start, finding no /dev/dri/card0, leaving login prompt on tty1 on display screen 2-X starts normally using amdgpu DDX driver Expected behavior: 1-X starts normally using amdgpu DDX driver Tested with kernels 5.12.13, 5.11.16, 5.7.11 # inxi -SGIay System: Host: asa88 Kernel: 5.12.13-1-default x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 11.1.1 parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz root=LABEL=tvgp07stw noresume ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0 mitigations=auto consoleblank=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1 video=1024x768@60 video=1440x900@60 drm.debug=0x1e log_buf_len=1M Console: tty pts/0 DM: TDM Distro: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20210730 Graphics: Device-1: AMD Kaveri [Radeon R7 Graphics] vendor: ASUSTeK driver: amdgpu v: kernel alternate: radeon bus-ID: 00:01.0 chip-ID: 1002:130f class-ID: 0300 Display: server: X.org 1.20.12 driver: loaded: vesa unloaded: fbdev,modesetting alternate: ati Message: Advanced graphics data unavailable for root. Info:...inxi: 3.3.06 Comments: 1-without radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1 on cmdline, X cannot be coaxed into using amdgpu DDX driver via /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/*conf 2-without radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1, greeter startup completes (normally, on first try) using modesetting DIX driver -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 27

[Bug 1189826] New: Severe screen flickering with kernel 5.13.12-1-default and i915
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 12 Mar '23

12 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189826 Bug ID: 1189826 Summary: Severe screen flickering with kernel 5.13.12-1-default and i915 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: javier(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- My laptop's screen flickers so much with 5.13.12 that it renders my laptop unusable. One workaround is to close and open the lid. After resuming, it works fine - there is no flickering. Booting up from the KDE Live image works fine. I have used the same Tumbleweed version (20210820) as the one I have installed on my laptop. The only difference is that I have an encrypted /home partition on my laptop's SSD. Tested kernels: 5.10.16-1.3: OK 5.11.4-1.3: NON-OK 5.12.12-1: NON-OK 5.13.12-1: NON-OK KDE Plasma 5.22.4 KDE Frameworks 5.85.0 Qt 5.15.2 See the attachments for more details. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 1189283] New: kernel-obs-build needs af_alg
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Feb '23

28 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189283 Bug ID: 1189283 Summary: kernel-obs-build needs af_alg Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: fvogt(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- libkcapi got updated to 1.3.1 (https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/910806) and apparently gnutls picks that up now and enables support for it. It seems like that depends on AF_ALG sockets though, which are currently not enabled in kernel-obs-build (missing af_alg module), so various builds (libzip, libvirt) fail with libkcapi - Error: AF_ALG: socket syscall failed (errno: -97) I'm not sure whether just af_alg is enough, it might need some other modules as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1188352] New: Can't enter LUKS password since kernel 5.13 on Pinebook Pro
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Jan '23

28 Jan '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188352 Bug ID: 1188352 Summary: Can't enter LUKS password since kernel 5.13 on Pinebook Pro Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: jonasdcdm(a)mailbox.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 851029 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=851029&action=edit dmesg Since the upgrade to kernel 5.13 it's no longer possible to enter the LUKS password on boot. The physical keyboard works fine in GRUB, but the LUKS prompt won't see it, it doesn't register any key press. Entering the password via serial console works, and the Pinebook Pro boots to the desktop, where the physical keyboard works again. Kernel 5.12.13-1 is still working fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1179894] New: warnings in OBS builds from kernel+initrd about "Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179894 Bug ID: 1179894 Summary: warnings in OBS builds from kernel+initrd about "Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps" Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: okurz(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: fvogt(a)suse.com, jslaby(a)suse.com, msuchanek(a)suse.com, okurz(a)suse.com, thomas.blume(a)suse.com, tiwai(a)suse.com Depends on: 1178401 Found By: --- Blocker: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1178401 +++ ## Observation https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory/images/local/000product:o… shows repeated warnings about: ``` [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps [ 14s] Warning: running kernel does not support fscaps ``` ## Steps to reproduce Seemingly reproducible in any build of packages, e.g. https://build.opensuse.org/public/build/openSUSE:Factory/standard/x86_64/00… shows the same ## Expected result Only errors and warnings in the log that I as package/project maintainer can fix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[kernel-bugs] [Bug 1178463] New: Flood of "usb usb{2,6}-port1: Cannot enable." messages
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Jan '23

27 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178463 Bug ID: 1178463 Summary: Flood of "usb usb{2,6}-port1: Cannot enable." messages Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: lmb(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 843325 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=843325&action=edit lsusb -vv With the 5.10.0rc2 kernel from Kernel:HEAD, I'm experiencing a flood of: ... [ 372.567942] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 374.686509] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 377.026495] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 378.986503] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 381.446415] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 383.290504] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 385.918496] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 387.586478] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 390.386475] usb usb2-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? [ 391.894454] usb usb6-port1: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad? ... The XPS 13 is connected to a Belkin Thunberbird dock. As far as I can tell, except for these messages, all USB connected peripherals (keyboard, mouse, webcam) are working. Attaching lsusb -vv and dmesg output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1188487] New: BUG: workqueue lockup
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Jan '23

26 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188487 Bug ID: 1188487 Summary: BUG: workqueue lockup Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: tdevries(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- I started seeing this bug on my tumbleweed system: ... 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803560+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804959] CPU: 3 PID: 31988 Comm: gdb Tainted: G D 5.12.10-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed Message from syslogd@lena at Jul 19 16:18:29 ... kernel:[722585.589404] BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for inted: G D 5.12.10-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803561+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804964] Hardware name: LENOVO 20F5S0KF00/20F5S0KF00, BIOS R02ET73W (1.46 ) 01/08/2020 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803563+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804966] Call Trace: 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803564+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804971] dump_stack+0x76/0x94 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803566+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804978] bad_page.cold+0x9b/0xa0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803567+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804983] get_page_from_freelist+0x739/0x13a0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803568+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804990] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x161/0x310 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803569+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.804993] pagecache_get_page+0x14c/0x4f0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803570+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805000] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0 7-07T16:24:41.803572+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805009] iomap_write_actor+0x9f/0x1a0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803573+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805013] iomap_apply+0x111/0x2e0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803575+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805015] ? iomap_write_end+0x260/0x260 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803576+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805020] iomap_file_buffered_write+0x5c/0x80 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803577+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805023] ? iomap_write_end+0x260/0x260 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803578+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805026] xfs_file_buffered_write+0xbd/0x2b0 [xfs] 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803579+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805122] ? _flat_send_IPI_mask+0x21/0x40 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803580+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805128] ? generic_exec_single+0x50/0xc0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803582+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805133] ? smp_call_function_single_async+0x17/0x20 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803583+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805138] new_sync_write+0x11c/0x1b0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803583+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805143] vfs_write+0x1b8/0x270 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803585+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805146] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803586+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805150] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803587+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805155] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803588+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805159] RIP: 0033:0x7fc4b3b4539f 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803589+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805162] Code: 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 10 89 7c 24 08 e8 b9 49 f9 ff 48 8b 54 24 18 48 8b 74 24 10 41 89 c0 8b 7c 24 08 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 31 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 0c 4a f9 ff 48 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803590+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805167] RSP: 002b:00007fff61dfb5f0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803592+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805171] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 00007fc4b3b4539f 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803592+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805174] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 0000000001f9fe90 RDI: 000000000000000e 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803593+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805177] RBP: 0000000001f9fe90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fff61dfbb30 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803594+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805180] R10: 0000000001a44440 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000001000 2021-07-07T16:24:41.803596+02:00 lena kernel: [1053710.805182] R13: 00000000018442a0 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 00007fc4b3c18700 ... This is with kernel: ... $ uname -a Linux lena 5.12.13-1-default #1 SMP Mon Jun 28 06:37:23 UTC 2021 (74bd8c0) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ... It happens during a build and test run of gdb. I've updated and rebooted to kernel version 5.13.0-1-default, but ran into the same bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[kernel-bugs] [Bug 1176026] New: bond interface should not invent mac address by default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Jan '23

25 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176026 Bug ID: 1176026 Summary: bond interface should not invent mac address by default Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: ro(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- since 5.8.4 (unsure about last digit): when setting up a bond if kernel chooses a random mac removing and readding the slave gets back to the used behaviour: obs-arm-1:~ # modprobe bonding 3: enP2p1s0v1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 1c:1b:0d:60:ee:8b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 9e:29:55:da:aa:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff obs-arm-1:~ # echo +enP2p1s0v1 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves 7: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 9e:29:55:da:aa:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff obs-arm-1:~ # echo -enP2p1s0v1 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves obs-arm-1:~ # echo +enP2p1s0v1 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves 7: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 1c:1b:0d:60:ee:8b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1188589] New: libbpf: failed to find valid kernel BTF
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Jan '23

25 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188589 Bug ID: 1188589 Summary: libbpf: failed to find valid kernel BTF Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: mrostecki(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Since the update to the TW snapshot with the kernel 5.13.2-1, I see the following errors when trying to load BPF CO-RE skeletons with libbpf: libbpf: failed to find valid kernel BTF libbpf: Error loading vmlinux BTF: -3 The full example - I'm trying to load BPF programs which I have in this project: https://github.com/rancher-sandbox/lockc and the full output is: �� sudo ./out/lockcd libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(9) .rodata.str1.1 libbpf: failed to find valid kernel BTF libbpf: Error loading vmlinux BTF: -3 libbpf: failed to load object 'lockc_bpf' libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'lockc_bpf': -3 Error: libbpf error Caused by: System error, errno: 3 Most likely, the solution for them would be setting the following kernel parameters to "y": CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_REDUCED CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT But I'm not entirely sure yet. trying to test that... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1189993] New: Btrfs hogged one of the CPU cores for more than 30 minutes after a reboot (5.13.12-2-default, 33df9c6)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 24 Jan '23

24 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189993 Bug ID: 1189993 Summary: Btrfs hogged one of the CPU cores for more than 30 minutes after a reboot (5.13.12-2-default, 33df9c6) Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: lpechacek(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 852174 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=852174&action=edit dmesg, SysRq-L, perf data, lsblk -f, snapper list My CPU fan had a long high-intensity exercise this morning. The root cause turned out to be a kworker thread doing "btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space". The offending thread identification is "kworker/u16:11". I've collected some data bits (dmesg, SysRq-L, perf data) during the event. It is unclear to me, however, what triggered this long-running FS maintenance and how I could stop it in case I needed to - i.e. if the laptop ran battery or if I sat in a quiet room where the CPU fan disturbance would be unacceptable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1