June 2006 - openSUSE IA64 - openSUSE Mailing Lists

question
by Gustavo Kuerten 28 Jun '06

28 Jun '06

Hy everyone! I have two kind of this intel Xeon: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 3000.250 cache size : 16 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr bogomips : 5996.54 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 128 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual My question is wich Suse do I have to install, IA64 or X86_64. Thanks a lot. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

RE: [suse-ia64] IA64, SLES 9 and Lilo
by Cook, Steven C 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

>-----Original Message----- >From: LDB [mailto:thesource@ldb-jab.org] >Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 16:22 >We just installed SLES 9 on an IA64 server and the default >boot manager is LILO. >Is that normal for IA64? I do not think so .. but ... Last I heard, elilo (EFI LILO) was the _only_ boot manager working on IA64...it's been a bit, but... *shrugs* --steve--

3 3

Re: [suse-sles-e] Re: [suse-ia64] IA64, SLES 9 and Lilo
by LDB 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

Dennis Conrad wrote: > LDB wrote: > > >>We just installed SLES 9 on an IA64 server and the default boot manager is LILO. >>Is that normal for IA64? I do not think so .. but ... > > > It's elilo and it is "normal". See > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elilo > > and > > http://elilo.sourceforge.net/ > > Dennis > Thank you .. LDB

1 0

IA64, SLES 9 and Lilo
by LDB 02 Jun '06

02 Jun '06

We just installed SLES 9 on an IA64 server and the default boot manager is LILO. Is that normal for IA64? I do not think so .. but ... Thanks, LDB

1 0