May 2020 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1166661] YaSt2 Software Management internal error Read Repositories undefined method `uniq!'
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166661 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166661#c6 Michal Filka <mfilka(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |mfilka(a)suse.com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Michal Filka <mfilka(a)suse.com> --- fixed in yast2-packager 4.3.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1165436] AUDIT-0: timeshift: polkit-untracked-privilege for in.teejeetech.pkexec.timeshift
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165436 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165436#c7 Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> --- This should be through for a long time now. Closing as FIXED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1169238] AUDIT-TRACKER: enlightenment: changes to binaries requiring suid bits
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169238 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169238#c12 Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|AUDIT-0: enlightenment: |AUDIT-TRACKER: |changes to binaries |enlightenment: changes to |requiring suid bits |binaries requiring suid | |bits --- Comment #12 from Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> --- I'm changing the bug type to TRACKER since there's currently nothing else to do. Once you can point me to a new package containing the official release I can make a second pass over the code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1169365] AUDIT-0: certmonger: backport D-Bus whitelisting for org.fedorahosted.certmonger.service to Leap 15.2
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169365 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169365#c7 Malte Kraus <malte.kraus(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Malte Kraus <malte.kraus(a)suse.com> --- closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1169241] AUDIT-0: authselect: review of profiles
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169241 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169241#c7 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> --- Reviewing the profiles in detail only partly makes sense. The profiles come with a bunch of "features" and depending on which features are used a large number of different combinations is the result. I can of course look into the base profiles without any features enabled but they will probably be fine given the simplicity. For now I'm waiting for you to clear up the conflict I mentioned in comment 6. Please let me know how you want to proceed with this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1171164] AUDIT-0: permissions: %_libexecdir changes from /usr/lib to /usr/libexec, affects multiple entries
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171164 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171164#c3 --- Comment #3 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1171164) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/801106 Factory / permissions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1171318] New: [Build 20200506] YaST security module: integrate with pam_pwdquality
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171318 Bug ID: 1171318 Summary: [Build 20200506] YaST security module: integrate with pam_pwdquality Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1257523/modules/yast 2_security/steps/27 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 Assignee: yast2-maintainers(a)suse.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: jsrain(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-yast2_gui@64bit fails in [yast2_security](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1257523/modules/yast2_sec… ### Relevant pam-config change: - Update to version 1.3 - Add support for pam_pwquality - Replace cracklib with pam_pwquality ### YaST security still queries cracklib, which is no longer installed. This results in the settings not working on the right settings. (I assume this could lead to broken pam configs if a user were to adjust setting shere) ## Test suite description Maintainer: qsf-y Test for yast2 UI, GUI only. Running on created gnome images which provides both text console for ncurses UI tests as well as the gnome environment for the GUI tests. Temporarily added YAST2_GUI_TERMINATE_PREVIOUS_INSTANCES to see if helps. This variable triggers code which terminates all yast2 processes before starting new one. (see poo#26104). ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20200506](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1257523) (current job) ## Expected result Last good: [20200504](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1255703) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1170740] New: mkiss kernel module is missing
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1170740 Bug ID: 1170740 Summary: mkiss kernel module is missing Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: marc(a)marcchamberlin.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- uname -r 4.12.14-lp151.28.48-default modinfo mkiss modinfo: ERROR: Module mkiss not found. The kernel module for mkiss is missing in Leap 15.1. It has always been part of the default kernel module. What happened to it and why was it removed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1171115] AUDIT-0: polkit-default-privs: org.freedesktop.login1.* in restrictive profile: KDE hangs on logout when choosing "shut down"
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171115 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171115#c10 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Vogt <fabian(a)ritter-vogt.de> --- (In reply to Matthias Gerstner from comment #9) > (In reply to fabian(a)ritter-vogt.de from comment #8) > > The Plasma session management is currently undergoing a rewrite anyway, this > > might be one of the planned changes. > > So are you reporting this to upstream now, or are we just hoping that things > will fix themselves? I asked upstream whether this is being done already and if not I'll report it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1171115] AUDIT-0: polkit-default-privs: org.freedesktop.login1.* in restrictive profile: KDE hangs on logout when choosing "shut down"
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 May '20

07 May '20

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171115 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171115#c9 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Gerstner <matthias.gerstner(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to fabian(a)ritter-vogt.de from comment #8) > The Plasma session management is currently undergoing a rewrite anyway, this > might be one of the planned changes. So are you reporting this to upstream now, or are we just hoping that things will fix themselves? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0