openSUSE Bugs May 2020

bugs@lists.opensuse.org

2 participants
3518 discussions

[Bug 1047218] New: trackerbug: packages do not build reproducibly from including build time
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 22 Mar '23

22 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1047218 Bug ID: 1047218 Summary: trackerbug: packages do not build reproducibly from including build time Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: All OS: SUSE Other Status: CONFIRMED Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bwiedemann(a)suse.com Reporter: bwiedemann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: Development Blocker: --- See also https://reproducible-builds.org/ and https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ When packages include the current time of build it results in binaries that differ on every build and thus trigger rebuilds of depending packages and are published to mirrors and users when actually nothing really changed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 29

[Bug 1165294] New: haveged is marked as deleted after reboot
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 21 Mar '23

21 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165294 Bug ID: 1165294 Summary: haveged is marked as deleted after reboot Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem Assignee: screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: hpj(a)urpla.net QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi, *After reboot*, a couple of my TW systems show: $ zyp ps Verbosity: 2 Checking for running processes using deleted libraries... The following running processes use deleted files: PID | PPID | UID | User | Command | Service | Files ----+------+-----+------+-------------------+--------- +------------------------------ 531 | 1 | 0 | root | haveged (deleted) | haveged | /lib64/ld-2.31.so | | | | | | /lib64/libc-2.31.so | | | | | | /usr/sbin/haveged (deleted) | | | | | | /usr/lib64/libhavege.so.1.1.0 You may wish to restart these processes. See 'man zypper' for information about the meaning of values in the above table. No core libraries or services have been updated. Reboot is probably not necessary. Marcus Meissner noted on the factory ML, that: > It is ran in the initrd and probably still running after transition to the > regular system. > > (Likely pulled in via dracut-fips module) Shouldn't a transition from initrd to regular operation include a restart of this service then? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 8

[Bug 952198] New: django-admin does not work, django-admin.py does
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952198 Bug ID: 952198 Summary: django-admin does not work, django-admin.py does Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 42.1 RC1 1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE 42.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: o.kurz(a)gmx.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- observation: The django tutorial https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/intro/tutorial01/ suggests to use the tool "django-admin" with django >= v1.7 which is also available in Leap but does not work. "django-admin.py" also exists and works ok. steps to reproduce: - "zypper in python-Django python-sqlite" # confirm uninstallation of blocker package - "django-admin startproject mysite" - observe error with python traceback problem: unknown so far. Is ist maybe related that python-Django (still) uses python2? workaround: - Use django-admin.py which works flawlessly, e.g. example project can be configured and run: "django-admin.py startproject mysite && python manage.py migrate && python manage.py runserver", connect with webbrowser to http://localhost:8000. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 13

[Bug 1129471] New: kernel 5.0.1-1-default: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1129471 Bug ID: 1129471 Summary: kernel 5.0.1-1-default: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com Reporter: hendrikw(a)arcor.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Sins Tumbleweed 20190314, with kernel 5.0.1-1-default (x86_64) I get the following message during boot: integrity: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65 Log snippet: [ 2.985576] sched_clock: Marking stable (2989021511, -3468039)->(2994215803, -8662331) [ 2.986009] registered taskstats version 1 [ 2.986012] Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates [ 2.986062] Loaded X.509 cert 'openSUSE Secure Boot Signkey: 0332fa9cbf0d88bf21924b0de82a09a54d5defc8' [ 2.986093] zswap: loaded using pool lzo/zbud [ 2.998908] Key type big_key registered [ 3.005600] Key type encrypted registered [ 3.005606] AppArmor: AppArmor sha1 policy hashing enabled [ 3.008353] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008414] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Microsoft Windows Production PCA 2011: a92902398e16c49778cd90f99e4f9ae17c55af53' [ 3.008415] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008452] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011: 13adbf4309bd82709c8cd54f316ed522988a1bd4' [ 3.008453] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008476] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Acer Database: 84f00f5841571abd2cc11a8c26d5c9c8d2b6b0b5' [ 3.008477] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008482] integrity: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65 [ 3.008494] fbcon: Taking over console [ 3.008496] Error adding keys to platform keyring UEFI:db [ 3.008497] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:db [ 3.008501] integrity: Problem loading X.509 certificate -65 [ 3.008505] Error adding keys to platform keyring UEFI:db [ 3.008596] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 240x67 [ 3.009680] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:MokListRT [ 3.009739] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'openSUSE Secure Boot Signkey: 0332fa9cbf0d88bf21924b0de82a09a54d5defc8' [ 3.009740] integrity: Loading X.509 certificate: UEFI:MokListRT [ 3.012608] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'openSUSE Secure Boot CA: 6842600de22c4c477e95be23dfea9513e5971762' [ 3.014923] ima: Allocated hash algorithm: sha256 [ 3.052885] evm: Initialising EVM extended attributes: hardware: Laptop Acer Aspire A517-51-5832, one year old -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 20

[Bug 1153837] New: gobject-introspection has to require a specific Python ABI version
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153837 Bug ID: 1153837 Summary: gobject-introspection has to require a specific Python ABI version Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: gnome-bugs(a)suse.de Reporter: stefan.bruens(a)rwth-aachen.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- The _giscanner module depends on the ABI version used during the build: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:… [ 108s] /usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/__init__.py 0 (none) 100644 root root 0 4294967295 [ 108s] -/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_giscanner.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0 (none) 100755 root root 0 4294967295 [ 108s] +/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_giscanner.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so 0 (none) 100755 root root 0 4294967295 [ 108s] /usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_version.py 0 (none) 100644 root root 0 4294967295 Trying to use g-ir-scanner then leads to non-obvious errors, e.g.: https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C/standard/x86_64… [ 50s] [ 28%] Built target fcitx-addon-fcitx-classic-ui--headers-1 [ 50s] Scanning dependencies of target fcitx-addon-fcitx-x11--addon--conf-1 [ 50s] Traceback (most recent call last): [ 50s] File "/usr/bin/g-ir-scanner", line 98, in <module> [ 50s] from giscanner.scannermain import scanner_main [ 50s] File "/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/scannermain.py", line 35, in <module> [ 50s] from giscanner.ast import Include, Namespace [ 50s] File "/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/ast.py", line 29, in <module> [ 50s] from .sourcescanner import CTYPE_TYPEDEF, CSYMBOL_TYPE_TYPEDEF [ 50s] File "/usr/lib64/gobject-introspection/giscanner/sourcescanner.py", line 33, in <module> [ 50s] from giscanner._giscanner import SourceScanner as CSourceScanner [ 50s] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1140614] New: Error loading Applications menu extension in SLE-Classic
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1140614 Bug ID: 1140614 Summary: Error loading Applications menu extension in SLE-Classic Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME Assignee: qkzhu(a)suse.com Reporter: qkzhu(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: gwang(a)suse.com, xiaoguang.wang(a)suse.com, yfjiang(a)suse.com, zcjia(a)suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- apps-menu disappeared in TW-20190704, and journalctl shows: > gnome-shell[2369]: Extension "apps-menu(a)gnome-shell-extensions.gcampax.github.com" had error: Error: Requiring GMenu, version none: Typelib file for namespace 'GMenu' (any version) not found -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 15

[Bug 1146018] New: Unreliable copy and cut
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 19 Mar '23

19 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1146018 Bug ID: 1146018 Summary: Unreliable copy and cut Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE Workspace (Plasma) Assignee: opensuse-kde-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: audi_s4(a)luukku.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- After fresh installation of Tumbleweed to a new hardware (Ryzen Threadripper + AMD gfx) copy and cut with ctrl+c/x started working unreliably (never experienced this with the previous hardware setups). After KDE is started these work OK but after few hours already copy and cut start to miss these presses. 2nd press usually works but not always. After several days without restarting KDE this problem gets more severe - misses more often. Also, strange behaviour happens with Dolphin for example. When ctrl+x is pressed the file/folder icon flicks quickly to greyed out (cut selection) and back to normal. It becomes difficult to press ctrl+x so that cut selection remains. Holding ctrl+x pressed for repeat the icon start to flicker between normal and selected. Tried changing clipboard configuration options but none have made any difference to the problem. I have not seen issues with paste i.e. if there's something on a clipboard it can be pasted. This is not only ctrl+c/x button combination issue but same applied to selecting copy&cut from application menus. All applications (KDE basic apps, LibreOffice, Thunderbird, Firefox..) I use suffer from this problem thus it seems to be KDE related issue. This has been an issue for several months (since installation early 2019). In the beginning it was even worse i.e. some updates have reduced the issue a bit but not much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1100677] New: trackerbug: packages do not build reproducibly from compile-time CPU-detection
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '23

18 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1100677 Bug ID: 1100677 Summary: trackerbug: packages do not build reproducibly from compile-time CPU-detection Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: bwiedemann(a)suse.com Reporter: bwiedemann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Depends on: 1100520 Blocks: 1081754 Found By: Development Blocker: --- e.g. bug 1100520 compiler options -march=native and -mtune=native make the resulting machine code depend on the build system's CPU which breaks reproducible builds. affects at least: glucat form python-annoy legion trigger-rally This is already fixed in: clpeak higan kyotocabinet one common approach seems to do sed -i "s|-march=native||g" $FILE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 19

[Bug 1159231] New: tesseract-ocr builds with march=native
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '23

18 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1159231 Bug ID: 1159231 Summary: tesseract-ocr builds with march=native Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: All OS: openSUSE Factory Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: idonmez(a)suse.com Reporter: bwiedemann(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: hiwatari.seiji(a)gmail.com Found By: Development Blocker: --- While working on reproducible builds for openSUSE, I found that the tesseract-ocr package binary varies depending on build machine CPU. This is a bug that can cause crashes on machines older that the random build machine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1166537] New: osc rq accept - forwarding request causes backtrace
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 15 Mar '23

15 Mar '23

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166537 Bug ID: 1166537 Summary: osc rq accept - forwarding request causes backtrace Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development Assignee: marco.strigl(a)suse.com Reporter: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de CC: suse-tux(a)gmx.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- When accepting a SR to a devel project, osc asks if I want to forward the SR to Factory. I answered "y", but got this nice backtrace instead of a SR to Factory: # osc rq accept 784420 Result of change request state: ok openSUSE:Factory Forward this submit to it? ([y]/n)y Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/osc", line 41, in <module> r = babysitter.run(osccli) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/osc/babysitter.py", line 64, in run return prg.main(argv) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 344, in main return self.cmd(args) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 367, in cmd retval = self.onecmd(argv) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 501, in onecmd return self._dispatch_cmd(handler, argv) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/osc/cmdln.py", line 1232, in _dispatch_cmd return handler(argv[0], opts, *args) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/osc/commandline.py", line 2652, in do_request project, package, html.escape(msg, quote=False)) NameError: name 'html' is not defined Wild guess: missing "import html"? Note: commandline.py has an "import html" in do_submitrequest(), but this import isn't visible to do_request(). Also note that there are more functions in this file that call html.escape() without importing html before and will probably break in a similar way. Doing the "import html" in the file header instead of inside the functions might be a good idea. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Bugs May 2020