March 2010 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 482307] higher version of package not seen in zypper up
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482307 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482307#c7 Ján Kupec <jkupec(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jnelson-suse(a)jamponi.net --- Comment #7 from Ján Kupec <jkupec(a)novell.com> 2010-03-18 17:46:31 UTC --- *** Bug 555296 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555296 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 555296] New: zypper: zypper up doesn't show upgrades that zypper search does
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555296 Summary: zypper: zypper up doesn't show upgrades that zypper search does Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: libzypp AssignedTo: zypp-maintainers(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: jnelson-suse(a)jamponi.net QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091016 SUSE/3.5.4-1.1.2 Firefox/3.5.4 I don't understand why zypper won't find the upgrade for a package. Example: worklaptop:~ # zypper search -ds jfsu Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository --+----------------------+------------+-------------+--------+---------------------------- v | jfsutils | package | 1.1.14-31.1 | x86_64 | jnelson-suse's Home Project v | jfsutils | package | 1.1.14-31.1 | i586 | jnelson-suse's Home Project i | jfsutils | package | 1.1.12-27.1 | x86_64 | openSUSE-11.2-Oss v | jfsutils | package | 1.1.12-27.1 | i586 | openSUSE-11.2-Oss | jfsutils | srcpackage | 1.1.14-31.1 | noarch | jnelson-suse's Home Project | jfsutils-debuginfo | package | 1.1.12-27.1 | x86_64 | openSUSE-11.2-Debug | jfsutils-debuginfo | package | 1.1.12-27.1 | i586 | openSUSE-11.2-Debug | jfsutils-debugsource | package | 1.1.12-27.1 | x86_64 | openSUSE-11.2-Debug | jfsutils-debugsource | package | 1.1.12-27.1 | i586 | openSUSE-11.2-Debug worklaptop:~ # zypper -vv up jfsutils Verbosity: 2 Non-option program arguments: 'jfsutils' Initializing Target Checking whether to refresh metadata for Google - i386 Checking whether to refresh metadata for NVIDIA Repository Checking whether to refresh metadata for Packman Repository Checking whether to refresh metadata for Software configuration management (openSUSE_11.2) Checking whether to refresh metadata for Telephony Software (openSUSE_11.2) Checking whether to refresh metadata for VirtualBox OSE is an Emulator (openSUSE_11.2) Checking whether to refresh metadata for Virtualization:Qemu Checking whether to refresh metadata for jnelson-suse's Home Project Checking whether to refresh metadata for openSUSE-11.2-Debug Checking whether to refresh metadata for openSUSE-11.2-Non-Oss Checking whether to refresh metadata for openSUSE-11.2-Oss Checking whether to refresh metadata for openSUSE-11.2-Update Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Force resolution: No No update candidate for 'jfsutils'. Resolving package dependencies... Force resolution: No Nothing to do. worklaptop:~ # As you can see, zypper search finds jfsutils 1.1.14, but zypper up doesn't appear to be considering it. Why not? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 482307] higher version of package not seen in zypper up
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482307 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482307#c6 Ján Kupec <jkupec(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Status Whiteboard|need zypp API | --- Comment #6 from Ján Kupec <jkupec(a)novell.com> 2010-03-18 17:46:14 UTC --- Fixed in 1.4.0 oS 11.3 and 1.3.2 for oS 11.2. zypper in package zypper up package zypper up All these commands provide additional info about which packages won't get updated and 'zypper in/up package' also says why. ----------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C zypper in amarok faac Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... 'amarok' is already installed. There is an update candidate for 'amarok', but it is locked. Use 'zypper removelock amarok' to unlock it. 'faac' is already installed. There is an update candidate for 'faac', but it is from different vendor. Use 'zypper install faac-1.28-1.pm.2.1.x86_64' to install this candidate. Resolving package dependencies... Nothing to do. ----------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C zypper up amarok faac Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... There is an update candidate for 'amarok', but it is locked. Use 'zypper removelock amarok' to unlock it. There is an update candidate for 'faac', but it is from different vendor. Use 'zypper install faac-1.28-1.pm.2.1.x86_64' to install this candidate. Resolving package dependencies... Nothing to do. ----------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C zypper up Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... The following package updates will NOT be installed: DirectFB amarok amarok-lang boost-devel boost-license1_39_0 cairo cmake faac fate ffmpeg gparted gstreamer-0_10-plugins-base gstreamer-0_10-plugins-base-lang gstreamer-0_10-plugins-good gstreamer-0_10-plugins-good-lang k3b k3b-codecs k3b-lang kaffeine kaffeine-lang knemo ktorrent ktorrent-lang libGLEW1_5 libSDL-1_2-0 libSDL_image-1_2-0 libSDL_mixer-1_2-0 libavcodec52 libavdevice52 libavformat52 libavutil50 libboost_date_time1_39_0 libboost_filesystem1_39_0 libboost_graph1_39_0 libboost_iostreams1_39_0 libboost_math1_39_0 libboost_mpi1_39_0 libboost_program_options1_39_0 libboost_python1_39_0 libboost_regex1_39_0 libboost_serialization1_39_0 libboost_signals1_39_0 libboost_system1_39_0 libboost_test1_39_0 libboost_thread1_39_0 libboost_wave1_39_0 libcaca0 libfaac0 libffmpegthumbnailer4 libgstapp-0_10-0 libmikmod libpostproc51 libqjson0 libquicktime0 libspeex1 libswscale0 libtheora0 libv4l libwavpack1 libxine1 libxine1-codecs libxine1-gnome-vfs osc-plugin-overview perl-HTML-Encoding perl-HTML-Tidy perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP perl-Set-IntSpan perl-WWW-Curl photorec pingus ppracer python-numpy rar ruby-mysql rubygem-haml rubygem-paperclip rubygem-postgres rubygem-sqlite3 wavpack The following NEW packages are going to be installed: libx264-88 perl-String-Approx rubygem-enhancerepo rubygem-trollop The following package is going to be REMOVED: enhancerepo The following packages are going to be upgraded: 2ManDVD MPlayer MozillaThunderbird MozillaThunderbird-translations-other OpenOffice_org-components OpenOffice_org-libs-core OpenOffice_org-libs-extern OpenOffice_org-libs-gui OpenOffice_org-mailmerge OpenOffice_org-math OpenOffice_org-writer cron dvdauthor enigmail gstreamer-0_10 gstreamer-0_10-lang hypermail lame libblas3 libgstinterfaces-0_10-0 libgstreamer-0_10-0 liblapack3 libmp3lame0 liboil-0_3-0 libopenal1-soft mjpegtools python-ReportLab python-m2crypto ruby-rpm ruby-xml-smart rubygem-actionmailer-2_3 rubygem-actionpack-2_3 rubygem-activerecord-2_3 rubygem-activeresource-2_3 rubygem-activesupport-2_3 rubygem-gem2rpm rubygem-gemcutter rubygem-hoe rubygem-icalendar rubygem-json_pure rubygem-maruku rubygem-mechanize rubygem-mocha rubygem-nokogiri rubygem-rack rubygem-rails rubygem-rails-2_3 rubygem-rake rubygem-rubyforge rubygem-syntax rubygems sane-frontends smplayer w3c-markup-validator w3c-markup-validator-libs wireshark xorg-x11-driver-input xorg-x11-driver-video youtube-dl 59 packages to upgrade, 4 new, 1 to remove. Overall download size: 138.8 MiB. After the operation, additional 1.1 MiB will be used. Continue? [y/n/?] (y): -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 588895] New: Scroll wheel doesn't follow cursor when changing values and combo boxes
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588895 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588895#c0 Summary: Scroll wheel doesn't follow cursor when changing values and combo boxes Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: OpenOffice.org AssignedTo: bnc-team-ooo(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: sbellerby12(a)yahoo.com QAContact: cwei(a)novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091222 SUSE/3.5.7-1.1 Firefox/3.5.7 Using OpenOffice.org 3.2 on openSUSE 11.1, when I try to change a value (like a page margin) or a combo box (like a line style) with the scroll wheel, the value that will change is whatever field presently has focus. What this used to do is follow the cursor so I could just move it over what I wanted to change. Now a click is required for every single change, which is much slower. No other programs are behaving this way, which makes it inconsistent. The problem only occurred after I updated to the 3.2 series, and only in OpenOffice. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: One Example (behavior occurs in numerous areas, basically everything that should have a scrollable changeable value): 1.Open OpenOffice.org Writer 2.Go to Format > Page 3.Attempt to scroll while only hovering over different margins WITHOUT clicking on them. Actual Results: Because the focus starts on the type of page, that will change when you scroll regardless of where the cursor is (if the default point of focus is different when attempting to reproduce this, it will be at that default, the default just happens to be the kind of page on mine) Expected Results: If the cursor is over another value, it will change that one instead (if I hover over the top margin and scroll it will change the top margin, if I then move the cursor from over the top margin value to the horizontal page size value, it will change that if I scroll again) I'm assuming this is a bug due to the fact that OpenOffice.org used to behave this way but no longer does, every other application (also all installed through openSUSE repositories) behaves this way though so it seems like OpenOffice.org SHOULD do this but isn't for some reason. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 564543] New: python-crypto package should be replaced with maintained version
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564543 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564543#c0 Summary: python-crypto package should be replaced with maintained version Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Security AssignedTo: security-team(a)suse.de ReportedBy: dr(a)baileynet.org QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091103 SUSE/3.5.5-1.1.2 Firefox/3.5.5 The version of the python-crypto package currently shipping is 2.0.1 and hasn't been maintained for well over a year. There is now a release 2.1.0 offered from the new maintainer at http://www.dlitz.net/software/pycrypto/ Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 567525] New: winbind broken with AD/DSFW Domain Authentication
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567525 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567525#c0 Summary: winbind broken with AD/DSFW Domain Authentication Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: i586 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Samba AssignedTo: samba-maintainers(a)SuSE.de ReportedBy: cpedersen(a)novell.com QAContact: samba-maintainers(a)SuSE.de Found By: Customer Blocker: --- Setting up winbind to do authentication against an AD or DSFW domain does not work. To duplicate; - setup Kerberos to use the realm from the domain (verify with 'kinit <user>@realm)' - use 'Windows Domain Membership' to insert the computer into the domain - verify that the computer is in cn=Computers,dc=domain - verify that users are found (getent passwd) - if not found add in [global] to smb.conf: winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes - restart winbind or reboot computer Now when one tries to login with DOMAIN\\user one get Your password has expired Changing password for DOMAIN\test (current) NT password: And in /var/log/messages: Dec 29 12:27:34 opensuse sshd[5806]: pam_winbind(sshd:auth): user 'DOMAIN\test' granted access Dec 29 12:27:34 opensuse sshd[5806]: pam_krb5[5806]: account checks fail for 'SITE\test': user is unknown or account expired (ignoring) Dec 29 12:27:34 opensuse sshd[5806]: pam_winbind(sshd:account): pam_sm_acct_mgmt success but PAM_WINBIND_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD is set Dec 29 12:27:34 opensuse sshd[5806]: pam_winbind(sshd:account): user 'SITE\test' needs new password Dec 29 12:27:34 opensuse sshd[5806]: pam_winbind(sshd:chauthtok): getting password (0x000001a0) The password is not expired. This works if one is using SLED10SP2 which is shipping with a different version of winbind (samba-winbind-3.2.7-11.6) vs OpenSuSE 11.2 (samba-winbind-3.4.2-1.1.3.1.i586) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 587220] New: incorrect "may be used uninitialized" warning
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587220 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587220#c0 Summary: incorrect "may be used uninitialized" warning Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Factory Platform: PowerPC-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: pth(a)novell.com ReportedBy: jeffm(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Development Blocker: --- Created an attachment (id=347713) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=347713) Flags used to call gcc Building arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c from the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel results in a build failure due to the use of -Werror and an incorrect "may be used uninitialized" warning. cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-default-2.6.34/linux-2.6.33/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c: In function '__kvmppc_vcpu_run': /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-default-2.6.34/linux-2.6.33/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c:1102:23: error: 'ext_bkp.vrsave' may be used uninitialized in this function The chunk in question is the following: struct thread_struct ext_bkp; bool save_vec = current->thread.used_vr; [...] #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC /* Save Altivec state in stack */ if (save_vec) { if (current->thread.regs->msr & MSR_VEC) giveup_altivec(current); memcpy(ext_bkp.vr, current->thread.vr, sizeof(ext_bkp.vr)); ext_bkp.vscr = current->thread.vscr; ext_bkp.vrsave = current->thread.vrsave; } ext_bkp.used_vr = current->thread.used_vr; #endif [...] #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC /* Restore Altivec state from stack */ if (save_vec && current->thread.used_vr) { memcpy(current->thread.vr, ext_bkp.vr, sizeof(ext_bkp.vr)); current->thread.vscr = ext_bkp.vscr; current->thread.vrsave= ext_bkp.vrsave; } current->thread.used_vr = ext_bkp.used_vr; #endif save_vec is set once at the top of the function and is not changed. ext_bkp.vrsave is set within the save_vec if statement and read within the next one, and not at all outside of either. I'll attach the .c, the .i, and the gcc build options. gcc version 4.5.0 20100302 (experimental) [trunk revision 157166] (SUSE Linux) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 558576] New: openSUSE Build Service - cg depends on library (libGLU.so) that doesn't exist on system
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558576 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558576#c0 Summary: openSUSE Build Service - cg depends on library (libGLU.so) that doesn't exist on system Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: 3rd party software AssignedTo: ro(a)novell.com ReportedBy: matt(a)milliams.com QAContact: opensuse-communityscreening(a)forge.provo.novell.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- I have the openSUSE:11.2:NonFree repo available on my openSUSE 11.2 system but I am unable to upgrade to the latest version since it depends on 'libGLU.so' which is not provided by any of the system's packages. Mesa provides 'libGLU.so.1' but this doesn't satisfy the dependency solver. I'm unsure where this problem resides but I thought I should start here. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 589371] New: yast2-printer: should prefer "manufacturer-PPD" over "recommended" PPD
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589371 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589371#c0 Summary: yast2-printer: should prefer "manufacturer-PPD" over "recommended" PPD Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: All OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: ASSIGNED Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: jsmeix(a)novell.com ReportedBy: jsmeix(a)novell.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com CC: eich(a)novell.com, mzugec(a)novell.com Found By: Development Blocker: --- Currently there is in Printer.ycp ------------------------------------------------------------- // This is a recommended PPD: string recommended = "\$recommended\$"; integer recommended_weight = 16; // This is an original PPD from a manufacturer: string manufacturerPPD = "\\[manufacturer-PPDs/"; integer manufacturerPPD_weight = 8; ------------------------------------------------------------- which should be better ------------------------------------------------------------- // This is an original PPD from a manufacturer: string manufacturerPPD = "\\[manufacturer-PPDs/"; integer manufacturerPPD_weight = 16; // This is a recommended PPD: string recommended = "\$recommended\$"; integer recommended_weight = 8; ------------------------------------------------------------- because when for the same printer model there is an original PPD from a manufacturer and several Foomatic PPDs where one is "recommended", the manufacturer's PPD is likely the "best" PPD because "recommended" is only a Foomtic-internal info which is meant to recommend one of several Foomatic PPDs. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 575715] New: unzip decrypts zip files from windows incorrectly
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 18 Mar '10

18 Mar '10

http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575715 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575715#c0 Summary: unzip decrypts zip files from windows incorrectly Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: pth(a)novell.com ReportedBy: msvec(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created an attachment (id=339943) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=339943) example zip file ZIP files created under windows have broken encoding resulting in the decrypted files being impossible to open at all if they contain non-ascii characters (see the attached example zip file). Last release (April 2009) of unzip 6.0 contains quite some fixes regarding this, but I can't still get it to work. Just for reference, updated versions of unzip and zip 3.0: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=home:msvec:branches:Archivi… -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3