June 2008 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 395400] New: KDE4 insists on having 2 workspaces / desktops
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395400 Summary: KDE4 insists on having 2 workspaces / desktops Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: RC 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Workspace AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: skh(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- I have not found a way to change the number of virtual desktops, so I have changed the respective entry in ~/.kde4/share/config/kwinrc to: [Desktops] Name_1= Name_2= Name_3= Name_4= Number=4 However, after logging out and in again, I still have 2 Desktops, and the entry is changed back to: [Desktops] Name_1= Name_2= Name_3= Name_4= Number=2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 395686] New: Konqueror "previous" button is off by one
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395686 Summary: Konqueror "previous" button is off by one Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: RC 1 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE4 Applications AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: elsewhere(a)rogers.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Using Konqueror for web browsing, if I click the "back" button to select the drop down of previous sites, I can select a particular site, and it will put me to the one after that site. For instance, if I browse Site A -> Site B -> Site C -> Site D, and then use "Back" to try and move back to Site B, it will actually load site C. Site A will load me at site B. Since I start my home page with about:blank, I have to select that in my history, if I want to reach Site A. Just using "Back" with a single click to move to the previous page works fine. I've noticed this behavior for a while now in the KDE 4.1 snapshots from KDE4/UNSTABLE, but assumed that it was one of those "quirky" things that would be fixed. Since it hasn't, I'm wondering if it might be peculiar to my system or to a certain configuration. Previous KDE 4.0.x versions displayed to expected behavior in Konq. Please let me know if you require further details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 394431] New: open-vm-tools: Host to Guest Drag'n'Drop does not work
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394431 Summary: open-vm-tools: Host to Guest Drag'n'Drop does not work Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: prusnak(a)novell.com ReportedBy: dominique.leuenberger(a)tmf-group.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Drag'n'Drop from the host to the guest does not work with the current installation. Several steps are needed in plus> a Directory /tmp/VMwareDnD with mode 1777 has to be created (this could be part of open-vm-tools rpm I assume?) on bootup, the kernel module vmblock has to be loaded and a virtual fs has to be mounted: mount -t vmblock none /proc/fs/vmblock/mountPoint I assume that vmware-guest startup script would be a good point to include the modprobe and mount command, right? Or should I try to include them in a different waz? Please advise. Dominique -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 395667] New: Various packages fail integrity check while updating from Opensuse 11. 0 beta3plus to RC1
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395667 Summary: Various packages fail integrity check while updating from Opensuse 11.0 beta3plus to RC1 Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Beta 3plus Platform: x86 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: djkraemer(a)afterhoursdjs.org QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: Beta-Customer Various packages fail integrity checks causing gnome and kde yast updaters to fail the update. For example, via the yast installer for KDE3 and 4, this is one of the many errors given to various packages, too many to list. Error: INVALID:Package ndesk-dbus-0.6.0-26 fails integrity check. Do you want to retry? Retrying produces the same error. Gnome produces similar results, only states that the update was aborted by user. Steps to reproduce: KDE 3 and 4: Open the software updater in YAST. Filter by repository, select the factory inst-source repository (not the debug), go to the package menu, select all packages, then update if newer package is found. Gnome: Simply use the Update app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 396144] New: requirements abuse: do not overuse rpm requirements
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396144 Summary: requirements abuse: do not overuse rpm requirements Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Final Platform: i586 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Patterns AssignedTo: coolo(a)novell.com ReportedBy: bluedzins(a)wp.pl QAContact: coolo(a)novell.com Found By: --- I observe this for some quite time -- requirements are treated equally to "useful extra packages". But they are not equal: * package required should be such packaged that without it the main app will not run * packaged advised (to install) is such package that extend the functionality of the main app but that's it, it is ok to run program without it as well More recent example: kdevelop, requirements: doxygen and kdelibs3-devel-doc. I assure you it is ok to run kdevelop without them. It was just example, but my point is -- please, do not put all fancy stuff into requirements. Only what is _required_. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 396158] New: firmware test has some broken plugin/modules
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396158 Summary: firmware test has some broken plugin/modules Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: RC 1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Installation AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: romain.pelissier(a)gmail.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- For the fun of it I have tried the firmware test on the RC1 DVD. Some errors messages appear about some plug ins or modules that does not work. I have tested this on my asus a7n8x motherboard and I will test it in a vm. Can you confirm that you have those errors too? Of course this firmware test are not for the current user so if they do not work it is not really an issue for the average user but if this option is present maybe it have to work without any issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 395099] New: installation without harddisk not possible (iscsi)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395099 Summary: installation without harddisk not possible (iscsi) Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: AutoYaST AssignedTo: ug(a)novell.com ReportedBy: ug(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- in case of iscsi it might be needed to install without harddisk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 391795] New: hitting the search button in Yast2 software installation does not show " busy cursor"
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391795 Summary: hitting the search button in Yast2 software installation does not show "busy cursor" Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Beta 3 Platform: i386 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.0 Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: P5 - None Component: YaST2 AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: myemailu(a)gmail.com QAContact: jsrain(a)novell.com Found By: --- The search-function in the YAST2 software installation module (sw_single) does not switch the cursor to the "busy" state. The search function takes up to 20 seconds on my Pentium M 1,5GHz (e.g. searching for "perl" in all fields), but then user receives no visual clue indicating that the search is in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 394754] NetworkManager / openvpn not working correctly ( routes are not set up etc)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394754 User bili(a)novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394754#c8 Li Bin <bili(a)novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |uli.2001(a)gmx.de --- Comment #8 from Li Bin <bili(a)novell.com> 2008-06-02 02:42:10 MDT --- *** Bug 350884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 350884] New: KNetworkManager: openvpn connection does not set up route correctly
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350884 Summary: KNetworkManager: openvpn connection does not set up route correctly Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: uli.2001(a)gmx.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- I use an openvpn connection that works fine with "rcopenvpn start", but there is a problem with KNetworkManager. /etc/openvpn/default.conf is as follows: client remote 134.76.83.44 5007 proto udp dev tun comp-lzo ca /home/ulrich/Documents/privat/cert/ucacert.pem cert /home/ulrich/Documents/privat/cert/uliPeopleCert.pem key /home/ulrich/Documents/privat/cert/uliPeopleKey.pem status /var/log/openvpn-status.log log-append /var/log/openvpn.log verb 4 Somehow (apparently not through the configuration file), this vpn connection is used only for a certain address range (the IPs of the institute that I am connecting to): >route -n Kernel IP Routentabelle Ziel Router Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 10.108.108.1 10.108.108.61 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 tun0 10.108.108.61 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun0 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 134.76.82.0 10.108.108.61 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 >ifconfig eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:15:58:7F:8C:A8 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Basisadresse:0x3000 Speicher:ee000000-ee020000 eth1 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:19:D2:06:C8:98 inet Adresse:192.168.2.101 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Maske:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:116505 errors:81 dropped:3226 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:76568 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:247154871 (235.7 Mb) TX bytes:25566146 (24.3 Mb) Interrupt:22 Basisadresse:0xa000 Speicher:edf00000-edf00fff lo Protokoll:Lokale Schleife inet Adresse:127.0.0.1 Maske:255.0.0.0 inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:4769 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4769 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0 RX bytes:219065 (213.9 Kb) TX bytes:219065 (213.9 Kb) tun0 Protokoll:UNSPEC Hardware Adresse 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet Adresse:10.108.108.62 P-z-P:10.108.108.61 Maske:255.255.255.255 UP PUNKTZUPUNKT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:100 RX bytes:384 (384.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Now I tried to get the same connection using KNetworkManager. I filled out the configuration form as follows: Gateway: 134.76.83.44 Port: 5007 CA file, Certificate, Key: filenames as above On the optional information tab, I only activated "Use LZO compression". This results in: >route -n Kernel IP Routentabelle Ziel Router Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 134.76.83.44 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 tun0 >ifconfig eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:15:58:7F:8C:A8 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Basisadresse:0x3000 Speicher:ee000000-ee020000 eth1 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:19:D2:06:C8:98 inet Adresse:192.168.2.101 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Maske:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:116608 errors:81 dropped:3226 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:76671 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:247168630 (235.7 Mb) TX bytes:25579715 (24.3 Mb) Interrupt:22 Basisadresse:0xa000 Speicher:edf00000-edf00fff lo Protokoll:Lokale Schleife inet Adresse:127.0.0.1 Maske:255.0.0.0 inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:4778 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4778 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0 RX bytes:219624 (214.4 Kb) TX bytes:219624 (214.4 Kb) tun0 Protokoll:UNSPEC Hardware Adresse 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet Adresse:10.108.108.62 P-z-P:10.108.108.61 Maske:255.255.255.255 UP PUNKTZUPUNKT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1412 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:100 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Using a web browser, I can connect to the institute's website, but not to other website such as google.com (as this is supposed not to run through the vpn connection). I guess I could use the option "only use VPN connection for these adresses" in KNetworkManager's setup, and extract the required information from openvpn's route configuration listed above, but I would expect that I should not have to provide this information myself as openvpn seems to be able to obtain this information differently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8