August 2007 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 245181] New: arpwatch & multiple interfaces does not work
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Nov '08

12 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245181 Summary: arpwatch & multiple interfaces does not work Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: novell.com(a)kraemit.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de OpenSuSE 10.2 -> arpwatch-2.1a13-19 /etc/sysconfig/arpwatch PROTEUS:/var/log # cat /etc/sysconfig/arpwatch ## Path: Network/Arpwatch ## Description: Arpwatch settings ## Type: string ## Default: "" ## ServiceRestart: arpwatch # # Space seperated list of interfaces for arpwatch to listen on. # ARPWATCH_INTERFACE="eth1 eth2 eth3 eth6" ## Type: string ## Default: "" ## ServiceRestart: arpwatch # # Additional arguments when starting arpwatch with the init script # /etc/init.d/arpwatch or rcarpwatch. # # See man 8 arpwatch for all available commandline options. # ARPWATCH_ARGS="-d " ## only for testing PROTEUS:/var/log # px | grep arp root 31742 0.0 0.2 3520 2424 pts/2 S 22:05 0:00 /usr/sbin/arpwatch -d -i eth1 -i eth2 -i eth3 -i eth6 In fact: only fo the last interface arp records will be captured! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 226161] New: Cleaning up ftp.suse.com
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 12 Nov '08

12 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226161 Summary: Cleaning up ftp.suse.com Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: SuSE Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Action Items AssignedTo: draht(a)novell.com ReportedBy: rschiele(a)gmail.com QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com Now that 9.2 is out of support it might be the right time to do some cleanup on ftp.suse.com again to gain some space for 10.2. In my opinion the following directories are obsolete: out of support: /pub/suse/i386/9.2 /pub/suse/i386/update/9.2 /pub/suse/i386/live-cd-9.2 /pub/suse/x86_64/live-cd-9.2 really out of support: /pub/suse/i386/live-cd-9.1 /pub/suse/i386/live-eval-9.0 /pub/suse/x86_64/supplementary/9.0-PatchCD /pub/suse/i386/supplementary/9.1 /pub/suse/x86_64/supplementary/9.1 now in the build service (Why should we confuse people by keeping an out-of-date version on ftp.suse.com?): /pub/suse/i386/supplementary/GNOME /pub/suse/x86_64/supplementary/GNOME /pub/suse/i386/supplementary/X/Xorg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 274073] New: Network CUPS server corruption due to unknown fault?
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 Nov '08

11 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274073 Summary: Network CUPS server corruption due to unknown fault? Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Final Platform: i586 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Printing AssignedTo: jsmeix(a)novell.com ReportedBy: alpha096(a)tpg.com.au QAContact: jsmeix(a)novell.com Apologies my title is not helpful. I have a file/print server CUPS that after being set up they just sit there, with the exception of running Klogviewer and applying updates. This is the second time this has occurred. The first was when I did an upgrade from 10.1-10.2 o.k for a while then corruption. I did a New installation, CUPS works fine, however this morning I cannot even access CUPS administration. Quote The error on accessing the Cups Server is http://localhost:631/ 404 Not Found End quote The functionality of the cups print server is non functional. I trust the logs will indicate where this issue lies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 16

[Bug 244039] New: KDE Help Center - Unable to run command specified. The file or folder ....... does not exists
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 11 Nov '08

11 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244039 Summary: KDE Help Center - Unable to run command specified. The file or folder ....... does not exists Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: i586 OS/Version: SuSE Linux 10.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Documentation AssignedTo: rwalter(a)novell.com ReportedBy: f.leerink(a)hccnet.nl QAContact: ke(a)novell.com Hello, If I try to click on the tabs (selectable fields) from the page displayed in the KDE Help Center after clicking Administration/hardware/cups the system displays the in the Summary Description mentioned error. According to KDE Bug Tracking System this is a distribution specific error so for that reason I report it here. The steps required to reproduce the error are: 1 Open KDE Help Center 2 Click, under Contents tab, on Administration 3 Click, under Contents tab, on Hardware 4 Click, under Contents tab, on Cups Now a page is displayed on "Common Unix Printing System 1.2.7" Directly under this title there are a number of tabs (selectable fields) displayed respectively: Home, Administration, Classes, Documentation/Help, Jobs and Printers. Clicking on Admin, Classes, Doc/Help, Jobs and Printers results in the reported errors: "Unable to run command specified. The file or folder ....... does not exists" The dots ..... reads respectively: file:///admin/ file:///classes/ file:///help/ file:///jobs/ file:///printers/ Regards, Frans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 246092] New: gnome screensaver unlock window non logical arrowkey responce
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Nov '08

10 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246092 Summary: gnome screensaver unlock window non logical arrowkey responce Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: SuSE Linux 10.1 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: bnc-team-gnome(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: s.handgraaf(a)xs4all.nl QAContact: qa(a)suse.de On systems running default final SuSE Linux 10.1 with Gnome the unlock window of the Gnome screensaver shows non logical responce to arrow key use. When the screensaver is active the unlock window can be prompted with any keypress or mous movement. This window asks the user for an unlock password and shows three buttons beneeth the textfield for the password. This window shows non logical behaviour to the use of arrow keys. Using the up and down arrow keys makes the focus move through the window field and buttons. The left and right arrow keys show no behavior except activating the window from a blanked screen. Although the responce to the arrowkeys can be a fine feature besides the function of the tab button for moving the focus, it is also not consistent with expected window focus behaviour, not conform the gnome accessability standard, is a pain when trying to use keys to activate the window and then start to type the password and minimizes the number of keys to show the window without affecting the window behaviour. For this I propose to eighter disable the focus movement responce to the up/down arrow key pressing (since this is where the tab key is for), or at least add a configuration option to disable this focus behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 299145] New: (k)NetworkManager fails to set ESSID
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Nov '08

10 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299145 Summary: (k)NetworkManager fails to set ESSID Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Beta 1 Platform: i386 OS/Version: openSUSE 10.3 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Network AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: hartmut.meyer(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: Other I'm trying to connect to an unencrypted network with hidden ESSID. In knetworkmanager I use the option "connect to other wireless network" (like I would do with 10.2). I enter the correct ESSID and monitor the progress with iwconfig on the command line. First it becomes apparent that networkmanager for some reason does not set the ESSID - it just stays blank. In a further attempt I set the ESSID manually before attempting to connect with knetworkmanager: iwconfig eth1 essid johann-eilers-weg_24 knetworkmanager -> connect to other wireless network (specifying the ESSID) after manually setting the ESSID I can see with "iwconfig" that the ESSID is correctly set. After starting to connect with knetworkmanager I see with "iwconfig" that the ESSID is blank again. So apparently networkmanager does change the ESSID, but always to an empty/blank state. Wireless connection to the same network works fine when completely done manually: iwconfig eth1 essid johann-eilers-weg_24 ifup-dhcp eth1 Hardware is an built-in mini-PCI card (orinoco_pci). I will attach hwinfo --wlan /var/log/NetworkManager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 227482] New: error message in add repo - advanced
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Nov '08

10 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227482 Summary: error message in add repo - advanced Product: openSUSE.org Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: BuildService AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de QAContact: adrian(a)novell.com I got some nice error messages in the web interface ;-) To reproduce, - go to a project page - add repository - advanced - enter "suse" in the textbox - press return Result: The error messages listed below expected result: a) error message "no such repo" or b) (better) show repos matching *suse* (or implement an AJAX-based search) Error Details: Errorcode: Message: Internal Server Error Exception from API: NoMethodError: undefined method `project' for #<ActiveXML::Node:0x2ab2fb941528> Stack Trace: /srv/www/opensuse/common/current/lib/activexml/node.rb:252:in `method_missing' /srv/www/opensuse/frontend/current/public/../config/../app/models/db_project.rb:147:in `store_axml' /srv/www/opensuse/common/current/lib/activexml/node.rb:224:in `method_missing' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/rexml/element.rb:939:in `each' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath.rb:53:in `each' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/rexml/element.rb:939:in `each' /srv/www/opensuse/common/current/lib/activexml/node.rb:222:in `method_missing' /srv/www/opensuse/frontend/current/public/../config/../app/models/db_project.rb:146:in `store_axml' /srv/www/opensuse/common/current/lib/activexml/node.rb:224:in `method_missing' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/rexml/element.rb:939:in `each' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/rexml/xpath.rb:53:in `each' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/rexml/element.rb:939:in `each' /srv/www/opensuse/common/current/lib/activexml/node.rb:222:in `method_missing' /srv/www/opensuse/frontend/current/public/../config/../app/models/db_project.rb:130:in `store_axml' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.3/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:51:in `transaction' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.3/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:91:in `transaction' /srv/www/opensuse/frontend/current/public/../config/../app/models/db_project.rb:39:in `store_axml' /srv/www/opensuse/frontend/current/public/../config/../app/models/db_project.rb:17:in `store_axml' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.3/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:51:in `transaction' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.3/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:91:in `transaction' /srv/www/opensuse/frontend/current/public/../config/../app/models/db_project.rb:13:in `store_axml' /srv/www/opensuse/common/current/lib/activexml/transport.rb:227:in `save' /srv/www/opensuse/common/current/lib/activexml/base.rb:90:in `save' /srv/www/opensuse/frontend/current/public/../config/../app/controllers/source_controller.rb:246:in `project_meta' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.3/lib/action_controller/base.rb:910:in `perform_action_without_filters' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.3/lib/action_controller/filters.rb:368:in `perform_action_without_benchmark' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.3/lib/action_controller/benchmarking.rb:69:in `perform_action_without_rescue' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:293:in `measure' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.3/lib/action_controller/benchmarking.rb:69:in `perform_action_without_rescue' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.3/lib/action_controller/rescue.rb:82:in `perform_action' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.3/lib/action_controller/base.rb:381:in `process_without_filters' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.3/lib/action_controller/filters.rb:377:in `process_without_session_management_support' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.3/lib/action_controller/session_management.rb:117:in `process' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.1.4/lib/dispatcher.rb:38:in `dispatch' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.1.4/lib/fcgi_handler.rb:150:in `process_request' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.1.4/lib/fcgi_handler.rb:54:in `process!' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/fcgi.rb:612:in `each_cgi' /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/fcgi.rb:609:in `each_cgi' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.1.4/lib/fcgi_handler.rb:53:in `process!' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.1.4/lib/fcgi_handler.rb:23:in `process!' /srv/www/opensuse/frontend/current/public/dispatch.fcgi:24 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 293429] New: ntfs-3g default mount options
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Nov '08

10 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293429 Summary: ntfs-3g default mount options Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Alpha 6 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: peter.kerekfy(a)winsdom.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- I suggest to add 'fmask=111' mount option to ntfs-3g filesystems because it makes all files non-executeable which look much better than executeable files. Especially because the noexec parameter is already default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 294162] New: Is there a boot cd install for x86_64 open suse 10.3x ?
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 08 Nov '08

08 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294162 Summary: Is there a boot cd install for x86_64 open suse 10.3x ? Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Alpha 6 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: gdoig(a)pcug.org.au QAContact: qa(a)suse.de Found By: --- Hello, Is there a boot cd install for x86_64 open suse 10.3x ?. I ask because I cannot find one at http://en.opensuse.org/Development_Version I have tried using Ktorrent getting the X86_64 DVD and its been slow for me around 70 to 80Kbs per second so that took along time over a few nights so I dont use all my peak allocated quota. After the first try I found out that image was corrupted :-(( . So I have to go through the whole process again to get a good iso image. I generally install most of the package groups/extras from the dvd. By the way my line speed is listed as Downstream Speed: 2592 kbps and Upstream Speed: 352 kbps and using Ktorrent is slower than wget or prozilla in getting large iso files. Can you assist in any way ? Suggestions welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 303924] New: OpenOffice (oocalc) should distinguish between Shift pressed and Shiftlock
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 07 Nov '08

07 Nov '08

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303924#c290355 Summary: OpenOffice (oocalc) should distinguish between Shift pressed and Shiftlock Product: openSUSE 10.3 Version: Beta 2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: OpenOffice.org AssignedTo: eward(a)novell.com ReportedBy: sndirsch(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de CC: eich(a)novell.com Found By: --- With some keyboard layouts (e.g. french and belgium, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caps_lock --> Shift lock and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_layout#AZERTY for french/belgium keyboard layout), it makes sense to use Capslock as Shiftlock to type numbers in a spreadsheet program, especially if you don't have a number key block (e.g. if you use a laptop). Unfortunately OpenOffice.Org (oocalc) and probably also any other application/toolkit do not distinguish between Shiftlock and Shift. Therefore when you select a cell (left mouse button) in the spreadsheet and then a second one (also left mouse button) with Shiftlock enabled you also mark the cells between - as if you would have Shift pressed. A behaviour you don't want, don't expect and also don't get on Windows. How to reproduce: * setxkbmap -layout us -option "caps:shiftlock" * oocalc * press capslock/shiftlock * mark different cells with left mouse button P.S.: This bugreport is the conclusion of Bug #290355. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9