Search results for

[opensuse-factory] reproducible builds status 2022-02

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

Hi, this month I once again managed to do a good number of fixes, but I expect to spend less time on rb in the next month. last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/… Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-01/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220301/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14371 (+58) build-tried: 14354 (+73) build-failed: 28 (+1) … [View More]

3 years, 1 month

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2019-12

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2019-11/msg00370.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-11/ Three weeks ago, I attended the reproducible builds summit and then wrote about it at https://lizards.opensuse.org/2019/12/13/opensuse-on-reproducible-builds-sum… We also opened https://www.reddit.com/r/reproduciblebuilds/ . I already … [View More]found and reported or fixed several problems that would have caused problems in 2020. Some of these may be forgotten upstream: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=124509 perl-TimeDate https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=124513 perl-OLE-Storage_Lite https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=124514 perl-Parse-Win32Registry https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=124528 perl-File-Listing https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=124524 perl-Image-ExifTool ; 11.81 and later include the fix I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20191223/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 12558 (+134) build-tried: 12550 (+134) build-failed: 49 (-2) build-n-a: 79 (-2) build-succeeded: 12422 (+138) build-official-failed+na: 100 (-26) build-compare-failed: 380 (-35) build-compare-succeeded: 12042 (+173) verify-failed: 550 (-10) verified-semi-reproducible: 11756 (+148) verified-bit-identical: 0 bit-by-bit-identical: 11662 (+181) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 757 (-37) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20191223/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20191223/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 2 were in ring0 45 were in ring1 That makes it 47/2901 => 1.62 % which is below the overall average of 380/12422 => 3.06 % 757/12422 => 6.09 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Newly unreproducible core packages: cri-o: from an old go problem (go1.9+) where parallelism in multi-core builds cause variations in the .note.go.buildid ELF header Newly reproducible core packages: fftw3: no more varies from -flto=%smp since it was rebuilt with new rpm that uses -flto=auto python-magnumclient From sphinx template patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/652669/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568815/ rpmlint-mini: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/754705 Happy Christmas Bernhard M. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRk4KvQEtfG32NHprVJNgs7HfuhZAUCXgEiIwAKCRBJNgs7Hfuh ZAz8AKDTuBE40xsuOIbL9Gm7HeAtizHJkACg7i8v06qdFRkDfC9WSoBUg3nlia0= =nrvf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org [View Less]

5 years, 3 months

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2020-05

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-04/msg00026.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-04/ The reproducible numbers may be around 60 too high because I ran the autoclassify on packages that had been classified more than a year ago. And that often leaves them reproducible-with-tweaks, which should be tracked separately in the … [View More]

4 years, 10 months

[opensuse-factory] reproducible builds status 2022-06

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

Hi, not much progress in June as I have been off for nearly 3 weeks. last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/… Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-06/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220704/ today https://rb.zq1.de/spec/glossar.txt explains the meaning of below values: total-packages: 14424 (+30) build-tried: 14412 (+26) build-failed: 29 (-… [View More]

2 years, 9 months

[opensuse-factory] reproducible builds status 2021-11

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

Hi, This month I had a small presentation in PackagingCon so there are some updates in https://github.com/bmwiedemann/reproducibleopensuse/tree/presentation last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/… Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-10/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/ yesterday and rbstats are: total-packages: 14263 (+51) build-… [View More]

3 years, 4 months

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2020-09

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-08/msg00355.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-08/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201001/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 13408 (+164) build-tried: 13401 (+165) build-failed: 26 (-40) build-n-a: 137 (+12) build-succeeded: 13238 (+193) build-official-failed+na: 214 (-109) build-compare-failed: 405 (-26) build-… [View More]

4 years, 6 months

Re: enabling reproducible builds in Factory and ALP

by Marcus Meissner

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:11:00AM -0700, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:31 AM Bruno Pitrus <brunopitrus(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Will this help in getting build-compare enabled in the Fedora repos? (bsc#1206734) Last time i tried to test this, it was broken because of the changing build-id files. > > Not unless build-compare is set up to filter out certain RPM header > tags that are intentionally non-reproducible (build host, build time, > … [View More]

1 year, 1 month

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2021-03

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

Hi, we made little progress this month. One good news is that SLE-15-SP3 (and thereby Leap 15.3 core) now got patches for rpmbuild and pesign-obs-integration that allow all kmp binary packages to be verified. Those patches were part of Factory for nearly 2 years. Also a groff date patch was merged to fix corosync verifiability. Other unverifiable SLE packages are mostly those that are known to not build reproducibly: erlang grub2 kernel-preempt libguestfs libpinyin ongres-scram perf pnetcdf … [View More]

4 years

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2019-09

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2019-08/msg00186.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-08/ Builds this month were much cleaner again with several long-standing build issues fixed. This month, I also pushed https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12341 for inclusion in our python and python3 packages to fix a whole class of reproducibility issues with python C bindings. … [View More]Tested it with python-ephem - the latest (and last) newcomer in Factory to be affected. Another toolchain fix that helps several others to become reproducible is for OpenStack packages: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/732328 I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20190926/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 12270 build-tried: 12260 build-failed: 115 build-n-a: 125 build-succeeded: 12020 build-official-failed+na: 220 build-compare-failed: 408 build-compare-succeeded: 11612 verify-failed: 588 verified-semi-reproducible: 11396 verified-bit-identical: 0 bit-by-bit-identical: 11201 not-bit-by-bit-identical: 814 https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20190926/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20190926/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 49 were in ring1 That makes it 52/2901 => 1.79 % which is below the overall average of 408/12020 => 3.39 % 814/12020 => 6.77 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Nearly fixed core packages: MozillaThunderbird https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/732106 kernel-vanilla https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-kernel/2019-08/msg00000.html I also found it is possible to build a reproducible Firefox, but only when disabling PGO - and that was only possible when disabling LTO at the same time (build errors otherwise): https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/733089 So this is one of the places where one would have to make a trade-off between performance of the binary and reproducibility. I heard, upstream solved this by publishing the profiling data for other people to use as input to their builds. Not such a nice solution either. Then there is still one rpm update missing to use -flto=auto As can be seen in https://build.opensuse.org/package/revisions/openSUSE:Factory/rpm it was briefly there and then reverted the next day, because it was bundled with another (broken) change. Since I am keeping a history of all Tumbleweed binaries (see https://lizards.opensuse.org/2019/04/03/experimental-opensuse-mirror-via-ip… ), I also noticed that the normal Factory update grew from ~4GB to ~8GB after LTO was enabled. Still need to do a closer investigation on why that is. Here is some raw data for x86 dirs with hardlinks: opensuse/history$ du -smc * 90090 20190630 4270 20190701 4967 20190702 5225 20190703 4493 20190704 7526 20190708 72674 20190713 # LTO rebuild 18845 20190716 7373 20190718 17633 20190721 7812 20190723 16653 20190724 7137 20190726 16724 20190730 20694 20190805 7951 20190806 8047 20190809 8182 20190810 9065 20190814 19168 20190815 11267 20190820 8955 20190822 8326 20190823 7129 20190824 32824 20190828 9543 20190829 9532 20190902 7183 20190904 7836 20190905 8484 20190907 9266 20190909 11367 20190916 6468 20190917 10443 20190918 8100 20190920 7868 20190921 519103 total Ciao Bernhard M. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org [View Less]

5 years, 6 months

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2020-07

by Bernhard M. Wiedemann

Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-06/msg00348.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-06/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200730/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 13133 (+133) build-tried: 13126 (+134) build-failed: 38 (+12) build-n-a: 126 (+6) build-succeeded: 12962 (+116) build-official-failed+na: 251 (-34) build-compare-failed: 434 (+11) build-… [View More]

4 years, 8 months

Main

Development

Information

Community

Social Media

Other

openSUSE Factory search results for query "reproducible-builds"