-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-04/msg00026.html
Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-04/
The reproducible numbers may be around 60 too high because I ran the autoclassify on packages that had been classified more than a year ago. And that often leaves them reproducible-with-tweaks, which should be tracked separately in the statistics, because there is work left to do.
Java is still a major factor in unreproducibility - I think, there are easy toolchain patches possible with xmvn https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1162112 and https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:bmwiedemann:reproducible:te st/java-11-openjdk
I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200602/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 12846 (+58) build-tried: 12837 (+55) build-failed: 13 (-35) build-n-a: 148 (+0) build-succeeded: 12676 (+90) build-official-failed+na: 640 (+403) build-compare-failed: 423 (-39) build-compare-succeeded: 12253 (+129) verify-failed: 535 (+19) verified-semi-reproducible: 11369 (+27) verified-bit-identical: 0 (+0) bit-by-bit-identical: 12086 (+290) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 591 (-199) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 590 (-200)
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200602/graph.png shows the change over time
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200602/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)
Of the badly unreproducible packages, 2 were in ring0 41 were in ring1
That makes it 43/2901 => 1.48 % which is below the overall average of 423/12676 => 3.34 %
591/12676 => 4.66 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible
Ciao Bernhard M.