Hi, This month I had a small presentation in PackagingCon so there are some updates in https://github.com/bmwiedemann/reproducibleopensuse/tree/presentation last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/O... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-10/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/ yesterday and rbstats are: total-packages: 14263 (+51) build-tried: 14233 (+52) build-failed: 34 (-14) build-n-a: 287 (-1) build-succeeded: 13912 (+65) build-official-failed+na: 54 (-637) build-compare-failed: 397 (+2) build-compare-succeeded: 13515 (+63) verify-failed: 459 (+4) verified-semi-reproducible: 13188 (+10) bit-by-bit-identical: 13428 (+54) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 478 (+5) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 484 (+11) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/graph.png shows the change over time. You can ignore most of the red during last month. I just did not notice the build failures and re-tried them now https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 4 were in ring0 35 were in ring1 That makes it 39/3247 => 1.20 % which is below the overall average of 397/13912 => 2.85 % 478/13912 => 3.44 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Ciao Bernhard M.