Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2019-10/msg00367.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-10/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20191129/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 12424 (+152) build-tried: 12416 (+152) build-failed: 51 (-23) build-n-a: 81 (-2) build-succeeded: 12284 (+177) build-official-failed+na: 126 (-93) build-compare-failed: 415 (+19) build-compare-succeeded: 11869 (+158) verify-failed: 560 (-18) verified-semi-reproducible: 11608 (+171) verified-bit-identical: 0 bit-by-bit-identical: 11481 (+163) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 794 (+13) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20191129/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20191129/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 2 were in ring0 48 were in ring1 That makes it 50/2901 => 1.72 % which is below the overall average of 415/12284 => 3.38 % 794/12284 => 6.46 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible This month, I added https://github.com/apache/felix/pull/209 as a test patch in https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:bmwiedemann:reproducible:test/m... and in addition with last month's https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/735873 that made it possible to build some dozen java packages reproducible by applying tweaks (e.g. use strip-nondeterminism and replace /dev/*random with /dev/zero to counter random maven UUIDs) On the unreproducible core package list, we have branding-openSUSE variations in .jpg files tomcat filesystem ordering issues and probably others python-python-xlib one .pyc file with timestamp newly reproducible core packages: nvme-cli from a gcc9 LTO patch = https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91307 python-tox from the https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094323 toolchain patch And in the next week I am off to the reproducible-builds world summit. Ciao Bernhard M.