October 2024 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1232536] New: bpftrace: ERROR: Error attaching probe: 'kprobe:swap_readpage'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '24

05 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232536 Bug ID: 1232536 Summary: bpftrace: ERROR: Error attaching probe: 'kprobe:swap_readpage' Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Slowroll Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: petr.vorel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- bpftrace tests on Tumbleweed fails on # echo -e "\ninterval:s:5 { exit(); }" | cat /usr/share/bpftrace/tools/swapin.bt - | bpftrace - stdin:1-16: WARNING: swap_readpage is not traceable (either non-existing, inlined, or marked as "notrace"); attaching to it will likely fail Attaching 3 probes... cannot attach kprobe, Invalid argument ERROR: Error attaching probe: 'kprobe:swap_readpage' echo $? 255 # bpftrace --info System OS: Linux 6.11.5-1-default #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Oct 23 04:27:11 UTC 2024 (b4e3aa9) Arch: x86_64 Build version: v0.21.2 LLVM: 18.1.8 unsafe probe: no bfd: no liblldb (DWARF support): yes libsystemd (systemd notify support): no Kernel helpers probe_read: yes probe_read_str: yes probe_read_user: yes probe_read_user_str: yes probe_read_kernel: yes probe_read_kernel_str: yes get_current_cgroup_id: yes send_signal: yes override_return: no get_boot_ns: yes dpath: yes skboutput: yes get_tai_ns: yes get_func_ip: yes jiffies64: yes for_each_map_elem: yes Kernel features Instruction limit: 1000000 Loop support: yes btf: yes module btf: yes map batch: yes uprobe refcount (depends on Build:bcc bpf_attach_uprobe refcount): yes Map types hash: yes percpu hash: yes array: yes percpu array: yes stack_trace: yes perf_event_array: yes ringbuf: yes Probe types kprobe: yes tracepoint: yes perf_event: yes kfunc: yes kprobe_multi: yes uprobe_multi: yes raw_tp_special: yes iter: yes Running the same test on Debian with kernel 6.11.5, and with these different build options it pass: LLVM: 18.1.8 bfd: no liblldb (DWARF support): yes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 1231167] New: Enable CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_QCOM for UFS support on QCOM platforms
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Nov '24

05 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231167 Bug ID: 1231167 Summary: Enable CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_QCOM for UFS support on QCOM platforms Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: aarch64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: rsalveti(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 877673 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=877673&action=edit kernel config diff Hi, I'm validating openSUSE Tumbleweed on QCOM-based arm64 platforms (e.g. rb3gen2) and noticed the installer can't find the UFS controller. This patch enables CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_QCOM as module so it can identify UFS controllers on QCOM platforms. Patch attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1231832] New: [Build 20241020] openQA test fails in podman_netavark
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '24

04 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231832 Bug ID: 1231832 Summary: [Build 20241020] openQA test fails in podman_netavark Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Slowroll Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4580879/modules/podm an_netavark/steps/183 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation Error: netavark: unable to append rule '-j MARK --set-xmark 0x2000/0x2000' to table 'nat': code: 2, msg: Warning: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module? ip6tables v1.8.10 (legacy): unknown option "--set-xmark" Try `ip6tables -h' or 'ip6tables --help' for more information The 'missing kernel module', and the fact that we updated the kernel to 6.11.4 in this snapshot (and I did not see anything podman/netavark related) triggered me to file this bug against Kernel component openQA test in scenario microos-Tumbleweed-DVD-x86_64-container-host@64bit fails in [podman_netavark](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4580879/modules/podman_n… ## Test suite description ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20241020](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4580329) ## Expected result Last good: [20241018](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4577907) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=microos… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1231825] New: Kernel 6.11.4 bluetooth scan stops working
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '24

04 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231825 Bug ID: 1231825 Summary: Kernel 6.11.4 bluetooth scan stops working Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.6 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: novell(a)tower-net.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- With Kernel 6.11.4 from https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/Kernel:stable:Backport the bluetooth scan doesn't find my mouse any longer. Rebooting 6.11.3 I can pair mouse and booting 6.11.4 I can use a pre-connected but no reconnect possible. dmesg | grep -i blue: [ 1.826585] usb 3-3: Product: Bluetooth Radio [ 2.947702] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22 [ 2.947728] NET: Registered PF_BLUETOOTH protocol family [ 2.947730] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized [ 2.947739] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized [ 2.947743] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized [ 2.947748] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized [ 3.118618] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: examining hci_ver=0b hci_rev=000b lmp_ver=0b lmp_subver=8852 [ 3.120636] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: rom_version status=0 version=1 [ 3.120645] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8852bu_fw.bin [ 3.126553] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8852bu_config.bin [ 3.128658] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: cfg_sz 6, total sz 65603 [ 3.192619] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3 [ 3.192622] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast [ 3.192628] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized [ 3.711634] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: fw version 0x04479301 [ 3.840057] Bluetooth: hci0: AOSP extensions version v1.00 [ 3.840061] Bluetooth: hci0: AOSP quality report is supported [ 4.081505] Bluetooth: MGMT ver 1.23 [ 15.909955] Bluetooth: hci0: AOSP extensions version v1.00 [ 15.909971] Bluetooth: hci0: AOSP quality report is supported [ 17.644507] input: Lenovo Bluetooth Mouse as /devices/virtual/misc/uhid/0005:17EF:60EF.0002/input/input19 [ 17.644841] input: Lenovo Bluetooth Mouse Keyboard as /devices/virtual/misc/uhid/0005:17EF:60EF.0002/input/input20 [ 17.645123] input: Lenovo Bluetooth Mouse as /devices/virtual/misc/uhid/0005:17EF:60EF.0002/input/input21 [ 17.645391] hid-generic 0005:17EF:60EF.0002: input,hidraw1: BLUETOOTH HID v0.15 Mouse [Lenovo Bluetooth Mouse] on f4:6a:dd:7d:17:10 [ 131.404331] input: Lenovo Bluetooth Mouse as /devices/virtual/misc/uhid/0005:17EF:60EF.0003/input/input22 [ 131.405030] input: Lenovo Bluetooth Mouse Keyboard as /devices/virtual/misc/uhid/0005:17EF:60EF.0003/input/input23 [ 131.405255] input: Lenovo Bluetooth Mouse as /devices/virtual/misc/uhid/0005:17EF:60EF.0003/input/input24 [ 131.405436] hid-generic 0005:17EF:60EF.0003: input,hidraw1: BLUETOOTH HID v0.15 Mouse [Lenovo Bluetooth Mouse] on f4:6a:dd:7d:17:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1232650] New: Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Nov '24

04 Nov '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650 Bug ID: 1232650 Summary: Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: 2835365572zty(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Description: I recently received a new Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 and installed Linux on it (kernel version 6.11.5). Most hardware functions as expected out of the box, including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, touchpad, keyboard backlight, audio, touchscreen, and graphics card. However, the system fails to wake up after entering sleep/suspend mode. When the system goes into suspend, the power button indicator light continues flashing, but attempting to wake it by pressing the keyboard or the power button has no effect. The system remains unresponsive. I also tried running sudo rtcwake -m mem -s 20 to test suspend mode, but the system did not wake up after the specified 20 seconds. Hardware Information: Device Model: Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 Linux Kernel Version: 6.11.5 dmesg log: https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=414716466d&log=dmesg.1 Full Hardware Probe: https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=414716466d https://pastebin.com/eMTCCPp3 Here is loglevel7 version. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Put the device into suspend/sleep mode via the power menu or by using sudo rtcwake -m mem -s 20. 2.Wait for the device to enter suspend, as indicated by the flashing power button light. 3.Attempt to wake the device by pressing any key or the power button. Expected Behavior: The device should resume from suspend mode, with the display and other system functions restored to a usable state. Actual Behavior: The device remains unresponsive, with only the power button indicator flashing. The system does not respond to key presses or the power button, requiring a forced reboot to recover. Additional Notes: 1.This issue has been observed consistently with kernel version 6.11.5. 2.No errors or warnings related to this behavior appear in the logs leading up to suspend. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 1232292] New: Machine locks on restore from hibernation after upgrade to kernel-default 5.14.21-150500.55.83-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232292 Bug ID: 1232292 Summary: Machine locks on restore from hibernation after upgrade to kernel-default 5.14.21-150500.55.83-default Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.5 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: carlos.e.r(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Machine locks on restore from hibernation after upgrade to kernel-default 5.14.21-150500.55.83-default, three days on a row. Machine hibernates normally, but on restore, keyboard leds freeze, does not respond. Display shows the frozen screen saver animation. Machine appears frozen. There is nothing saved on the log after the apparently successful hibernation. I am removing this kernel and going back to 5.14.21-150500.55.73-default, but I still have the journal if you are interested. journal entries: Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar sudo[20578]: root : TTY=pts/43 ; PWD=/root ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/systemctl hibernate Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar sudo[20578]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:setcred): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_setcred Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar sudo[20578]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0) Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar sudo[20578]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:session): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_open_session Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar sudo[20578]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:session): pam_kwallet5: not a graphical session, skipping. Use force_run parameter to ignore this. Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar ModemManager[1718]: <info> [sleep-monitor] system is about to suspend Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar sudo[20578]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar sudo[20578]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:session): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_close_session Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar sudo[20578]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:setcred): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_setcred Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar leafnode[19718]: <QUIT Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar leafnode[19718]: >205 Always happy to serve! Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar dovecot[3429]: [redacted] Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar systemd[1]: Reached target Sleep. Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar systemd[1]: Starting Hibernate... Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20599]: INFO: running /usr/lib/systemd/system-sleep/grub2.sleep for hibernate Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20599]: INFO: Running prepare-grub .. Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar mine-time[20608]: Inside /usr/lib/systemd/system-sleep/mine-time. Params -pre--hibernate-. Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar mine-sleep[20609]: Hibernating the system now (pre)... Oct 24 02:37:36 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20606]: service: no such service upsd.service Oct 24 02:37:37 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20599]: running kernel is grub menu entry main-os (vmlinuz-5.14.21-150500.55.83-default) Oct 24 02:37:37 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20599]: preparing boot-loader: selecting entry main-os, kernel /boot/5.14.21-150500.55.83-default Oct 24 02:37:37 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20599]: running /usr/sbin/grub2-once "main-os" Oct 24 02:37:37 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20599]: time needed for sync: 0.0 seconds, time needed for grub: 0.2 seconds. Oct 24 02:37:37 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20599]: INFO: Done. Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar xinetd[3425]: EXIT: nntp status=0 duration=392(sec) Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar sudo[21410]: root : TTY=pts/43 ; PWD=/root ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/local/sbin/beep Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar sudo[21410]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:setcred): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_setcred Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar sudo[21410]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0) Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar sudo[21410]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:session): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_open_session Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar sudo[21410]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:session): pam_kwallet5: not a graphical session, skipping. Use force_run parameter to ignore this. Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar sudo[21410]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar sudo[21410]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:session): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_close_session Oct 24 02:37:39 Telcontar sudo[21410]: pam_kwallet5(sudo:setcred): pam_kwallet5: pam_sm_setcred Oct 24 02:37:41 Telcontar systemd-sleep[20593]: Entering sleep state 'hibernate'... Oct 24 02:37:41 Telcontar kernel: PM: hibernation: hibernation entry -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1232650] Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650#c17 --- Comment #17 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you check with "nomodeset" boot option and try suspend/resume? This will disable the native graphics and uses EFI framebuffer, so the graphics might be broken after resume. But it's interesting to see whether the resume finishes without AMDGPU or it still hangs somewhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232650] Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650#c15 --- Comment #15 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Is AMDGPU issue with 6.12 kernel? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232650] Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650#c13 --- Comment #13 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Interesting. It means that it can be some race condition; with no_console_suspend, some resume procedure is delayed, and it starts working. In anyway, you can check some basic debug info: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/power/basic-pm-debugging.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232650] Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650#c9 --- Comment #9 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- On 6.11 and 6.12, how is the resume behavior exactly? LED flashing changed? e.g. it's rather blinking? If it's blinking, it might indicate a kernel panic, and we have a chance to catch the crash via kdump. Try to install and setup kdump. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232650] Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650#c5 --- Comment #5 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Thanks. Then it's a regression between 6.10 and 6.11, and the latest upstream still suffers. BTW, could you upload the dmesg and hwinfo outputs from 6.10, 6.11 and 6.12 to this Bugzilla (use attachments)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232650] Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650#c3 --- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Zhang from comment #2) > I have tried 6.12rc5 kernel-default, 6.11 kernel-default, 6.11 > kernel-vanilla, 6.12rc5 on Fedora and 6.10 kernel-vanilla. Only 6.10 > kernel-vanilla works. It woke up properly. Doesn't kernel-default 6.10.x from OBS home:tiwai:kernel:6.10 work? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232650] Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 fails to wake up from suspend mode
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232650#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |2835365572zty(a)gmail.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(2835365572zty@gma | |il.com) --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you check with the latest 6.12-rc kernel in OBS Kernel:HEAD repo? http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/HEAD/standard/ If the problem still happens with that, we'd like to know whether it's a regression. You can try the older TW kernels from my repos, e.g. OBS home:tiwai:kernel:6.10, home:tiwai:kernel:6.9, etc: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/kernel:/6.10/standar… http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/kernel:/6.9/standard/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231465] Kernel 6.11.2-1 only a fraction of ram is available
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465#c46 --- Comment #46 from Felix Niederwanger <felix.niederwanger(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 878298 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=878298&action=edit dmesg for bc2846c7ab029f0660fef1774c6d02a1ec021aaa dmesg for bc2846c7ab029f0660fef1774c6d02a1ec021aaa from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231465] Kernel 6.11.2-1 only a fraction of ram is available
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465#c45 --- Comment #45 from Felix Niederwanger <felix.niederwanger(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 878297 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=878297&action=edit dmesg for 2e6871a632a99d9b9e2ce3a7847acabe99e5a26e dmesg for 2e6871a632a99d9b9e2ce3a7847acabe99e5a26e from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231465] Kernel 6.11.2-1 only a fraction of ram is available
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465#c44 --- Comment #44 from Felix Niederwanger <felix.niederwanger(a)suse.com> --- I did another test, with the commits 2e6871a632a99d9b9e2ce3a7847acabe99e5a26e and bc2846c7ab029f0660fef1774c6d02a1ec021aaa from the upstream Kernel as requested by Jiri: > 2e6871a632a99d9b9e2ce3a7847acabe99e5a26e: fail > bc2846c7ab029f0660fef1774c6d02a1ec021aaa: ok This confirms the result of the bisection that 2e6871a632a99d9b9e2ce3a7847acabe99e5a26e is (likely) the culprit. I will also add the dmesg for both commits here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231465] Kernel 6.11.2-1 only a fraction of ram is available
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465#c43 --- Comment #43 from Felix Niederwanger <felix.niederwanger(a)suse.com> --- Created attachment 878296 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=878296&action=edit dmesg of 6.11.5-10-default As requested by Jiri Slaby, I tested the updated 6.11.5-10-default kernel from https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:jirislaby:kernel-bsc1231465…. 6.11.5-10-default works from cold boot (showing 32 GiB) I'm attaching the dmesg of the current boot in that kernel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1230414] kernel: reproducible builds issue with BTF
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 30 Oct '24

30 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230414 Maintenance Automation <maint-coord+maintenance-robot(a)suse.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232539] [Build 20241027] openQA test fails in fanotify22 - -ltp-syscalls
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232539 Petr Vorel <petr.vorel(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org |jack(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232539] [Build 20241027] openQA test fails in fanotify22 - -ltp-syscalls
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232539 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232539#c1 Petr Vorel <petr.vorel(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED CC| |petr.vorel(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Petr Vorel <petr.vorel(a)suse.com> --- Kernel bug, Jan Kara has posted a fix for it [1], IMHO not yet merged. Also tracked in LTP bugtracker. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20241004221556.19222-1-jack@suse.cz/ [2] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/1206 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232539] New: [Build 20241027] openQA test fails in fanotify22 - -ltp-syscalls
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232539 Bug ID: 1232539 Summary: [Build 20241027] openQA test fails in fanotify22 - -ltp-syscalls Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4600009/modules/fano tify22/steps/6 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-JeOS-for-RPi-aarch64-jeos-ltp-syscalls@RPi4 fails in [fanotify22](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4600009/modules/fanotify22/st… fanotify22 fails often on RPi4. ## Test suite description /var/tmp: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/155017 LTP_TAINT_EXPECTED=0x8001b801 ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20241024](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4594145) ## Expected result Last good: [20241023](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/4590714) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=aarch64&distri=opensu… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231802] [drm] *ERROR* Atomic update failure on pipe A
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231802 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231802#c3 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(jshand2013@gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Then you can ignore it for now. The pipe A is often for the laptop display or such. Feel free to reopen if this happens too frequently and/or anything real is broken. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232342] No Ethernet device anymore on RPi3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342#c10 Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(guillaume.gardet@ | |arm.com) | --- Comment #10 from Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #8) > I'm building a test kernel package with the drop of the patch. It's being > built in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1232342. Thank you Takashi! With 6.4.0-150600.1.gc84227d-default ethernet is back on-line. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232402] wake up after hibernation stopped working after switching to 6.4.0-150600.23.25 from 6.4.0-150600.23.22
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Oct '24

28 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232402 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232402#c6 --- Comment #6 from Coly Li <colyli(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #3) > OK, it's tough to debug if it's not reproducible reliably. > > In anyway adding Coly to Cc, as this might be an MD issue. > > FYI, there were two changes about MD between *.22 and *.25: > 34cd7b5b435ab2205be3a505de13c65d3a8b6fdf > md/raid1: Fix data corruption for degraded array with slow disk > bfb799a0ccab07a21277db07ccc365138bc16ef7 > md/raid5: avoid BUG_ON() while continue reshape after reassembling > > Judging from the description, the first one might be relevant, and my test > kernel in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1232402 is with the revert of that patch. I decide to put most of my time/focus on md now. This is a headache since v6.4, the development is too active to restrict regressions.... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1230414] kernel: reproducible builds issue with BTF
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Oct '24

28 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230414 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230414#c18 --- Comment #18 from Michal Suchanek <msuchanek(a)suse.com> --- Turns out that 72d091846de935e0942a8a0f1fe24ff739d85d76 v6.7-rc1 kbuild: avoid too many execution of scripts/pahole-flags.sh depends on fccb3d3eda8d19b893e1fd18e8c70b78784b2a72 v6.2-rc1 kbuild: add test-{ge,gt,le,lt} macros which in turn depends on 88b61e3bff93f99712718db785b4aa0c1165f35c v6.1-rc1 Makefile.compiler: replace cc-ifversion with compiler-specific macros -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232402] New: wake up after hibernation stopped working after switching to 6.4.0-150600.23.25 from 6.4.0-150600.23.22
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Oct '24

28 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232402 Bug ID: 1232402 Summary: wake up after hibernation stopped working after switching to 6.4.0-150600.23.25 from 6.4.0-150600.23.22 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.6 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: oleksii.prudkyi(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Hi, in logs I got ``` [ T1040] Freezing user space processes failed after 20.003 seconds (2 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0): ``` with processes like udev-worker and mdadm on 6.4.0-150600.23.22 everything fine ``` [ T1040] PM: Image signature found, resuming [ T1040] PM: hibernation: resume from hibernation [ T1040] random: crng reseeded on system resumption [ T1040] Freezing user space processes [ T1040] Freezing user space processes failed after 20.003 seconds (2 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0): [ T1040] task:mdadm state:D stack:0 pid:985 tgid:985 ppid:642 flags:0x00000006 [ T1040] Call Trace: [ T1040] <TASK> [ T1040] __schedule+0x381/0x1540 [ T1040] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x102/0x300 [ T1040] ? mempool_alloc+0x64/0x180 [ T1040] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] schedule+0x24/0xb0 [ T1040] _md_handle_reqeust+0x7e/0x1e0 [md_mod dc71c1fc6aeb160a219080a6f7f64626cf165910] [ T1040] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] __submit_bio+0xa8/0x150 [ T1040] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x153/0x370 [ T1040] ? block_read_full_folio+0x206/0x350 [ T1040] block_read_full_folio+0x206/0x350 [ T1040] ? __pfx_blkdev_get_block+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] ? __mod_memcg_lruvec_state+0x9d/0xf0 [ T1040] ? __mod_lruvec_page_state+0x74/0xb0 [ T1040] ? __pfx_blkdev_read_folio+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] filemap_read_folio+0x41/0x2b0 [ T1040] ? __pfx_workingset_update_node+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] ? __pfx_blkdev_read_folio+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] do_read_cache_folio+0x108/0x390 [ T1040] ? slab_post_alloc_hook+0x69/0x2e0 [ T1040] read_part_sector+0x32/0xa0 [ T1040] read_lba+0xe5/0x180 [ T1040] efi_partition+0xed/0x7e0 [ T1040] ? vsnprintf+0x102/0x4c0 [ T1040] ? snprintf+0x45/0x70 [ T1040] ? __pfx_efi_partition+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] ? bdev_disk_changed+0x228/0x570 [ T1040] bdev_disk_changed+0x228/0x570 [ T1040] blkdev_get_whole+0x8e/0x90 [ T1040] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x298/0x2f0 [ T1040] ? __pfx_blkdev_open+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] blkdev_open+0x45/0xb0 [ T1040] do_dentry_open+0x22f/0x420 [ T1040] path_openat+0xde8/0x1050 [ T1040] ? security_inode_alloc+0x24/0x90 [ T1040] do_filp_open+0xc5/0x140 [ T1040] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x163/0x300 [ T1040] ? getname_flags+0x46/0x1e0 [ T1040] ? do_sys_openat2+0x248/0x320 [ T1040] do_sys_openat2+0x248/0x320 [ T1040] do_sys_open+0x57/0x80 [ T1040] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80 [ T1040] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e/0x40 [ T1040] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 [ T1040] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e/0x40 [ T1040] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 [ T1040] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e/0x40 [ T1040] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80 [ T1040] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x7c/0xe6 [ T1040] RIP: 0033:0x7fc5d274e17e [ T1040] RSP: 002b:00007fff11a04e60 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 [ T1040] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000004000 RCX: 00007fc5d274e17e [ T1040] RDX: 0000000000004000 RSI: 00007fff11a04ef0 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c [ T1040] RBP: 00007fff11a04ef0 R08: 0000000000000064 R09: 0000000000000000 [ T1040] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000009 [ T1040] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 000055ad8ac57ae0 R15: 00007fff11a05e50 [ T1040] </TASK> [ T1040] task:mdadm state:D stack:0 pid:1046 tgid:1046 ppid:626 flags:0x00000006 [ T1040] Call Trace: [ T1040] <TASK> [ T1040] __schedule+0x381/0x1540 [ T1040] ? release_pages+0x151/0x660 [ T1040] schedule+0x24/0xb0 [ T1040] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x11/0x20 [ T1040] __mutex_lock.isra.15+0x1c0/0x700 [ T1040] ? ilookup+0x79/0x110 [ T1040] ? blkdev_get_by_dev+0xb6/0x2f0 [ T1040] blkdev_get_by_dev+0xb6/0x2f0 [ T1040] ? __pfx_blkdev_open+0x10/0x10 [ T1040] blkdev_open+0x45/0xb0 [ T1040] do_dentry_open+0x22f/0x420 [ T1040] path_openat+0xde8/0x1050 [ T1040] ? __alloc_pages+0x18b/0x350 [ T1040] do_filp_open+0xc5/0x140 [ T1040] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x163/0x300 [ T1040] ? getname_flags+0x46/0x1e0 [ T1040] ? do_sys_openat2+0x248/0x320 [ T1040] do_sys_openat2+0x248/0x320 [ T1040] do_sys_open+0x57/0x80 [ T1040] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80 [ T1040] ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x150 [ T1040] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x7c/0xe6 [ T1040] RIP: 0033:0x7f4870e8717e [ T1040] RSP: 002b:00007ffdbacffa80 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 [ T1040] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f4870e8717e [ T1040] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffdbad04f0a RDI: 00000000ffffff9c [ T1040] RBP: 00007ffdbad04f0a R08: 00007ffdbad02ad0 R09: 00007ffdbad02c50 [ T1040] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 000055db601292a0 [ T1040] R13: 00007ffdbad03300 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffdbad02e50 [ T1040] </TASK> [ T1040] OOM killer enabled. [ T1040] Restarting tasks ... done. [ T985] md2: p1 [ T1040] PM: hibernation: resume failed (-16) ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1232342] No Ethernet device anymore on RPi3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Oct '24

28 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342#c9 --- Comment #9 from Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Stefan Wahren from comment #6) > I added Ivan in CC for > the V5 series [4] which revert the mentioned patch. I was hoping to inform > you about this and get a Tested-by. > Thank you Stefan! I saw the emails, but did not make the relation :-) I will check and report back. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232402] wake up after hibernation stopped working after switching to 6.4.0-150600.23.25 from 6.4.0-150600.23.22
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Oct '24

28 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232402 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232402#c3 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colyli(a)suse.com --- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- OK, it's tough to debug if it's not reproducible reliably. In anyway adding Coly to Cc, as this might be an MD issue. FYI, there were two changes about MD between *.22 and *.25: 34cd7b5b435ab2205be3a505de13c65d3a8b6fdf md/raid1: Fix data corruption for degraded array with slow disk bfb799a0ccab07a21277db07ccc365138bc16ef7 md/raid5: avoid BUG_ON() while continue reshape after reassembling Judging from the description, the first one might be relevant, and my test kernel in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1232402 is with the revert of that patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231465] New: Kernel 6.11.2-1 causes OOM errors with Plasma 6.2
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 28 Oct '24

28 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231465 Bug ID: 1231465 Summary: Kernel 6.11.2-1 causes OOM errors with Plasma 6.2 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: felix.niederwanger(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 877874 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=877874&action=edit dmesg After updating from TW 20241001 to 20241007 (current) causes many OOM errors when logging in to a Plasma desktop. The issue is only present when booting with the new 6.11.2-1 kernel, not when booting the older 6.11.0-1 kernel. I see the login manager and when I try to login as user, the Plasma Splash screen pops up, and then the laptop freezes. In the dmesg I see many OOM messages like the following: > [ 92.704048] [ T848] systemd-journal invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x140cca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_COMP), order=0, oom_score_adj=-250 > [ 92.704056] [ T848] CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 848 Comm: systemd-journal Not tainted 6.11.2-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed e7184aff5e8c765d07bd8e233cb429101cfc70a8 > [ 92.704060] [ T848] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude 7290/09386V, BIOS 1.39.0 07/04/2024 > > ... > > [ 92.704266] [ T848] Tasks state (memory values in pages): > [ 92.704267] [ T848] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss rss_anon rss_file rss_shmem pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name > ... > [ 92.704386] [ T848] [ 5486] 1000 5486 67186069 2101 2081 20 0 1273856 0 200 baloo_file > [ 92.704439] [ T848] [ 5912] 1000 5912 67125561 700 608 92 0 192512 0 200 kioworkerr > [ 92.704478] [ T848] [ 6084] 1000 6084 53113 884 768 116 0 184320 0 200 kioworker > [ 92.704480] [ T848] [ 6086] 1000 6086 67125560 753 640 113 0 188416 0 200 kioworker > ... > [ 92.704510] [ T848] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,global_oom,task_memcg=/,task=DiscoverNotifie,pid=6205,uid=1000 > [ 92.704530] [ T848] Out of memory: Killed process 6205 (DiscoverNotifie) total-vm:1148792kB, anon-rss:174748kB, file-rss:176kB, shmem-rss:0kB, UID:1000 pgtables:912kB oom_score_adj:200 See the full log as attachment. Hardware: DEll Latitude 7290, Intel i7-8650U, 32 GiB RAM As said, running the old 6.11.0-1 kernel from the same 20241007 snapshot works without issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 1229020] Zypper dup installed kernels which reboot immediately
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229020 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229020#c13 Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(wwonko(a)rdwarf.com | |) --- Comment #13 from Jiri Slaby <jslaby(a)suse.com> --- So no disks were found. Perhaps you need to recreate initramdisk by dracut -f? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232292] Machine locks on restore from hibernation after upgrade to kernel-default 5.14.21-150500.55.83-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232292 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232292#c3 --- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- To be sure, could you try the kernel at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/bsc1231578/pool/ ? This was confirmed to work for bsc#1231578. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232402] wake up after hibernation stopped working after switching to 6.4.0-150600.23.25 from 6.4.0-150600.23.22
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232402 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232402#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(oleksii.prudkyi@g | |mail.com) CC| |oleksii.prudkyi(a)gmail.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- To be sure, could you verify whether the problem persists with the latest SLE15-SP6 branch in OBS Kernel:SLE15-SP6 repo? http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/SLE15-SP6/pool/ Also, I'm building a test kernel with the revert of a suspected MD patch. It's being built in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1232402 repo. Once after the build finishes, it'll be available at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/bsc1232402/pool/ If the kernel in OBS Kernel:SLE15-SP6 repo still shows the problem, try this one, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231341] missing vbox module for current kernel-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341#c12 --- Comment #12 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Can you install virtualbox from OBS Virtualization project? It has also 7.1.4 for Leap 15.6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231341] missing vbox module for current kernel-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '24

26 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341#c11 --- Comment #11 from Daniel Pecka <nettezzaumanaa(a)gmail.com> --- Hello, I am thinking about this further ... what we're doing here ? Everybody who doesn't have like me locked old packages # zypper -vv se -xsi kernel-default virtualbox-kmp-default virtualbox Verbosity: 3 Non-option program arguments: 'kernel-default' 'virtualbox-kmp-default' 'virtualbox' Initializing Target Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository ---+------------------------+---------+--------------------------------------------+--------+------------------ il | kernel-default | package | 6.11.0-lp155.4.1.gce149d2 | x86_64 | (System Packages) il | kernel-default | package | 6.11.5-lp155.4.1.g4703d94 | x86_64 | kernel il | kernel-default | package | 6.4.0-150600.23.25.1 | x86_64 | Update SLE 15 i+ | virtualbox | package | 7.0.20-lp155.2.31 | x86_64 | kernel-kmp il | virtualbox-kmp-default | package | 7.0.20_k6.11.0_lp155.4.gce149d2-lp155.2.20 | x86_64 | (System Packages) il | virtualbox-kmp-default | package | 7.1.4_k6.11.5_lp155.4.g4703d94-lp155.2.1 | x86_64 | kernel-kmp is disqualified if they want to use https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/stable:/Backport/standar… https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/stable:/Backport:/KMP/st… along with virtualbox .. Updated kernel repo is absolutely crucial for desktops, especially new hardware on laptops (unless you enjoy i915 lock-ups and freezes) .. Please stick as with a temporary solution with what we have currently .. we currently have latest available virtualbox 7.0.20-lp155.2.31 so let's provide for it virtualbox-kmp-default ... Providing 7.1.4_k6.11.5_lp155.4.g4703d94-lp155.2.1 without virtualbox-7.1.4_k6.11.5_lp155.4 makes absolutely no sense .. thanks for support and regards, ~dan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231341] missing vbox module for current kernel-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '24

26 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341#c10 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Pecka <nettezzaumanaa(a)gmail.com> --- Hello Takashi-San, and isn't then possible and reasonable to just stick with existing virtualbox # zypper -vv se -xs -r kernel -r kernel-kmp kernel-default virtualbox-kmp-default virtualbox Verbosity: 3 Non-option program arguments: 'kernel-default' 'virtualbox-kmp-default' 'virtualbox' Initializing Target Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository ---+------------------------+------------+------------------------------------------+--------+----------- il | kernel-default | package | 6.11.5-lp155.4.1.g4703d94 | x86_64 | kernel | kernel-default | srcpackage | 6.11.5-lp155.4.1.g4703d94 | noarch | kernel | kernel-default | srcpackage | 6.11.5-lp155.3.1.g6764933 | noarch | kernel i+ | virtualbox | package | 7.0.20-lp155.2.31 | x86_64 | kernel-kmp | virtualbox | srcpackage | 7.0.20-lp155.2.31 | noarch | kernel-kmp il | virtualbox-kmp-default | package | 7.1.4_k6.11.5_lp155.4.g4703d94-lp155.2.1 | x86_64 | kernel-kmp and just build a virtualbox-kmp-default for 7.0.20-lp155.2.31 ? I don't get why we're pushing into the repository packages that don't work .. virtualbox-7.0.20-lp155.2.31 is latest and current vbox package in the repository .. If we cannot build a newer due to some dependencies please build along with updated kernel packages a virtualbox-kmp-default for current virtualbox .. thanks and regards, ~dan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232342] No Ethernet device anymore on RPi3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '24

26 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342#c8 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com Flags| |needinfo?(guillaume.gardet@ | |arm.com) --- Comment #8 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- I'm building a test kernel package with the drop of the patch. It's being built in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1232342. Guillaume, could you test it once after the build finishes? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232342] No Ethernet device anymore on RPi3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '24

26 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342#c7 --- Comment #7 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Thanks Stefan for the detailed information! Then I drop the backported patch for now from SLE15-SP6 branch as a temporary solution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231341] missing vbox module for current kernel-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '24

26 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341#c9 --- Comment #9 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- OK, now set up a link to kbuild and vbox KMP seems built. But virtualbox itself isn't built due to other missing dependencies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232342] No Ethernet device anymore on RPi3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 26 Oct '24

26 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342#c6 Stefan Wahren <wahrenst(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wahrenst(a)gmx.net --- Comment #6 from Stefan Wahren <wahrenst(a)gmx.net> --- Hi, I work since several weeks on s2idle support for Raspberry Pi. In the early stage I discovered an critical issue [1] and in the lack of a better solution the workaround d483f034f032 ("usb: dwc2: Skip clock gating on Broadcom SoCs") was applied. Unfortunately this cause a regression on Rasperry Pi 3B+ in a specific scenario [2]. I prevent the patch to be applied in linux-stable and tried to find the root cause even with the Raspberry Pi guys but no luck so far [3]. So recently I decided to revert this patch. On Friday I noticed this ticket and assume you manually applied the offending patch. I added Ivan in CC for the V5 series [4] which revert the mentioned patch. I was hoping to inform you about this and get a Tested-by. [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/2bcf7fac-8e8f-4d7a-a837-08805a0076e3@gmx.… [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/a4cb3fe4-3d0f-4bf9-a2b1-7f422ba277c8@gmx.… [3] - https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/6411 [4] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20241025103621.4780-1-wahrenst@gmx.net/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231341] missing vbox module for current kernel-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341#c8 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Pecka <nettezzaumanaa(a)gmail.com> --- Hi Takashi-San, Isn't just possible to build package on system with required kbuild and provide along with newer kernels also virtualbox-kmp-default package with pre-built module ? It is actually not required to build a package locally ... # rpm -qa | grep gce149d2 kernel-default-6.11.0-lp155.4.1.gce149d2.x86_64 kernel-source-6.11.0-lp155.4.1.gce149d2.noarch kernel-syms-6.11.0-lp155.4.1.gce149d2.x86_64 virtualbox-kmp-default-7.0.20_k6.11.0_lp155.4.gce149d2-lp155.2.20.x86_64 kernel-devel-6.11.0-lp155.4.1.gce149d2.noarch kernel-default-devel-6.11.0-lp155.4.1.gce149d2.x86_64 thanks and regards, ~dan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1229020] Zypper dup installed kernels which reboot immediately
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229020 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229020#c12 Louis Erickson <wwonko(a)rdwarf.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(wwonko(a)rdwarf.com | |) | --- Comment #12 from Louis Erickson <wwonko(a)rdwarf.com> --- Created attachment 878212 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=878212&action=edit Screen shot showing kernel panic. Here's a new screen shot, this time showing a kernel panic. Hopefully that's useful to you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232342] No Ethernet device anymore on RPi3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342#c5 --- Comment #5 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Guillaume GARDET from comment #4) > The lan78xx device is not found on USB. Do you mean that it's missing in lsusb output, too, i.e. not enumerated at all? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231341] missing vbox module for current kernel-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341#c7 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #7 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- It's not really a kernel problem... virtualbox requires a newer version of kbuild package, and that's missing for Leap. Possibly we may add a link to the project as an ad hoc workaround. But not sure what other influences it may have... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232342] No Ethernet device anymore on RPi3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342#c4 --- Comment #4 from Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com> --- The lan78xx device is not found on USB. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1232342] No Ethernet device anymore on RPi3
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232342#c3 --- Comment #3 from Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com> --- Created attachment 878208 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=878208&action=edit dmesg from working eth on Tumbleweed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1231341] missing vbox module for current kernel-default
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231341#c6 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Pecka <nettezzaumanaa(a)gmail.com> --- Hi, is there please some update on this .. Otherwise it is not possible to use virtualbox with kernel from https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/stable:/Backport/standar… thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225890] [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl kernel parameter 'sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first: No such file or directory'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225890 Jozef Pupava <jpupava(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INVALID |UPSTREAM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225893] [tw][Build 20240531] Sysctl 'Sysctl_net_core_optmem_max' value is changed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225893 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225893#c1 Jozef Pupava <jpupava(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM CC| |jpupava(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Jozef Pupava <jpupava(a)suse.com> --- Probably changed with kernel update [1] Generally the value is increased e.g. [2] * Thu Sep 01 2022 jslaby(a)suse.cz - Linux 5.19.6 (bsc#1012628). ... - net: Fix data-races around sysctl_optmem_max (bsc#1012628). [1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012628 [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-crypto/patch/02fd8c825b9d77bfc6c… https://github.com/openSUSE/sys-param-check/pull/23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225892] [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl 'Sysctl_kernel_yama_ptrace_scope' value is changed
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225892 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225892#c1 Jozef Pupava <jpupava(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM CC| |jpupava(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Jozef Pupava <jpupava(a)suse.com> --- * Fri Apr 15 2022 dmueller(a)suse.com - Update config files (bsc#1198722, bsc#1197746). Enable compiled in LSMs on boot * landlock: optional ability for user land applications to sandbox themselves * yama: optional restrict of use of ptrace for nonprivileged users * default to apparmor, list selinux before bpf to avoid bsc#1197746 * bpf: create eBPF based LSMs dynamically - commit 5506937 https://github.com/openSUSE/sys-param-check/pull/23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1225890] [tw][Build 20240531] sysctl kernel parameter 'sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first: No such file or directory'
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 25 Oct '24

25 Oct '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225890 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225890#c2 Jozef Pupava <jpupava(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |jpupava(a)suse.com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Jozef Pupava <jpupava(a)suse.com> --- Looks like part of kernel update https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012628 sched_child_runs_first was removed on [1] after [2] [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230920130025.412071-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230531124604.137187212@infradead.org/ https://github.com/openSUSE/sys-param-check/pull/23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0