January 2024 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1189456] Add ashmem and binder drivers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456#c12 --- Comment #12 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- And see comment 2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189456] Add ashmem and binder drivers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456#c11 Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivan.ivanov(a)suse.com Flags|needinfo?(tiwai(a)suse.com) | --- Comment #11 from Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov(a)suse.com> --- It was described in comment#1. It should be possible to build Android IPC as "loadable module", not just as build-in module. "CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_IPC=m" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219193] 5G Wifi Stopped Working after Kernel 6.7.1 Upgrade
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219193 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219193#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1219192 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189456] Add ashmem and binder drivers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456#c10 roke beedell <rokejulianlockhart+1674683091(a)outlook.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(tiwai(a)suse.com) --- Comment #10 from roke beedell <rokejulianlockhart+1674683091(a)outlook.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #5) > Right. It has to be addressed in the upstream at first. Do you know where I can track the issue describing what needs to be done upstream? Without it being present in this thread, the rationale for the WONTFIX is missing its most important element. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1217412] [aarch64][LenovoX13s] Missing wsa883x module for audio
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217412 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217412#c22 --- Comment #22 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- The config seems to have been lost during the merge from master branch. The fix was submitted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189456] Add ashmem and binder drivers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456#c9 --- Comment #9 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- To repeat the point: as mentioned in comment 1, the problem is that binder stuff is provided only for built-in kernel. That is, even if that's just a matter of a few kconfig knobs, enabling them will bring a potential problem on the kernel core unconditionally, and that's what we can't accept for the default kernel (that can be used for servers and other serious usages). And, allowing binder to be built as modules needs some changes, and this was declined by the upstream. This part has to be addressed in the upstream at first. Meanwhile, building an unofficial kernel with the enablement of binder config is pretty easy. I've set up OBS repos for Tumbleweed and Leap 15.5 kernels with the enablement of binder. Those are found in OBS home:tiwai:kernel:binder-stable and home:tiwai:kernel:binder-sle15-sp5 repos, respectively. http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/kernel:/binder-stabl… http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/kernel:/binder-sle15… You can use those kernels instead of the official ones. Those are linked targets, hence they will follow the Tumbleweed and SLE15-SP5 kernel changes and be rebuilt automatically upon each update. Note that the above kernels are unofficial builds, and it means that you'd need to turn off Secure Boot. Give it a try, and let me know if it's still something missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1189456] Add ashmem and binder drivers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189456#c8 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Markov <werwolf131313(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 1219258 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219258] New: add binder kernel module
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219258 Bug ID: 1219258 Summary: add binder kernel module Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: werwolf131313(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- For waydroid and anbox, as well as similar programs to work, the binder kernel module is required, which is not in the standard opensuse kernel. is it possible to add it as kmp? > [werwolf@home] ~ > ❯ zgrep BINDER /proc/config.gz > # CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_IPC is not set > > [werwolf@home] ~ > ❯ rpm -qf /boot/vmlinuz-6.7.1-2-default > kernel-default-6.7.1-2.1.x86_64 > > [werwolf@home] ~ > ❯ LANG=c zypper info kernel-default > Loading repository data... > Reading installed packages... > > > Information for package kernel-default: > --------------------------------------- > Repository : repo-oss > Name : kernel-default > Version : 6.7.1-2.1 > Arch : x86_64 > Vendor : openSUSE > Installed Size : 240.3 MiB > Installed : Yes > Status : up-to-date > Source package : kernel-default-6.7.1-2.1.nosrc > Upstream URL : https://www.kernel.org/ > Summary : The Standard Kernel > Description : > The standard kernel for both uniprocessor and multiprocessor systems. > > > Source Timestamp: 2024-01-26 06:32:58 +0000 > GIT Revision: 6aca25404404e4f72fa252563503b29fe5828cca > GIT Branch: stable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1219258] add binder kernel module
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219258 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219258#c6 --- Comment #6 from Ivan Ivanov <ivan.ivanov(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Dmitry Markov from comment #5) > (In reply to Ivan Ivanov from comment #4) > > (In reply to Dmitry Markov from comment #3) > > > > > Should this be regarded as a refusal or an impossibility? > > > I reopened the report to get a final answer like "this will never be done > > > because..." or "this will be done in such and such a release" > > > > Please read comment#1 in bsc#1189456 for an explanation. > > does this mean that I should have reopened not this request but bsc#1189456 > with the same question? > Sorry, I really didn't understand. To be considerd for enabling "Android IPC" should be able to be build as "loadable modules". This is not currently possible. This should be "fixed" upstream first (like in the Linus Torvalds tree). CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_IPC=m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219258] add binder kernel module
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219258 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219258#c5 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Markov <werwolf131313(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Ivan Ivanov from comment #4) > (In reply to Dmitry Markov from comment #3) > > > Should this be regarded as a refusal or an impossibility? > > I reopened the report to get a final answer like "this will never be done > > because..." or "this will be done in such and such a release" > > Please read comment#1 in bsc#1189456 for an explanation. does this mean that I should have reopened not this request but bsc#1189456 with the same question? Sorry, I really didn't understand. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0