June 2022 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1190482] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c creates stale workers
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 05 Jun '22

05 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1190482 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1190482#c2 Benjamin Greiner <code(a)bnavigator.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Benjamin Greiner <code(a)bnavigator.de> --- not reproducible anymore -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1200216] New: Missing backport for kernel
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 04 Jun '22

04 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1200216 Bug ID: 1200216 Summary: Missing backport for kernel Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: gerberb(a)zenez.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- OpenSUSE backported mainline commit 48eab831ae8b ("net: create netdev->dev_addr assignment helpers") but not 40af35fdf79c ("netdevice: demote the type of some dev_addr_set() helpers"). openSUSE Leap 15.3. Build failure of vmware-host-modules-tmp-workstation-16.2.3-k5.19 /tmp/vmware-host-modules-tmp-workstation-16.2.3-k5.19/vmnet-only/netif.c:90:1: error: conflicting types for ��__dev_addr_set�� __dev_addr_set(struct net_device *dev, const void *addr, size_t len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /tmp/vmware-host-modules-tmp-workstation-16.2.3-k5.19/vmnet-only/netif.c:29:0: /usr/src/linux-5.3.18-150300.59.68/include/linux/netdevice.h:4391:1: note: previous definition of ��__dev_addr_set�� was here __dev_addr_set(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *addr, size_t len) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /tmp/vmware-host-modules-tmp-workstation-16.2.3-k5.19/vmnet-only/netif.c:95:13: error: redefinition of ��dev_addr_set�� static void dev_addr_set(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *addr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /tmp/vmware-host-modules-tmp-workstation-16.2.3-k5.19/vmnet-only/netif.c:29:0: /usr/src/linux-5.3.18-150300.59.68/include/linux/netdevice.h:4396:20: note: previous definition of ��dev_addr_set�� was here static inline void dev_addr_set(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *addr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ make[4]: *** [/usr/src/linux-5.3.18-150300.59.68/scripts/Makefile.build:288: /tmp/vmware-host-modules-tmp-workstation-16.2.3-k5.19/vmnet-only/netif.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [/usr/src/linux-5.3.18-150300.59.68/Makefile:1675: _module_/tmp/vmware-host-modules-tmp-workstation-16.2.3-k5.19/vmnet-only] Error 2 make[2]: *** [../../../linux-5.3.18-150300.59.68/Makefile:179: sub-make] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-5.3.18-150300.59.68-obj/x86_64/preempt' make[1]: *** [Makefile:117: vmnet.ko] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/vmware-host-modules-tmp-workstation-16.2.3-k5.19/vmnet-only' make: *** [Makefile:21: vmnet-only] Error 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1200162] New: Linux DOS caused by lsof invoked on symlink inside FUSE filesystem
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1200162 Bug ID: 1200162 Summary: Linux DOS caused by lsof invoked on symlink inside FUSE filesystem Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: x86-64 OS: openSUSE Tumbleweed Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: slawek(a)lach.art.pl QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/100.0 Build Identifier: I trying to implement own FUSE FS by Python (FUSE PY). I would not try to understood if my implementation is good. Problem is: when invoked lsof on symlink inside of my FS other lsof invocation would be blocked. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download VSimple-IPC project from GITHUB (Linux-ERROR tag) 2. Ran my fs, but create /vsimple-ipc directory first 3. Create a symlink to /vsimple-ipc/${CURRENT-PID}-${CREATIONTIME}/app 4. Try to lsof on symlink 5. Try to lsof on other location in the same moment Actual Results: Both lsof invocation would block Expected Results: Maybe just invocation on /vsimple-ipc FS could be broken. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1200097] Booting problems with Tumbleweed 32-bit installed on an external USB drive
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200097 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200097#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nwr10cst-oslnx(a)yahoo.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com Assignee|kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org |dracut-maintainers(a)suse.de Flags| |needinfo?(nwr10cst-oslnx@ya | |hoo.com) --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Sounds more like some dracut issue, indeed. We may need the verbose dracut messages. Could you check with rd.debug option? Tossed to dracut-maintainers for better advice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1200162] Linux DOS caused by lsof invoked on symlink inside FUSE filesystem
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200162 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200162#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgoldwyn(a)suse.com, | |slawek(a)lach.art.pl, | |tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(slawek(a)lach.art.p | |l) --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Could you check what syscall is actually blocked, e.g. via strace? Adding filesystem team to Cc, in anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1200187] New: several btrfs super blocks - grep _BHRfS_M
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200187 Bug ID: 1200187 Summary: several btrfs super blocks - grep _BHRfS_M Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.3 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: mmeisters(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- That looks screwed up. One btrfs should only have at most 3 super blocks (not 66). sudo grep -o -a --byte-offset "_BHRfS_M" /dev/mapper/system0-root 65600:_BHRfS_M 67108928:_BHRfS_M 236167766:_BHRfS_M 238798356:_BHRfS_M 238798440:_BHRfS_M 238798978:_BHRfS_M 239873264:_BHRfS_M 240034256:_BHRfS_M 243875360:_BHRfS_M 348791197:_BHRfS_M 428924625:_BHRfS_M 428924853:_BHRfS_M 568741321:_BHRfS_M 568786002:_BHRfS_M 568954002:_BHRfS_M 569007218:_BHRfS_M 570735218:_BHRfS_M 2934967224:_BHRfS_M 4790915929:_BHRfS_M 4791464409:_BHRfS_M 4791782311:_BHRfS_M 4791782762:_BHRfS_M 4792293977:_BHRfS_M 4792795577:_BHRfS_M 4793273529:_BHRfS_M 4793767337:_BHRfS_M 4859935544:_BHRfS_M 4881038178:_BHRfS_M 4882054936:_BHRfS_M 4883326360:_BHRfS_M 4884640328:_BHRfS_M 4885661160:_BHRfS_M 4886705656:_BHRfS_M 4887723224:_BHRfS_M 4888981544:_BHRfS_M 4890575144:_BHRfS_M 4906920232:_BHRfS_M 4908243704:_BHRfS_M 4909578712:_BHRfS_M 4933311074:_BHRfS_M 4946892322:_BHRfS_M 4948788138:_BHRfS_M 4950012842:_BHRfS_M 6965233186:_BHRfS_M 7182610845:_BHRfS_M 8663067544:_BHRfS_M 8667261890:_BHRfS_M 9100955512:_BHRfS_M 9102226936:_BHRfS_M 9103541544:_BHRfS_M 9105167944:_BHRfS_M 9106212440:_BHRfS_M 9858030904:_BHRfS_M 9859289224:_BHRfS_M 9860885256:_BHRfS_M 9862240648:_BHRfS_M 9863564120:_BHRfS_M 9864899128:_BHRfS_M 9888070242:_BHRfS_M 10971731490:_BHRfS_M 10973627546:_BHRfS_M 10974852250:_BHRfS_M 11317706970:_BHRfS_M 11318096090:_BHRfS_M 11748356509:_BHRfS_M Any idea what is causing this? Any further details needed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1195821] /usr/lib/modules/ contains old kernel directories
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '22

02 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195821 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195821#c5 Martin Wilck <martin.wilck(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Martin Wilck <martin.wilck(a)suse.com> --- It was fixed in kdump-0.9.2, released early this year. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199925] [Build 20220524] LTP: preadv2 fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '22

02 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199925 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199925#c7 --- Comment #7 from Petr Vorel <petr.vorel(a)suse.com> --- Fix merged https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/f9715d7c2e78713e26533c6e08… I retriggered building of LTP package in OBS, next openQA build should be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199925] [Build 20220524] LTP: preadv2 fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jun '22

01 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199925 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199925#c6 --- Comment #6 from Petr Vorel <petr.vorel(a)suse.com> --- Martin prepared patch based on Fabian's suggestion: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20220601141634.1795-1-mdoucha@suse.cz/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20220601141634.1795-1-mdouch… Thanks Fabian. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1190007] openSUSE Kernel version is old, can't install on my laptop.
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jun '22

01 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190007 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190007#c17 --- Comment #17 from Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner(a)suse.com> --- Very late response sorry, got lost. No not really. Still an issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0