May 2022 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1199046] zypper dup wants to install kernel-preempt-5.3.18-150300
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046#c8 --- Comment #8 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Michal Suchanek from comment #6) > yes, sounds like we need obsoletes for kernel-x-devel in addition to kernel-x Do we need Obsoletes, not only Provides? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199046] zypper dup wants to install kernel-preempt-5.3.18-150300
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046#c7 --- Comment #7 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- I guess we need to add Provides for KMPs that are built from this spec, too. I'll push the fix once after confirming the test build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199046] zypper dup wants to install kernel-preempt-5.3.18-150300
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046#c6 --- Comment #6 from Michal Suchanek <msuchanek(a)suse.com> --- yes, sounds like we need obsoletes for kernel-x-devel in addition to kernel-x -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199046] zypper dup wants to install kernel-preempt-5.3.18-150300
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046#c5 --- Comment #5 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- It's likely because of the dependency of kernel-preempt-devel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199046] zypper dup wants to install kernel-preempt-5.3.18-150300
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046#c4 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Krupp <obs(a)akr.yagii.de> --- However, why would 5.3.18 be chosen in the first place, while the most current by version number is 5.14.21-150400.3.3, IMHO? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199046] zypper dup wants to install kernel-preempt-5.3.18-150300
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046#c3 --- Comment #3 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- A temporary workaround is just to uninstall kernel-preempt-devel package once, and install kernel-default-devel afterwards (if not installed). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199046] zypper dup wants to install kernel-preempt-5.3.18-150300
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Hm, the problem seems to be that kernel-default-devel doesn't provide kernel-preempt-devel. The kernel-preempt.rpm as well as kernel-preempt-{extra,optional} themselves are provided by kernel-default (and its variants), but the devel package was forgotten. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1199046] zypper dup wants to install kernel-preempt-5.3.18-150300
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199046#c1 Alexander Krupp <obs(a)akr.yagii.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Maintenance |Kernel Assignee|maintenance(a)opensuse.org |kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org --- Comment #1 from Alexander Krupp <obs(a)akr.yagii.de> --- Maybe "Maintenance" has been the wrong category for this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198552] systemd-udevd: USB devices fails to probe. Cant suspend/reboot/shutdown
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198552 Oliver Neukum <oneukum(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org |oneukum(a)suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1198552] systemd-udevd: USB devices fails to probe. Cant suspend/reboot/shutdown
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 18 May '22

18 May '22

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198552 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198552#c19 Oliver Neukum <oneukum(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(matias.nicolas.zc | |(a)gmail.com) --- Comment #19 from Oliver Neukum <oneukum(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Mat�as Z��iga from comment #18) > Created attachment 858994 [details] > dmesg usbcore.autosuspend=-1 - boot without ac > > So I repeated 3 times the following cases with the build from > bsc1198552_20220517_A: > 1 - Boot with no ac, no cmdline > 2 - Boot with no ac, usbcore.autosuspend=-1 > 3 - Boot with ac - disconnect while using the camera, no cmdline > 4 - Boot with ac - disconnect while using the camera, usbcore.autosuspend=-1 > > In all cases the behavior was the same as before. One of the runs for case Please just attach the results in a clearly labelled form. Picking the right log out of a long report is no fun. > nr 2 was different though, in that I got some extra "UVC control" errors on > dmesg. Attached is the dmesg in case it brings anything useful Unfortunately That does not tell us, why the HC was accessed at that moment and why that failed. Please attach the output of "lspci -vvv" before and after unplugging the AC with the test kernel from comment#16 The test kernel switched off any use of ACPI within USB runtime PM. We need to rule out that any hotplug event is generated from the firmware when you unplug the AC. Please also attach the output of "lspci -vvv" of the standard Leap kernel after a boot with AC and a boot without AC. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0