June 2021 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1186710] wrong/dead symlinks with kernel-default-devel-5.12.4-2.1.x86_64 (after usrmerge?)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710 Ludwig Nussel <lnussel(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1029961 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186710] wrong/dead symlinks with kernel-default-devel-5.12.4-2.1.x86_64 (after usrmerge?)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710#c11 --- Comment #11 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #5) > I'm afraid that the relative symlink is bad in this case. The kernel > package from the latest build is often used on a Leap or SLE system, and > this would break things. Not sure if that is a good way forward. That limits innovation in the kernel package. You could still build the same sources for other targets and make the package behave differently. That's what user space packages usually do after all, you hardly take the TW binaries :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186710] wrong/dead symlinks with kernel-default-devel-5.12.4-2.1.x86_64 (after usrmerge?)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710#c10 --- Comment #10 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Ruediger Oertel from comment #8) > proposal: > > diff --git a/brp-25-symlink b/brp-25-symlink > index 2884a34..15ec95c 100755 > --- a/brp-25-symlink > +++ b/brp-25-symlink > @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ do > /proc/*|/dev/*|/sys/*) # links pointing into kernel file system > should be absolute > link_dest=$link_absolut > ;; > + /lib/modules/*|/lib/firmware/*) # keeping kernel modules and > firmware absolute for now > + link_dest=$link_absolut > + ;; Yup, either that or anything in /lib that links outside of it in general. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186710] wrong/dead symlinks with kernel-default-devel-5.12.4-2.1.x86_64 (after usrmerge?)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710#c8 --- Comment #8 from Ruediger Oertel <ro(a)suse.com> --- proposal: diff --git a/brp-25-symlink b/brp-25-symlink index 2884a34..15ec95c 100755 --- a/brp-25-symlink +++ b/brp-25-symlink @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ do /proc/*|/dev/*|/sys/*) # links pointing into kernel file system should be absolute link_dest=$link_absolut ;; + /lib/modules/*|/lib/firmware/*) # keeping kernel modules and firmware absolute for now + link_dest=$link_absolut + ;; ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}*) echo "ERROR: Link $link -> $link_orig points inside build root!" had_errors=1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186710] wrong/dead symlinks with kernel-default-devel-5.12.4-2.1.x86_64 (after usrmerge?)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710#c7 --- Comment #7 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Ruediger Oertel from comment #6) > what about just patching brp-25-symlink to do nothing for kernel-* or > specifically /lib/modules/* in kernel-* ? That sounds feasible (maybe some generic blacklist?). Both /lib/modules/* and /lib/firmware/* are fixed paths, hard to modify. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186710] wrong/dead symlinks with kernel-default-devel-5.12.4-2.1.x86_64 (after usrmerge?)
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186710#c6 --- Comment #6 from Ruediger Oertel <ro(a)suse.com> --- what about just patching brp-25-symlink to do nothing for kernel-* or specifically /lib/modules/* in kernel-* ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1183890] [Build 20210320] openQA test fails in welcome - NET ISO is stuck on linuxrc blue screen
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183890 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183890#c6 --- Comment #6 from Oliver Kurz <okurz(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for openQA integration by the openqa_review script: This bug is still referenced in a failing openQA test: create_hdd_tumbleweed https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1762720 To prevent further reminder comments one of the following options should be followed: 1. The test scenario is fixed by applying the bug fix to the tested product or the test is adjusted 2. The openQA job group is moved to "Released" 3. The label in the openQA scenario is removed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186692] CDC ACM speed regression from LEAP 15.2 Kernel 5.3 to KOTD
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186692 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186692#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu- | |darmstadt.de, | |oneukum(a)suse.com, | |tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(bon(a)elektron.ikp. | |physik.tu-darmstadt.de) --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- (In reply to Uwe Bonnes from comment #1) > Is there some archive of KOTDs or a simple way to bisect the SUSE kernel? There is no official archive, but you can find some kernel packages in my OBS repos, e.g. OBS home:tiwai:kernel:5.9, home:tiwai:kernel:5.10, ... It'd be helpful if you can narrow down which kernel version starts showing the regression. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1186648] New: Intel GPU UHD 630 - no install possible
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 01 Jun '21

01 Jun '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186648 Bug ID: 1186648 Summary: Intel GPU UHD 630 - no install possible Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.2 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: n.moendjen(a)vodafone.de QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 849811 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=849811&action=edit Machine information Install Media from Leap 15.2 up to actual tumbleweed just blank out after grub. you can make the install media work with the kernel parameter nomodeset. Than they install just fine in grubs resolution. After install you must keep the nomodeset setting. If not the screen blanks out again at start. With nomodeset, no resolution change is possible and on Leap i915 is not loading, on tumbleweed i915 is loaded by X but without audio support and also no resolution change possible. As info: The newer *buntus are installing and running just fine on it. The picture shows the machine. It is taken on kubuntu. I think some kernel patches are missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 14