January 2021 - openSUSE Kernel Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1180901] Incomplete list of attached USB devices using "lsusb"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180901 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180901#c5 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nsaenzjulienne(a)suse.com, | |oneukum(a)suse.com --- Comment #5 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- OK, thanks, this information is helpful. It implies that the regression was introduced between 5.9 and 5.10, which must be quite new. Could you give the dmesg outputs from both 5.9.x kernel and 5.10.x kernel? Also hwinfo output from both please. Adding our USB people to Cc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180917] kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2144!
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917#c5 --- Comment #5 from Sarah Julia Kriesch <sarah.kriesch(a)ibm.com> --- (In reply to LTC BugProxy from comment #3) > ------- Comment From geraldsc(a)de.ibm.com 2021-01-15 10:30 EDT------- > (In reply to comment #4) > [..] > > > > I don't know if this is related boo#1163684 > > If that kernel does not have the fix from that bugzilla (LTC bug#184202, > SUSE bug#1163684), then it most likely is related. > > If it has the fix, then it must be something new. This is a BUG message from > common code, do you only see this on s390? > That is s390x related. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180917] kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2144!
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917#c4 --- Comment #4 from Sarah Julia Kriesch <sarah.kriesch(a)ibm.com> --- We are using kernel 5.10.7 in the latest Tumbleweed version. The latest iso image is available under: https://download.opensuse.org/ports/zsystems/tumbleweed/iso/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180901] Incomplete list of attached USB devices using "lsusb"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180901 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180901#c4 --- Comment #4 from robert spitzenpfeil <rs.opensuse(a)spitzenpfeil.org> --- Some more VM testing: * 5.10.7-2.1.gc9a364-default: BAD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180917] kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2144!
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917#c3 --- Comment #3 from LTC BugProxy <bugproxy(a)us.ibm.com> --- ------- Comment From geraldsc(a)de.ibm.com 2021-01-15 10:30 EDT------- (In reply to comment #4) [..] > > I don't know if this is related boo#1163684 If that kernel does not have the fix from that bugzilla (LTC bug#184202, SUSE bug#1163684), then it most likely is related. If it has the fix, then it must be something new. This is a BUG message from common code, do you only see this on s390? BTW, where can I find the source code for this kernel "5.10.5-1-default", or any openSUSE Tumbleweed kernel? I cannot find it at the same place where the SLES kernel source lives: https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel.git -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180901] Incomplete list of attached USB devices using "lsusb"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180901 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180901#c3 --- Comment #3 from robert spitzenpfeil <rs.opensuse(a)spitzenpfeil.org> --- I found old snapshots of a TW VM (W10 LTSC 1809 host) * 5.8.14-1-default: OK * 5.9.1-1-default: OK * 5.9.12-1-default (TW 20201026): OK * 5.10.5-1-default (TW 20210113): BAD Non-TW Kernels in a VM: * 5.8.14-pmagic64: OK * 5.10.1-pmagic64: OK -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1174087] system is taking a long time (more than 2 minutes) to complete the boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174087 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174087#c1 Miguel Rozsas <miguel(a)rozsas.eng.br> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Miguel Rozsas <miguel(a)rozsas.eng.br> --- Fixed on openSUSE Tumbleweed 20210107/Kernel Version: 5.10.4-1-default Now, booting in single mode or level 3 there is no delay to display the login prompt and no graphical mode is called (as expected). I can't tell if it was fixed in a previous release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1166424] Automatically reserve memory with multiple ECC failures
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166424 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Other |Kernel Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1174087] system is taking a long time (more than 2 minutes) to complete the boot
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174087 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Basesystem |Kernel Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180649] amdgpu: [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180649 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180649#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(abergmann(a)suse.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Does the same problem happen on the recent TW kernel? SLE15-SP3/Leap15.3 has the DRM code that is based on 5.9.x or later, and the bug might have been fixed there if it's addressed in the recent upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180901] Incomplete list of attached USB devices using "lsusb"
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180901 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180901#c2 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rs.opensuse(a)spitzenpfeil.or | |g, tiwai(a)suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(rs.opensuse@spitz | |enpfeil.org) --- Comment #2 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Wasn't the issue seen on 5.9.x or earlier kernel? We need to identify / narrow down the regression range, supposing that it's a regression since 5.3.x. There are various kernel packages available in my OBS repo, e.g. home:tiwai:kernel:5.4, home:tiwai:kernel:5.5, ... Please check with those and see which kernel started showing the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180882] perf does not build reproducibly
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180882 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180882#c1 Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tiwai(a)suse.com Assignee|kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org |tonyj(a)suse.com --- Comment #1 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- Something for Tony. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1178247] [Build 20201028] openQA test fails in yast2_bootloader on Raspberry pi 2, 3 and 4
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178247 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Basesystem |Kernel Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180917] kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2144!
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917#c2 --- Comment #2 from Sarah Julia Kriesch <sarah.kriesch(a)ibm.com> --- That is happening during packaging continuously. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180917] kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2144!
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917 Sarah Julia Kriesch <sarah.kriesch(a)ibm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P2 - High Severity|Normal |Major -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180917] kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:2144!
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180917 LTC BugProxy <bugproxy(a)us.ibm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugzilla.linux.ibm. | |com/show_bug.cgi?id=190818 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1179014] [rpm4.16] invalid use of barewords in kernel spec files
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179014 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179014#c28 --- Comment #28 from Swamp Workflow Management <swamp(a)suse.de> --- SUSE-SU-2021:0133-1: An update that solves 14 vulnerabilities and has 85 fixes is now available. Category: security (important) Bug References: 1040855,1044120,1044767,1050242,1050536,1050545,1055117,1056653,1056657,1056787,1064802,1065729,1066129,1094840,1103990,1103992,1104389,1104393,1109695,1109837,1110096,1112178,1112374,1114648,1115431,1118657,1122971,1129770,1136460,1136461,1138374,1139944,1144912,1152457,1163727,1164780,1171078,1172145,1172538,1172694,1174784,1174852,1176558,1176559,1176956,1177666,1178270,1178372,1178401,1178590,1178634,1178762,1179014,1179015,1179045,1179082,1179107,1179142,1179204,1179403,1179406,1179418,1179419,1179421,1179444,1179520,1179578,1179601,1179616,1179663,1179666,1179670,1179671,1179672,1179673,1179711,1179713,1179714,1179715,1179716,1179722,1179723,1179724,1179745,1179810,1179888,1179895,1179896,1179960,1179963,1180027,1180029,1180031,1180052,1180086,1180117,1180258,1180506,1180559 CVE References: CVE-2018-20669,CVE-2019-20934,CVE-2020-0444,CVE-2020-0465,CVE-2020-0466,CVE-2020-27068,CVE-2020-27777,CVE-2020-27786,CVE-2020-27825,CVE-2020-28374,CVE-2020-29660,CVE-2020-29661,CVE-2020-36158,CVE-2020-4788 JIRA References: Sources used: SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12-SP5 (src): kernel-default-4.12.14-122.57.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12-SP5 (src): kernel-docs-4.12.14-122.57.1, kernel-obs-build-4.12.14-122.57.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12-SP5 (src): kernel-default-4.12.14-122.57.1, kernel-source-4.12.14-122.57.1, kernel-syms-4.12.14-122.57.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 (src): kernel-default-4.12.14-122.57.1, kgraft-patch-SLE12-SP5_Update_14-1-8.3.1 SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability 12-SP5 (src): kernel-default-4.12.14-122.57.1 NOTE: This line indicates an update has been released for the listed product(s). At times this might be only a partial fix. If you have questions please reach out to maintenance coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180802] New: amdgpu works but has another small issue
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180802 Bug ID: 1180802 Summary: amdgpu works but has another small issue Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: jshand2013(a)gmail.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- When I log into my account with tumbleweed the graphics are very good. however, just above the menu bar bottom of the screen is a think black line visible. enclosed is the png file I took with screenshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1180649] amdgpu: [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 15 Jan '21

15 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180649 Chenzi Cao <chcao(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Basesystem |Kernel Assignee|screening-team-bugs(a)suse.de |kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180336] [RPi4] No USB in rpi4b and rpi400 since v5.10
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Jan '21

14 Jan '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180336 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180336#c7 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Patricio Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne(a)suse.com> --- It turns out it's not something firmware can fix, as per RPi's engineer's comment: the USB firmware load sequence can only be performed *once* per controller reset. Subsequent firmware load operations will leave the controller in a bad state. This means in practice that every time a handover happens during the boot process the PCIe bus has to be properly reset, in particular the #PERST line. I'll soon post here a u-boot series fixing this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180336] [RPi4] No USB in rpi4b and rpi400 since v5.10
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Jan '21

14 Jan '21

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180336 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180336#c6 Nicolas Patricio Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Patricio Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne(a)suse.com> --- Closed the issue too soon. A temporary fix was merged in the kernel, but the proper fix has to be introduced in u-boot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180928] Drop CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_ENABLE_OBSOLETE from kernel 5.10+
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Jan '21

14 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180928 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180928#c4 Dirk Mueller <dmueller(a)suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS CC| |schwab(a)suse.com --- Comment #4 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller(a)suse.com> --- submitted a change for master that is arm* specific. I think we could drop this also safely from riscv. for other architectures I think we should be waiting for more feedback from the kernel maintainers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180928] Drop CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_ENABLE_OBSOLETE from kernel 5.10+
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Jan '21

14 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180928 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180928#c3 --- Comment #3 from Andreas F�rber <afaerber(a)suse.com> --- FTR Guillaume had pre-announced this option and asked for it to be disabled: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.opensuse.org/thread/A… There were no objections, so feel free to go ahead for arm64. For other architectures I'd suggest to ask again on the list, as he had singled out arm64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180928] Drop CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_ENABLE_OBSOLETE from kernel 5.10+
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Jan '21

14 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180928 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180928#c2 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet(a)arm.com> --- Yes, this is expected. RC4, Khazad, Anubis, SEED and TEA are the obsoletes alg and thus depend on CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_ENABLE_OBSOLETE (which depends on the AF_ALG interface being enabled in the first place). Your patch LGTM and is likely applicable to all architectures. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1180928] Drop CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_ENABLE_OBSOLETE from kernel 5.10+
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 14 Jan '21

14 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180928 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180928#c1 --- Comment #1 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller(a)suse.com> --- this is the full impact of this change: --- a/config/arm64/default +++ b/config/arm64/default @@ -11141,8 +11141,6 @@ CONFIG_CRYPTO_WP512=m # CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_TI=m -CONFIG_CRYPTO_ANUBIS=m -CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARC4=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLOWFISH=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLOWFISH_COMMON=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAMELLIA=m @@ -11151,13 +11149,10 @@ CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST5=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST6=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_DES=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_FCRYPT=m -CONFIG_CRYPTO_KHAZAD=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SALSA20=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CHACHA20=m -CONFIG_CRYPTO_SEED=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SERPENT=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SM4=m -CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEA=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH_COMMON=m @@ -11187,7 +11182,7 @@ CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_SKCIPHER=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_RNG=m # CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_RNG_CAVP is not set CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_AEAD=m -CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_ENABLE_OBSOLETE=y +# CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_ENABLE_OBSOLETE is not set # CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS is not set CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH_INFO=y so this removes the Anubis Cypher algorithm, , the Khazad algorithm , the ARC4, the SEED cipher algorithm and the TEA, XTEA and XETA cipher algorithms. None of that looks controversial to me, so I'd do it for all of the architectures in a git commit. any opinions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0