April 2009 - openSUSE Features - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[openFate 305696] Add YaST Functionalities under GNOME "Common Tasks" Header
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Feature added by: Kevin Dupuy (kdupuy9) Feature #305696, revision 1, last change by Title: Add YaST Functionalities under GNOME "Common Tasks" Header openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Kevin Dupuy (kdupuy9) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Currently, the GNOME Control Center features a "Common Tasks" banner on the sidebar of the window. An an improvement, some common YaST tasks could be added under this banner (currently, only "Set Preferred Applications" is listed). Some possible functionality: * Add User Account * Add/remove software repositories * Open administrator settings* (opens YaST) *Because there is no other method of opening YaST besides actually knowing that one needs to open YaST (e.g., new user). -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305696

1 7

[openFATE 302476] KDE notification for apparmor rejects
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 02 Apr '09

02 Apr '09

Feature changed by: Stefan Behlert (sbehlert) Feature #302476, revision 24 Title: KDE notification for apparmor rejects openSUSE-11.0: Rejected by Stephan Kulow (coolo) reject date: 2008-03-26 17:30:24 Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Desirable openSUSE-11.1: Rejected by JP Rosevear (jproseve) reject date: 2008-08-15 11:38:24 reject reason: Rejected due to lack of time. Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Desirable - openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed + openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important Projectmanager: Desirable Requested by: Stephan Kulow (coolo) Description: fate #300563 added dbus event advertising. We'd need a KDE frontend for these dbus events that shows a notification of these events. Documentation Impact: Needs to be documented Discussion: #1: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2008-03-18 10:45:07) Just had a chat with Ludwig and Marcus about this topic (if it would be a nice SoC project) and they don't see much use in having such an applet on the desktop. #2: Marcus Meissner (msmeissn) (2008-03-20 14:52:14) (reply to #1) (background reasoning is: it would spend almost all of the time: doing nothing.) #4: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-03-26 17:30:09) (reply to #2) such dbus callbacks are perfect kded modules - they would register a callback and be dead code after that and create a notification on callback. And it's half a day effort, not really SoC material. #3: Jared Allen (jpallen) (2008-03-20 13:56:50) I like the idea of using this as a SoC project. Let's consider this for openSUSE 11.1 #6: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2009-01-17 16:16:46) (reply to #3) Any objection to make this fate public for openSUSE.org partner and try to advertize it there? -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/302476

1 0

[openFATE 305296] Easy Way to Disable Beagle Completely During Installation
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 01 Apr '09

01 Apr '09

Feature changed by: Pedro Veloso (pedrodh) Feature #305296, revision 61 Title: Easy Way to Disable Beagle Completely During Installation openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Important Projectmanager: Important Requested by: JP Rosevear (jproseve) Description: We need to either have beagle off by default and allow a user to enable it the first time they search or provide an install option to turn it off. Relations: - Better Beagle Acceptance (feature/id: 303367) - Easy way to disable beagle completely during install (novell/bugzilla/id: 282678) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282678 Discussion: #1: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-01-26 20:52:46) I prefer to start with disabled, offer option to run at first search. We are proliferating checkboxes in the installer too much. #8: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-02-10 15:32:39) (reply to #1) I wholehearty agree. Having specific applications in the installer is definitely something that we shouldn't do. Have it disabled by default and make it easy to enable. #9: Manuel Bejarano (mbejaranoc) (2009-02-11 09:29:51) (reply to #1) 100% agree #11: Jean-Daniel Dodin (jdd) (2009-02-15 10:12:29) (reply to #1) +1 #2: Kevin Dupuy (kdupuy9) (2009-01-29 23:40:17) I prefer a more sane option than disabling it by default... instead, allow the user to go in and uninstall it from the installation software screen, just as they would any other app (perhaps make 'Desktop Search' pattern, installed by default?) We just need to insure that uninstalling Beagle doesn't throw up any dependency errors. #3: Eric Springer (erikina) (2009-01-30 00:16:23) Every single openSUSE install I've done has resulted in beagle being removed. It slows down the computer, and the firefox extension throws lots of errors. I'm quite happy with how easy it is to remove, and I can see why it's useful -- but unless its seriously improved, I think it should be removed (by default) #26: Peter Nixon (peternixon) (2009-03-11 20:39:01) (reply to #3) +1 + #29: Pedro Veloso (pedrodh) (2009-04-01 22:18:05) (reply to #26) + Totally agree #4: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-30 15:22:34) Maybe pulseaudio should be too, for slightly similar reasons. :) #5: Rastislav Krupansky (ra100) (2009-01-31 13:10:36) (reply to #4) exactly right ;-) #6: Thomas Beimel (rheydtergekko) (2009-02-01 16:22:09) Yes this would be an perfect option during installation. Especially because I prefer to have a new installation that consumes as less resources as possible. I do not need indexing service and I think many others as well. #7: Andri Andreas Priyanto (turtlix) (2009-02-05 11:20:44) I haven't use beagle since I install openSUSE, and maybe wouldn't or never But I don't know other user. I always remove beagle from my gnome-session-properties. #10: Johnny Stovall (oouc) (2009-02-11 22:50:14) Beagle should be disabled by default. Everyone in the DFW Linux Users Group complained when Suse added it. It causes nothing but trouble for me. #12: Bart Otten (bartotten) (2009-02-16 01:13:58) I agree with the people voting to disable it by default. I think we have to keep focus on the 'consumer' and most of them won't use Kerry/Beagle. ps. KDE4 -and- Beagle is useless. KDE4 uses Strigi and Nepomuk. #13: Sebastian Rösgen (palimpseste) (2009-02-17 12:55:11) Despite all who now have voted for this proposal, I just have to vote against it. At least in the forms discussed here. I use Beagle heavily as do some other people I got convinced to use openSUSE instead of Windows. A good Desktop search was among the arguments to move these people to change their OS (others arguments were Deskbar etc... which btw. does not necessarily need Beagle but gets some interesting advantages IF Beagle is activated). Why not simply ask at startup how to configure some basic system defaults. Among them there could be beagle. So concerning the proposals of Federico Lucifredi, Stephan Kulow and so on, I am definitively of the same mind. Beagle should be installed by default, but it should be easy to switch it "on" or "off" whenever one wants. #14: Eric Springer (erikina) (2009-02-18 01:05:18) (reply to #13) Yes, a search is very useful. Yes, some people find beagle beneficial (as apparently you do). But the vast majority (Currently the vote is at 47:1) of people it doesn't work well with. And that's truly an amazing statistic, as it's super easy to see and use the feature it provides but much harder to see that it's beagle causing so many (resource related) problems. And if that statistic alone isn't enough to convince you it's not a sensible default, then I have absolutely no idea how to. There really should be a resemblance of QA in place, especially for default (and completely optional) packages. #15: Sebastian Rösgen (palimpseste) (2009-02-19 12:04:23) (reply to #14) Ok, I hope that my comment did not sound as gruff or ... brusque, for I, basically, hoped to present a different opinion. What I did not intend was to, evidently, irritate somebody by not completely assenting to his opinion. See: I am working for a university in Germany. We have 45.000 students and a staff of employees of a size appropriate for this amount of students. We rely heavily on the capabilities of a search system (to be honest: in this case not beagle, but somethings similar to beagle). I am one person who posts here but, to stay in your line of argumentation, statistically I represent so many single individuals, that my vote could be multiplied by a "pretty fight factor". Now the problem is that most of these people just use a search feature but do not understand of configure it. But they will notice when it is gone . These users do not vote, they are not involved in community work, they are not programmers, not system architects, not members of an online community. But they use systems like beagle. I know, as I stated in my first post, some people, which I got to switch their OS, from Windows to openSUSE. These people will miss features, too. Especially if you are so eager so simple remove this feature despite the fact that it was part of the distribution for many years. The more I write here, the angrier I get. I mentioned that Lucifredi and Kulow are of another opinion (disable but no remove the software; make it possible to switch it on or off when needed), an opinion I agree with. Is it possible that YOU ignored that part? This is quite normale for the usual open source community. To me it is a relatively illusive concept, the more I deal with it (and I deal with it for now 9 years) the more I learn about the ignorance it contains. Too many people choose rather to ignore those who have to vote (usually called users) and instead see their opinion as the ultimate measure to decide pro and contra. Did it come to your mind that about 80-90% of those who start to create an account for a portal like openFATE, who pay the time to write some comments and skip through all these proposals in this portal, that 80-90% of these people might perhaps be programmers? Geeks and nerds as they are called nowadays. This is no real statistic representing the opinion of those who use a software, it is a statistic of those how develop a software. Make this clear to you. So to get back on a rather rational level: I recognize that you are of another opinion. That most of the people here are. But, and that was important to me, these votes in here are not a real representation of opinions. I prefer openSUSE after all these years espcially because it was bought by Novell. Because they do research in usability, which is the only real way to ask the customers/the users, how to design the software. That is why I said, that an easy startup QA for the normal user is the best to do. Do not be too ignorant. The users know what they want, even if they miss some technical versatily, they will still take note of features that are missing, of bugs in the browser, of missing parts in the system "that they know worked on a different OS" or whatever else. Perhaps they annot name the source of the problem and do not know if it is a real design issue or a real bug. But they will say that the feature is not how they expected it to be. I recently said to a colleague of mine that the times of Mac OS are nearly over. The only real advantage they have is that they can design an OS without paying too much attention to different hardware. They know exactly which hardware their OS will possible have to run on. If Linux with a nice GNOME, KDE, or-whatever-desktop would run out of the box on ANY posible hardware, with all features running without a problem (Audio, Bluetooth, 3D Graphics are still a problem as we know) it would be undeniable that Linux will be the winner. I see progress made well into that direction. I see that Linux is close to this goal, to solve these issues in nears time (most Graphic Cards now easily work, with only a few exceptions). So please do not disappoint me. I have to lead discussions about Linux/Windows and Linux/MacOSX nearly every week. I do not want to have them led in vain. Look at what Mac and Windows do, they have a search system with an index. Make ours betters, faster and less memory hungry instead of removing it. These who switch from Windows/Mac to Linux (for instance to openSUSE) want to find new and more useful features instead of fewer features. I know this post was too long. I am sorry, but it thought it necessary. #16: Eric Springer (erikina) (2009-02-19 14:33:07) (reply to #15) I agree with everything you said, but you must realize I/we aren't arguing against search. We're arguing against beagle. I personally use google desktop search on a daily basis. And it works well. I assume that it does all its work when I'm not physically using the computer (a policy that is ideal for desktop usage). I'm not advocating its inclusion (primarily license reasons and kde integration reasons) but you should see that I'm not against a search or anything like that. Beagle on the other hand, I've tried to give it a fair shot a few times. To see if it has improved (something I will admit Banshee has done). But its *always* problematic. Something that is echoed daily on IRC and the mailing lists. The firefox extension causes huge amounts errors and slow downs. The actual search program maxs out the CPU. IO brings the computer to a crawl when I need to get work done etc. It's just not pretty. So if Beagle works well, I'd love to use it. But it doesn't and shouldn't be included. Put it this way. I would really like to see kernel initialization of graphics devices. However, until it's finished and works properly -- I think we'd both agree that it shouldn't be on our systems. I know it's not a good test for everything, but have you noticed how many other desktop distros have chosen to include beagle? #17: Sebastian Rösgen (palimpseste) (2009-02-19 18:16:48) (reply to #16) Ok, I see your point. Perhaps beagle is indeed not a good solution and I was too narrow minded to realize it. (Though I haven't experienced the CPU problems anymore for about one year, I suppose you are right). Especially since the development of beagle has come to a crawl (the last release: 0.3.9 was released about four weeks ago but it needed nearly half a year to be released and contains only some mere bug fixes). I think, I am going to open a new feature request in openFate. If you (and the other guys) are not against desktop search, but instead against beagle, it could be interesting to discuss why Tracker (http://projects.gnome.org/tracker/index.html) should not become a replacement for beagle. Especially since KDE has now Strigi as a core component. So one can get rid of beagle and use some "quasi native" tools for desktop search (namely "strigi" and "tracker") on Gnome and, respectively, KDE. Anyway, thanks for your reply and the discussion. #18: Sebastian Rösgen (palimpseste) (2009-02-19 18:23:53) (reply to #17) Hm, as it seems I cannot open such a request. Wonderful! So perhaps somebody has read this discussion and might be so kind to at least evaluate the request and "perhaps" might open a new feature request concerning the replacement of beagle by Tracker (which is a Gnome Desktop search, but since KDE has already its own Desktop search this should not be that problematic... I hope) And before somebody asks: no I will not file a feature request via bug tracking system. Those usually take weeks or even months before they are answered/evaluated/discussed etc... #19: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-02-19 16:52:12) (reply to #18) Hello Sebastian - I do not take the thread as being "against desktop search", which is a great feature, or against Beagle, which I personally run. The decision is only to have Beagle not be running by default out of the box, but to have it installed and ready. The first time a search is performed, we ask. Users who want desktop search select to run it, and those who are more "frugal" in terms of CPU do not. I am running a 3 year old laptop, and Beagle is running just fine for me. I suspect that's the case for a lot of people. But it is still a good idea to ask for a choice. #20: Eric Springer (erikina) (2009-02-22 03:03:55) (reply to #17) 100% agree. I think tracker/strigi make wonderful replacements. :) #22: andrea florio (anubisg1) (2009-02-25 00:40:51) (reply to #20) indeed... beagle is to heavy, traker instead, is simply wonderful! #23: Barbara Hudson (barbie_h) (2009-03-04 02:22:21) (reply to #15) I was going to vote in favour of the request, because I've been bitten by beagle bringing machines to a crawl many times, but one thing I've noticed is that, as people move to dual / quad -core machines, it's no longer a big issue. I'm not saying ignore the memory and resource problems - just that even laptops nowadays can run plasma and beagle and still feel responsive. The current system, where it notifies you when it does the initial indexing, is a lot better than the computer slowing to a crawl on a fresh install and people wondering why openSUSE is soooo slow. #21: Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) (2009-02-24 09:10:56) Coolo, I believe this should be done via patterns. #24: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-03-04 11:52:23) (reply to #21) having a desktop search easy to enable sounds like a good to have feature, so I wouldn't simply remove the package from install. But it doesn't make sense on a KDE4 desktop (and it's not there in 11.1 afaik) and it doesn't have to be running by default for GNOME either. But this is something for the beagle maintainers to decide. #25: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-03-04 11:53:33) (reply to #24) that is: it should be off by default (seeing all the votes). But if it's worth to make it easier to turn it on than it is, I leave to those that know. But the solution to enable it, should be within the desktop. #27: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-03-16 18:03:00) Less than "easy way to disable beagle completey during installation" it should even be "disable beagle by default", thank you. #28: Marcel Müller (open_assistant) (2009-03-16 20:32:45) great idea, especially to my slowly pc -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305296

1 0

[openFATE 302628] Access to encrypted devices/partitons by dongle
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 01 Apr '09

01 Apr '09

Feature changed by: Mario Goppold (mgoppold) Feature #302628, revision 32 Title: Access to encrypted devices/partitons by dongle openSUSE-11.0: Rejected by Stephan Kulow (coolo) reject date: 2008-03-31 10:53:14 reject reason: too late - and still lacking a real concept behind the full story. Priority Requester: Desirable openSUSE-11.1: Rejected by Stephan Kulow (coolo) reject date: 2008-08-07 16:27:08 reject reason: out of resources. Priority Requester: Desirable openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Stefan Fent (sfent) Description: Think of the following scenario: You store your files on an encrypted partition and if you want to access them you just insert your USB stick, flash card or whatever and gain access to your files. Another thought would be to encrypt the whole system and the only possibilty to access it is via dongle. Relations: - FATE#301352: Filesystem encryption using Smartcard certificate (feature/id: 301352) Discussion: #1: Gerald Pfeifer (geraldpfeifer) (2007-10-05 23:04:19) Michele (desktop) / Matthias (storage) what do you think about this? #2: Michael Löffler (michl19) (2008-01-02 18:27:26) Nice to have but I miss a business case. #3: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-01-07 14:42:28) (reply to #2) the business case of such a feature only works if you have a company to sell those dongle sticks I'd say. And those dongle vendors prefer custom boot loaders from those I know. So I don't think a solution with a stick that can be easily copied by dd is preferrable and I would rather reject this. #4: Guy Lunardi (glunardi) (2008-01-18 19:46:42) It's my understanding that Chris' work would allow for this to happen. This would be very neat indeed, we have discussed this with several customers who expressed interest. Using a simple USB key would be one inexpensive way to make this work. One alternative that a customer asked was to have the ability to unlock the data using certificates strored within a smart card. #7: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-06-27 11:23:16) (reply to #4) Chris work? I fail to see the context. #9: Guy Lunardi (glunardi) (2008-07-02 15:27:37) (reply to #7) I do believe that Chris' work would be good for us to leverage however I do not know the details and could be wrong since it has been a few months now since we last talked about this. Chris, would you be able to assist me with provide insights on ways we could address this? #11: Chris Rivera (chrismrivera) (2008-07-06 23:52:49) (reply to #9) If you setup an encrypted home directory with cryptconfig it defaults to creating an encrypted container and a key file. The key file can reside anywhere, including removable media. If you use removable media you need to setup an fstab entry using the device label or device UUID to ensure that the dongle gets mounted automatically and the key file is in the right location. #12: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-08-07 16:26:44) (reply to #11) ok, just talked about with Chris about this feature. We have no resources for yast work any more and the work required seem to be this: "so it would just mean moving the .key file to the media, changing the . key file location in pam_mount.conf, and adding an fstab entry" (quoting Chris). So this would be either put in a README or we wait for SPx. #13: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-03-04 11:39:07) (reply to #12) any objection against opening this to openSUSE.org? #14: Marcus Meissner (msmeissn) (2009-03-04 11:40:59) (reply to #13) no, done #5: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-03-31 10:52:41) I still have no clear picture of what cryptfs setups we're going to support - there are various fate entries about it: e,g, 302981 and 301352. So I would like PM to sort this out - and I personally think it's too late for 11.0. #6: Matthias Eckermann (mge1512) (2008-04-01 01:35:14) In an ideal world we would support: * TPM (incl. fingerprint readers etc.) * Smart Cards * simple devices with key on (USB sticks, memory cards) * passphrase (as today) * (optional) integration with a directory (LDAP, eDirectory, ...) #15: Mario Goppold (mgoppold) (2009-03-29 22:26:03) Hi, because I just need to unlook my root partition via USB stick I have build an rpm for it: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/mgoppold/openSUSE_11.1/x86_… _SVNr46_luks_key-64.1.x86_64.rpm The main changes are in /lib/mkinitrd/scripts/{setup,boot}-luks.sh and the new /etc/sysconfig/initrd.luks_key. The LUKS-Keyfile should on an Labled or UUIDed USB-Stick. You can unlook all partitions with a master key or define a separate for every luks_device. The approach is certainly not the best but there is no keyscript in /etc/crypttab jet (why not?). #16: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) (2009-03-30 09:13:46) (reply to #15) mind creating a patch against http://git.opensuse.org/?p=projects/boot.crypto.git;a=summary so I can have a look? I'm not really fond of supporting the keyscript option but since debian now uses that askpass program that I like to integrate we'd basically get keyscript support for free at least wrt boot.crypto. For YaST it would be between hard and impossible to support as one can never know what the keyscript does. #17: Mario Goppold (mgoppold) (2009-03-30 22:14:47) (reply to #16) Have a look at boot.crypto-035e11e5c04eb03ca972baf135a12b869e758f91. luks-key.dif (https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=boot.crypto-035e11e5c04eb… 3Amgoppold) an the new rpm Build 73 (https://api.opensuse.org/build/home:mgoppold/openSUSE_11.1/x86_64/cryptsetu… _SVNr46_luks_key-73.1.x86_64.rpm) + #18: Mario Goppold (mgoppold) (2009-04-01 20:59:06) (reply to #16) + I have made some little updates: + * There is no need to add /dev/mapper/swap and /dev/mapper/what_else to + setup-storage.sh. or /boot/grub/menu.lst + * If the key-File is not within the luks-Container there is now a + prompt fallback. + * I added ext3 and jbd modules to have the Key on ext3 formatted USB- + Sticks + The new version is Build 77 (http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/mgoppold/openSUSE_11.1/x86_…) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/302628

1 0

[openFATE 306326] mount encrypted /home before user config
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 01 Apr '09

01 Apr '09

Feature changed by: Stefan Behlert (sbehlert) Feature #306326, revision 2 Title: mount encrypted /home before user config openSUSE-11.2: New Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Stefan Behlert (sbehlert) Description: Taken from bugzilla, requested by development. When installing with an encrypted /home partition I am informed during - user creation that the /home partition is not mounted (see screenshot). + user creation that the /home partition is not mounted (see screenshot + in bugzilla). What is missing here is the possibility to enter the password for the partition, mount the partiton and continue with the user configuration. Relations: - mount encrypted /home before user config (novell/bugzilla/id: 456004) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456004 -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306326

1 0