February 2009 - openSUSE Features - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[openFATE 305919] Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

Feature added by: Stephan Kulow (coolo) Feature #305919, revision 1, last change by Title: Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) Description: Why Hunspell? MySpell is not developed for quite a long time either in Mozilla and in OpenOffice.org. Hunspell is a fork of MySpell, it has great improvements is several ways, and fully backward compatible with MySpell. Main features: * Extended support for language peculiarities; Unicode character ncoding, compounding and complex morphology. * Improved suggestion using n-gram similarity, rule and dictionary ased pronounciation data. * Morphological analysis, stemming and generation. * Hunspell is based on MySpell and works also with MySpell dictionaries. * GPL/LGPL/MPL tri-license http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunspell http://hunspell.sourceforge.net/ Fedora project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary I also find a reference in the wishlist: http://en.opensuse.org/Wishlist_Various Relations: - Hunspell as a system wide spellchecker (novell/bugzilla/id: 354554) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354554 Discussion: #1: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2008-01-18 06:18:21) For reference: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2008-01/msg00156.html #2: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:20:54) * ** Bug 301458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #3: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-18 07:24:25) I'll do my best to do it for openSUSE-11.0. I am still busy with some other things. Or Michael, do you have time to look at it? #4: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-27 12:17:56) patch for gtkspell (2.0.11): http://www.abisource.com/~dom/gtkspell-2.0.11-enchant.patch using this patch makes obsolate the gtkspell-gcc-err-fix.diff patch for gnome-spell 1.0.7: based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426347 attached #5: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-01-28 05:44:13) Adding gtkspell maintainer to CC. #6: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-01-28 05:52:56) Created an attachment (id=191980) gnome spell check patch #7: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 02:24:22) now available in Build Service (without dictionaries) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/ #8: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-04 02:49:51) Proposed patch for gtkspell has been added. #9: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-04 12:38:37) dictionaries http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/kkemenczy/openSUSE_Factory/… #10: Martin Schlander (cb400f) (2008-02-05 01:30:16) For Danish (da_DK) there's a dictionary being developed that's optimized for hunspell at http://www.stavekontrolden.dk http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.dic http://www.stavekontrolden.dk/main/sspinputfiles/da_DK.aff I believe it's already a better option for hunspell than the dictionary from http://da.speling.org which is currently packaged. If not already it will become so soon as it's developed a lot more actively. Furthermore it's available under these licenses: GPL version 2 LGPL version 2.1 MPL version 1.1 Don't hesitate to ask if there are further questions. #11: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-05 07:25:42) da_DK dictionary updated what is the next step? Someone had to decide to add it to the factory for further test. #12: Petr Mladek (pmladek) (2008-02-05 09:57:30) Lado. is there any chance that you could create the hunspell package for STABLE/FACTORY? I am still busy with some other stuff. #13: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-06 02:49:05) O.K. I'll do it. It won't be in Alpha 2 because it is already under mastering process. It should appear in Alpha 3. #14: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-19 06:14:25) Package is in Factory. #15: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-02-21 03:48:22) imho several tasks left: * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. ttps://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell ttp://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 more info: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.ht… * Removing hunspell from Enchant ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 * vim patch for hunspell: ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? #16: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-02-21 04:13:53) (In reply to comment #15 from kalman kemenczy) > imho several tasks left: > > * I am not sure that gnome-spell is Enchant-enable or not. > https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=191980 > > * Sonnet's enchant backend backport to kdelibs / kspell > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154560 > more info: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg01493.ht… > > * Removing hunspell from Enchant > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426402 > > * vim patch for hunspell: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 > > Should I create seperate bugs or we should keep them together here? Adding kde-maintainers and gnome-maintainers to CC. Reassigning to vim maintainer. #17: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-03-23 12:43:01) * ** Bug 237828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #18: Bjoern Jacke (bjacke) (2008-05-01 15:57:47) - any news from vim maintainer on this? - enchant still needs rework or update - gnome-spell still needs enchant support added #19: Ladislav Michnovič (lmich) (2008-05-05 04:40:12) Adding JP. What do you think about this? See comment #15 and #18. #20: Matthias Koenig (makoenig) (2008-05-05 06:42:03) There are some problems with the vim patch. Currently we have /bin/vim-normal as default vim and /usr/bin/vim-enhanced. As the patch links against libhunspell which lives in /usr/lib{,64} we cannot link /bin/vim-normal against this. This would require either moving libhunspell to /lib{,64} which is not want we want (libhunspell itself also links against /usr/lib{,64}/libstdc++), or building /bin/vim-normal without syntax features at all (as the spell features seem to be tightly coupled to the general syntax features), which I also don't want. The best solution would be to provide a /bin/vim-tiny with minimal features and moving /bin/vim-normal to /usr/bin/vim-normal. But this will not happen for 11.0, as it will need yet another vim package restructuring. But, despite of this, yes, I think using hunspell is a good idea, as the vim dictionaries are derived from the OO ones and would otherwise waste a lot of space by duplicated data. Also worth mentioning, that this patch has been sent a year ago to upstream. While the idea has been appreciated, the patch has been rejected as is, AFAIK there has not been any work to improve this: http://www.mail-archive.com/vim-dev@vim.org/msg03252.html #21: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:54:06) Created an attachment (id=214116) Gnome spell enchant patch here is the latest and greatest patch wirtten by Szilveszter Farkas from Ubuntu community, however this is created for gnome-spell 1.0.7, maybe it could use for 1.0.8. #22: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2008-05-09 22:57:46) Rodrigo, could you check this patch to gnome-spell, please? https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=214116 Hopefully you are the maintainer for this packge. Many thanks, kalman #23: Stanislav Brabec (sbrabec) (2008-05-21 04:21:49) Patch applied (autogenerated files removed from it). #24: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-11 18:53:30) There's a ton of spelling tools, why could not it have used one of the previously packaged ones, aka aspell or ispell? #25: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 01:19:59) Jan, Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE. To answer your why's please read comment#1 #26: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-12 03:06:41) >Hunspell already packaged in openSUSE But was not in 10.3. Hence the question. >comment#1 First comment says "Myspell". I asked about aspell/ispell. #27: Kálmán Kéménczy (kkemenczy) (2009-01-12 03:41:41) I think there are some reasons why choose Mozilla and OpenOffice.org and why Fedora decided as well, and slowly Ubuntu will go this way. In my comment#1 you should find the awesome summary: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary Hunspell is not a question, the question is when? -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305919

1 3

[openFate 305587] Yast template for theming
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 01 Apr '11

01 Apr '11

Feature added by: Jakub Steiner <jimmac(a)novell.com> Feature #305587, revision 1, last change by Title: Yast template for theming openSUSE-11.2: New Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Jim McEldowney <jimmac(a)erie.net> Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: To be able to skin the Yast installer properly, I would welcome the existence of a YCP template to include all of the widgets included in the actual installer. Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Without such a testbed it's extremely hard and error prone to create new styling. In some cases it's impossible to see the implications of a style change until after it has been submitted to build and new distribution snapshot released. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305587

1 6

[openFATE 305876] Packages usage statistics
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 31 Mar '11

31 Mar '11

Feature added by: Michal Vyskocil (mvyskocil) Feature #305876, revision 1, last change by Title: Packages usage statistics openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Michal Vyskocil (mvyskocil) Description: Moved from Brainstorming_Prague (http://en.opensuse.org/BrainStorming_Prague#We_don.27t_know_which_packages_…) Problem: We don't know which packages users really use/have installed We cannot focus our interest on really important packages for our end-users, because we don't know which are important. Those popularity statistics could help us in many ways - for example bug priority of popular package should be higher, or we can decide move the package from/to Factory, ... Debian has a http://popcon.debian.org/ and popularity-contest package, so we should reuse an existing code. The pupularity-contest executable is a simple Perl script, which should be ported to rpm (replacing of dpkg calls by rpm alternative should be enough). Those package usage statistics could be integrated into Software Portal and to YaST comparing relative results for individual packages between openSUSE and Debian can give us a valuable information about the community structure (how many users use development tools etc.) -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305876

1 4

[openFate 305723] Allow to set the owner of a partition
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 16 Mar '11

16 Mar '11

Feature added by: Rajko Matovic (rajko_m) Feature #305723, revision 1, last change by Title: Allow to set the owner of a partition openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Rajko Matovic (rajko_m) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: If a user buys a new external harddrive and partitions it via YaST he will not be able to write on it, since the filesystem is owned by root. A normal user would need to know about how to use konsole and which command to use in order to change the owner. It would be a lot easier, if the user could change the owner within the partitioning module. Of course this should not be possible for system-partitions such as / and /usr etc, yet /windows and /media, as well as /home/xyz/ should be fine. The problem is not trivial as it is not enough to change fstab. See: See: http://ntfs-3g.org/support.html#unprivileged -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305723

1 5

[openFate 305075] Allow to set the owner of a partition
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 16 Mar '11

16 Mar '11

Feature added by: Arvin Schnell (aschnell(a)novell.com) Feature #305075, revision 1 Title: Allow to set the owner of a partition openSUSE-11.1: New Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Sven Burmeister (sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: If a user buys a new external harddrive and partitions it via YaST he will not be able to write on it, since the filesystem is owned by root. A normal user would need to know about how to use konsole and which command to use in order to change the owner. It would be a lot easier, if the user could change the owner within the partitioning module. Of course this should not be possible for system-partitions such as / and /usr etc, yet /windows and /media, as well as /home/xyz/ should be fine. Discussion: #1: Arvin Schnell(aschnell(a)novell.com) (2008-07-15 08:32:00) Do you want to set gui and uid in /etc/fstab? #2: Sven Burmeister(sven.burmeister(a)gmx.net) (2008-07-15 08:56:26) I'm not sure which is the best approach. Either the user could do something that replaces "chown user:group ." on the new partition or some predefined gui/uid to select from, because the normal user has no idea about those and the numbers that go with them. The goal is that a user that knows the root password can not only partition a new harddrive via GUI but also make it accessible (rw) to users without having to know anything about fstab-syntax and options. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305075

1 17

[openFate 305672] openFATE - Show References
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

Feature added by: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) Feature #305672, revision 1, last change by Title: openFATE - Show References Requested by: Klaas Freitag (kfreitag) Description: openFATE should comfortably display and handle external references like: * related bug numbers * other features (dupes, related) * wiki pages into the opensuse wiki * sourcecode, ie. svn path People should be able to edit references as well. Wiki page and sourcecode references are new and must be added. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305672

1 7

[openFate 305768] Use open source firmware for b43
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 03 Feb '11

03 Feb '11

Feature added by: Helmut Schaa (hschaa) Feature #305768, revision 1, last change by Title: Use open source firmware for b43 openSUSE-11.2: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Helmut Schaa (hschaa) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Currently openSUSE does not ship the firmware for broadcom devices due to legal issues. Only a script /usr/sbin/install_bcm43xx_firmware is provided which is not easy to find for new users. However an open source firmware for these devices are available now at [1] and would allow to be shipped with openSUSE. Of course this firmware needs some testing but it would be quite nice to not depend anymore on the proprietary firmware. [1] http://www.ing.unibs.it/openfwwf/ -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305768

1 4

[openFATE 305923] osc revert or merge
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 18 Dec '10

18 Dec '10

Feature added by: Will Stephenson (wstephenson) Feature #305923, revision 1, last change by Title: osc revert or merge Buildservice: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Will Stephenson (wstephenson) Description: The only way to revert packages currently is very inconvenient. Some more svn semantics like osc merge to enable reverts would help. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305923

1 2

[openFate 305695] Binary Upload of prebuild packges
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 17 Dec '10

17 Dec '10

Feature added by: Martin Mohring (MartinMohring) Feature #305695, revision 1, last change by Title: Binary Upload of prebuild packges Buildservice: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Martin Mohring (martinmohring) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Ths allow also developers without direct access to the OBS backend to create distributions that consist of only binary packages or that are initially created from binary packages, there should be a combination of backend and osc be capable to upload binary files to :full directory of a project. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305695

1 1

[openFate 305081] openSUSE Testfeature
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 11 Dec '10

11 Dec '10

Feature added by: Christopher Hofmann (cwh(a)novell.com) Feature #305081, revision 1 Title: openSUSE Testfeature openSUSE-11.1: New Priority Requester: Neutral Requested by: Christopher Hofmann (cwh(a)novell.com) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Feel free to play aroud with this feature. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305081

1 34