October 2009 - openSUSE Features - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[openFATE 306327] Add DB2 Express-C
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 15 Oct '09

15 Oct '09

Feature changed by: Silviu Marin-Caea (silviumc) Feature #306327, revision 12 Title: Add DB2 Express-C openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Requested by: Robert Schweikert (rjschwei) Description: IBM is interested to providing an easy mechanism for users to install DB2 Express C, the free version of DB2. It would be nice if we could add DB2 Express C to the openSUSE non-oss repository. Relations: Discussion: #3: Glenn Doig (doiggl) (2009-04-24 06:16:56) http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/db2/express/ http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/db2/express/download.html #4: Pascal Bleser (pbleser) (2009-05-20 22:00:05) Why not, let's go for it. If IBM wants to see openSUSE as a vehicle to drive the adoption of their products, even if not opensource, and as long as it doesn't affect the license/EULA/redistribution of the distribution itself, I don't see any reason not to support that initiative. IBM can choose to either have it in the non-OSS repository, or host it in a repository of their own, with openSUSE builds. What is involved on our side of things ? #5: Robert Schweikert (rjschwei) (2009-05-28 09:21:00) - IBM has a distribution agreement that needs to be signed. In addition I think when somone installs DB2-Express C from the non-oss repo we should pop up a box telling them about the agreement if they intend to distribute DB2 Express with a product. No registration required for private use. #6: Robert Schweikert (rjschwei) (2009-05-28 09:22:04) Added attachment Distribution agreement (IBM_DB2_and_WAS_CE_Distribution_Form_and_Agreement_4_17_2009.pdf) #7: Luc de Louw (delouw) (2009-07-12 14:45:45) It is a good idea to add DB2-Express. How about also to add Oracle XE (the equivalent to DB2-Express) so users have more choice. Should I add a feature request for Oracle XE? + #8: Silviu Marin-Caea (silviumc) (2009-10-15 11:45:13) (reply to #7) + See https://features.opensuse.org/308140 Add Oracle XE + Vote for it :-) + See also https://features.opensuse.org/308141 Add Oracle SQL Developer -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/306327

1 0

[openFATE 305362] iFolder not available in openSUSE factory
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 14 Oct '09

14 Oct '09

Feature changed by: Joe Harmon (jaharmon) Feature #305362, revision 4 Title: iFolder not available in openSUSE factory Requested by: Kalidas Balakrishnan (kalidasbala) Description: iFolder was available as part of openSUSE 10.2. As a Novell sponsored project, I would expect it to be made available as part of the main openSUSE 11.0 distribution. However, it is not currently part of the alpha release. Relations: - iFolder not available in openSUSE factory (novell/bugzilla/id: 350223) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350223 + - feature/duplicate: 305712 Discussion: #1: Jan-Simon Möller (dl9pf) (2008-01-13 10:40:25) Hi Benjamin! You are right! And i second you. For the last 1/2 year I maintain some experimental packages in the buildservice. Look at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dl9pf/ for some builds i made. The factory build is broken since 2007/12/19 and i was not able to fix it. Unfortunately, there is not much progress in the projects svn and the devs@novell are (atm?) not really resposive to the "community". Although its open-source, its now rather developed like a closed-source project - which is just sad. #2: Benjamin McCann (chengas123) (2008-01-13 13:40:10) Yes, unfortunately it seems you are right. I do not think Novell is too committed to this project. It appears there's only been one commit since September (http://forge.novell.com/pipermail/ifolder-svn/). The wiki at iFolder.com is not editable, so there's little room for community participation. Thank you for your builds. I did install it awhile back, but unfortunately iFolder is just too buggy for me to use presently. I've submitted bug reports on those as well, but it doesn't look like anyone at Novell has taken much of a look at them. I don't suppose you know more about whether this will be in 11.0? There's a lot of potential for iFolder, but I've basically given up on it. #3: Jan-Simon Möller (dl9pf) (2008-01-15 03:23:40) I know the wiki is readonly. A new server was promised 3/4 year ago. Problem is the missing spam-protection of the wiki. I did fix all the daily spam for several month - alone. After that we made the wiki readonly until the new server would be ready. No new setup up to now :- ( . Most interesting bugreports are not visible to the public. Which is just confusing for a OSS-project! This underlines the "closed development". I don't know - may be. #4: Jan-Simon Möller (dl9pf) (2008-01-15 03:44:56) See Bug 232984 ... #5: Claes Backstrom (etrash) (2008-01-15 08:49:56) If we try to add iFolder Server to openSUSE 11.0 perhaps we can get the development and wiki to work more like an opensource project. There is plans to add iFolder both to fedora and ubuntu. We should as an Novell sponsored project make this before them. #6: Benjamin McCann (chengas123) (2008-02-23 15:39:44) Any update on this? There are still another few weeks to get it into an Alpha release. Or should I assume Novell has left iFolder for dead? #7: Ted Bullock (meiqur) (2008-04-09 11:18:35) This is really an enhancement request, not a defect #8: Ted Bullock (meiqur) (2008-04-09 11:22:20) * ** Bug 232984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** #9: Dan Elder (danman21) (2008-05-28 19:05:15) I'd be happy to help test any experimental packages as well for 11. Considering iFolder2 is no longer supported and iFolder3 usually doesn't work though I'm not sure how much effort Novell is putting into it. #10: Claes Backstrom (etrash) (2008-07-03 13:55:43) This did not happen for openSUSE 11.0 but now there is 6 months to the release of openSUSE 11.1. That should be enough time to get ifolder into it. Could someone from the ifolder team please comment if this is not possible. #11: Jan-Simon Möller (dl9pf) (2008-09-01 02:49:20) from rpm HEADER: Name : ifolder Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 3.6.0.8213.1 Vendor: (none) Release : 1 Build Date: Fri Aug 1 07:49:42 2008 Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: blrwgpcm3 Group : System/GUI/Other Source RPM: ifolder-3.6.0.8213.1-1.src.rpm Size : 29083369 License: GPL; LGPL Signature : (none) Packager : http://support.novell.com URL : http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?ifolder Summary : File Sharing and Collaboration Tool Description : The iFolder Project is a project focused on file sharing and collaboration, released under the GPL and supporting the iFolder 3 protocol from Novell. Distribution: Novell Open Enterprise Server 2.0.0 Linux (i586) So please tell me: As stated in the RPM, the software is GPL/LGPL - where can the source be accessed??? And i mean an up-to-date revision. Same applies to simias. N.B.: in both packages the GPL is included. And again: let's _join forces_ and push this great app forward! #12: Jan-Simon Möller (dl9pf) (2008-09-08 15:39:55) Just a sidenote: if iFolder works on 11.1, it will work well in SLE11 as it (as we all know) shares most of the codebase. So if there would be an OSS build for 11.1 much trouble can be found/fixed for SLE 11. Just my 0,02 $. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305362

1 0

[openFATE 308078] Package Greenstone Digital Library System
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Feature added by: Stephen Kellat (skellat) Feature #308078, revision 1 Title: Package Greenstone Digital Library System Package Wishlist: Unconfirmed Priority Requester: Important Requested by: Stephen Kellat (skellat) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Greenstone is a digital library system created by a team at the University of Waikato in New Zealand. The system was developed in partnership with UNESCO and the Human Info NGO. At present it is not packaged for any distribution whatsoever. To broaden the appeal of openSUSE to educators who already can install virtual learning environment from Moodle, Greenstone could be packaged for installation. Use Case: 1. Educator using openSUSE education custom spin is able to comply with an administrator's wishes to create a digital library with few headaches. 2. A development team seeking a way to archive project communications for posterity does not have to turn to Google Groups to do it. Business case (Partner benefit): openSUSE.org: Right now the installation tool for Greenstone requires a fair degree of proficiency in administering your own server. The downloads available are operating system specific and assume that you are using an x86 processor set. With the power of the openSUSE Build Service working behind the scenes, it might be possible to make installation more tenable for educators who are not moonlighting as IT staff but want to run this on whatever hardware they have. An additional benefit outside the realm of education is that this may present a better tool for development projects than simply using wikis. Greenstone is a digital library package and is geared towards having excellent indexing for searching archives. Proof of concept databases are already hosted by the project team showing how e-mail archives can be made quite readily searchable. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/308078

1 0

[openFATE 305657] finer grained PolicyKit support for Networkmanager
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Feature changed by: Tanja Roth (ta-ro) Feature #305657, revision 48 Title: finer grained PolicyKit support for Networkmanager openSUSE-11.2: Candidate Priority Requester: Important Projectmanager: Desirable Requested by: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) Description: NetworkManager currently only supports one PolicyKit privilege. That is whether a user is allowed to modify administrator defined connections or not. There is no way to disallow users to define their own network configurations. NetworkManager should at least support one additional PolicyKit privilege that defines whether or not users are allowed to bring their own network configuration or whether they mere are allowed to use administrator defined ones. Use Case: - disallow workers on centrally administered machines to configure different network settings - protect home users that only ever connect to a few well known nets from accidently changing their setup Discussion: #1: Matthias Nagorni (mnagorni) (2009-08-21 14:26:22) If this can be done with little effort I would be even tempted to rate it Mandatory. #2: Stefan Behlert (sbehlert) (2009-08-25 16:37:57) Alex, is there soemone on your team who could look at that? MAybe with some support form Tambet? #3: Li Bin (binli) (2009-08-26 05:58:01) I and lance wang would like to take care of it. We still don't know the requirement clearly. 1. disallow workers on centrally administered machines to configure different network settings The workers mean the users in administered machines? Does it right that when workers configure network settings it prompt they are no permission? If so I thought we could change the PolicyKit's configuration file to complete it. 2. protect home users that only ever connect to a few well known nets from accidently changing their setup How to distinguish home users from workers? Does it mean don't allow the user to configure the other users connections? #4: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) (2009-08-26 08:40:53) (reply to #3) Currently there's only org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system. modify, introduce something like org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.user.modify so NM can determine whether it should accept user settings. #16: Wang Lance (lzwang) (2009-09-25 11:26:20) (reply to #4) Hi Ludwig Nussel I have added the following policy action: org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wired.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wireless.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.mobile.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.vpn.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.dsl.apply . NM now can determine whether it should apply the user settings to devices by type. Does the implementation meet your request? I need your feedback to determine what should to do next step. Thanks, Lance Wang #17: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) (2009-09-25 11:58:50) (reply to #16) Sure, that's even more than I had wished for. Would it be possible to also have a separate privilege for the connection sharing thingy? In contrast to the other configurations that one also messes with iptables and starts a DHCP daemon. #5: JP Rosevear (jproseve) (2009-08-26 17:06:51) (reply to #3) My suggestion would be to look at something like the following: org. freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.modify org.freedesktop. network-manager-settings.system.add org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.delete and the same for .user - you may even want to specifically allow or disallow adding for specific network types like wired, wireless, etc. You probably also want to have the ability to enable/disable wireless in general and enable/disable networking covered. You can default all of these to the current settings, but adding these would allow more lockdown opportunities. #6: Li Bin (binli) (2009-08-31 11:22:12) Well, We'll works on this feature in this week, know about the PolicyKit and NetworkManager, write the patch if time is okay. Tambet, Do you have any idea about this feature? #7: Luis Medinas (lmedinas) (2009-08-31 18:40:51) (reply to #6) Might worth looking at NM 0.8 (git master), it supports the latest polkit-1 and it should be released before 11.2. Maybe some of this features were introduced. #8: Tambet Ingo (tambet) (2009-09-01 09:40:05) (reply to #7) NM 0.8 will not be out before 11.2, it'll be out for the next Fedora release which will happen after 11.2. Also, current git master does not have any work for this feature, it's just been converted to use the newer, incompatible polkit API. #9: Tambet Ingo (tambet) (2009-09-01 09:43:56) (reply to #6) The upstream has been planning on having similar feature for a while now, but no work has been done on it yet. I strongly suggest to have a discussion with the upstream maintainer before any work gets done, otherwise our effort might end up thrown away as soon as upstream implements it. #10: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-01 09:14:24) Yes, I talk with the upstream today, just wait for response. You can follow it from below link. Thanks! http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2009-September/date.html #11: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-07 13:39:17) (reply to #10) didn't see a lot of replies. #12: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-10 05:24:05) The upstream maintainer Dan already reply this issue, and it's no user case for seperating add, modify and delete permission, and the others was agreed. Lanc wang with me work the sled11 and upstream now, we'll provide a patch in this week. #13: Wang Lance (lzwang) (2009-09-15 08:10:43) Hi I add five policy like the following : org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.wired.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings. system.wireless.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system. mobile.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.vpn. modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.dsl.modify. As you know there will be one policy one type. I make a patch which works. But I feel a little confused on the user settings. As the user settings are saved in the gconf, so adding someting like manager- settings.user.*.modify make no sense. As far as I know user can always edit their gconf settings. I think what should be done may be the policy that determine if the users can apply their settings to the system devices throught dbus. Given we do it like that, should the nm-applet display the user setting in the menu, when a normal user can not apply his or her settings to system devices? I think it is better that nm-applet show both system settings and user settings, and it will show error dialog if a user try to apply user settings when the user does not have the right do that. Hi Tambet, what do you think? #14: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-17 11:18:37) (reply to #13) Tambet reply in the mailinglist, we just lock the /system/networking path in gconf and the settings can't be changed. #15: Michael Meeks (michael_meeks) (2009-09-23 16:55:40) We should also add the case mentioned in bug #522742 - to allow disabling the "Create new wireless network" functionality. This is of particular concern to the security team, and I'd like to see it addressed as part of the same work if possible. Otherwise, this looks great - thanks Li Bin :-) #18: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-25 12:03:28) (reply to #15) Michael, I've viewed the bug#522742, it talk more about sharing, and we don't need to disable "Create new wireless network", user can add it, but when they wanna to apply it by click the connection, check org. freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wireless.apply permission like the Lance describe in #16. Does it okay? #19: Michael Meeks (michael_meeks) (2009-09-28 10:10:26) (reply to #18) No - connecting to a new wireless network is -very- different from sharing all your existing connections over your current wireless network; I can see why people would want to allow one and not allow the other. We should (ideally) have a different policy setting for this - if possible. Thanks #20: Tanja Roth (ta-ro) (2009-10-05 15:01:26) Can you please confirm what the final policy names (identifiers) are going to be for 11.2 and what can be influenced with them? (a short description as available from the Description field in polkit-gnome- authorization would be sufficient). I would like to mention this in the 11.2 docs about NetworkManager, but so far, I only found the one policy that relates to modifying administrator defined connections (org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.modify). From your comments above I'm not sure if the names mentioned in #16 are the final ones for the newly added policies (and if the list is complete). Please advise asap as the translation deadline for this chapter is approaching. Thanks! #22: (binli) (2009-10-12 11:27:53) (reply to #20) Tanja, Just come back from holiday, sorry for late. Now this feature is still not in the upstream, I'm still working on it. I prepare to seperate the permission into more fined like, org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.wireless.modify - Modify system wired connections org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.wired.modify - Modify system wireless connections the description follow the policy. The #16 is now for the SLED 11-SP1 for temporary resolving usercase, I'm not sure if it could be received by upstream which is used for 11.2. So what's your translation deadline? I'll inform you when I confirm it with upstream. #23: (ta-ro) (2009-10-12 12:25:30) (reply to #22) Lin Bi, thanks very much for clarifying! :) Our localization deadline is Oct 15th but as the files have to go through language proofreading before, I have to finish the chapter today, I'm afraid. But don't worry, to be on the safe side (whatever the upstream decision may be), we can handle it as follows: for now, I'll only mention that there *are* policies for NetworkManager and where to find them in PolicyKit. We can then add more details for the next release of the docs (presumably SLE 11 SP1). + #24: (ta-ro) (2009-10-12 13:18:21) (reply to #23) + Removing the needinfo status. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305657

1 0

[openFATE 305657] finer grained PolicyKit support for Networkmanager
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Feature changed by: Tanja Roth (ta-ro) Feature #305657, revision 47 Title: finer grained PolicyKit support for Networkmanager openSUSE-11.2: Candidate Priority Requester: Important Projectmanager: Desirable Requested by: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) Description: NetworkManager currently only supports one PolicyKit privilege. That is whether a user is allowed to modify administrator defined connections or not. There is no way to disallow users to define their own network configurations. NetworkManager should at least support one additional PolicyKit privilege that defines whether or not users are allowed to bring their own network configuration or whether they mere are allowed to use administrator defined ones. Use Case: - disallow workers on centrally administered machines to configure different network settings - protect home users that only ever connect to a few well known nets from accidently changing their setup Discussion: #1: Matthias Nagorni (mnagorni) (2009-08-21 14:26:22) If this can be done with little effort I would be even tempted to rate it Mandatory. #2: Stefan Behlert (sbehlert) (2009-08-25 16:37:57) Alex, is there soemone on your team who could look at that? MAybe with some support form Tambet? #3: Li Bin (binli) (2009-08-26 05:58:01) I and lance wang would like to take care of it. We still don't know the requirement clearly. 1. disallow workers on centrally administered machines to configure different network settings The workers mean the users in administered machines? Does it right that when workers configure network settings it prompt they are no permission? If so I thought we could change the PolicyKit's configuration file to complete it. 2. protect home users that only ever connect to a few well known nets from accidently changing their setup How to distinguish home users from workers? Does it mean don't allow the user to configure the other users connections? #4: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) (2009-08-26 08:40:53) (reply to #3) Currently there's only org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system. modify, introduce something like org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.user.modify so NM can determine whether it should accept user settings. #16: Wang Lance (lzwang) (2009-09-25 11:26:20) (reply to #4) Hi Ludwig Nussel I have added the following policy action: org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wired.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wireless.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.mobile.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.vpn.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.dsl.apply . NM now can determine whether it should apply the user settings to devices by type. Does the implementation meet your request? I need your feedback to determine what should to do next step. Thanks, Lance Wang #17: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) (2009-09-25 11:58:50) (reply to #16) Sure, that's even more than I had wished for. Would it be possible to also have a separate privilege for the connection sharing thingy? In contrast to the other configurations that one also messes with iptables and starts a DHCP daemon. #5: JP Rosevear (jproseve) (2009-08-26 17:06:51) (reply to #3) My suggestion would be to look at something like the following: org. freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.modify org.freedesktop. network-manager-settings.system.add org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.delete and the same for .user - you may even want to specifically allow or disallow adding for specific network types like wired, wireless, etc. You probably also want to have the ability to enable/disable wireless in general and enable/disable networking covered. You can default all of these to the current settings, but adding these would allow more lockdown opportunities. #6: Li Bin (binli) (2009-08-31 11:22:12) Well, We'll works on this feature in this week, know about the PolicyKit and NetworkManager, write the patch if time is okay. Tambet, Do you have any idea about this feature? #7: Luis Medinas (lmedinas) (2009-08-31 18:40:51) (reply to #6) Might worth looking at NM 0.8 (git master), it supports the latest polkit-1 and it should be released before 11.2. Maybe some of this features were introduced. #8: Tambet Ingo (tambet) (2009-09-01 09:40:05) (reply to #7) NM 0.8 will not be out before 11.2, it'll be out for the next Fedora release which will happen after 11.2. Also, current git master does not have any work for this feature, it's just been converted to use the newer, incompatible polkit API. #9: Tambet Ingo (tambet) (2009-09-01 09:43:56) (reply to #6) The upstream has been planning on having similar feature for a while now, but no work has been done on it yet. I strongly suggest to have a discussion with the upstream maintainer before any work gets done, otherwise our effort might end up thrown away as soon as upstream implements it. #10: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-01 09:14:24) Yes, I talk with the upstream today, just wait for response. You can follow it from below link. Thanks! http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2009-September/date.html #11: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-07 13:39:17) (reply to #10) didn't see a lot of replies. #12: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-10 05:24:05) The upstream maintainer Dan already reply this issue, and it's no user case for seperating add, modify and delete permission, and the others was agreed. Lanc wang with me work the sled11 and upstream now, we'll provide a patch in this week. #13: Wang Lance (lzwang) (2009-09-15 08:10:43) Hi I add five policy like the following : org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.wired.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings. system.wireless.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system. mobile.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.vpn. modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.dsl.modify. As you know there will be one policy one type. I make a patch which works. But I feel a little confused on the user settings. As the user settings are saved in the gconf, so adding someting like manager- settings.user.*.modify make no sense. As far as I know user can always edit their gconf settings. I think what should be done may be the policy that determine if the users can apply their settings to the system devices throught dbus. Given we do it like that, should the nm-applet display the user setting in the menu, when a normal user can not apply his or her settings to system devices? I think it is better that nm-applet show both system settings and user settings, and it will show error dialog if a user try to apply user settings when the user does not have the right do that. Hi Tambet, what do you think? #14: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-17 11:18:37) (reply to #13) Tambet reply in the mailinglist, we just lock the /system/networking path in gconf and the settings can't be changed. #15: Michael Meeks (michael_meeks) (2009-09-23 16:55:40) We should also add the case mentioned in bug #522742 - to allow disabling the "Create new wireless network" functionality. This is of particular concern to the security team, and I'd like to see it addressed as part of the same work if possible. Otherwise, this looks great - thanks Li Bin :-) #18: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-25 12:03:28) (reply to #15) Michael, I've viewed the bug#522742, it talk more about sharing, and we don't need to disable "Create new wireless network", user can add it, but when they wanna to apply it by click the connection, check org. freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wireless.apply permission like the Lance describe in #16. Does it okay? #19: Michael Meeks (michael_meeks) (2009-09-28 10:10:26) (reply to #18) No - connecting to a new wireless network is -very- different from sharing all your existing connections over your current wireless network; I can see why people would want to allow one and not allow the other. We should (ideally) have a different policy setting for this - if possible. Thanks #20: Tanja Roth (ta-ro) (2009-10-05 15:01:26) Can you please confirm what the final policy names (identifiers) are going to be for 11.2 and what can be influenced with them? (a short description as available from the Description field in polkit-gnome- authorization would be sufficient). I would like to mention this in the 11.2 docs about NetworkManager, but so far, I only found the one policy that relates to modifying administrator defined connections (org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.modify). From your comments above I'm not sure if the names mentioned in #16 are the final ones for the newly added policies (and if the list is complete). Please advise asap as the translation deadline for this chapter is approaching. Thanks! #22: (binli) (2009-10-12 11:27:53) (reply to #20) Tanja, Just come back from holiday, sorry for late. Now this feature is still not in the upstream, I'm still working on it. I prepare to seperate the permission into more fined like, org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.wireless.modify - Modify system wired connections org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.wired.modify - Modify system wireless connections the description follow the policy. The #16 is now for the SLED 11-SP1 for temporary resolving usercase, I'm not sure if it could be received by upstream which is used for 11.2. So what's your translation deadline? I'll inform you when I confirm it with upstream. + #23: (ta-ro) (2009-10-12 12:25:30) (reply to #22) + Lin Bi, thanks very much for clarifying! :) Our localization deadline + is Oct 15th but as the files have to go through language proofreading + before, I have to finish the chapter today, I'm afraid. + But don't worry, to be on the safe side (whatever the upstream decision + may be), we can handle it as follows: for now, I'll only mention that + there *are* policies for NetworkManager and where to find them in + PolicyKit. We can then add more details for the next release of the + docs (presumably SLE 11 SP1). -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305657

1 0

[openFATE 305657] finer grained PolicyKit support for Networkmanager
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Feature changed by: Li Bin (BinLi) Feature #305657, revision 46 Title: finer grained PolicyKit support for Networkmanager openSUSE-11.2: Candidate Priority Requester: Important Projectmanager: Desirable Requested by: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) Description: NetworkManager currently only supports one PolicyKit privilege. That is whether a user is allowed to modify administrator defined connections or not. There is no way to disallow users to define their own network configurations. NetworkManager should at least support one additional PolicyKit privilege that defines whether or not users are allowed to bring their own network configuration or whether they mere are allowed to use administrator defined ones. Use Case: - disallow workers on centrally administered machines to configure different network settings - protect home users that only ever connect to a few well known nets from accidently changing their setup Discussion: #1: Matthias Nagorni (mnagorni) (2009-08-21 14:26:22) If this can be done with little effort I would be even tempted to rate it Mandatory. #2: Stefan Behlert (sbehlert) (2009-08-25 16:37:57) Alex, is there soemone on your team who could look at that? MAybe with some support form Tambet? #3: Li Bin (binli) (2009-08-26 05:58:01) I and lance wang would like to take care of it. We still don't know the requirement clearly. 1. disallow workers on centrally administered machines to configure different network settings The workers mean the users in administered machines? Does it right that when workers configure network settings it prompt they are no permission? If so I thought we could change the PolicyKit's configuration file to complete it. 2. protect home users that only ever connect to a few well known nets from accidently changing their setup How to distinguish home users from workers? Does it mean don't allow the user to configure the other users connections? #4: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) (2009-08-26 08:40:53) (reply to #3) Currently there's only org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system. modify, introduce something like org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.user.modify so NM can determine whether it should accept user settings. #16: Wang Lance (lzwang) (2009-09-25 11:26:20) (reply to #4) Hi Ludwig Nussel I have added the following policy action: org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wired.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wireless.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.mobile.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.vpn.apply org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.dsl.apply . NM now can determine whether it should apply the user settings to devices by type. Does the implementation meet your request? I need your feedback to determine what should to do next step. Thanks, Lance Wang #17: Ludwig Nussel (lnussel) (2009-09-25 11:58:50) (reply to #16) Sure, that's even more than I had wished for. Would it be possible to also have a separate privilege for the connection sharing thingy? In contrast to the other configurations that one also messes with iptables and starts a DHCP daemon. #5: JP Rosevear (jproseve) (2009-08-26 17:06:51) (reply to #3) My suggestion would be to look at something like the following: org. freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.modify org.freedesktop. network-manager-settings.system.add org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.delete and the same for .user - you may even want to specifically allow or disallow adding for specific network types like wired, wireless, etc. You probably also want to have the ability to enable/disable wireless in general and enable/disable networking covered. You can default all of these to the current settings, but adding these would allow more lockdown opportunities. #6: Li Bin (binli) (2009-08-31 11:22:12) Well, We'll works on this feature in this week, know about the PolicyKit and NetworkManager, write the patch if time is okay. Tambet, Do you have any idea about this feature? #7: Luis Medinas (lmedinas) (2009-08-31 18:40:51) (reply to #6) Might worth looking at NM 0.8 (git master), it supports the latest polkit-1 and it should be released before 11.2. Maybe some of this features were introduced. #8: Tambet Ingo (tambet) (2009-09-01 09:40:05) (reply to #7) NM 0.8 will not be out before 11.2, it'll be out for the next Fedora release which will happen after 11.2. Also, current git master does not have any work for this feature, it's just been converted to use the newer, incompatible polkit API. #9: Tambet Ingo (tambet) (2009-09-01 09:43:56) (reply to #6) The upstream has been planning on having similar feature for a while now, but no work has been done on it yet. I strongly suggest to have a discussion with the upstream maintainer before any work gets done, otherwise our effort might end up thrown away as soon as upstream implements it. #10: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-01 09:14:24) Yes, I talk with the upstream today, just wait for response. You can follow it from below link. Thanks! http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2009-September/date.html #11: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-09-07 13:39:17) (reply to #10) didn't see a lot of replies. #12: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-10 05:24:05) The upstream maintainer Dan already reply this issue, and it's no user case for seperating add, modify and delete permission, and the others was agreed. Lanc wang with me work the sled11 and upstream now, we'll provide a patch in this week. #13: Wang Lance (lzwang) (2009-09-15 08:10:43) Hi I add five policy like the following : org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.wired.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings. system.wireless.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system. mobile.modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.vpn. modify org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.dsl.modify. As you know there will be one policy one type. I make a patch which works. But I feel a little confused on the user settings. As the user settings are saved in the gconf, so adding someting like manager- settings.user.*.modify make no sense. As far as I know user can always edit their gconf settings. I think what should be done may be the policy that determine if the users can apply their settings to the system devices throught dbus. Given we do it like that, should the nm-applet display the user setting in the menu, when a normal user can not apply his or her settings to system devices? I think it is better that nm-applet show both system settings and user settings, and it will show error dialog if a user try to apply user settings when the user does not have the right do that. Hi Tambet, what do you think? #14: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-17 11:18:37) (reply to #13) Tambet reply in the mailinglist, we just lock the /system/networking path in gconf and the settings can't be changed. #15: Michael Meeks (michael_meeks) (2009-09-23 16:55:40) We should also add the case mentioned in bug #522742 - to allow disabling the "Create new wireless network" functionality. This is of particular concern to the security team, and I'd like to see it addressed as part of the same work if possible. Otherwise, this looks great - thanks Li Bin :-) #18: Li Bin (binli) (2009-09-25 12:03:28) (reply to #15) Michael, I've viewed the bug#522742, it talk more about sharing, and we don't need to disable "Create new wireless network", user can add it, but when they wanna to apply it by click the connection, check org. freedesktop.network-manager-settings.user.wireless.apply permission like the Lance describe in #16. Does it okay? #19: Michael Meeks (michael_meeks) (2009-09-28 10:10:26) (reply to #18) No - connecting to a new wireless network is -very- different from sharing all your existing connections over your current wireless network; I can see why people would want to allow one and not allow the other. We should (ideally) have a different policy setting for this - if possible. Thanks #20: Tanja Roth (ta-ro) (2009-10-05 15:01:26) Can you please confirm what the final policy names (identifiers) are going to be for 11.2 and what can be influenced with them? (a short description as available from the Description field in polkit-gnome- authorization would be sufficient). I would like to mention this in the 11.2 docs about NetworkManager, but so far, I only found the one policy that relates to modifying administrator defined connections (org.freedesktop.network-manager- settings.system.modify). From your comments above I'm not sure if the names mentioned in #16 are the final ones for the newly added policies (and if the list is complete). Please advise asap as the translation deadline for this chapter is approaching. Thanks! + #22: (binli) (2009-10-12 11:27:53) (reply to #20) + Tanja, + Just come back from holiday, sorry for late. Now this feature is still + not in the upstream, I'm still working on it. I prepare to seperate + the permission into more fined like, + org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.wireless.modify - + Modify system wired connections + org.freedesktop.network-manager-settings.system.wired.modify - Modify + system wireless connections + the description follow the policy. + The #16 is now for the SLED 11-SP1 for temporary resolving usercase, + I'm not sure if it could be received by upstream which is used for + 11.2. + So what's your translation deadline? I'll inform you when I confirm it + with upstream. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/305657

1 0

[openFate 305702] Finer checks for a syslog reload need in dhcp client scripts
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Feature added by: Marius Tomaschewski (mtomaschewski) Feature #305702, revision 1, last change by Title: Finer checks for a syslog reload need in dhcp client scripts openSUSE-11.2: New Priority Requester: Neutral Requested by: Karl Katzke (karlkatzke) Interested: Stefan Behlert (sbehlert) Interested: Stephan Kulow (coolo) Partner organization: openSUSE.org Description: Syslog reloads every time the DHCP lease is renewed, even though the "change hostname via DHCP" option is turned off in the configuration. Finer control requested in bugzilla, bug 466198, by Karl Katzke. Would be a finer control / finer checks (hostname, ip address changes) desirable to implement? Relations: - syslog does not get right hostname when dhcp is used (novell/bugzilla/id: 116466) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=116466 - DHCP renewal causes syslog-ng reset even if host name has not changed (novell/bugzilla/id: 466198) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466198 -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/?rm=feature_show&id=305702

1 8

[openFATE 301175] Update Messages Handling
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Feature changed by: Michael Andres (mlandres) Feature #301175, revision 42 Title: Update Messages Handling openSUSE-10.2: Rejected by Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) reject date: 2006-11-23 08:29:21 reject reason: not done in time... Priority Requester: Mandatory Projectmanager: Important openSUSE-10.3: Rejected by Stephan Kulow (coolo) reject date: 2007-08-07 11:17:55 reject reason: Solution needs to be integrated earlier in the release Priority Requester: Mandatory Projectmanager: Important openSUSE-11.2: Done Priority Requester: Mandatory Projectmanager: Important Requested by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger) Requested by: Marcus Meissner (msmeissn) Description: During update of packages they could notify users about changes via email and/or the SuSEplugger (until 10.0, this is not anymore in 10.1). Most of these are outdated and not really usefull anymore and should be removed. The question is how to handle situations like bind where config files get rewritten and the user should be informed if this fails. In general, it is not possible to send emails from rpm install scripts. Most cases could be handled by the release notes but there are cases that cannot and we need a better solution to present this, especially since many people to not read the local emails. Relations: - update-messages functionality not implemented (novell/bugzilla/id: 450093) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450093 + - Software Management/Code11/Scripts and Messages (url: http://en.opensuse.org/Software_Management/Code11/Scripts_and_Messages#Auto…) Discussion: #2: Hendrik Vogelsang (hennevogel) (2006-09-05 14:52:12) Cleanup the messages and readd the features we lost with the removal of SUSEPlugger to zen-updater or whatever? #3: Duncan Mac-Vicar (dmacvicar) (2006-11-02 11:48:15) Current patches offer the message feature, so you could basically offer that package as a patch. If that is not sufficient, I propose something: We add a /var/spool/zypp-messages or something, and a binary which rpm spec call to inject messages. The zypp backend of the applet, check the spool in every check and use knotify to notifiy the user. I am only missing, where does the current rpm inject the messages to? #5: Edith Parzefall (emapedl) (2007-02-01 17:30:54) Andreas: any comments on the proposed solutions? #6: Duncan Mac-Vicar (dmacvicar) (2007-07-27 15:58:07) A proposal for normal packages: Create a dbus/dcop interface both applets implement. * create a /usr/sbin/update-messsage wrapper that allows rpms to send a message. * the wrapper sends a dcop/dbus message to the applets, which in turn show a passive popup? Other ideas? #7: Edith Parzefall (emapedl) (2007-08-06 13:50:22) Coolo, should we go ahead with the proposed solution and make a late feature admission request? #8: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2007-08-06 19:18:17) (reply to #7) No, this requires documentation changes I'm not willing to accept. So I rather stay with the status quo ;( #9: Edith Parzefall (emapedl) (2007-08-07 11:05:55) Then please reject for 10.3. #10: Duncan Mac-Vicar (dmacvicar) (2008-07-25 17:19:05) Please reject for 11.0. All resources allocated with mandatory features already. #11: Duncan Mac-Vicar (dmacvicar) (2008-07-25 17:32:22) Please reject for SLE11/11.1. All resources allocated with mandatory features already. #12: Marcus Meissner (msmeissn) (2008-12-03 15:50:15) This was promised as "will be done" to the Maintenance Department. Mark it Mandatory for SP1. #13: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-01-23 15:39:07) (reply to #12) please note, any solution must not break "RPM only" compatibility - meaning these should be notification messages, not scripts used in any event to finish configuration or to cause "side effects" of any kind. #14: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2009-01-23 15:38:53) I disagree with the rationale that users don't read local mail. An admin should have that local mail forwarded, and I think we ought to facilitate configuring the forwarding even to other machines. I think that may have more success than popups... at least for Enterprise customers. For community use, sure, popups are helpful (as init 5 is more likely :-) #15: Stephan Kulow (coolo) (2009-03-04 11:35:25) (reply to #14) but who would send these mails if rpm is the only vehicle we can be sure of. We don't want packages to send mails. #16: Michael Andres (mlandres) (2009-09-23 17:18:17) That's the zypp.conf option I'd like to introduce for this feature: ## ## Command to be invoked to send update messages. ## ## Packages may leave an update message file in {update.messagesdir}. ## At the end of each commit, zypp collects those messages and may send ## a notification to the user. ## ## zypp will prepare the update messages according to the selected ## content format and pipe the content to the command. ## ## Format: ## single - For each update message invoke the command and send ## the message. ## none - For each update message invoke the command but don't ## use a pipe to send any data. You probably want to pass ## the message file on the commandline using %P (see ## Substitutions). ## digest - Single invocation of the command, sending the path ## names of all update message. One per line. ## bulk - Single invocation of the command, sending the ## concatenated content of all update messages, separated ## by Ctrl-L. ## ## Substitutions: ## %p - package identification (name-version-release.arch) ## %P - full path to the update message file ## ## Valid values: The value is specified as "format | command". ## An empty value will turn off any notification. ## ## Examples: single | mail -s 'Update message from %p' root ## none | my-send-script -f %P ## ## Default value: single | /usr/lib/zypp/notify-message -p %p ## # update.messages.notify = single | /usr/lib/zypp/notify-message -p %p #17: Michael Andres (mlandres) (2009-10-07 17:13:03) The libzypp part seems to be done with libzypp-6.18.0 (for openSUSE 11.2). The /usr/lib/zypp/notify-message script, which gets invoked per default, sends mail with subject [zypp-notify-message] packagename- version.arch to root. The feature can be configured/disabled in /etc/zypp.conf. The list of update message files is also returned via ZYppCommitResult, so zypper/UI could write a note, or even offer to display them if we want that too. And we could also think about sending the config file diffs we create via this feature. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/301175

1 0

[openFATE 120326] Resume download
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Feature changed by: Dave Plater (plater) Feature #120326, revision 89 Title: Resume download openSUSE-10.2: Rejected by Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) reject date: 2006-09-21 09:56:17 reject reason: Not enough resources to implement in time. Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Desirable openSUSE-10.3: Rejected by Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) reject date: 2007-07-25 15:20:32 reject reason: Out of time. Postponing. Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Desirable openSUSE-11.0: Rejected by Jiri Srain (jsrain) reject date: 2008-03-28 13:51:03 reject reason: Out of resources for 11.0. Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Important openSUSE-11.1: Rejected by Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) reject date: 2008-07-01 11:34:46 reject reason: Postponing, needs downloading refactor. Priority Requester: Desirable openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Desirable Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Description: YaST/YOU times out too easy when downloading large packages like kde- base (14 MB) over a single ISDN connection. Please cache the half downloaded package so I don't have to start from the beginning again. See http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=suse9740 (http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=suse9740) http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278507 (http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278507) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545242 Discussion: #1: Gerald Pfeifer (geraldpfeifer) (2006-06-30 17:40:31) Klaus, do you now whether this is still an issue? #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2006-06-30 18:38:23) We still have very large packages (kernel, OpenOffice_org) which might not download completely in one go. #5: Milisav Radmanic (radmanic) (2006-09-08 15:25:57) (reply to #4) this applies to the media manager and Jiri already agreed to return this back to the YAST team, since Marius only helped out during CODE 10. Marius will of course help with the implementation, by sharing his knowledge. #7: Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) (2007-11-23 10:32:46) Related to commit-refactoring. #9: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2008-06-12 20:21:33) Klaus, are you still running ISDN? just kidding :-) Stano, please your opinion on workload - is this easily achievable? if not, there are hgher priorities. #10: Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) (2008-06-20 13:10:21) (reply to #9) Jiri, could we get estimate for this? #11: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2008-08-04 08:59:34) (reply to #10) Since curl itself does support resuming download, then this feature should not be hard to be implemented. #12: Ruchir Brahmbhatt (ruchir) (2009-01-17 12:07:25) I also vote for this feature. #13: Dmitry Mittov (michael_knight) (2009-01-19 09:01:09) It is also a great problem when you use slow mirror. download.opensuse. org redirects me to one of yandex mirrors (score 20). And I have timeout on big packages. #14: Piotrek Juzwiak (benderbendingrodriguez) (2009-01-21 18:17:13) I'd vote at least for a way to change the timeout settings for YaST or it doesn't solve the problem? #15: Alam Aby Bashit (init7) (2009-01-22 09:35:17) I'd like to vote this feature implemented in 11.2. You surely want to have resume capability if you have unreliable yet slow internet connection for say, updating KDE 4.2 :) #16: Duncan Mac-Vicar (dmacvicar) (2009-01-22 15:14:44) (reply to #15) Please stop this "I vote for this" or "+1" or "mee too" comments. There is no voting system in FATE yet, but following a discussion about "I want this too" makes hard to evaluate features. #17: James Mason (bear454) (2009-01-24 06:05:01) Could this be accomplished using a bittorrent backend instead of curl ? #18: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-30 15:31:33) (reply to #17) ISDN is already slow as it is. I would not want to spend more time downloading just because of the metadata traffic that is going to happen. Not to mention what happens if there are no peers around or they configured themselves to upload-limit themselves. Still, most download.opensuse.org downloads are faster than a torrent for me. #19: Pascal Bleser (pbleser) (2009-03-02 08:42:26) Caching is one thing. But even using retries in curl would help, see "curl --retries". #20: Piotrek Juzwiak (benderbendingrodriguez) (2009-04-23 16:38:17) It could be accomplished by using aria for downloading packages? There would be no more problems with timeouts and bad checksums ? #21: Ján Kupec (jkupec) (2009-04-23 17:36:18) (reply to #20) Actually we are already using aria in current development branch, so this is not so urgent anymore. Still, the download can be interrupted also in other ways than connection timeout, e.g. user decision, sudden power outage, etc... Does anyone know whether aria supports resuming? (Implementing this for the curl backend is not important anymore). #22: Markus K (kamikazow) (2009-04-25 12:49:41) (reply to #21) Yes, aria supports resuming -- even better than wget (don't know about curl), because aria uses the file size to check whether the to-be- downloaded file changed. #23: Peter Poeml (poeml) (2009-04-28 09:14:12) (reply to #21) It does. See section "Resuming Download" in its man page (http://aria2.sourceforge.net/aria2c.1.html#_resuming_download) ; and also note the -c option. #24: T. J. Brumfield (enderandrew) (2009-06-12 23:35:43) Perhaps as an addendum to this feature, I'd like to see the option to set a number of automatic retries. If Yast tells me it needs to download 3 gigs worth of packages, I don't want to watch for one package to timeout, hanging the whole process up. I'd like to configure it so that it will automatically retry the package X times, then skip the package and move on. #25: Michal Papis (mpapis) (2009-07-04 21:14:32) (reply to #24) Good thing would be here to watch network status (maybe by ping'ing the download server each few minutes, and resume download after it is back again. #30: Eduard Avetisyan (dich) (2009-09-15 09:21:41) (reply to #24) In fact, the system should keep on trying to download this particular package, and in the meantime try to download the next package in the list. I've had cases where a single package would fail to download (for unknown reason, since the same URL worked fine in firefox on the same machine), while the rest of the packages went fine. I also find 'curl' less robust and featurefull than 'wget', I wonder why the first was chosen as a backend... #28: Kahenya Kamunyu (kahenya) (2009-08-29 22:03:55) Yup, this should be there. One place Ubuntu kicks openSUSE ass #29: Vincent Petry (pvince81) (2009-09-03 07:24:15) Here in China I also experience timeouts sometimes, even over a regular ADSL connection (512 Mbps). It happens with my home connection as well as at my company's office. Resuming download would definitely be helpful, because sometimes I have to resume the same big package several times before it can finish. + #31: Dave Plater (plater) (2009-10-08 13:45:48) + It must be so simple to allow aria2c to use it's resume download + feature, I don't understand why it hasn't been implemented yet. I've + just completed a three day 2.1 gig zypper dup on a beta trial adsl line + which caused many failures. The new download in advance feature would + have made zypper into a super upgrade package if it wasn't blemished by + libzypps inability to resume interupted downloads. I had to use aria2c + manually to download two large packages directly into libzypps package + cache to complete the upgrade. + see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545242 + unfortunately the bug has been closed due to this feature request but + not using aria2c's resume feature spoils an otherwise streamlined + zypper -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/120326

1 0

[openFATE 120326] Resume download
by fate_noreply＠suse.de 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Feature changed by: Dave Plater (plater) Feature #120326, revision 88 Title: Resume download openSUSE-10.2: Rejected by Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) reject date: 2006-09-21 09:56:17 reject reason: Not enough resources to implement in time. Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Desirable openSUSE-10.3: Rejected by Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) reject date: 2007-07-25 15:20:32 reject reason: Out of time. Postponing. Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Desirable openSUSE-11.0: Rejected by Jiri Srain (jsrain) reject date: 2008-03-28 13:51:03 reject reason: Out of resources for 11.0. Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Important openSUSE-11.1: Rejected by Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) reject date: 2008-07-01 11:34:46 reject reason: Postponing, needs downloading refactor. Priority Requester: Desirable openSUSE-11.2: Evaluation Priority Requester: Desirable Projectmanager: Desirable Requested by: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) Description: YaST/YOU times out too easy when downloading large packages like kde- base (14 MB) over a single ISDN connection. Please cache the half downloaded package so I don't have to start from the beginning again. See http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=suse9740 (http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=suse9740) http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278507 - (http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278507) + (http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278507) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545242 Discussion: #1: Gerald Pfeifer (geraldpfeifer) (2006-06-30 17:40:31) Klaus, do you now whether this is still an issue? #2: Klaus Kämpf (kwk) (2006-06-30 18:38:23) We still have very large packages (kernel, OpenOffice_org) which might not download completely in one go. #5: Milisav Radmanic (radmanic) (2006-09-08 15:25:57) (reply to #4) this applies to the media manager and Jiri already agreed to return this back to the YAST team, since Marius only helped out during CODE 10. Marius will of course help with the implementation, by sharing his knowledge. #7: Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) (2007-11-23 10:32:46) Related to commit-refactoring. #9: Federico Lucifredi (flucifredi) (2008-06-12 20:21:33) Klaus, are you still running ISDN? just kidding :-) Stano, please your opinion on workload - is this easily achievable? if not, there are hgher priorities. #10: Stanislav Visnovsky (visnov) (2008-06-20 13:10:21) (reply to #9) Jiri, could we get estimate for this? #11: Jiri Srain (jsrain) (2008-08-04 08:59:34) (reply to #10) Since curl itself does support resuming download, then this feature should not be hard to be implemented. #12: Ruchir Brahmbhatt (ruchir) (2009-01-17 12:07:25) I also vote for this feature. #13: Dmitry Mittov (michael_knight) (2009-01-19 09:01:09) It is also a great problem when you use slow mirror. download.opensuse. org redirects me to one of yandex mirrors (score 20). And I have timeout on big packages. #14: Piotrek Juzwiak (benderbendingrodriguez) (2009-01-21 18:17:13) I'd vote at least for a way to change the timeout settings for YaST or it doesn't solve the problem? #15: Alam Aby Bashit (init7) (2009-01-22 09:35:17) I'd like to vote this feature implemented in 11.2. You surely want to have resume capability if you have unreliable yet slow internet connection for say, updating KDE 4.2 :) #16: Duncan Mac-Vicar (dmacvicar) (2009-01-22 15:14:44) (reply to #15) Please stop this "I vote for this" or "+1" or "mee too" comments. There is no voting system in FATE yet, but following a discussion about "I want this too" makes hard to evaluate features. #17: James Mason (bear454) (2009-01-24 06:05:01) Could this be accomplished using a bittorrent backend instead of curl ? #18: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) (2009-01-30 15:31:33) (reply to #17) ISDN is already slow as it is. I would not want to spend more time downloading just because of the metadata traffic that is going to happen. Not to mention what happens if there are no peers around or they configured themselves to upload-limit themselves. Still, most download.opensuse.org downloads are faster than a torrent for me. #19: Pascal Bleser (pbleser) (2009-03-02 08:42:26) Caching is one thing. But even using retries in curl would help, see "curl --retries". #20: Piotrek Juzwiak (benderbendingrodriguez) (2009-04-23 16:38:17) It could be accomplished by using aria for downloading packages? There would be no more problems with timeouts and bad checksums ? #21: Ján Kupec (jkupec) (2009-04-23 17:36:18) (reply to #20) Actually we are already using aria in current development branch, so this is not so urgent anymore. Still, the download can be interrupted also in other ways than connection timeout, e.g. user decision, sudden power outage, etc... Does anyone know whether aria supports resuming? (Implementing this for the curl backend is not important anymore). #22: Markus K (kamikazow) (2009-04-25 12:49:41) (reply to #21) Yes, aria supports resuming -- even better than wget (don't know about curl), because aria uses the file size to check whether the to-be- downloaded file changed. #23: Peter Poeml (poeml) (2009-04-28 09:14:12) (reply to #21) It does. See section "Resuming Download" in its man page (http://aria2.sourceforge.net/aria2c.1.html#_resuming_download) ; and also note the -c option. #24: T. J. Brumfield (enderandrew) (2009-06-12 23:35:43) Perhaps as an addendum to this feature, I'd like to see the option to set a number of automatic retries. If Yast tells me it needs to download 3 gigs worth of packages, I don't want to watch for one package to timeout, hanging the whole process up. I'd like to configure it so that it will automatically retry the package X times, then skip the package and move on. #25: Michal Papis (mpapis) (2009-07-04 21:14:32) (reply to #24) Good thing would be here to watch network status (maybe by ping'ing the download server each few minutes, and resume download after it is back again. #30: Eduard Avetisyan (dich) (2009-09-15 09:21:41) (reply to #24) In fact, the system should keep on trying to download this particular package, and in the meantime try to download the next package in the list. I've had cases where a single package would fail to download (for unknown reason, since the same URL worked fine in firefox on the same machine), while the rest of the packages went fine. I also find 'curl' less robust and featurefull than 'wget', I wonder why the first was chosen as a backend... #28: Kahenya Kamunyu (kahenya) (2009-08-29 22:03:55) Yup, this should be there. One place Ubuntu kicks openSUSE ass #29: Vincent Petry (pvince81) (2009-09-03 07:24:15) Here in China I also experience timeouts sometimes, even over a regular ADSL connection (512 Mbps). It happens with my home connection as well as at my company's office. Resuming download would definitely be helpful, because sometimes I have to resume the same big package several times before it can finish. -- openSUSE Feature: https://features.opensuse.org/120326

1 0