- openSUSE Bugs

[Bug 202079] Kernel panic during install on K6 and K6-2 processors (VIA Apollo chipsets) 10.2 Alpha 3
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202079 ------- Comment #55 from al4321(a)gmail.com 2006-10-10 02:09 MST ------- Well, the alpha5 doesn't makes any errors ! very good ! People, please test on your AMD K6 boxes... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 210256] New: Ghostscript, ps2pdf produces ugly pdf, same problem when printing from kde to pdf
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210256 Summary: Ghostscript, ps2pdf produces ugly pdf, same problem when printing from kde to pdf Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Printing AssignedTo: jsmeix(a)novell.com ReportedBy: geroxp(a)web.de QAContact: jsmeix(a)novell.com When using ps2pdf or gs directly or through kde print to pdf dialog ugly pdfs are generated. The letters are "jumping" up and down. This problem is valid for ghostscript-esp-8.15.1 and ghostscript-esp-7.07.1. The following command was used to convert postscript to pdf: gs -dNOPLATFONTS -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -q -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=test.pdf -dSAFER -c .setpdfwrite -f pdfproblem.ps I can reproduce this on Suse 10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 13

[Bug 173373] There is no notification, if no update server is available
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173373 ------- Comment #21 from visnov(a)novell.com 2006-10-10 00:24 MST ------- No, the check is dynamic, meaning that the source does not provide the patches right now. But for update source, ZYPP will need to remember which source is really configured as an update source. So, the fix done by Duncan would be just a workaround that might not work in all cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 202121] Suse 10.1 doesn't recognize the Ipaq 5450
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202121 scheurer(a)uni-landau.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|olh(a)novell.com |scheurer(a)uni-landau.de ------- Comment #3 from scheurer(a)uni-landau.de 2006-10-10 00:08 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=101077) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=101077&action=view) hwinfo output Here is the HWinfo output! I have the same problem with SLED10... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 210204] New: Poor XFS performance under 10.1 with many files
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210204 Summary: Poor XFS performance under 10.1 with many files Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening(a)forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: detlef(a)die-mafia.de QAContact: qa(a)suse.de I use xfs since SUSE 9.2, i'm very happy with good performance of xfs. But on 10.1, xfs has problems with write/read of many files. I setup my pc with SUSE 10.1 twice with all updates (incl new kernel-update), one with xfs and one with ext3, both on the same hd: samsung sata 160gb, SiI 3512 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller. Test with big files: ext3: ----- time dd if=/dev/zero of=/build/testfile bs=1M count=1024 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.1206 seconds, 81.8 MB/s real 0m14.456s user 0m0.004s sys 0m3.276s time cp /build/testfile /build/testfile1 real 0m48.515s user 0m0.036s sys 0m3.948s time rm /build/* real 0m1.444s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.436s xfs: ---- time dd if=/dev/zero of=/build/testfile bs=1M count=1024 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 12.3374 seconds, 87.0 MB/s real 0m12.417s user 0m0.000s sys 0m2.000s time cp /build/testfile /build/testfile1 real 0m43.686s user 0m0.048s sys 0m2.708s time rm /build/* real 0m0.206s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.112s Ok, looks good, xfs is a little bit faster. But now test with y2pmbuild, many files in variable size. y2pmbuild have to create a fresch chroot in an empty directory. ext3: ----- time y2pmbuild knemo.spec real 3m29.911s user 1m31.446s sys 0m28.658s time rm -r /build/* real 0m5.533s user 0m0.036s sys 0m1.148s xfs: ---- time y2pmbuild knemo.spec real 7m27.520s user 1m31.230s sys 0m30.318s time rm -r /build/* real 2m3.613s user 0m0.036s sys 0m3.228s This looks not fine for xfs. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 185165] Via VT6102 Rhine II embeded ethernet on VT8235 does not work in 10.1. It does work in 10.0
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185165 lnelson15(a)houston.rr.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lnelson15(a)houston.rr.com ------- Comment #24 from lnelson15(a)houston.rr.com 2006-10-09 21:14 MST ------- Just an aside, I have an ABIT VT-7 with a VIA VT6103 shown as a VT6102 in YAST Control Center Hardware information and DMESG output. The ETHO interface goes through a Netgear WGT624 router setup to serve IP and act as a de facto DHCP server. I have all my 4 versions of SUSE/Novell Linux on this box. As I have progressed up the install ladder from NLD 9 SP3, SUSE Enterprise Linux Desktop 10, SUSE Linux Desktop (Eval copy) and SUSE Linux Desktop 10.1 retail box, the ETHO interface has gone from the no issue to a severe issue. NLD9 has no network issues on ETHO. SLED seems to be okay. SLE 10 installed without the network manager and all other settings as install defaults the ETHO just seems to lose it's connection with the world haphazdly (i.e. I am not sure when it will bail....it just does sometime during a session. The SLE 10.1 version ETH0 setup with our without NetManager bails in short order also. When the NetManager tries to get an IP from the DHCP section of the router, the response is slow and I end up with one of the 168 addresses (usually doled out when no connection is found). I am not sure where to start with a resolution for the SLE 10.1 ( I have it uninstalled presently as my patience was thin looking for the problem with limited overall Linux skills in the sense of how the hardware is handle. I have looked at a lot of the log files mentioned here on bugzilla for similar issues but I am not really sure what I am looking for in relation to the ETHO interface bailing). I actually will probably move SLE 10.1 to another box but I hate walk away from a problem this severe. This post is just FYI. I am not sure where to place the bug issue with SLE 10.1 at this moment. I still am not sure where the issue is, just that my Rhine II (VT6103 discrete component on the mobo) ethernet interface is dropping out rather rapidly and cannot reconnect without rebooting. Usually when I reboot because of the network interface loss, the sound goes into a weird looping with whatever is playing at the moment as the desktop is being cleared off by the OS...some sort of odd IRQ problem maybe??? Best regards, Lee Nelson lnelson15(a)houston.rr.com PS I followed the SLE 10.1 Alpha and Beta process at opensuse.org, downloading and testing alot of the versions and did not notice this issue. I may have been doing it on a different box. Time has passed since this Spring....(In reply to comment #0) > In SUSE 10.0 everything works great. No matter how I install 10.1 either > upgrade or new install the network and sound don't work. They are found and > can configure them. > > On boot I see a message where it is trying to load the network card. > "SIOCSIFFLAGS Device or Resource Busy" > > In var\log\messages I found a line where it tries to load the network that > said: setup_irq: IRQ handler mismatch > > I have a soyo sy-kt400 dragon ultra platinum edition. The built in ethernet > is Via VT6102 Rhine II embeded ethernet on VT8235. > > I have done one upgrade and 4 new installs. Each time I just selected the > Gnome setup. Didn't add any other software. > > I am using the retail version of 10.0 and 10.1. > > Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help track down this bug. > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 118385] nvidia driver messes up frame buffer consoles after suspend/resume
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Oct '06

09 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=118385 lfriedman(a)nvidia.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |jdebaer(a)novell.com ------- Comment #20 from lfriedman(a)nvidia.com 2006-10-09 17:56 MST ------- Patrick, I'd suggesting submitting a new bug, as the problem you're describing doesn't match up with the bug reported here. Please make sure to include an nvidia-bug-report.log with your new bug. Thanks, Lonni -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 118385] nvidia driver messes up frame buffer consoles after suspend/resume
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Oct '06

09 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=118385 patrick.smart(a)advalvas.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|jdebaer(a)novell.com | ------- Comment #19 from patrick.smart(a)advalvas.be 2006-10-09 17:53 MST ------- This driver doesn't work at all for me. I did an init 3, installed with the run file, and init 5. Then I had a scrambled KDM screen. I decided to reboot and the system completely froze on the nVIDIA startup screen. I am running an up to date SUSE 10.1. Please tell me if I can provide you with more info! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 180141] can not install / on raid1
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Oct '06

09 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180141 rmaxfiel(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #5 from rmaxfiel(a)novell.com 2006-10-09 17:08 MST ------- This prblem will g away with domUloader's replacement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 184660] network broken / down after suspend to disk and resume using traditional networking scheme
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 09 Oct '06

09 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184660 patrick.smart(a)advalvas.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Attachment #91253|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Comment #14 from patrick.smart(a)advalvas.be 2006-10-09 16:18 MST ------- Created an attachment (id=101070) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=101070&action=view) output of network diagnostic commands before and after suspend to disk - v2 Sorry for the delay... I'm happy that you're following that up! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0