- openSUSE Bugs

[Bug 198379] zen-updater shows me three patterns as updates
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198379 ------- Comment #33 from andreas.hanke(a)gmx-topmail.de 2006-10-10 10:45 MST ------- *** Bug 211369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 211369] New: zen-updater is showing invalid updates (i.e., always show the patterns)
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211369 Summary: zen-updater is showing invalid updates (i.e., always show the patterns) Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Alpha 5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Zenworks AssignedTo: crivera(a)novell.com ReportedBy: mauro(a)novell.com QAContact: mauro(a)novell.com PROBLEM STATEMENT Zen-updater (gui) is always showing a list of 'available updates'. The list is populated with all the patterns from the install disk. If you go to the console and type rug lu, you will get no updates listed. STEEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Install opensuse 10.2 alpha 5 2. launch zen-updater 3. launch a console and type rug lu 4. compate output ACTUAL RESULTS Invalid update list @ zen-updater EXPECTED RESULTS A proper list in zen-updater. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 197190] IA64: Xserver startup terminates with SIGILL
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197190 ------- Comment #24 from mhopf(a)novell.com 2006-10-10 10:36 MST ------- Update: Machine freezes in xf86ReadBIOS(). So this is not an x86 emulator issue (yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 166170] Error in %suse_update_desktop_file RPM macro definition
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166170 andreas.hanke(a)gmx-topmail.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Development |Development OS/Version|SuSE Linux 10.1 |All Product|SUSE Linux 10.1 |openSUSE 10.2 Platform|x86-64 |All Version|RC 1 |Alpha 5 ------- Comment #10 from andreas.hanke(a)gmx-topmail.de 2006-10-10 10:31 MST ------- The problem is still present in rpm-4.4.2-57 as distributed with openSUSE 10.2 Alpha 5. Just as an example, rebuilding xorg-x11.src.rpm from Factory fails with the following output: ####### $ rpmbuild -bb xorg-x11.spec suse_update_desktop_file: invalid option -- i error: Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() suse_update_desktop_file: invalid option -- i error: Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() suse_update_desktop_file: invalid option -- i error: Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() suse_update_desktop_file: invalid option -- i error: Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() suse_update_desktop_file: invalid option -- i error: Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() suse_update_desktop_file: invalid option -- i error: Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() error: Unknown option ? in verify_permissions(:-:) Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77856 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/packages/BUILD + cd /usr/src/packages/BUILD + cd . ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 1000 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 1000 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77856 (%prep) RPM build errors: Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() Unknown option ? in suse_update_desktop_file() Unknown option ? in verify_permissions(:-:) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77856 (%prep) ####### I know that the build failure is not caused by %suse_update_desktop_file (it's because %setup tries to do something which is not allowed => spec file bug). But the output is highly misleading, many people will conclude that rpm is just broken. Just for clarity: Both %suse_update_desktop_file and %verify_permissions are broken in a way that does *not* cause the build failures, but broken anyway, and this results in error messages which point users into the wrong direction in case there is a build failure for an unrelated reason. I'd like to see this fixed in openSUSE 10.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 211333] New: Folders in KMenu/All Programs should not require clicking to open
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211333 Summary: Folders in KMenu/All Programs should not require clicking to open Product: openSUSE 10.2 Version: Alpha 5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: KDE AssignedTo: kde-maintainers(a)suse.de ReportedBy: jdluhos(a)novell.com QAContact: qa(a)suse.de In the new KDE Start menu, all its items can be open by hovering the mouse cursor over them, except for the "All Programs" menu where the sub-branches can be opened only by clicking; it is annoying (at least for me). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 1

[Bug 210991] New: XEN requirements and procedures
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210991 Summary: XEN requirements and procedures Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: P5 - None Component: Documentation AssignedTo: rwalter(a)novell.com ReportedBy: Ulrich.Windl(a)rz.uni-regensburg.de QAContact: ke(a)novell.com The admin guide has a chapter on XEN, but there is missing some information: 1) The XEN README file states that a XEN installation defaults to VNC being used, but it lacks the details 2) The XEN module of YaST2 requires a graphical environment (in Domain 0), even though XEN User documentation suggests to have a minimal Environment in Domain 0. Furthermore the only reason for YaST requiring a graphical environment seems to be due to the fact that actual installation is performed using an xterm and _not_ VNC (as the README suggests). I think that with using VNC YaST's XEN module would work without a graphical environment. There are still too many things the user has to find out. For example: YaST knows how to build an initial bootable image using some scripts, but it's not mentioned how to do that without YaST. So a user must use YaST to create VMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 176528] openssh build from src.rpm fails
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176528 postadal(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #2 from postadal(a)novell.com 2006-10-10 09:29 MST ------- Thnx for patch. Fixed sles10-sp1 and FACTORY -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 190931] suse10 canm not deal with hardward configuration
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190931 lmb(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Info Provider|glgcg(a)bristol.ac.uk | Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #5 from lmb(a)novell.com 2006-10-10 09:04 MST ------- Sorry, if you do not wish to reproduce the problem on 10.1, we cannot help you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 193369] BIOS timer controlled wakeup does not work / Linux destroys BIOS data
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193369 lmb(a)novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Info Provider|Christian.Andretzky(a)MB.TU- | |Chemnitz.DE | Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #4 from lmb(a)novell.com 2006-10-10 09:01 MST ------- No activity for 2 months. Please reopen the bug if the problem persists with SL10.1 or even the 10.2 alphas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 176366] Amarok keeps crashing
by bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com 10 Oct '06

10 Oct '06

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176366 ------- Comment #7 from lmb(a)novell.com 2006-10-10 08:25 MST ------- Andreas, I'm not sure it's the same bug. This issue reported here, despite the subject, is not a crash with core, but an intermittent freeze. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0