January 2024 - openSUSE Bugs - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[Bug 1217733] gnuhealth not installable, needs to covert to python3.11
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217733 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217733#c1 Axel Braun <axel.braun(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #1 from Axel Braun <axel.braun(a)gmx.de> --- All known updates are applied for 3.11, waiting for staging to be merged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219336] VUL-0: CVE-2024-23170: mbedtls: timing side channel in private key RSA operations
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219336 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219336#c4 --- Comment #4 from OBSbugzilla Bot <bwiedemann+obsbugzillabot(a)suse.com> --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1219336) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1142919 Factory / mbedtls https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1142922 Factory / mbedtls-2 https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1142926 Backports:SLE-15-SP5 / mbedtls -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1191543] autofs invoking mount.cifs ignores the user id
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191543 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191543#c9 --- Comment #9 from Manfred Hollstein <manfred.h(a)gmx.net> --- (In reply to David Disseldorp from comment #8) > (In reply to Manfred Hollstein from comment #7) > > Reassigning to the bugowner after a loooooong time of no response :( > > Sorry for the delay, Manfred. I understand your frustration, but please > understand that SLE support commitments take precedence in most cases. I'd > still like to keep this on my plate, given that I have the automated > reproducer (and failed bisect) lying around. I used to work for SUSE quite some time ago, so I understand that SLE support has priority. What I also learned during that time is that there is always some room for this - just think of hackweek... ;) With Tumbleweed snapshot 20240128 the problem still exists :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219394] ffmpeg-6-mini-libs should not be in repo
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219394 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219394#c2 --- Comment #2 from Ludwig Nussel <lnussel(a)suse.com> --- For building it would be sufficient to move those kind of packages into a separate repo that OBS can consume. This caused a real usability issue. zypper came up with hilarious solutions trying to install this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219394] ffmpeg-6-mini-libs should not be in repo
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219394 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219394#c1 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> --- (In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #0) > ffmpeg-6-mini-libs requires this-is-only-for-build-envs so should not be > published invalid - it was agreed that all packages should be out - but with correct guards to not be installable (also relevant for devel projects building against DoD repo, to have the same packages available when building against factory as against tumbleweed) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219394] New: ffmpeg-6-mini-libs should not be in repo
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219394 Bug ID: 1219394 Summary: ffmpeg-6-mini-libs should not be in repo Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Other Assignee: dimstar(a)opensuse.org Reporter: lnussel(a)suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- ffmpeg-6-mini-libs requires this-is-only-for-build-envs so should not be published -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219139] New: [Build 20240123] pam 1.6 vs apparmor
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219139 Bug ID: 1219139 Summary: [Build 20240123] pam 1.6 vs apparmor Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3889394/modules/mutt /steps/24 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: AppArmor Assignee: suse-beta(a)cboltz.de Reporter: dimstar(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation the test sets up a postfix/dovecot mail server and then tries to connect using mutt to it. Since the upgrade to PAM 1.6, this no longer works On a local debug I could identify AppArmor blocking access to two objects while authenticating: type=AVC msg=audit(1706098433.326:138): apparmor="DENIED" operation="exec" class="file" profile="dovecot-auth" name="/usr/sbin/unix_chkpwd" pid=1479 comm="auth" requested_mask="x" denied_mask="x" fsuid=0 ouid=0 type=AVC msg=audit(1706098433.326:139): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="dovecot-auth" name="/proc/1478/loginuid" pid=1478 comm="auth" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 If I tear down AppArmor (aa-teardown) I can successfully login to my test dovecot setup. openQA test in scenario opensuse-Tumbleweed-JeOS-for-kvm-and-xen-x86_64-jeos-extra@64bit_virtio-2G fails in [mutt](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3889394/modules/mutt/steps/24) ## Test suite description Same as jeos, plus some more tests. ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [20240123](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3888714) ## Expected result Last good: [20240122](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/3886456) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=opensus… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1217417] Realtek RTL-8126 Network Driver
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217417#c29 --- Comment #29 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.com> --- The updated kernel is being built in OBS home:tiwai:bsc1217417-2 repo. It'll appear later at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tiwai:/bsc1217417-2/standar… Give it a try. BTW, at the next time, please just do the direct forward of the mail to me. The way you forwarded broke the tabs and spaces in the patch, which made it inapplicable. I had to edit all lines manually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219345] zypper dup with ZYPP_SINGLE_RPMTRANS=1 fails with kernel-default-6.7.1-2.1
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219345 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219345#c13 hui <sturm-fr(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |db(a)mail25.net --- Comment #13 from hui <sturm-fr(a)web.de> --- *** Bug 1219361 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1219361] New: Kernel 6.7.1-2.1 module conflict during update
by bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com 31 Jan '24

31 Jan '24

https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219361 Bug ID: 1219361 Summary: Kernel 6.7.1-2.1 module conflict during update Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs(a)opensuse.org Reporter: db(a)mail25.net QA Contact: qa-bugs(a)suse.de Target Milestone: --- Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 872326 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=872326&action=edit zypper logs Ran `zypper dup` today and got errors about conflicting kernel module files. The following 2 packages are going to be upgraded: openSUSE-release openSUSE-release-appliance-custom The following product is going to be upgraded: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20240126-0 -> 20240128-0 The following 2 packages are going to be reinstalled: kernel-default-6.7.1-2.1 kernel-default-devel-6.7.1-2.1 Was there a packaging error or is something messed up on my system? I already have kernel-default-6.7.1-2.1 installed but zypper seems to see the one installed as different from the one in the repo: > sudo zypper se -s kernel-default Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository ---+-----------------------------+---------+----------------+--------+----------------------------- i+ | kernel-default | package | 6.7.1-2.1 | x86_64 | (System Packages) i+ | kernel-default | package | 6.7.1-1.1 | x86_64 | (System Packages) v | kernel-default | package | 6.7.1-2.1 | x86_64 | openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Main-OSS Attached zypper logs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2